PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Mainstream genetic testing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing: A conceptual framework.

PURPOSE: Demand for genetic testing is increasing across medicine, whereas the genetics workforce remains stable. In response, mainstreaming models are being introduced, in which nongeneticist clinicians are increasingly involved in the genetic testing pathway. Because a standardized approach would facilitate evaluation and optimal patient care, a unified framework is warranted. METHODS: Through a focus group with clinical genetics experts, a conceptual framework for the mainstreaming of clinical genetic testing is proposed. Through a consensus process, experts elucidated the steps in the diagnostic care pathway and defined a set of variables that influence which mainstreaming model is best suited to specific patient care scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 35 individuals representing 20 distinct clinical genetics services and all Canadian provinces participated in the development of the framework. The framework describes 4 generalizable mainstreaming models of care, each with varying levels of involvement of the clinical genetics service in the diagnostic care pathway. CONCLUSION: This framework will help guide clinical teams in the design and evaluation of mainstreaming efforts. It is critical that these programs are evaluated and shared in a standardized way so that we can implement strategies that allow optimal utilization of genetics resources and improve patient care.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The work of specialist nurses in the mainstreaming of germline genomic testing in cancer: an investigation.

BACKGROUND: Specialist nurses are increasingly working in the mainstreaming of germline genomic testing in cancer. AIMS: The study aimed to investigate the work of specialist nurses in the mainstreaming of germline genomic testing in cancer, with a focus on Lynch syndrome, and to consider the future of genomics in nursing. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 specialist nurses and three genetic counsellors, and thematic analysis was carried out. FINDINGS: Prominent themes arising from the data were: the capability and capacity of specialty-based clinical nurse specialists, for whom genomics is an added part of their wider role, to deliver genomic testing; and whether these specialty-based nurses or specialist genomic nurses, who work only in genomics, are best placed to deliver genomic testing. CONCLUSION: When planning service provision in the mainstreaming of genetic testing, the capacity and capability of specialty-based clinical nurse specialists should be considered alongside the possible need for specialist genomic nurses.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Uptake of germline testing for Lynch Syndrome in patients with deficient mismatch repair/ microsatellite-high colorectal cancer in the public hospital system in South Australia.

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for approximately 4% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and arises from pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Australian guidelines recommend universal MMR or microsatellite instability (MSI) screening in all CRC patients; however, real-world uptake remains variable. This study evaluated rates of MMR/MSI screening, germline testing, and genetics referrals across two major public hospitals in South Australia. A retrospective review of 1775 patients discussed at colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings in the Royal Adelaide and Queen Elizabeth hospitals between January 2021 and December 2023 was conducted to identify rates of MMR/MSI screening and subsequent referral of eligible patients to genetics. Of the 1129 colorectal cancer cases identified, MMR/MSI testing was performed in 93.2% (1052/1129), with deficiency detected in 12.5% (131/1052). Of these, 37% (49/131) were eligible for genetics referral after exclusion of somatic causes. Among eligible patients, 73.5% (36/49) were referred, and 43% (21/49) underwent germline testing. LS was confirmed in 12 patients (9% of deficient MMR CRC), while 9 patients (6.9%) were classified as having Lynch-like syndrome. Despite high screening rates, gaps remain in genetics referral and testing. Barriers included lack of reflex testing, loss to follow-up, and patient refusal. Targeted system-level interventions and improved genomic education are needed to enhance adherence to guidelines and optimise patient outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The role of pathology laboratories in integrating genetic testing into Australian primary care: an implementation science perspective.

As genomic testing moves into mainstream healthcare, non-genetic healthcare professionals, including general practitioners (GPs), play a critical role as gatekeepers to genetic services. Laboratories are essential in supporting this transition by providing not only high-quality genetic tests but also point-of-care tools, educational materials and clinical guidance to support their use. This study aimed to explore how these tools and supports are conceptualized, developed, implemented and evaluated and how laboratories integrate them into their relationships with GPs, an essential process for paving the way toward better use of genomics in primary care. A qualitative study design was employed using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with representatives from genetic laboratories across Australia. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided deductive content analysis of data. Findings spanned the four CFIR domains (Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting and Implementation Process) across 34 constructs. Participants reported that laboratories viewed point-of-care tools and resources as essential responses to persistent genomic knowledge gaps among GPs. Development of evidence-based, practice-driven and adaptable resources was supported and rewarded within laboratory organisations. A strong culture of clinical responsibility and implementation readiness, combined with robust networks and communications, enabled timely support for GPs. Gaps identified included lack of implementation planning, misalignments between laboratory-developed resources and GPs' real-world needs and inadequate mechanisms for obtaining GPs' feedback, which made evaluation problematic. By applying an implementation science framework, these findings provide insights for future efforts to build and sustain the provision of point-of-care tools and support, ultimately improving the integration of genomics in primary care.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Survey of diagnostic laboratories highlights need for improved standards in somatic genomic testing and reporting.

There is a growing international need to support somatic genomic testing, standardised variant curation and improved patient access to molecular profiling for somatic conditions, including cancer. We conducted a survey of scope, curation, reporting and sharing practices of diagnostic laboratories performing somatic testing in Australia and New Zealand. Laboratories with accreditation (n = 41) were invited in 2023 to complete a semi-structured, 25-question interview. Responses were received for 27 laboratories (66% response rate) offering solid tumour, haematological malignancy and non-cancer services. Only 36% of laboratories offered tests capturing the full breadth of variants, from single-nucleotide variants to gene fusions. Knowledge sharing was rare, with only one laboratory submitting variant classifications to a public knowledge base. Most laboratories (96%) conducted somatic testing in oncology. Of cancer laboratories, 35% offered testing considered capable of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Almost half of cancer laboratories had already adopted the 2022 ClinGen/CGC/VICC oncogenicity guidelines, and 84% were using AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 clinical significance guidelines. Only 47% of mixed discipline cancer laboratories reported biomarkers such as tumour mutational burden, with wide variation in reporting of matched therapy options. Our study has generated a unique overview of somatic laboratory practices in the region, and areas for global standardisation in somatic molecular testing and reporting. We also provide a model for practice and guideline uptake assessment, for application by other country-wide networks. This is particularly relevant in anticipation of CGP mainstreaming, with the increasing complexity of sequencing interpretation for laboratories and clinicians.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Prevalence of BRCA1/2 variants in an Ovarian Cancer Cohort: outcomes from a Nationwide Testing Program.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the management of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer (OC). In 2020, Ireland implemented a nationwide, oncology-led pathway for mainstreamed BRCA1/2 testing in patients with OC. This study evaluated the pathway and characterised the BRCA1/2 landscape in an Irish cohort of patients with OC. Samples collected between January 2020 and December 2023 were tested in two national molecular diagnostic laboratories. Single-molecule molecular inversion probe sequencing was used to detect single nucleotide variants, while multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assessed large genomic rearrangements. Variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Clinical Genomic Science 2020 guidelines and CanVIG-UK specifications. In total, 535 patients were included, with a median age of 65.5 years (range, 27-89 years). Of these, 455/535 (85.0%) underwent germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) testing using peripheral blood, and 360/535 (67.2%) underwent tumour BRCA1/2 (tBRCA) testing, resulting in 292/535 (54.6%) patients having paired testing. Among gBRCA-tested patients, 10.3% (47/455) had a clinically actionable variant (CAV), while 2.1% (10/455) had a variant of uncertain significance. Of the 262 patients who underwent paired testing and had negative gBRCA results, 9.5% (25/262) had a somatic BRCA CAV. Recurrent germline BRCA CAVs were identified in regional clusters, including BRCA1 c.5266dup, BRCA1 c.1175_1214del, and BRCA2 c.4398_4402del. This nationwide real-world study demonstrates that mainstreamed germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing is feasible in Ireland and reports the prevalence of BRCA CAVs in a cohort of patients with OC. Although the observed prevalence of germline BRCA CAVs was lower than anticipated, it is consistent with UK real-world data. The identification of recurrent, regionally clustered germline variants further enhances the characterisation of the Irish genomic landscape.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Exploring the causal association between television viewing and meniscal injuries: A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a potential causal relationship between sedentary behavior and meniscal injuries based on the Mendelian randomization (MR) method. This study used a two-sample MR design to integrate pooled data from a large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were significantly associated with sedentary behavior (represented by daily TV-viewing time) and independent of each other were selected as instrumental variables, while focusing on data from populations of European ancestry. To ensure the robustness and reliability of the analyses, 3 mainstream MR analysis methods were combined in this study: inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median estimation (WME) and MR-Egger regression. Heterogeneity test, horizontal multivariate analysis, and leave-one-out sensitivity test were also conducted to further validate the stability of causal estimation. The results of the IVW method showed that sedentary behavior was significantly associated with the risk of meniscus injury, with an OR (95% CI) of 2.93 (1.89-4.52), and a P-value of&#x2005;<&#x2005;.001, suggesting that sedentary behavior may be an important risk factor for meniscus injury. No significant bias was found in the heterogeneity test and the assessment of multiple validity, and the sensitivity analysis showed that the effect of individual SNPs on the overall estimation was small, and the results had good robustness. This study provides genetic epidemiological evidence of a positive causal effect of sedentary behavior on meniscal injuries based on a causal inference approach with genetic instrumental variables. The results suggest that reducing sedentary time, especially prolonged TV watching behavior, may reduce the risk of meniscus injury to some extent.

Humans↗