SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MRD”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

MRD-2 in the GHSG HD21 trial assessed by a validated circulating tumor DNA sequencing assay.

Beyond cure, major goals in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are tailoring treatment to a patient's individual risk for relapse to reduce acute and late toxicities, identifying candidates for early incorporation of novel agents, and making treatment affordable on a global level. Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing emerged as a promising strategy to achieve these goals; however, previous studies differed in sampling time points, assay validation, and definitions for MRD negativity. Here, we applied LymphoVista, a validated ctDNA sequencing assay for genotyping and MRD monitoring in lymphoma, to samples obtained from the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD21 trial after 2 cycles of treatment (MRD-2) using a case-cohort design. Patients with positive MRD-2 result were at higher risk for relapse, progression, or death compared with MRD-2-negative patients (4-year progression-free survival [PFS], 36.7% vs 82.2%; hazard ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-13.8; P = .0008). After inverse probability weighting accounting for the number of events in the full reference set, patients with positive and negative MRD-2 results had 4-year PFS rates of 72.2% vs 95.3%. Combining MRD-2 with positron emission tomography after 2 cycles of BrECADD/eBEACOPP (PET-2) can identify patients at very low and patients at very high risk of relapse, progression, or death. In summary, these results suggest that MRD-2 assessment by LymphoVista allows for early outcome prognostication in patients with HL and could be used as a tool to improve treatment guidance on its own or in conjunction with PET-2.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

MRDagent: iterative and adaptive parameter optimization for stable ctDNA-based MRD detection in heterogeneous samples.

MOTIVATION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) as critical biomarker for cancer prognosis and management plays a crucial role in improving patient outcomes. However, detecting MRD via next-generation sequencing-based circulating tumor DNA variant calling remains unstable due to the extremely low variant allele frequency and significant inter- and intra-sample heterogeneity. Although parameter optimization can theoretically enhance the detection performance of variants, achieving stable MRD detection remains challenging due to three key factors: (i) the necessity for individualized parameter tuning across numerous heterogeneous genomic intervals within each sample, (ii) the tightly interdependent parameter requirements across different stages of variant detection workflows, and (iii) the limitations of current automated parameter optimization methods. RESULTS: In this study, we propose MRDagent, a novel variant detection tool designed specifically for MRD detection. MRDagent incorporates an iterative and self-adaptive optimization framework capable of handling unknown objectives, varying constraints, and highly coupled parameters across stages. A key innovation of MRDagent is the integration of a convolutional neural network-based meta-model, trained on historical data to enable rapid parameter prediction. This significantly enhances computational efficiency and generalization performance. Extensive evaluations on simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate MRDagent's superior and stable performance, providing an efficient, reliable solution for MRD detection in clinical and high-throughput research applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MRDagent is freely available at https://github.com/aAT0047/MRDagent.git. The corresponding dataset and software archive are available at Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15458496.

Circulating Tumor DNA↗

PubMed2026

From detection to action: ctDNA-MRD surveillance and translational strategies in early breast cancer.

Recurrence remains a major cause of mortality in early breast cancer (EBC), and conventional follow-up often identifies relapse only after clinically detectable disease has emerged. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (ctDNA-MRD) testing offers the possibility of detecting molecular relapse earlier and refining recurrence-risk assessment during follow-up. This narrative review examines the evolving role of ctDNA-MRD in EBC, focusing on assay interpretation, longitudinal surveillance, MRD-guided trial design, and clinical implementation. Prospective studies consistently show that postoperative or surveillance ctDNA positivity is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. However, test performance and interpretation vary with assay characteristics and sampling strategies, and whether treatment initiated solely on the basis of MRD positivity can improve patient outcomes remains unresolved. The central challenge is no longer simply to detect residual disease earlier, but to determine when and how that information should influence care. Further prospective validation, assay standardization, clear pathways for uncertain findings, and patient-centered implementation will be needed before ctDNA-MRD can be integrated into routine management of EBC.

circulating tumor DNA↗

PubMed2026

KIT and FLT3-ITD mutations do not predict outcomes in pediatric core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: findings from the C-HUANAN-AML-15 multicenter cohort study.

Although core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is generally considered a favorable-risk subtype in children, disease relapse remains a significant concern. The prognostic relevance of co-occurring mutations, particularly KIT and FLT3-ITD, remains debatable, and treatment intensity may modulate their impact. This multicenter analysis included 289 children (< 14 years) with newly diagnosed CBF-AML enrolled in the C-HUANAN-AML-15 study (2015-2023). KIT and FLT3-ITD mutations were identified via cytogenetic analysis and targeted sequencing. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following induction chemotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. This multicenter analysis included 289 children (< 14 years) with newly diagnosed CBF-AML enrolled in the C-HUANAN-AML-15 study (2015-2023). KIT and FLT3-ITD mutations were identified via cytogenetic analysis and targeted sequencing. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following induction chemotherapy. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. KIT mutations were detected in 103 patients (35.6%), predominantly involving exon 17 (69.9%), and were associated with extramedullary disease, sex chromosome loss, and trisomy 22. No significant differences in 5-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), or cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were observed between patients with and without KIT mutations. FLT3-ITD mutations (5.5% of patients) did not adversely affect outcomes. Neither mutation independently predicted survival. MRD positivity (MFC-MRD ≥ 0.1%) after the second induction cycle strongly predicted inferior EFS and OS and higher CIR, with corresponding results observed for molecular MRD and parallel findings for PCR-based MRD. In this large multicenter cohort, KIT and FLT3-ITD mutations did not adversely affect the prognosis of pediatric CBF-AML treated according to the C-HUANAN-AML-15 protocol. MRD after induction was the most powerful predictor of relapse and survival, underscoring its importance for risk stratification in future pediatric AML trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Quizartinib for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD-positive AML who received maintenance therapy in QuANTUM-First.

QuANTUM-First demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with FMS-like receptor tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) treated with quizartinib + standard chemotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the impact of postconsolidation/posttransplant single-agent maintenance therapy on clinical outcomes in patients receiving maintenance, focusing on measurable residual disease (MRD) status at maintenance onset. OS, event-free survival, and relapse-free survival were prespecified exploratory analyses. Cumulative incidence of relapse, analyses by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT), and analyses by MRD status were post hoc and not powered for statistical significance. Samples for FLT3-ITD MRD analysis were collected from patients with composite complete remission ≤30 days before receiving maintenance and assessed using an ultrasensitive amplicon-based assay. More patients who had received an allo-HCT and quizartinib treatment received maintenance (71%) vs placebo (55%); OS benefit was not demonstrated among these patients. In patients who did not undergo allo-HCT, quizartinib maintenance was associated with a significant OS benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.401; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.192-0.838), including a benefit in patients who were MRD negative at the start of maintenance (OS HR, 0.194; 95% CI, 0.056-0.676). Patients who were MRD negative at the completion of consolidation achieved 89.1% (95% CI, 70.0-96.4) survival at 3 years with quizartinib maintenance in the absence of allo-HCT. These data suggest that for patients who achieve FLT3-ITD MRD negativity after induction and consolidation with quizartinib, maintenance with quizartinib provides a significant survival benefit and, in some patients, may eliminate the need for allo-HCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02668653.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Relevance of Genomics Defined WHO5 Subtypes of Pediatric B-ALL in the Context of Measurable Residual Disease-Directed Risk-Based Therapy.

PURPOSE: WHO5 (2022) classification of B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) incorporates several novel entities requiring high-throughput sequencing for their accurate characterization. The clinical relevance of this classification in the context of contemporary measurable residual disease (MRD)-directed therapy is unclear. METHODS: We analyzed 533 pediatric B-ALL uniformly treated with Indian Collaborative Childhood Leukaemia group (ICiCLe)-ALL-14 protocol as defined by WHO-2016 and reclassified them as per WHO5 using targeted sequencing, FISH, and cytogenetics. RESULTS: Subtype-defining genomic abnormalities were identified in 81.2% of the cohort as per the WHO5 classification. Among the new subtypes, PAX5alt and MEF2D-r were associated with a trend toward an inferior 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 32.8% (P = .003) and 33.7% (P = .091), respectively. We developed a three-tier genomic risk stratification model incorporating 15 genomic subtypes and the IKZF1 deletion. Children with standard (SGR), intermediate (IGR), and high genomic risk (HGR) demonstrated 3-year EFS of 80.4%, 59.3%, and 45.8% (P < .0001), and 3-year overall survival of 89.6%, 75.3%, and 62.3% (P < .0001), respectively. Genomic risk further identified heterogeneous outcomes among ICiCLe risk groups (P < .0001). SGR was associated with superior EFS irrespective of MRD status (3-year EFS 80.5% in postinduction [PI] MRD-negative v 80.8% PI-MRD-positive patients, P = .530). On multivariable analysis, genomic risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.01]; P < .0001), initial ICiCLe risk (HR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.49]; P = .009), and PI-MRD (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.66 to 2.90]; P < .0001) independently predicted EFS. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the potential role of genomic risk stratification, in conjunction with MRD, in stratifying patients into clinically relevant risk categories.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

MRDtarget: A heuristic Gaussian approach for optimizing targeted capture regions to enhance Minimal Residual Disease detection.

Molecular residual disease (MRD) detection, initially developed for hematologic malignancies, has become a critical biomarker for monitoring solid tumors. MRD detection primarily relies on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis using next-generation sequencing, offering high sensitivity and broad genomic coverage. However, challenges remain in designing cost-effective panels that maximize mutation detection while maintaining biological relevance. Fixed panels often lack sufficient patient-specific mutation coverage, while WES-based personalized MRD assays, despite their high sensitivity, are costly and less accessible. We developed a tumor comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP)-informed personalized MRD assay to detect tumor-derived mutations, which allowed us to design patient-specific personalized panels and meanwhile, provide a cost-effective alternative to whole exome sequencing (WES). To address these limitations, we developed MRDtarget, a heuristic multivariate Gaussian model-based targeted capture region selection method. By expanding beyond traditional hotspot regions, MRDtarget optimizes variant tracking for MRD detection, significantly improving sensitivity. Using a Bayesian inference-based heuristic approach, MRDtarget integrates multi-feature informativeness rates to identify optimal genomic regions for capture. Experimental results demonstrate that MRDtarget enables the detection of more variants per patient. This study underscores the importance of rational panel design to improve MRD sensitivity and provides a novel approach to enhance precision diagnostics and treatment for solid tumor patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

ctDNA can detect minimal residual disease in curative treated non-small cell lung cancer patients using a tumor agnostic approach.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to become a reliable biomarker for identifying minimal residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following curative treatment. However, there is a lack of studies that investigate the clinical validity of ctDNA using a tumor-agnostic approach, which can provide significant clinical benefits. METHODS: We analyzed samples from 45 NSCLC patients recruited in a prospective national multicenter study, all of whom had undergone curative treatment. A total of 38 pre-treatment plasma samples and 76 post-treatment plasma samples were examined using a commercially available cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-seq) strategy, and a tumor-agnostic approach. Post-treatment samples were collected at two distinct landmark time points: Follow-up 1 (0.5-4.5 months post-treatment) and Follow-up 2 (4.5-7.5 months post-treatment). RESULTS: Detectable ctDNA post-treatment was significantly associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence and shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS). Using only a single blood sample taken from Follow-up 2, we correctly identified MRD in 50% of the patients who later experienced recurrence. However, subgroup analysis further revealed that in patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), ctDNA detection was significantly linked to shorter RFS in the MRD analysis from Follow-up 2, but not in the MRD analysis from Follow-up 1. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that post-treatment ctDNA, detected using a tumor-agnostic approach, is a reliable biomarker for predicting recurrence in NSCLC patients following curative treatment. However, the optimal timing for blood sampling to detect MRD appears to depend on the type of curative treatment received.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Measurable Residual Disease and the Unresolved Biology of Leukemic Stem Cells.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing has transformed the management of hematologic cancers by enabling detection of residual malignant cells after therapy. Current approaches rely on qPCR and next-generation sequencing to monitor leukemia-associated somatic mutations, while multiparameter flow cytometry identifies aberrant leukemic immunophenotypes. Although these methods provide valuable prognostic and therapeutic information, MRD negativity remains an imperfect surrogate for cure. Most MRD platforms evaluate CD45+, rapidly dividing leukemic populations and fail to detect quiescent cells that may survive cytotoxic therapies which efficiently target proliferating hematopoietic cells. Relapse frequently occurs despite deep molecular remission, suggesting persistence of rare leukemic stem cells (LSCs) that are intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. The paradox of relapse despite molecular remission could be explained by the presence of very small embryonic-like stem cells (VSELs) which are pluripotent, quiescent stem cells sitting at the top of cellular hierarchy in multiple adult tissues including bone marrow. A pluripotent VSEL divides through asymmetrical cell division to give rise to two cells of different sizes and fates, smaller cell is to self-renew while the bigger is lineage-restricted and tissue-committed progenitor which undergoes extensive epigenetic changes, divides rapidly and undergoes clonal expansion before further differentiation. Dysfunctions of VSELs initiate both solid and hematologic cancers. Based on this view, somatic mutations monitored during MRD assessment possibly represent downstream consequences of clonal expansion rather than the initiating drivers of disease persistence. Thus, exclusive monitoring of somatic mutations and CD45 + leukemic populations possibly overlook rare, small-sized, CD45- VSELs that contribute to therapeutic resistance and relapse.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Molecular Residual Disease and Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for recurrence and treatment response in patients with rectal cancer undergoing upfront surgery. BACKGROUND: ctDNA-based molecular residual disease (MRD) testing shows promise in colorectal cancer, but its role in patients with rectal cancer not receiving neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. This study evaluates whether postoperative ctDNA predicts disease-free survival (DFS) and guides adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) decisions. METHODS: We analyzed ctDNA from patients with stage II to III rectal cancer (N=250) enrolled in the GALAXY study, a multicenter registry in Japan. A clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex PCR next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera) was used to detect and quantify ctDNA. The primary outcome was DFS, defined as the time from landmark to recurrence, death, or the latest radiologic assessment. RESULTS: In the MRD window (2-10 wk postsurgery, before ACT), 14.2% (35/246) of patients were ctDNA-positive and had significantly shorter DFS (HR: 9.96, 95% CI: 5.76-17.2, P <0.0001). Among patients who were ctDNA-positive in the MRD window, a significant benefit from ACT was observed (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.09-0.89, P =0.031), whereas no benefit was seen in ctDNA-negative patients (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.26-1.35, P =0.211). When analyzing ctDNA dynamics from the MRD window to 6 months postsurgery, recurrence risk was higher in patients who converted from ctDNA-negative to positive (HR: 8.22, 95% CI: 1.86-36.32, P =0.0055) and who remained ctDNA-positive (HR: 45.48, 95% CI: 14.31-144.57, P <0.0001) compared with serially ctDNA-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ctDNA status is a robust biomarker predicting recurrence risk and ACT benefit in patients with rectal cancer undergoing upfront surgery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma: the BUTTERFLY study.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in perioperative and neoadjuvant strategies, patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers remain at high risk of recurrence after curative intent treatment. No validated biomarkers are available to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) or to guide post-operative risk-adapted management. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive tool for disease monitoring; single-parameter or tumor-informed assays, however, may lack sensitivity in low-tumor burden settings. Multimodal, tumor-agnostic approaches may overcome these limitations. METHODS: The BUTTERFLY study is a prospective, multicenter observational study enrolling patients with stage II-III gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal cancer treated with perioperative chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. It evaluates the diagnostic performance and prognostic value of an academic, tumor-agnostic, multimodal ctDNA assay for MRD detection and prognostic stratification. Serial plasma samples are collected from baseline through post-operative follow-up and at relapse. Cell-free DNA is analyzed using the Agnostic Liquid Biopsy Multimodal Advancement (ALMA) platform, integrating tumor fraction estimation, somatic copy number alterations, fragmentomic features, single-nucleotide variants, and whole-genome methylation profiling. Multimodal features are combined with clinical variables using machine learning-based models to enhance MRD detection and relapse risk stratification. The primary endpoint includes sensitivity and specificity of ALMA-defined ctDNA/MRD status at the 4-8 weeks after surgery landmark, whereas secondary endpoints assess diagnostic performance at other time points and associations between ctDNA status and dynamics with disease-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and lead time to recurrence. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: If validated, this tumor-agnostic, multimodal ctDNA approach may enable earlier molecular relapse detection and support personalized post-operative management strategies.

circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)↗

PubMed2026

Day + 30 detection of minimal residual FLT3-ITD by high-sensitivity PCR-NGS predicts relapse risk and guides post-transplant maintenance in AML.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has improved outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations. However, relapse still occurs in 15-35% of these patients after transplantation. Therefore, early and highly sensitive detection methods are required to identify patients at risk of relapse and enable timely post-transplant intervention. METHODS: In this NICHE cohort study, a total of 136 patients were included, then we evaluated whether high-sensitivity polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-next-generation sequencing (NGS) for FLT3-ITD (limit of detection: 5 × 10-6) on day + 30 post-HSCT could identify patients at a high risk of relapse and inform decisions regarding maintenance therapy. RESULTS: Among the 136 patients, 37 patients (27.2%) had detectable FLT3-ITD clones on day + 30. These patients exhibited a significantly higher cumulative incidence of post-HSCT multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)-measurable residual disease (MRD) relapse (40.3% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.001). Notably, FLT3-ITD-positive patients who received FLT3 inhibitor maintenance therapy had no relapses, while 6 out of the 13 patients who did not receive maintenance therapy relapsed. Conversely, FLT3-ITD-negative patients without high-risk factors (2022 European LeukemiaNet adverse-risk group, relapsed/refractory AML, MFC-MRD positivity pre-HSCT) showed limited benefit from maintenance therapy (MFC-MRD-free survival: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.25 (0.03-2.11), p = 0.204; OS: HR = 0.20 (0.02-1.70), p = 0.142). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that detection of minimal FLT3-ITD clones at the fixed time point of day + 30 post-HSCT can reliably stratify relapse risk in AML patients and provide a rationale for individualized post-transplant maintenance therapy.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Defining and managing high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2026.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a highly heterogeneous malignancy in which outcomes are particularly poor for patients classified as having high-risk disease. Traditionally, high-risk AML has been defined by adverse baseline genetic features, including complex cytogenetics, TP53 alterations, and mutations associated with secondary or therapy-related disease. However, this static, genetics-centered definition is increasingly insufficient in the modern therapeutic era. Emerging evidence supports a more dynamic and context-dependent model in which risk is shaped not only by molecular architecture but also by treatment intensity, patient fitness, measurable residual disease (MRD), and evolving resistance mechanisms. Advances in genomic profiling have refined risk stratification frameworks, including ELN 2022 for intensively treated patients and the ELN 2024 classification for those receiving less-intensive therapies. In parallel, MRD has emerged as a powerful biomarker that reclassifies patients during treatment, identifying those with persistent, therapy-resistant disease despite morphologic remission. Biologically, high-risk AML is driven by the interplay of clonal evolution, epigenetic plasticity, leukemic stem cell persistence, and protective microenvironmental and immune interactions, all of which contribute to relapse. Therapeutically, the landscape has expanded to include targeted agents, venetoclax-based combinations, and transplantation strategies, yet outcomes remain limited in key high-risk subsets, particularly TP53-mutated disease and post-venetoclax relapse. Accordingly, current strategies emphasize rational combination therapies, MRD-guided treatment adaptation, and approaches targeting both leukemic cells and their supportive niches. In 2026, high-risk AML is best understood as a dynamic, treatment-context-dependent state. Improving outcomes will require integration of precision diagnostics, biologically informed therapy, and adaptive strategies designed to anticipate and overcome resistance.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Minimal Residual Disease for Recurrence-Free Survival in Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Serial Monitoring Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) is an emerging biomarker, but its utility in resectable gastric cancer remains incompletely characterized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight studies (520 patients) to evaluate the prognostic value of ctDNA-based MRD for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in resectable gastric cancer. RESULTS: In localized resectable gastric cancer (Stage I-III), the setting in which postoperative ctDNA most coherently represents true molecular residual disease after curative-intent surgery, postoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with diminished recurrence-free survival (RFS: HR 12.26, 95% CI 3.30-45.52) and overall survival (OS: HR 8.57, 95% CI 3.06-23.98). The test for subgroup differences between localized and mixed-stage cohorts was not statistically significant (P = 0.57), and the numerically higher HR in the localized subgroup should therefore not be interpreted as evidence of a quantitatively stronger prognostic effect. Postoperative ctDNA detection demonstrated substantially stronger prognostic value (overall RFS: HR 10.00, 95% CI 4.53-22.10) compared to preoperative assessment (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.10-4.28). Both tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic strategies effectively stratified high-risk patients. However, these effect sizes should be interpreted cautiously given the small number of studies and substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 65-72%). Results from mixed-stage cohorts including Stage IV disease are supportive but should not be considered equivalent to localized-disease findings, as ctDNA in metastatic disease reflects persistent systemic burden rather than minimal residual disease in the postoperative sense. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ctDNA-based MRD shows a consistent adverse prognostic association in resectable gastric cancer, with localized disease (Stage I-III) representing the most biologically and clinically coherent setting for interpretation. However, the large pooled hazard ratios (HR 10.00-12.26) should be interpreted as a directionally consistent signal rather than precise quantitative estimates, given the small number of studies, wide confidence intervals, and substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 65-73%). This heterogeneity is largely driven by substantial variation in postoperative sampling timing (4 days to 16 weeks) and ctDNA assay characteristics (platform, sensitivity, coverage, variant filtering, and positivity thresholds), which require standardization in future studies. While ctDNA is prognostically valuable, its clinical utility remains unestablished. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine whether ctDNA-guided strategies improve patient outcomes before routine clinical implementation can be recommended.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Frontline therapies for adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common ALL in adults. Overall survival (OS) with frontline chemotherapy remains poor. Blinatumomab is currently the only targeted agent approved for frontline treatment. METHODS: We systematically reviewed 96 studies (43 interventional, 53 observational) between 2012-2026 evaluating frontline pharmacologic therapy in adults with Ph- B-ALL. RESULTS: Across chemotherapy studies, nearly half of patients relapsed within 3 years, and only 49%-69% survived beyond 3 years. Blinatumomab demonstrated robust and consistent efficacy in first complete response (CR1), supported by 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 16 single-arm trials (SAT). In one RCT, blinatumomab reduced the risk of death by 59% versus chemotherapy alone (HR 0.41) when added to frontline consolidation in minimal residual disease (MRD) negative patients. Median OS reached 41.2 months in a SAT where blinatumomab monotherapy was administered to patients in MRD-positive CR1. SATs showed consistent efficacy outcomes regardless of age, MRD status, or chemotherapy backbone. DISCUSSION: Additional targeted therapies still under investigation have shown mixed results. CONCLUSION: Frontline inotuzumab (±blinatumomab) plus chemotherapy showed promise in older populations, while the efficacy benefit of rituximab was inconclusive. No new safety signals were identified in the frontline setting for targeted therapies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

CAR T-cell therapy as a definitive consolidation for older adults with B-ALL in first complete remission.

We report a phase 1 study assessing the safety and efficacy of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells as definitive consolidation in older adults (aged ≥55 years) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) in first complete remission (CR1). Eighteen patients received lymphodepletion followed by infusion of memory-enriched CD19 CAR T cells. The median age was 64 years, and all patients were measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative before lymphodepletion. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome, or any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Estimated 18-month event-free and overall survival were 84% and 100%, respectively. CAR T cells expanded in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid despite patients' MRD-negative status. Comparing clinical samples from patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-ALL from our historical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02146924) and patients in CR1, we found that the blood and CAR T-cell products from patients with R/R B-ALL were hyperinflammatory and hyperimmunometabolic, respectively. First-line CAR T-cell therapy was safe and well tolerated and potentially extended remission in patients in MRD-negative CR1. These findings support further investigation of the early use of CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05707273.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

RAG-mediated structural variation and its impact on relapse risk in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Relapse during treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is a harbinger of poor outcomes. Identifying biomarkers for subsequent relapse risk which are detectable at B-ALL diagnosis remains a priority. Off-target recombination-activating gene (RAG)-mediated structural variants (SVs) generate genomic instability that drives leukemogenesis and may underlie treatment resistance. Leveraging sequencing data in 1,496 pediatric B-ALL patients enriched for relapse status (relapse n=532; non-relapse n=964), we characterized RAG-mediated SVs across B-ALL molecular subtypes and examined their association with patient characteristics and their impact on clinical outcomes. Off-target RAG-mediated SVs were overall frequent, particularly in ETV6::RUNX1, ETV6::RUNX1-like, and Ph-like B-ALL subtypes, while increasing age-at-diagnosis was positively associated with burden of off-target RAG-mediated SVs (P<.001). Off-target RAG-mediated SVs with a recombination signal sequence (RSS) at one breakpoint, a hallmark of off-target RAG activity, were significantly more frequent at diagnosis in patients who subsequently relapsed (P=.001). This association remained significant in multivariable regression analysis (per SV odds ratio [OR]:1.08, 95%CI:1.04-1.12), in minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative patients (OR:1.09, 95%CI:1.04-1.14) and across subtypes. Excluding deletions, MRD-negative ETV6::RUNX1 patients with ≥3 off-target RAG-mediated SVs had a >3-fold risk of relapse (hazard ratio:3.47, 95% CI:1.86-6.49). RAG-mediated SVs were also associated with relapse risk in T-cell ALL patients. Off-target RAG-mediated SV burden at diagnosis is a risk factor of relapse in pediatric ALL across molecular subtypes and independent of MRD status.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

IGH::FENDRR and specific KRAS mutations define a novel B-ALL molecular subtype with poor chemotherapy response.

Large-scale sequencing efforts have defined up to 27 diagnostic subtypes in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), leaving few samples unclassified. Extended genomic and transcriptomic profiling in routine diagnostics broadens the sample collection, enabling identification of novel subtypes. We analyzed 4857 patients with B-ALL from 3 cohorts and identified a group of 20 patients (age, 18-66 years; median, 34 years) characterized by a previously undescribed IGH::FENDRR rearrangement exclusive to this subtype (n = 17/20), KRAS p.A146T/V/P mutations (n = 17/20 vs n = 86/4857; P< .001), and distinct DNA methylation/gene expression profiles, including overexpression of the lncRNA FENDRR and the transcription factor FOXF1 (FOXF1/FENDRR) as well as JAK/STAT and RAS/MAPK signaling signatures. A gene expression machine learning classifier accurately identified FOXF1/FENDRR cases in 2 independent cohorts. Patients treated according to German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL)/Group for Research in Adult ALL (GRAALL) protocols showed very poor chemotherapy response with 8 of 13 exhibiting induction failure or minimal residual disease (MRD) ≥10-3 and 8 of 12 remaining MRD positive after first consolidation/salvage. Intensification including blinatumomab (n = 10) and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n = 12) resulted in ongoing molecular remission in 13 of 16 patients. FOXF1/FENDRR represents a novel B-ALL subtype which might benefit from early immunotherapeutic treatment or targeted interventions.

Humans↗