SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MET exon 14”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation in NSCLC: From Genomic Discovery to Biomarker-Guided Therapeutic Innovation.

INTRODUCTION: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, and the MET exon 14 skipping mutation is a key oncogenic driver, which promotes tumor progression and provides a new direction for precision therapy. METHODS: A systematic search of English-language literature and clinical trial data related to the MET exon 14 skipping mutation from 2020-2025 was performed to summarize the role of the mutation and therapeutic advances. RESULTS: DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), RNA-based NGS, and RT-qPCR were employed as the main detection methods. Preclinical models confirmed that mutations promote tumor progression by activating the RAS/MAPK pathway. Clinical trials have reported objective remission rates (ORR) of 46-68% for first-line treatment with MET inhibitors in NSCLC patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations. DISCUSSION: MET exon 14 skipping mutation as a therapeutic target for NSCLC has made significant progress, and MET inhibitors are more advantageous than chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and have been recommended by national and international guidelines as a first-line treatment option. Additionally, NGS technology has the potential to dynamically monitor tumor evolution and drugresistant mutations, thereby helping to realize precision medicine. CONCLUSION: The MET exon 14 skipping mutation is an important target for the precision treatment of NSCLC, and MET-TKIs have remarkable efficacy but a prominent problem with drug resistance. The construction of a precision medicine system encompassing diagnosis, treatment, and drug resistance management through multi-omics research, technological innovation, and international collaboration is a key direction for improving prognosis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comprehensive characterization of MET exon 14 skipping mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METΔex14) is a key driver event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can emerge as an acquired drug resistance mechanism to MET, EGFR or ALK inhibitors. The clinical and genomic features of METΔex14 in NSCLC require further characterization. METHODS: Our study included a total of 585 patients with METΔex14 + NSCLC, comprising 556 baseline samples, 53 samples from patients exhibiting resistance to MET inhibitors, and 16 samples from patients resistant to EGFR/ALK inhibitors. Genomic data from targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tissue and/or plasma samples using GeneseeqPrime™ (a 425 pan-cancer gene panel) were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, METΔex14 exhibited a prevalence of 1.02% (n = 585) in the screened NSCLC population, with a higher incidence in patients with a sarcomatoid histology. METΔex14 was predominantly detected at the splice donor site, though the non-coding region adjacent to the splice acceptor site contributed considerably to the complexity of METΔex14. Common concurrent alterations identified at baseline included those in TP53 (40.8%), CDK4 (16%) and EGFR (12.4%). Concurrent MET amplification and cell cycle pathway mutations were both associated with worse outcomes in patients treated with crizotinib, with significant co-occurrences observed also among these concurrent genomic variations. In addition, increased chromosomal instability and intra-tumoral heterogeneity correlated with a poorer response to crizotinib. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to MET inhibitors were primarily attributed to on-target MET D1228X/Y1230X mutations or off-target alterations within genes in the RTK/RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Intriguingly, our exploratory analysis also identified the FGFR3::TACC3 fusion as a potential resistance mechanism to savolitinib. Moreover, METΔex14 was identified in 16 patients following progression on EGFR and ALK inhibitors, highlighting the need for developing tailored therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive characterization of METΔex14 in NSCLC, revealing its dual role as a primary driver of oncogenesis and a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR/ALK inhibitors. The identification of concurrent genetic alterations and potential resistance mechanisms enhances our molecular understanding of treatment responses. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into targeted therapies that consider the genomic complexity of METΔex14 to improve treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Targeting Both Oncogenic Signaling and Dependence Receptor Function is Required to Fully Suppress MET Exon 14 Skipping-Driven tumorigenesis.

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) classically function as oncogenic drivers that promote survival and proliferation upon ligand binding. A subset of RTKs can also function as dependence receptors, inducing apoptosis in the absence of their ligands. Genetic alterations that enhance RTK signaling are well characterized in cancer and can be targeted with kinase inhibitors, which show limited efficacy in some clinical settings. Elucidation of whether oncogenic mutations can promote tumorigenesis by directly abolishing the pro-apoptotic activity of dependence receptors could help improve strategies to target RTKs. Here, we identified MET exon 14 skipping (METex14Del) as a paradigmatic example of an oncogenic alteration that drives tumorigenesis through genetic inactivation of the dependence receptor function of an RTK. METex14Del removed both the caspase cleavage site and adjacent CBL-binding motif, preventing generation of the pro-apoptotic p40MET fragment while sustaining oncogenic MET signaling. Uncoupling regulatory functions of MET using genome editing showed that loss of apoptosis capacity is a critical determinant of METex14Del-driven tumorigenesis. Combined-but not individual-mutation of the caspase and CBL sites was sufficient to recapitulate resistance to apoptosis and tumor growth induced by METex14Del in HGF-humanized mouse models. Importantly, inducible re-expression of p40MET in METex14Del-expressing cells restored apoptotic sensitivity, decreased tumor formation in vivo, and resensitized tumors to capmatinib. Together, these findings redefine RTKs as receptors with dual oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions and show that disruption of dependence receptor-mediated apoptosis is an oncogenic mechanism. These results provide a conceptual framework explaining why therapies targeting only RTK signaling may fail and support strategies restoring dependence receptor function to achieve durable tumor suppression.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Understanding tumor adaptations and resistance to MET inhibitors in MET-altered non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: Type Ib MET inhibitors are clinically active in selected MET-altered non-small cell lung cancer, particularly tumors with MET exon 14 skipping or MET amplification, but acquired resistance remains incompletely understood. Here, we investigated resistance across biologically distinct MET-altered contexts, including MET exon 14 skipping, MET amplification, and MET overexpression. METHODS: Paired baseline and progression samples from seven patients treated with tepotinib or capmatinib were analyzed using spatial transcriptomics, whole-exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, CRISPR screening, and drug-combination assays. Patient-derived cultures and resistant cell-line models were used to explore resistance-associated changes. RESULTS: MET inhibitor resistance was heterogeneous, with persistence of the initial MET alteration in most evaluable cases and emergence of patient-specific genomic events. Three main resistance-associated, often overlapping, routes were identified: on-target MET evolution through kinase-domain alterations; extracellular matrix and tumor-microenvironment remodeling, including collagen and fibronectin upregulation, complement-related signaling, and partial EMT-associated programs; and bypass signaling involving EGFR/HER, MAPK, and PI3K/Akt pathways. In vitro models reproduced several tumor-cell-intrinsic features but only partially captured microenvironment-associated changes. CONCLUSIONS: MET inhibitor resistance in this cohort involved overlapping, context-dependent genomic, phenotypic, and signaling adaptations, supporting combination strategies for MET-altered lung cancer.

CRISPR screen↗

PubMed2026

MET-Aberrant non-small cell lung cancer: from kinase dependence to cell-surface targetability-mechanistic basis and biomarker framework for bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

MET-aberrant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not a uniform therapeutic entity. Its biology, diagnostic pathways, and treatment sensitivity differ across MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METex14), MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This heterogeneity cannot be fully explained by conventional event-based classification and is reflected in the distinct clinical activity of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MET-TKIs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the emergence of antibody-based therapies, MET has evolved from a signaling driver to a cell-surface target for receptor modulation and payload delivery. We therefore propose a clinically anchored two-dimensional framework for interpreting therapeutic relevance in MET-aberrant NSCLC: kinase dependence and cell-surface targetability. Neither dimension should be regarded as a directly measurable binary variable. Kinase dependence is inferred from genomic and treatment-contextual proxies, most strongly METex14 and, more conditionally, high-level focal MET amplification. Cell-surface targetability is approximated by drug-specific IHC assessment of assay-defined c-MET protein expression; however, receptor internalization, intracellular trafficking, and payload delivery capacity remain incompletely measurable in routine clinical practice. Within this framework, MET-TKIs have the most evidence-supported established role in tumors with evidence of MET-driven kinase dependence. EGFR × MET BsAbs have demonstrated clinical activity in broad post-osimertinib EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while EGFR/MET co-dependence or MET-mediated bypass activation provides a mechanistic rationale for their use; MET-defined preferential benefit remains to be prospectively established. MET-directed antibody-drug conjugates (MET-ADCs) are supported in drug- and assay-defined populations with high c-MET protein overexpression, although the predictive relevance of delivery-related factors remains hypothesis-generating. Accordingly, MET testing should shift from single-event detection to platform-oriented stratification: next-generation sequencing (NGS) for driver alterations and resistance profiles, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for high-level focal amplification, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for surface expression relevant to antibody-based therapies. This framework is intended to organize current biological and clinical evidence rather than to replace drug-specific companion diagnostics, regulatory indications, or prospectively validated treatment-selection algorithms. Precision treatment of MET-aberrant NSCLC is thus moving from event-based drug selection toward mechanism-based therapeutic matching. Future priorities include standardizing biomarkers, defining optimal target populations, and aligning biological subtypes, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic platforms.

Antibody-drug conjugate↗

PubMed2025

Distinct Clinicogenomic Features and Immunotherapy Associations in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare NSCLC subtype with poor prognosis. Outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and genomic features in PSC remain underexplored compared with other NSCLC subtypes. METHODS: Patients from three institutions and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) with metastatic NSCLC treated with ICI alone or with chemotherapy were identified. Clinicogenomics and treatment outcomes were compared across PSC, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). RESULTS: We analyzed 4841 patients including 165 PSC cases treated with ICI-based therapy from three institutions and 201 PSC from NCDB. In MDACC, 65 (4.3%) were PSC, 1138 (75.1%) LUAD, and 312 (20.6%) LUSC. Patients with PSC were older and more likely to present with metastatic disease. In both the MDACC and NCDB cohorts, ICIs resulted in better outcomes for patients with PSC compared with chemotherapy. In these patients, there was no difference in outcome between ICI-monotherapy and ICI-chemotherapy. Across the three institutional cohorts, 37% to 43% of patients with PSC who received ICIs were responders, compared with 26% to 29% in LUAD and 22% to 46% in LUSC (p < 0.05). Improved ICI outcomes in PSC appeared driven by high PD-L1 (≥50% in 73%-77% cases). Among patients with high PD-L1, response rates were similar across histologic subtypes. Conversely, TMB was similar in PSC compared with LUAD or LUSC and was not associated with ICI outcomes. Across cohorts, PSC tumors were enriched for TP53, NF1, NF2, and NRAS, with relative depletion of STK11 and KEAP1 compared with LUAD. Case observation revealed relatively better outcomes to ICI than targeted therapies in patients with PSC with MET exon 14 skipping or KRAS G12C. CONCLUSION: PSC exhibits improved outcomes to ICI relative to other therapies, potentially driven by high PD-L1 expression. Genomic analysis highlights a distinct genomic landscape of PSC when compared with LUAD.

Humans↗