PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Medicaid”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Differences in the obstetric malpractice claims filed by Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients.

BACKGROUND: Many physicians believe Medicaid patients are more likely than non-Medicaid patients to file malpractice claims. This study examines the accuracy of this belief in regard to obstetric malpractice claims. METHODS: Claims filed between January 1982 and June 1988 from the major malpractice insurer in Washington State were used to compare obstetric malpractice claims filed on behalf of Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients. RESULTS: Eleven percent (7/62) of all closed obstetric claims were filed by Medicaid patients, whereas 19 percent of all births in Washington State were to Medicaid patients between 1982 and 1988. Failure to diagnose or treat a fetal condition was the most commonly alleged negligence in both Medicaid and non-Medicaid groups. Most claims in both groups were settled before the cases went to court; a substantial minority of claims were dropped. The mean cost of Medicaid claims ($406,984) was three times that of non-Medicaid claims ($133,743), suggesting that paid Medicaid claims were more severe than paid non-Medicaid claims. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients appear no more likely to file obstetric malpractice claims than non-Medicaid patients. The low likelihood of filing claims, coupled with large settlements, suggests that Medicaid patients may have less access to legal services than non-Medicaid patients.

Female↗
PubMed1979

Comparing the medical utilization and expenditures of low income health plan enrollees with Medicaid recipients and with low income enrollees having Medicaid eligibility.

The study examines the medical care (hospital, physician, drug, diagnostic) utilization and expenditures of low income persons enrolled in a prepaid health plan with a matched group of Medicaid recipients. The study also examines the medical care utilization of low income persons enrolled in a prepaid health plan with a similar group of low income persons enrolled in the health plan but also eligible for Medicaid benefits. Utilization and population-at-risk data were obtained from the Kaiser-Permanente Medical Care Program of Portland, Oregon and from the State of Oregon Welfare Division. A hypothesis of lower hospital utilization by low income enrollees compared with Medicaid recipients was accepted. A hypothesis of higher ambulatory care utilization was accepted for diagnostic procedures and prescription use, but rejected for office visit utilization. An analysis of the findings appeared to implicate the Medicaid program for differences observed. The hypotheses of no significant differences in inpatient and ambulatory medical care utilization of low income health plan enrollees with and without Medicaid eligibility were generally rejected. Low income enrollees with concurrent Medicaid had consistently higher utilization rates for all services resulting in substantially higher medical care expenditures per person. The findings appear to contribute some useful information to planning or establishing policy for Medicaid Prepayment programs or other programs enrolling low income persons in prepaid health plans or HMOs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

Optometric prescribing patterns: a quality comparison of Medicaid and non-Medicaid practitioners.

This study analyzes five variables related to quality and utilization of optometric prescribing of eyeglasses. The practices of optometrists participating in the New York City Medicaid Program were compared with those not participating. The variables chosen for this study can be analyzed by computer and seem to have wide applicability for monitoring of optometry services. Significant differences were found in four of the five variables under review. Overall, non-Medicaid patients appear to be receiving higher quality optometric care and less unnecessary care. Many of these differences, however, depend on the setting of the practice-whether solo, group, or corporate. Of additional note, wide variations occurred in the patterns of practice for non-Medicaid, as well as Medicaid, optometrists.

Eyeglasses↗
PubMed1991

Medical malpractice claims filed by Medicaid and non-Medicaid recipients in Maryland.

Several databases available in Maryland are used to investigate whether Medicaid recipients are more likely than other persons to engage in medical malpractice litigation. All malpractice claims filed during 1985 and 1986 (N = 1037) were updated for outcomes through 1989 and described with regard to the payer status of claimants. The proportion of claims filed by persons enrolled in Medicaid before and/or during the alleged malpractice incident was lower than the proportion of state residents enrolled in Medicaid. In addition, the proportion of obstetric claims filed by Medicaid recipients was identical to their proportion of hospital discharges for obstetric services during the period in which the incidents occurred.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1991

Nursing home costs, Medicaid rates, and profits under alternative Medicaid payment systems.

This analysis compares nursing home costs, Medicaid payment rates, and profits under three Medicaid nursing home payment systems: case-mix, facility-specific, and class-rate systems. Data used were collected from 135 nursing homes in seven states. The association of case mix with costs, rates, and profits under the three payment systems was of particular interest. Case mix was more strongly associated (positively) with patient care cost and the Medicaid rate for the case-mix systems than for the other systems, particularly the class-rate systems. In contrast, case mix and profits were not associated in the case-mix or facility-specific systems, but were negatively associated in the class rate systems. Overall, the results suggest that case-mix systems have some important advantages over other payment systems, but further research is needed on larger samples and involving the newer case-mix systems.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Factors associated with pediatricians' participation in Medicaid in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relative importance of factors influencing pediatricians' participation in Medicaid in North Carolina. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nonacademic primary care pediatricians in direct patient care at least 50% of the time; 332 (85%) of the 389 eligible pediatricians responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of pediatricians who restricted Medicaid patients' access to their practices. The association between restricting access and the following factors was assessed: Medicaid reimbursement, pediatricians' demographic characteristics, knowledge of the Medicaid program, attitudes toward Medicaid patients and the Medicaid program, and beliefs about whether other physicians were available to care for Medicaid patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of pediatricians restricted Medicaid patients' access to their practices. The proportion of pediatricians restricting access was 62% in cities, 13% in medium-sized towns, and 12% in small towns (P less than .001), but the proportion of pediatricians in cities who restricted access varied from 87% to 22%. Pediatricians who received a higher proportion of their usual fee were less likely to restrict Medicaid patients' access. The relationship between Medicaid payment and restricted access was substantially weakened after controlling for the following factors: (1) the size of the community, (2) pediatricians' attitudes toward Medicaid payment, (3) their perceptions that they were too busy to care for Medicaid patients, and (4) whether there were other resources for the care of Medicaid patients. At comparable levels of payment, rural pediatricians were about six times less likely than urban pediatricians to restrict access. Pediatricians who knew less about Medicaid reimbursement also restricted access more often. Whether or not they restricted access to new Medicaid patients, pediatricians provided acute, preventive, hospital, and emergency care to the Medicaid patients who were already in their practices. CONCLUSIONS: Existing resources for the care of Medicaid patients, pediatricians' economic dependence on Medicaid, and the local norms of practice may be important factors in pediatricians' decision to participate in Medicaid. Increasing reimbursement will have only modest effects on Medicaid participation. Strategies to improve participation should also address pediatricians' knowledge of the Medicaid program and enlist the support of community physicians.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1979

Physician participation in Medicaid: evidence from California.

The objective of this paper is to investigate physician participation in the Medicaid program. In particular, how sensitive is the physician's involvement with Medicaid to variations in Medicaid reimbursements? How important are fee levels in the private market? What is the impact of inflation on the costs of physicians' inputs, particularly if the Medicaid fee remains relatively constant? These questions are explored through an empirical analysis fo data from the California Medicaid program. Two aspects of physician participation form the focus of the study: 1) the percentage of physicians participating in Medicaid in a given county and 2) the average number of nonaged, Medicaid patients treated by each participating physician. Information on these variables and on Medicaid fees and private charges come from Medicare and Medicaid claims records for more than 3,000 physicians. The most significant result of the study is the reaffirmation of the importance of the amounts of both private charges and Medicaid payments in determining participation rates and average Medicaid case loads per participating physician. Both dependent variables are, as expected, inversely related to physicians' average billed revenue per patient and are positively related to average Medicaid payments per patient. In addition, it appears that the long-run impact of a change in billed revenue is significantly larger in absolute value than a corresponding change in the amount that Medicaid is willing to pay.

California↗
PubMed1991

The adequacy of physician reimbursement for pediatric care under Medicaid.

This article examines 1989 Medicaid physician reimbursement for pediatric care in 47 states and the District of Columbia. To assess the adequacy of payment, several state reimbursement policies were analyzed, including physician payment methods, frequency of payment updates, and fee data for five common evaluation and management codes and two Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment visit categories. Physician payment rates were evaluated to determine overall state and regional patterns of Medicaid reimbursement. They were also compared with regional private market fee data and average national Medicare fees to assess their adequacy. The majority of state Medicaid programs used fixed fee schedules as their physician reimbursement method. Nearly one fourth of states that update their fees overall by physician specialty have not adjusted their rates since 1985 or before. Medicaid reimbursement rates for five commonly used evaluation and management Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (4th ed) office visit codes and Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment screening and follow-up examinations varied substantially across states and among regions. States in the West paid the highest rates for most office visits, while Northeastern states generally paid the least. A comparison of Medicaid payment rates with private market fee data revealed that Medicaid payments for established patients averaged less than two thirds of market rates for pediatricians, family physicians, and general practitioners. New patient care is reimbursed somewhat better. Regional variations are substantial. In addition, a comparison of Medicaid payment rates with 1988 Medicare fee data showed that average Medicaid reimbursement rates were less than four fifths of average allowed Medicare charges. Policy implications include the need to increase Medicaid rates so that they are much closer to private insurance and Medicare rates, particularly in the Northeast and in selected states, in order to increase participation by pediatric providers in Medicaid. In addition, efforts to re-evaluate reimbursement relative to level of service, as used in Medicare's resource-based relative value scales, deserve further research. Finally, comparable access to comprehensive pediatric care especially in underserved urban areas will require not only improvements in physician reimbursement but also more deliberate efforts to affect the maldistribution of mainstream medical care. Approaches to measure the impact of enhanced reimbursement on access to care by Medicaid-eligible children are discussed.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed1990

Spend-down of assets before Medicaid eligibility among elderly nursing-home recipients in Michigan.

Many elderly persons enter nursing homes as private pay clients, spend their available life savings, and then apply for medical assistance under Medicaid after their assets are depleted. However, reliable data on the size and characteristics of this "spend-down" population have been lacking. This study used Medicaid claims and enrollment data to identify the proportion of elderly Medicaid nursing-home users who originally entered nursing homes as private pay clients versus those eligible for Medicaid before or concurrent with, their nursing-home admission. The study population consisted of all elderly nursing-home users receiving Medicaid in Michigan in 1984, a total of 36,898 unduplicated recipients. Findings indicated that "spend-downers" comprised 27.2% of all elderly users. Once on Medicaid, spend downers exhibited similar nursing-home utilization patterns as other groups, but incurred lower Medicaid claims because they contributed more to the cost of their nursing-home care. In aggregate, the State of Michigan Medicaid program spent $75.4 million on nursing-home services in 1984 for elderly persons who spent down to eligibility in a nursing home. These data are relevant to state policy initiatives to reduce Medicaid spending for nursing-home care by encouraging potential spend downers to purchase long-term care insurance.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Participation of Colorado pediatricians and family physicians in the Medicaid program.

The Pediatric Health Policy Group of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver) surveyed 650 family physicians and 296 pediatricians in 1988, with 50% of family physicians and 48% of pediatricians responding. Half of the pediatricians in private practice and 35% of family physicians in private practice accepted all children who were Medicaid beneficiaries into their practice; 42% of pediatricians and 50% of family physicians accepted all non-Medicaid patients but only some new Medicaid patients; and 8% of pediatricians and 15% of family physicians accepted new non-Medicaid patients but no Medicaid patients. Practice location was associated with the level of Medicaid participation for these primary care physicians: Significantly more rural pediatricians and family physicians than those with urban practices accepted Medicaid patients. The average reimbursement level for these physicians was shown to be an important determinant of whether physicians would accept Medicaid patients. Nonparticipatory physicians were more concerned about excessive paperwork compared with physicians with limited participation. Among physicians with limited participation, family physicians and pediatricians both cited problems of excessive paperwork, reimbursement delays, and retroactive denials of payment as important deterrents to accepting Medicaid patients.

Colorado↗
PubMed1991

Obstetric care, Medicaid, and family physicians. How policy changes affect physicians' attitudes.

Recent expansion of Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women and increased reimbursement to physicians who provide perinatal services were designed to improve access to care. Family physicians provide a relatively high proportion of care to pregnant women on Medicaid, especially in rural areas. We surveyed all family physicians who provide obstetric services in 26 northern California counties regarding these changes and perceived barriers to providing obstetric care to women on Medicaid. Of surveyed physicians who limited the number of their Medicaid obstetric patients, 58% stated that recent Medicaid policy changes had increased their willingness to accept new Medicaid obstetric patients. Despite these policy changes, administrative issues and poor reimbursement were cited as the two most notable barriers to providing obstetric care to women on Medicaid. Fear of being sued by Medicaid patients is still seen as a barrier by physicians who have recently discontinued practicing obstetrics and by those who continue to care for a large number of Medicaid obstetric patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1991

Medicaid eligibility patterns for persons with AIDS in California and New York, 1982-1987.

An analysis of Medicaid eligibility patterns for persons with AIDS (PWAs) was conducted, based on the longitudinal Medicaid eligibility histories of 1,314 AIDS decedents in California and 6,273 AIDS decedents in New York between 1982 and 1987. The study analyzed what eligibility groups or categories and which financial standards PWAs were using to qualify for Medicaid. States have many options with regard to the categories of people they cover under Medicaid and where they set their financial thresholds. The study findings are useful in showing how these policy decisions affect PWAs. A major conclusion of the study is the importance of medically needy coverage for PWAs. Medically needy coverage, which is optional to states, opens up Medicaid to persons of any income level, assuming their medical expenses are high enough. The study also found that PWAs who qualify only through the medically needy provisions have much shorter enrollment and lower lifetime Medicaid expenditures than other PWAs on Medicaid. Presumably, most medically needy only enrollees have other sources of health care coverage in the early stages of the illness. Study data also suggested significant administrative obstacles for PWAs in dealing with the Medicaid eligibility process. Finally, an unexpected study result was that all states may not be aggressively utilizing federal Medicaid financing options for covering the medical assistance expenditures for a significant proportion of the low-income AIDS population.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1991

Physician participation in Medicaid revisited.

Medicaid cut-backs during the Reagan Administration may have combined with other factors to affect physicians' willingness to participate in Medicaid. The author analyzed participation rates for two comparable groups of physicians: one group surveyed in 1977-78 and the other surveyed in 1984-85. Over this time period, there was a small, but statistically significant, decline in Medicaid participation rates (from 12.1-9.5%). Regression analysis showed, however, that physicians remain sensitive to important policy variables, such as fee levels and eligibility criteria. Physicians treat significantly more Medicaid patients when Medicaid fees are relatively high and when there is a relatively large number of people eligible for Medicaid in their area. These findings reinforce recent Congressional mandates to expand Medicaid eligibility and to raise payment levels for obstetric and pediatric services. Increased participation on the part of urban physicians, however, may be limited by the residential segregation of many Medicaid eligible people in the inner city.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1992

Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

BACKGROUND: To control rising costs, state Medicaid agencies are enrolling recipients in managed care health plans (MCPs). We performed this study to assess this policy's impact on accessibility and outcomes of Medicaid-funded prenatal care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, controlled study with three cohorts: a study group of 1106 Medicaid recipients enrolled in three MCPs, a matched comparison group of 4830 recipients receiving care in the fee-for-service (FFS) system, and a second matched comparison group of 4434 non-Medicaid enrollees of the same MCPs. Data on prenatal care use and birth outcomes were obtained through linkage of claims and discharge files with birth certificate files. RESULTS: Medicaid recipients enrolled in MCPs used prenatal care similarly to those in the FFS system and showed equal or modestly improved birth-weight distributions. However, Medicaid MCP enrollees showed poorer use of prenatal care and birth outcomes compared with non-Medicaid enrollees of the same plans. CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in MCPs has a neutral or small beneficial effect on the prenatal care received by the Medicaid population. However, providing financial access and modifying the system of care for this population did not result in parity with the general population.

Birth Certificates↗
PubMed1992

Professional liability reform and access to Medicaid obstetric care in New York State.

Professional liability costs and fear of lawsuits have made participation in Medicaid difficult for office-based physicians who provide prenatal care, both obstetricians and family physicians. We assessed the possible impact of changes in three liability policy reforms on expanding access of Medicaid-eligible pregnant women to these private physicians. We surveyed members of the New York State District of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the New York Academy of Family Physicians to explore whether they would start, expand, or resume obstetric service to Medicaid patients in response to a ceiling on litigation awards, no-fault insurance and a subsidy for liability expenses. We then compared the reported increases in participation on the basis of liability reforms to those in response to changes in Medicaid policies. We found in general that the three liability reforms would have similar impacts on Medicaid participation, although a subsidy was indicated by fewer physicians than the ceiling or no-fault approaches. The support for the liability reforms was as effective as proposals of greater reimbursement rates. The proportion of obstetricians or family physicians increasing their participation depended more on whether they would be starting Medicaid participation, expanding existing Medicaid participation or resuming former Medicaid participation than on the particular liability policy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1991

Medicaid beneficiaries under managed care: provider choice and satisfaction.

This study describes patterns of choosing a provider and of consumer satisfaction among prepaid Medicaid beneficiaries in Monroe County, New York, and compares their level of satisfaction to that of fee-for-service Medicaid beneficiaries. Two interview surveys were conducted with AFDC and HR (general assistance) Medicaid eligibles, the first under the fee-for-service system servicing the Medicaid population, and the second 18 months after the introduction of a mandatory, prepaid managed care system for Medicaid beneficiaries. The results show significant ethnic differences in patient choice of provider and provider site. Given the choice, Medicaid beneficiaries switch from clinics as their usual source of care to private physician practice. Under prepayment, white Medicaid beneficiaries tripled their affiliations with private doctors, while "others" doubled theirs. The results also demonstrate higher levels of patient satisfaction with "humaneness of doctors" and with "quality of care" among those beneficiaries under prepaid care, than previously documented for those under fee-for-service. The evaluations of humaneness and quality of medical system may reflect the respondents' perceptions that the process of receiving care under prepaid, managed care is somehow different, no longer second class, and better that it was under the fee-for-service Medicaid.

Adolescent↗