PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Max Planck Society”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

[The history of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society during the Third Reich. Interim reports of the president's commission of the Max Planck Society].

In 1997 the Max Planck Society set up a presidential commission to do research on the historical development of its precursor organization, the Kaiser Wilhelm Society (KWG), during the Third Reich. This paper presents some of the important results given in the interim reports of this commission that are relevant to psychiatry. It focuses on brain research, anthropology, psychiatric genetics, and the role of the well-known biochemist Adolf Butenandt. In general, the interim reports reflect the numerous links between the biomedical research of the KWG and the institutions of the National Socialist (Nazi) state. However, they do not yet allow a final historical assessment as to the complex situation of this field of research during National Socialism.

Academies and Institutes↗

[Klaus Joachim Zülch: Partner to neurosurgery, advocate of neurology and the neuropathological basis].

Klaus Joachim Zülch (1910-1988) since 1959 head of a department of the german Max-Planck-Society, deeply influenced the neurological sciences in post-war Germany. The department with the name Abteilung für allgemeine Neurologie (i.e. department of general neurology) constituted a section of the renowned Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung (i.e. institute for brain research) and found its place in Cologne. At the same time he was in charge of the local neurology unit of the municipal Cologne hospital, on the right Rhine riverside in Köln (Cologne) Merheim. In this double position he was able to focus his work as a neurologist on the major issues of this specialty, that at this time were not in the center of neurological interest: The connection of basic science i.e. morphology with important themes such as raised intracranial pressure, brain swelling and edema, brain and spinal chord circulation disturbances, head injuries and - in the first line - tumors of the central nervous system. This broad approach to essential issues in the field was probably due to his upbringing in german neurological tradition. His first contact with this specialty took place in Otfrid Foersters neurological clinic in Breslau, today in Poland, before World War II. Otfrid Foerster, a neurological encyclopedist, exerted a deep influence upon Klaus Joachim Zülch lifelong. Here he also came in contact with Percieval Bailey with whom he shared the obsession to classify brain tumors since then. This preoccupation became fruitful when he started collaboration with Wilhelm Tönnis 1936 at the time still in Würzburg. The collaboration continued, when Tönnis moved to Berlin, during and after World War II up to 1959, when Klaus Joachim Zülch became head of the mentioned department of the german Max-Planck-society. At this time, important contributions already existed concerning brain injuries, brain edema and tumor classification. The couple Wilhelm Tönnis and Klaus Joachim Zülch may well be compared to the team formed by Harvey Cushing and Percieval Bailey. Their respective philosophies were equally identical, namely to classify tumors of the central nervous system through a pragmatic approach that would facilitate the communication between neuropathologist, neurosurgeon, neurologist and of course be ultimately as helpful as possible to the patient. Since 1959 Zülchs research turned to the topics of brain hypoxia, circulatory disturbances and stroke, notwithstanding that his interest remained with the other items, whenever new or old questions came up. The occupation with tumors became even once more intense when the WHO installed a reference center for brain tumor classification at his place in Cologne. In the new field of brain circulation, Klaus Joachim Zülch tried once again to bring basic science and clinical practise together and to draw the neurologists attention upon these frequent and important conditions, a development that gained increasing importance under the heading of "stroke unit" in our days. Klaus Joachim Zülch therefore may be regarded as neurologist ahead of his time trying to cover the epidemiologically important and frequent themes and establishing equal partnership with neurosurgery The connection with the scientific basis, i.e. morphology in different variations at the time under a common roof was crucial in his understanding of the work as neurologist.

Brain Diseases↗

As a guest of the Chinese Academy in Peking and Shanghai.

At the invitation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Academia Sinica) the President and seven members of the Max-Planck Society visited the People's Republic of China in April 1974. Their aim was to become acquainted with the scientific activities at the institutes of the Academy in Peking and Shanghai. They also established contact with the University of Peking. In the course of the visit, the Academia Sinica and the Max-Planck Society agreed to have a regular exchange of scientists in future.

Academies and Institutes↗

German science. Max Planck charts new path.

Germany's premier basic research organization, the Max Planck Society, released a long-awaited blueprint for change during its annual meeting this week, recommending that the society's nearly 3000 scientists embrace more interdisciplinary and international projects in a range of new research priorities. The report, called Max Planck 2000-Plus, is the product of an 18-month-long internal review. Its recommendations were formulated by some two dozen Max Planck researchers and administrators, who sought input from every institute.

Academies and Institutes↗

History of the German Cardiac Society (DGHKF).

1927 Foundation of the DGHKF by Prof. A. Weber and Prof. B. Kisch in Bad Nauheim. The first executive board of the DGHKF consists of A. Weber, Bad Nauheim, H. E. Hering, Köln, J. Rihl, Prag, B. Kisch, Köln, and H. Eppinger, Freiburg. Registered office was William-G. Kerckhoff-Herzforschungsinstitut, Bad Nauheim, under direction of Prof. F. Groedel. 1933 Emigration of F. Groedel to the United States of America. 1933-1941 Prof. E. Koch becomes acting chairman but Groedel remains director and influences fate and finances from his New York domicile and practice. 1938 Emigration of B. Kisch to the United States of America. 1948 Foundation of the "American College of Cardiology" in the United States. (Executive board: Groedel and Kisch). 1948 Prof. H. Schäfer is the new executive secretary of the society (executive board: K. Matthes, Erlangen, F. Hildebrandt, Bad Nauheim/Giessen, C. Oelemann, Bad Nauheim, A. Weber, Bad Nauheim, E. Wollheim, Lund). 1952 Incorporation of the Kerckhoff-Institute into the Max-Planck-Society, Appointment of Prof. R. Thauer to the directorship of the Kerckhoff-Institute and election to the position of the executive secretary until 1976. 1972 Appointment of Prof. W. Schaper to the Kerckhoff-Institute, Bad Nauheim. 1976 Election of Prof. Wolfgang Schaper to the executive board of the society and assumption of the office of the executive secretary until 1989.

Cardiology↗

Apologizing for the past: German science and Nazi medicine.

Recently, religious organisations, governments and public institutions have begun to offer apologies for historical wrongs. Can they legitimately do so? Departing from the tendency, Professor Hubert Markl, President of the Max Planck Society, has offered strong reasons for not apologizing for the crimes of medical scientists who experimented on human subjects during the Nazi era. He argues that only the perpetrators can meaningfully apologize. Markl's position is considered and rejected in favour of the view that apologies by proxy for historical wrongs are justifiable and should be made by institutions that have the authority to do so.

Compensation and Redress↗