[Hypermotile functional disorders of the tubular esophagus. Inpatient manometry and long-term manometry].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this prospective study is to investigate whether anal manometry is useful in orienting the surgical policy and improving the clinical and functional results following surgery for fistula-in-ano. Anal manometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in 96 patients. The results of surgery, in terms of both fecal soiling and recurrence rate, were analyzed and compared with those of another group of 36 subjects. Some operative maneuvers, such as internal sphincterotomy, laying open of the fistula with division of striated muscle, or use of a seton, were carried out according to the preoperative sphincter pattern as shown by anal manometry in the first group. A standard procedure was followed in the control group. The recurrence rate was 3 percent in the anal manometry group and 13 percent in the control group (P less than 0.01); postoperative soiling occurred in 14 percent of patients in the anal manometry group compared with 31 percent of patients in the control group (P less than 0.001). The functional results in transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas, which are usually considered at higher risk for postoperative incontinence, were better in the anal manometry group, due to greater use of the seton. No increase in recurrence rate was observed in these complex fistulas after anal manometry. Internal sphincterotomy led to a disordered continence, mainly when associated with division of striated muscle; a significant decrease in resting tone from 56 +/- 22 to 47 +/- 50 and voluntary contraction from 114 +/- 30 to 85 +/- 28 mm Hg (mean +/- S) was found after surgery in patients with soiling. In conclusion, the routine use of anal manometry may be recommended in the management of patients with fistula-in-ano as it improves the clinical and functional outcome of surgery.
The nature, frequency, severity, and possible causes of complications after 207 sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements were studied in 146 patients. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 6% (12 of 207) of the investigations and in 8% (12 of 146) of the patients examined. The pancreatitis was mild in all patients. After cannulation of the pancreatic duct, acute pancreatitis occurred in 10 of 95 (11%) patients compared with one of 93 (1%) when the manometry catheter entered the bile duct only (p less than 0.02). Seven (58%) of the patients who developed acute pancreatitis, however, were found to be suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Some 26% of all sphincter of Oddi manometry measurements on patients with this diagnosis were complicated by an acute attack of pancreatitis compared with 3% (p less than 0.001) in patients without signs of chronic pancreatitis. In all patients the pancreatitis developed within three hours of manometry. We conclude that pancreatitis may occasionally follow sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement, even in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease, and that underlying chronic pancreatitis constitutes a definite risk. Sphincter of Oddi manometry measurement in control subjects should therefore be performed only in centres where the safety of the procedure has been established, and the presence of chronic pancreatitis should be excluded beforehand. Cannulation of the pancreatic duct should be avoided. Manometry can be safely performed, however, as an outpatient procedure.
A recently developed technique for dynamic anal manometry was used to study 40 healthy volunteers and 23 patients with fecal incontinence. Seven parameters of anal function were measured. Intraindividual variation of the parameters was studied in 5 females and 5 males. The results of dynamic anal manometry were compared with standard pull-through static anal manometry and correlated well. During opening of the anal sphincter at rest, compliance increased with increasing distension. Males had higher maximal closing pressures during squeeze and lower anal compliance during squeeze than females. There was no sex differences of the sphincter measurements at rest. Age had little effect, and gender had no effect on the measurements. With standard anal manometry, 6 of 23 patients with fecal incontinence both had maximal resting pressure and maximal squeeze pressure within the normal range. When dynamic anal manometry was used, all 23 patients showed one or more abnormal values. The method of dynamic anal manometry provides an opportunity for a more thorough assessment of anal sphincter function than previous manometric methods.
Anorectal manometry is used in the treatment of complex anorectal disorders, such as fecal incontinence and intractable constipation. In a 3-year period at one institution 308 anorectal manometries were performed. A total of 168 procedures were performed for complaints of fecal incontinence, 77 for constipation, and the remainder for a variety of anorectal disorders. Anorectal manometry in those under 20 years of age was performed most often to differentiate Hirschsprung disease from functional constipation, as well as to provide a differential diagnosis related to congenital anorectal anomalies. In patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years, evaluation of fecal incontinence (especially obstetrical injuries) was most significant. Fecal incontinence accounted for twice the number of anorectal manometries for those between the ages of 41 and 60. For those over 60 years of age, the majority of anorectal manometries were done for fecal incontinence rather than for constipation (nearly a 4:1 ratio). Anorectal manometry is a valuable physiologic adjunct in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of organic and functional disorders of the anorectum.
Conventional oesophageal manometry is seldom accompanied by symptoms and may indeed be normal in patients with a history of dysphagia. We have recently shown that oesophageal manometry during eating may be helpful in the evaluation of patients with dysphagia but there has been little systematic comparison of fed oesophageal motor patterns with conventional clinical manometry. Oesophageal manometry in response to water swallows and during eating was therefore examined in 58 consecutive patients who had been referred for clinical oesophageal function studies. The patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of peristaltic activity during conventional manometry: group 1 (n = 21) had 100% peristalsis; group 2 (n = 29) had 1-99% peristalsis and group 3 (n = 8) were aperistaltic. All the patients in group 3 had achalasia and remained aperistaltic during eating, however, was less than with water swallows in both group 1 (53% compared with 100%) and group 2 (49% compared with 82.3%) patients. Synchronous contractions and non-conducted swallows were correspondingly increased during eating. Although there was a significant correlation between the amplitude of peristaltic contractions with water and bread in groups 1 and 2, mean peristaltic amplitudes were less with bread than with water swallows. The data show that there are substantial differences in the distal oesophageal motility patterns produced by water swallows and by eating. Conventional manometry with water swallows does not allow prediction of the fed oesophageal motility pattern, except in patients with achalasia.
Thirteen patients who had recently bled from varices underwent oesophageal manometry. A control group of 13 asymptomatic subjects were also studied. Seven of the thirteen variceal patients had manometry before oesophageal transection and repeat manometry at least 1 month following operation. A further group of 17 post-transection patients also underwent manometry at a mean 27.6 months following operation. Comparison between variceal (13) and control subjects (13) showed that the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, total length and length of the abdominal and proximal portions of the sphincter were similar in the two groups. Pre- and postoperative manometry (7) revealed a significant reduction in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure following transection. The total length of the lower sphincter was shorter postoperatively compared to the pre-operative length. Both the abdominal and the proximal portion of the sphincter were significantly shorter postoperatively. Comparison between post-transection group (24) and control subjects (13) showed that lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was significantly less following transection. Both total length and the length of the abdominal portion of the sphincter were significantly lower in the post-transection group.
Between 1975 and 1983, 17 neonates with transient functional obstruction of the colon were studied in our surgical department. Five could be successfully treated conservatively with enemas. In the remaining 12 cases colostomy was necessary. In three cases colostomy was performed too late and the patients died. In the other nine cases rectal biopsies and anorectal manometries were performed repeatedly. In spite of clear radiological signs of colonic obstruction such as in Hirschsprung's disease in each case, and identical clinical signs, true aganglionosis could be excluded. Rectoanal manometry 4 months after colostomy showed that the situation had normalized in five cases, but was still pathological in four cases, as in aganglionosis. Of the rectal biopsies, five showed signs of immaturity of ganglionic cells and three were normal. Rectoanal manometry 12-24 months later showed normal reaction in all cases, and of the five cases with immaturity of the ganglionic cells at 4 months one was still pathologic at 12-24 months. In eight of 12 cases the colostomy was closed without relapse of the obstruction, even on long-term follow up. Aganglionosis of the ultrashort type was excluded. In cases of severe transient functional obstruction of the colon in neonates, in which colostomy is necessary, rectoanal manometry and rectal biopsies should be performed as early as possible. Rectoanal manometry, at least, should be done before closure of the colostomy to avoid relapse of the obstruction from closing it to early: the functional disturbance may persist for several months. The term "small left colon syndrome" should be abandoned in favor of "transient functional obstruction,", as the latter describes the clinical condition far better.
Two methods are used to assess esophageal motility. The mapping technique uses catheter withdrawal at 1 cm steps until the entire esophagus is evaluated. A simpler method is commonly used that involves keeping the catheter stationary for the entire evaluation. We compared these 2 techniques in 30 patients referred for the evaluation of dysphagia. Emphasis was placed on the distal 10 cm of the esophagus because this is the primary location of esophageal motility disorders. There was excellent correlation between techniques for mean distal amplitude (r = 0.945), mean distal duration (r = 0.942), and percentage of non-peristaltic contractions (r = 0.967). The overall manometry diagnosis was similar by both methods in 27 (90%) patients. Three patients had different manometry diagnoses resulting from use of the two techniques. However, the change in diagnosis was only clinically important in one patient in whom the mapping technique identified a segmental motility disorder that had been missed by the stationary technique. Stationary manometry had a 94% sensitivity and 93% specificity rate for identifying motility disorders compared to mapping manometry. We conclude that stationary manometry is a simple and accurate method for evaluating esophageal pressures and distal disorders. Only those patients with normal results of stationary studies may benefit by further mapping to identify rare segmental motility disorders.
There are two approaches to endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry, the microtransducer method and the perfusion method. Data reported by us and others are reviewed, with the aim of comparing the two techniques. Biliary pressure, pancreatic duct pressure, and sphincter of Oddi phasic wave activity can be measured by both of these methods. Easy handling and the capability of recording the mode of phasic wave propagation with a multilumen catheter are present advantages of perfusion manometry over the microtransducer method. Because there is no need for perfusion of fluid, the equipment needed for microtransducer manometry is simpler than that needed for the perfusion method, and the microtransducer technique may be more suitable for prolonged recording. An inter-study comparison of manometric data is easier with microtransducer manometry, but must await the collection of more data. Manometric differences between various diseases are still inconsistent, whereas there is no question of the effect of sphincterotomy on pressure values, with the exception of pancreatic duct and sphincter pressures. The possibilities of diagnosing sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and of predicting the response to sphincterotomy have been received with enthusiasm. However, whether the findings obtained by endoscopic manometry over relatively short periods of time can be considered representative of overall sphincter function is now being questioned since the presence of physiologic cyclic changes in sphincter of Oddi phasic activity in phase with the migrating motor complex of the duodenum was demonstrated. Hormonal or pharmacological stimulation of sphincter activity may help us overcome this problem.
Long myotomy (6-8 cm) + partial fundopexy + posterior fixation with intraoperative manometry of the esophagus was performed in 23 cases of esophageal achalasia. These cases ranged from 24-72 years of age (average 42), 11 were males and 12 females. There were 19 primary cases and 4 postoperative cases of recurrence, and the period of their clinical courses ranged from 2 months to 23 years. Concerning the operative procedure, in 22 cases the approach was via an upper midline incision and 1 case the approach was via left thoraco-abdominal incision. Intraoperative manometry was performed to help in judging the extent of each manipulation. With the operative manipulation, the LESP is reduced to 13.0 +/- 6.0 mmHg (39% of the average preoperative value) and HPZ is elongated to 60.9 +/- 14.1 mm (155% of the average preoperative value). Moreover, post-operative manometry data resembled intra-operative data. The effectiveness of the procedure is judged on the basis of the chief complaints, esophagography, endoscopic examination, esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring. Patients are followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year from the operation. Results showed 22 excellent cases (96.65%), 1 fair case (4.34%). These are better results than those of other reports that showed 50-60% excellent results and 30% good results (remaining slight passage disturbance). The reason for this difference is that we obtain sufficient LESP decompression effect (myotomy + submucosal layer ablation) based on intraoperative manometry. In the only case that we judged as fair (a reoperated case after Heller's operation) showed severe EGR totalling 213 min. on 24-hr pH monitoring of the esophagus in the postoperative period and was erosion also seen in the lower esophagus endoscopically. In this case, the LESP was 6.0 mmHg and its HPZ is 27.0 mm, showing a higher HPZ than the non-reflux group. Among the non-reflux group, LESP was as low as 6.0 mmHg, and this case had a remarkable long HPZ of 57.0 mm. In conclusion, even though the LESP is low, it is possible to prevent reflux if the HPZ is sufficiently long.
Standard manometry is currently considered the gold standard for the classification of esophageal motor disorders. We compared the new technique of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal motility monitoring to standard manometry in 108 patients thought to have a primary esophageal motor disorder, assessed the esophageal motor pattern associated with spontaneous noncardiac chest pain, and studied the effect of long esophageal myotomy on circadian esophageal motor function. Standard manometry was found to frequently overestimate and underestimate the severity of esophageal motor abnormalities as compared to 24-hour monitoring. Ambulatory manometry showed a direct correlation of abnormal esophageal motor activity with episodes of noncardiac chest pain in 13 of 26 patients who experienced the symptom during the monitoring period. The abnormal motor activity immediately preceding the pain episodes in these patients was characterized by an increased frequency of simultaneous, double and triple-peaked, high amplitude, and long duration contractions (p less than 0.01). Long esophageal myotomy markedly reduced or eliminated the ability of the esophagus to produce these abnormal contractions (p less than 0.01). These data suggest that ambulatory esophageal motility monitoring allows more precise classification of esophageal motor disorders than standard manometry and identifies abnormal esophageal motor activity associated with noncardiac chest pain that can be abated by long esophageal myotomy.
Motility disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract have traditionally been diagnosed by excluding mechanical small-bowel obstruction. In order to diagnose GI motility disorders in a positive fashion, small-bowel manometry was performed on 15 patients who were referred to the authors with intestinal motility disorders. Intestinal manometry was performed after first positioning a 200-cm multilumen tube into the small intestine. Ports located at 10-cm intervals were perfused with sterile water and connected to pressure transducers to record intraluminal pressures with a multichannel chart recorder. This low compliance water perfusion manometry system allowed examination of both fasting and postprandial motility. Intestinal manometry was able to assist in the diagnosis of two patients that had true mechanical small-bowel obstruction. One patient had a stenosis of the gastrojejunostomy and three patients had a functional gastric outlet obstruction secondary to a motility disorder in the Roux limb. One patient had a functional obstruction from a reversed jejunal loop and eight patients were identified as having intestinal pseudo-obstruction. We found intestinal manometry was a helpful adjunct in the diagnosis of GI motility disorders.
We studied 309 constipated infants and children who underwent rectal manometry (n = 261) and/or punch rectal biopsy, in which acetylcholinesterase histochemistry (n = 124) was compared with routine histologic examination (n = 93) for diagnostic accuracy. A 99% diagnostic accuracy was achieved with acetylcholinesterase histochemistry compared with 61% accuracy with routine hematoxylin-eosin staining on punch rectal biopsy. We recommend screening cooperative, quiet patients with rectal manometry. Most patients with abnormal manometric studies or those on whom manometry cannot be performed should have superficial punch biopsy (except those ill infants who require urgent operative intervention). This plan of management provides the least invasive but the most accurate evaluation of the constipated child. Deep rectal biopsy can be avoided except in the very rare child with hypoganglionosis or "skip-area" aganglionosis, which can be detected by manometry.
Anorectal manometry was performed in 48 Japanese children with Hirschsprung's disease and 61 normal children. The resting pressure of the rectum and anal canal was not significantly different between these groups of subjects. The frequency of rhythmical contractions of the anal canal of patients was significantly lower than for the normal subjects, but the frequencies overlapped considerably. Therefore, the frequency is an inadequate indicator for identifying these patients. Conventional manometry elicited a distinct rectoanal relaxation reflex from 90% of the normal children, and the rate increased to 98% when indistinct reflexes were regarded as positive. Indistinct reflexes often occur in neonates, possibly because the constriction of the anal canal is weak. However, when prostaglandin F2 alpha was intravenously administered during the examination, all ambiguous reflexes became distinct. Of patients with Hirschsprung's disease, 4% had a distinct reflex and 19% an atypical one. Most of the atypical reflexes were regarded as being artifacts and were mostly attributed to distension by a balloon. In these patients, the reflex was abolished in case of examination with electric stimulation or stimulation with cold water, procedures which do not dilate the rectum. Moreover these atypical reflexes did not fit the criteria for the normal rectoanal relaxation reflex prepared by the Japan Study Group of Pediatric Intestinal Manometry. The use of electric stimulation, cold water, or intravenously administered prostaglandin F2 alpha improves reliability of the conventional anorectal manometry. A clear and accurate definition of the normal reflex should aid in excluding the atypical reflex.
We performed fasting and postprandial recordings of antroduodenal manometry in 21 normal volunteers, 13 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and gastrointestinal symptoms, and 11 patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. None of the patients or volunteers had previously undergone an intestinal intubation study. Recordings could not be obtained from four of the diabetic patients due to failure to intubate the pylorus. Catheter migration led to incomplete antral data in a further 21% of all recordings. Due to the wide variations demonstrated by the normal volunteers, parameters of either the migrating motor complex (MMC) or the fed response could not differentiate between either of the patient groups and/or the controls. Similarly, while abnormal patterns of either fasting or postprandial motility were common in the diabetic patients, manometry had a sensitivity of only 67% in comparison to the less invasive radionuclide gastric emptying study. Furthermore, manometry failed to identify any diagnostic abnormality in irritable bowel patients; in particular, the incidence of "clustered" contractions was similar in all three groups. We conclude that short duration antroduodenal manometry is of limited diagnostic usefulness due to the difficulties in pyloric intubation in the presence of a dilated stomach and the intrinsic variability in normal motor patterns, perhaps excerbated by the stressful effects of the procedure itself in tube-naive subjects.
Prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure monitors are being developed to evaluate noncardiac chest pain. This new technology needs comparison with conventional esophageal tests before determining which studies are most useful in diagnosing and treating esophageal chest pain. Therefore, we studied 45 patients with esophageal manometry, acid perfusion and edrophonium tests, and 24 hr pH and pressure monitoring. Manometry was abnormal in 20 patients (44%) with nutcracker esophagus, the most common motility disorder. Fifteen (33%) had positive acid perfusion test and 24 (55%) positive edrophonium test. During ambulatory monitoring, all patients experienced chest pain with a total of 202 individual events: 32 events (15%) secondary to acid reflux, 15 (7%) secondary to motility abnormalities, 7 (3%) to both pH and pressure changes, and 149 events (74%) occurred in the absence of any abnormal pH or motility changes. Patients with normal manometry were significantly (P less than 0.01) more likely to have acid reflux chest pain events than did nutcracker patients, who had an equal frequency of pH and motility events. A positive acid perfusion test was significantly associated with abnormal pressure events (P = 0.02; odds ratio 5.95), while a positive edrophonium test more likely predicted acid reflux chest pain during 24-hr monitoring (P = 0.007; odds ratio 7.25). Therefore, abnormal manometry and positive provocative tests point to the esophagus as the likely source of chest pain. However, ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring are required to accurately define the relationship between chest pain and acid reflux or motility disorders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Radiography and manometry of the esophagus were compared in 77 patients consecutively referred for manometric investigation on suspicion of esophageal motility disorder. Radiography and manometry were carried out simultaneously, and the results were assessed blindly. The examination comprised barium swallow, bread barium swallow, and barium swilling. Considering manometry as the standard, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the radiologic examinations were 90.4% and 92.0%, respectively. We conclude that radiology is an excellent investigation for the separation of patients with and without esophageal motility disorders, but correct subclassification often required manometry.