PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Mesalamine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

An oral preparation of mesalamine as long-term maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The Mesalamine Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of a pH-sensitive, polymer-coated oral formulation of mesalamine (Asacol, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Cincinnati, Ohio) with those of placebo in maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Eight private practices, five university-based medical centers, and four hospitals or clinics. PATIENTS: 264 patients with ulcerative colitis that had been maintained in remission for at least 1 month while the patients were receiving stable doses of sulfasalazine or any oral mesalamine product. INTERVENTION: Coated mesalamine at oral dosages of 0.8 g/d or 1.6 g/d or matching placebo for 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Treatment success, defined as maintenance of remission after 6 months, and treatment failure, defined as relapse during the study (as indicated by proctosigmoidoscopy at 1, 3, or 6 months of treatment) or withdrawal due to adverse events. Safety was assessed on the basis of laboratory analyses and patient- and investigator-noted adverse events. RESULTS: 189 patients were compliant with the protocol for 6 months or stopped receiving therapy because of relapse or adverse events. Of these 189 patients, 25 of the 63 patients (39.7%) in the placebo group had treatment success compared with 40 of the 68 patients (58.8% [95% CI, 46.4% to 71.3%]) in the group receiving mesalamine, 0.8 g/d (P = 0.036) and 38 of the 58 patients (65.5% [CI, 52.4% to 78.6%]) in the group receiving mesalamine, 1.6 g/d (P = 0.006). In the intention-to-treat analysis of all patients, 42 of the 87 patients (48.3%) in the placebo group had treatment success compared with 57 of the 90 patients (63.3% [CI, 52.8% to 73.8%]) in the group receiving mesalamine, 0.8 g/d (P = 0.050) and 61 of the 87 patients (70.1% [CI, 59.9% to 80.3%]) in the group receiving mesalamine, 1.6 g/d (P = 0.005). Age, sex, and race were not found to predict treatment success or failure. The mesalamine tablet was well tolerated, and no clinically significant changes were seen in hematologic, hepatic, or renal laboratory profiles. CONCLUSION: Coated mesalamine at oral dosages of 0.8 g/d and 1.6 g/d is safe and effective in maintaining remission in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Distal ulcerative colitis refractory to rectal mesalamine: role of transdermal nicotine versus oral mesalamine.

BACKGROUND: Distal ulcerative colitis usually responds to treatment with rectal mesalamine, but the management of refractory cases is poorly defined. AIM: To evaluate the possible therapeutic benefit of transdermal nicotine versus oral mesalamine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis unresponsive to treatment with a mesalamine 4 g enema at bedtime were randomly allocated to additional therapy with either transdermal nicotine 15 mg daily or oral mesalamine 800 mg tid for four weeks. Clinical remission was evaluated by Rachmilewitz's activity index and confirmed by sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Remission was observed in 12 of 15 patients receiving additional treatment with nicotine and in five of 15 patients receiving additional treatment with oral mesalamine (P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of transdermal nicotine to treatment with mesalamine enemas is significantly superior to combined therapy with oral and rectal mesalamine in patients with distal ulcerative colitis refractory to rectal mesalamine alone.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1997

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of mesalamine in the maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease. The Canadian Mesalamine for Remission of Crohn's Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of mesalamine for the maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease is controversial. The aim of this study was to conduct a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of mesalamine (750 mg four times a day for 48 weeks) in maintaining remission in 293 patients with Crohn's disease. Patients were stratified according to the method of induction of remission (medical or surgical). METHODS: Patients were assessed at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Relapse was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index of >150 (+60 points over baseline). RESULTS: Of the 293 patients, 246 (84%) returned for at least 4 weeks of follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Thirty of the 118 (25%) who received mesalamine had a relapse compared with 47 of 128 (36%) receiving placebo (P = 0.056). Among those with relapse, the time to relapse was 119 days for the mesalamine-treated patients compared with 109 days for placebo-treated patients (P = NS). However, 25% of mesalamine-treated patients had relapsed by 249 days of follow-up compared with 154 days for placebo-treated patients. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with ileocecal-colonic disease or patients who were women had fewer relapses on mesalamine therapy than placebo-treated patients (21% vs. 41%, P = 0.018; and 19% vs. 41%, P = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine treatment reduced relapse compared with placebo treatment, although conventional statistical significance was not achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of budesonide and mesalamine for active Crohn's disease. International Budesonide-Mesalamine Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease is often treated with glucocorticoids or mesalamine. We compared the efficacy and safety of controlled-ileal-release budesonide capsules and slow-release mesalamine tablets in patients with active Crohn's disease affecting the ileum, the ascending colon, or both. METHODS: In a double-blind, multicenter trial, we enrolled 182 patients with scores of 200 to 400 on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (with higher scores indicating greater disease activity) and randomly assigned 93 to receive 9 mg of budesonide once daily and 89 to receive 2 g of mesalamine twice daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was clinical remission, defined as a score of 150 or less on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index. RESULTS: In the analysis of all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, the rates of remission after 8 weeks of treatment were 69 percent in the budesonide group and 45 percent in the mesalamine group (P=0.001); the respective rates after 16 weeks of treatment were 62 percent and 36 percent (P<0.001). Seventy-seven patients in the budesonide group completed the 16 weeks of treatment, as compared with 50 patients in the mesalamine group (P<0.001). The numbers of patients with adverse events were similar in the two groups, but those assigned to budesonide had fewer severe adverse events. Among patients who completed 16 weeks of treatment, the morning plasma cortisol value was normal in 67 percent of budesonide-treated patients and 83 percent of mesalamine-treated patients (P=0.06); 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively, had normal increases in cortisol in response to cosyntropin (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active Crohn's disease affecting the ileum, the ascending colon, or both, a controlled-ileal-release formulation of budesonide was more effective in inducing remission than a slow-release formulation of mesalamine.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Mesalamine in the treatment of mild to moderate active Crohn's ileitis: results of a randomized, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine) in the treatment of flare-ups of Crohn's disease is controversial. In previous studies, different locations and pathological behavior of Crohn's disease could have obscured the efficacy of these drugs that deliver their substance in different intestinal sites. The present study tested two different mesalamine formulations with 6-methylprednisolone in mild to moderate active Crohn's ileitis. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with Crohn's ileitis (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI], 180-350) were randomly assigned to receive for 12 weeks mesalamine tablets, 4 g (35 patients); mesalamine microgranular preparation, 4 g (28 patients); and 6-methylprednisolone, 40 mg (31 patients). Mesalamine microgranular preparation was a gelatin capsule containing 400 mg of mesalamine microgranules coated with Eudragit S, which has been shown to deliver the drug in the terminal ileum. RESULTS: Patients taking mesalamine tablets experienced a decrease of CDAI median score value of 113.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 33-149) compared with 123 (95% CI, 77-155) in the mesalamine microgranular group and 154 (95% CI, 99-197) in the 6-methylprednisolone group (P = 0.07 [NS]). Remission at the final visit occurred in 19 of 31 (61%) patients taking steroids compared with 21 of 35 (60%) patients taking mesalamine tablets and 22 of 28 (79%) patients taking microgranular mesalamine (NS). Five patients on steroids were withdrawn because of side effects, and a case of pancreatitis was related to microgranular mesalamine. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine in microgranular formulation seems to be equally as effective as a standard dosage of steroids in the treatment of the mild to moderate form of Crohn's ileitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A double-blind comparison of oral versus rectal mesalamine versus combination therapy in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mesalamine rectal suspension enema (Rowasa) alone, oral mesalamine tablets (Asacol) alone, and the combination of mesalamine enema and mesalamine tablets in patients with active mild-to-moderate distal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Sixty outpatients with ulcerative colitis at least 5 cm above the anal verge and not more than 50 cm, inclusive, and a total disease activity index (DAI) score between 4 and 10, inclusive, were randomized to either mesalamine rectal enema (n = 18) once nightly, oral mesalamine 2.4 g/day (n = 22), or a combination of both treatments (n = 20). Placebo capsules and enemas were used to maintain a blind procedure. Total DAI scores and abbreviated DAI scores were evaluated at wk 3 and 6, and wk 1 and 2, respectively. Patients recorded the amount of blood in stools, urgency, straining at stools, and abdominal pain in daily diaries. Physicians and patients rated overall improvement at each visit. RESULTS: At wk 6, combination therapy produced a greater improvement (-5.2) in total DAI scores than did either mesalamine enema (-4.4) or mesalamine tablet (-3.9) therapy alone; similar treatment differences were observed at wk 3. Compared with patients given mesalamine enemas or mesalamine tablets, combination-therapy patients reported an absence of blood in stools significantly sooner and, at all visits, the combination therapy group had the highest percentage of patients who reported no blood in their stools. Physicians' and patients' ratings of improvement indicated that combination therapy significantly improved disease status, compared with mesalamine tablet therapy alone. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oral and rectal mesalamine therapy was well tolerated and produced earlier and more complete relief of rectal bleeding than oral or rectal therapy alone.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Enhanced anti-inflammatory effects of a nitric oxide-releasing derivative of mesalamine in rats.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nitric oxide (NO)-releasing derivatives of cyclooxygenase inhibitors exhibit enhanced anti-inflammatory activity and greatly reduced gastrointestinal toxicity. We evaluated whether a similar derivatization of mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid) would improve its anti-inflammatory activity. METHODS: Effects of an NO-releasing derivative of mesalamine (NCX-456; NO-mesalamine) were compared with those of mesalamine itself and 2 other NO donors in a rat model of colitis. These drugs were compared for their ability to inhibit leukocyte adherence to the vascular endothelium in vivo, interleukin (IL)-1beta and interferon (IFN)-gamma release in vitro (splenocytes and colon), and messenger RNA expression in the inflamed colon. RESULTS: NO-mesalamine was significantly more effective than mesalamine in reducing the severity of colitis (damage and granulocyte infiltration). Unlike mesalamine, NO-mesalamine significantly suppressed leukocyte adherence to the vascular endothelium in vivo. NO-mesalamine inhibited IL-1beta and IFN-gamma release and caspase 1 activity in splenocytes; such effects were not found in the inflamed colon. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that an NO-releasing derivative of mesalamine has significantly enhanced anti-inflammatory activity, including improved efficacy in a rat model of colitis. The improved efficacy of this derivative is most likely caused by its enhanced ability to suppress leukocyte infiltration and possibly to scavenge peroxynitrite.

Aminosalicylic Acids↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bioavailability of single and multiple doses of enteric-coated mesalamine and sulphasalazine.

The bioavailibity of mesalamine from enteric-coated mesalamine and sulphasalazine was determined following a single dose and at steady state in healthy subjects in crossover studies. Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of mesalamine and its major metabolite, N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, were measured. After a single dose of enteric-coated mesalamine, about 10 h elapsed before the onset of measurable plasma drug concentrations, probably representing gastro-intestinal transit prior to drug release near the ileocaecal junction. The elimination kinetics were similar for a single oral dose and steady state using enteric-coated mesalamine, but after both single and multiple administration of enteric-coated mesalamine only about 20% of the mesalamine given was absorbed, with about 80% estimated to remain for colon therapeutic activity. It is concluded that, despite different mechanisms of mesalamine release, enteric-coated mesalamine and sulphasalazine produced similar mesalamine absorption.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Exacerbation of chronic ulcerative colitis with mesalamine.

Activation of ulcerative colitis with mesalamine has rarely been reported. In case 1, a 34-year-old man was treated with oral mesalamine, resulting in an exacerbation of colitis that rapidly improved with glucocorticoids and mesalamine withdrawal. Oral cromolyn sodium and occasional low-dose prednisone therapy has maintained long-term remission. In case 2, a 28-year-old man receiving prednisone treatment developed chest pain and myalgias 1 week after initiation of mesalamine that resolved on mesalamine withdrawal. A lower dose of mesalamine with continued glucocorticoids resulted in clinical improvement, and both drugs were tapered. Mesalamine sensitivity was documented endoscopically and histologically by evaluating mucosal changes after two mesalamine enemas during a 24-hour period. There was dramatic progression from quiescent disease to active colitis in 24 hours. Mesalamine sensitivity must be included in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative colitis exacerbations. Concurrent steroid therapy can suppress systemic side effects, making the diagnosis even more elusive.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Delivery and fate of oral mesalamine microgranules within the human small intestine.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oral use of mesalamine in inflammatory bowel disease requires slow-release preparations to prevent premature absorption and inactivation. Resulting luminal concentrations within the human small intestine are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine human intestinal delivery patterns of mesalamine from a microgranule preparation (Pentasa; Ferring Arzeimittel, Kiel, Germany) effective in Crohn's disease with small bowel involvement. METHODS: A multilumen tube for duodenal, jejunal, and ileal aspiration and marker perfusion was placed in 6 normal subjects. Levels of luminal, plasma, and urinary mesalamine and its main metabolite, acetyl mesalamine, were measured for 7 hours after ingestion of mesalamine (500 mg) with a labeled meal. RESULTS: Gastric emptying of mesalamine paralleled the meal, and its release occurred throughout the small intestine (cumulative, 20% of dose). For 4 hours, mean luminal mesalamine and acetyl mesalamine concentrations were 52 and 38 micrograms/mL (duodenum), 59 and 82 micrograms/mL (jejunum), and 64 and 104 micrograms/mL (ileum). Cumulative colonic delivery was 82% (7% dissolved, 75% in microgranules), and urinary excretion was 3.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the major part of continuous-release mesalamine is delivered to the colon, large proportions are liberated and available at high concentrations within the small intestinal lumen, thus explaining its therapeutic efficacy in small intestinal Crohn's disease.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

The safety of mesalamine in human pregnancy: a prospective controlled cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mesalamine is a first-line drug in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Information regarding human pregnancy experience with mesalamine has been scarce and uncontrolled despite its frequent use in women of childbearing age. The aim of this study was to examine the fetal safety of mesalamine. METHODS: The Motherisk Program prospectively enrolled and followed up 165 women exposed to mesalamine during pregnancy, 146 of whom had first trimester exposure. Pregnancy outcome was compared with that of a matched control group, who were counseled for nonteratogenic exposure. RESULTS: There was no increase in major malformations (1 of 127 [0.8%] for mesalamine vs. 5 of 131 [3.8%] for nonteratogenic controls; P = 0.23). There was an increase in the rate of preterm deliveries (13.0% for mesalamine vs. 4.7% for nonteratogenic controls; P = 0.02), a decrease in the mean maternal weight gain during pregnancy (13.1 +/- 6.3 kg for mesalamine vs. 15.6 +/- 6.0 kg for nonteratogenic controls; P = 0.0002), and a decrease in the mean birth weight (3253 +/- 546 g for mesalamine vs. 3461 +/- 542 g for nonteratogenic controls; P = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in the maternal obstetric history, rates of live births, miscarriages, pregnancy terminations, ectopic pregnancies, delivery method, or fetal distress between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that mesalamine does not represent a major teratogenic risk in humans when used in the recommended doses.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Peroxynitrite-induced apoptosis in human intestinal epithelial cells is attenuated by mesalamine.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Peroxynitrite (PN), a potent oxidant, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gut inflammation and epithelial cell apoptosis. The aim of this study was to investigate mesalamine, a standard therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, to see if it attenuates PN-induced cytotoxicity in human intestinal epithelial cells and if mesalamine directly interacts with PN or its precursor, nitric oxide. METHODS: T84 and HT29 cells were divided in several protocols: mesalamine was administered 2 hours before, simultaneously, or 30 minutes after PN. T84 cells, grown in filter chamber inserts, were used to determine if basolateral or apical administration of PN initiated apoptosis and epithelial barrier function. The effects of mesalamine on PN decomposition and NO half-life were determined. RESULTS: Mesalamine resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in PN-induced apoptosis, whether mesalamine was administered before (>10 micromol/L; IC50, 16 micromol/L), simultaneously (25-200 micromol/L; IC50, 24 micromol/L), or 30 minutes (200 micromol/L) after PN exposure. Mesalamine protected the epithelial barrier function of T84 cells against PN. Mesalamine rapidly degraded PN, whereas the half-life of NO was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of mesalamine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease may involve an attenuation of PN-induced cell injury and apoptosis through direct and indirect mechanisms without affecting NO levels.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The effect of mesalamine and nicotine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the usefulness of mesalamine and nicotine in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis and inactive Crohn's disease. DATA SOURCES: Citations were selected from the MEDLINE database. Only those involving human subjects, inflammatory bowel disease, and available in English were selected. STUDY SELECTION: Selection criteria of clinical trials and review articles assessing the effects of mesalamine and nicotine in active ulcerative colitis or inactive Crohn's disease and the utility of reducing steroid dependence or relapse rate. Less than 20% of the articles identified met the selection criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: In patients with inactive Crohn's disease, mesalamine 2 g/d significantly reduced the risk of relapse in high-relapse-risk patients compared with placebo, reducing the relapse rate from 71% to 55%, but was ineffective in preventing recurrence of inactive Crohn's disease following surgical resection. Mesalamine 4 g/d was effective in decreasing weaning failure due to steroid dependence by 67%, although the relapse rate was not significant compared with placebo at the end of 12 months. Following surgical resection, mesalamine was unable to significantly reduce the incidence of recurrence compared with placebo at the end of 1 year. In patients with active ulcerative colitis, oral mesalamine 2 and 4 g/d was superior to placebo in inducing remission compared with placebo. Among patients with prior steroid of sulfasalazine treatment, rectal mesalamine 4 g hs achieved a remission rate of 78% in more than 12 weeks of therapy. Other studies have not found a dose-response relationship with lower dosages of mesalamine. Whereas nicotine 15-25 mg/d administered as a transdermal patch produced greater symptomatic improvement in active ulcerative colitis compared with placebo, nicotine 15 mg/16 h produced results no different from those with placebo in maintaining remission in active colitis. Nicotine appears to have an adverse effect on the course of Crohn's disease and is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine has demonstrated clinical effectiveness as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis and inactive Crohn's disease. Although its relationship to inflammatory bowel disease has been known for many years, the usefulness of nicotine for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis requires further exploration before it can be recommended as therapeutic agent.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2002

A randomized, double blind, dose-response comparison of balsalazide (6.75 g), balsalazide (2.25 g), and mesalamine (2.4 g) in the treatment of active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Balsalazide is a new innovative, mesalamine-containing prodrug that is activated by bacteria in the colon. Balsalazide has been shown previously to be well tolerated and effective in the treatment of acute ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to determine the dose-response of balsalazide for efficacy and safety in active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and to compare this profile with that of mesalamine, pH-dependent, delayed-release tablets. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, active control, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-response, parallel-group study was performed comparing balsalazide (6.75 g daily), balsalazide (2.25 g daily), and mesalamine (2.4 g daily), administered for 8 wk to 154 patients with active, mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis as verified by sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Eight weeks of treatment with 6.75 g of balsalazide daily provided significantly greater improvement than did balsalazide (2.25 g daily) in rectal bleeding (64.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 32.4% [2.25-g balsalazide], p < 0.006), stool frequency (58.8% vs 29.4%, p < 0.006), sigmoidoscopic score (78.9% vs 52.5%, p < 0.015), and Physician's Global Assessment (73.7% vs 51.3%, p < 0.03). The efficacy of balsalazide showed a significantly more rapid onset of action than that of mesalamine (2.4 g daily) (2-wk sigmoidocopic score improvement, 54.7% [6.75-g balsalazide] vs 29.4% [2.4-g mesalamine], p = 0.006) with numerically greater improvement at 8 wk in five of seven measured signs and symptoms. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) was well tolerated, and the safety profile did not differ significantly from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) or mesalamine. CONCLUSIONS: Eight weeks of treatment with balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is significantly more effective than balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and more rapid in onset than mesalamine (2.4 g daily) in improving signs and symptoms of acute ulcerative colitis. Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is well tolerated, and the safety profile does not differ from that of balsalazide (2.25 g daily) and mesalamine (2.4 g daily).

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Mesalamine and olsalazine: 5-aminosalicylic acid agents for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

The history, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of rectal mesalamine and oral olsalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are reviewed. The high incidence of toxicity associated with sulfasalazine led to the development of the nonsulfonamide 5-aminosalicylic acid products mesalamine and olsalazine. The exact mechanism of action of these agents in the treatment of IBD is unknown. In clinical trials, mesalamine was shown to be as effective as or more effective than sulfasalazine or corticosteroids in treating active ulcerative colitis, proctitis, and proctosigmoiditis. Mesalamine is effective in the maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of olsalazine in the treatment of active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Olsalazine is also effective in the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis. The most common adverse effect associated with mesalamine enemas is perianal irritation or trauma secondary to insertion. The most common adverse effects associated with olsalazine are dose-dependent watery diarrhea and gastrointestinal upset. The recommended dosage of the mesalamine enema for the treatment of active mild to moderate ulcerative colitis is one 4-g (60-mL) retention enema daily for three to six weeks. The dosage of mesalamine suppositories for the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis is one 500-mg suppository inserted rectally twice daily for three to six weeks. The dosage of olsalazine is 1 g daily in divided doses for the maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis. Both rectal mesalamine and oral olsalazine provide clinicians with an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, proctosigmoiditis, and proctitis in patients unresponsive to or intolerant of the effects of sulfasalazine or corticosteroids.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1993

Mesalamine capsules for the treatment of active Crohn's disease: results of a 16-week trial. Pentasa Crohn's Disease Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Mesalamine is released from sulfasalazine in the colon and benefits colonic Crohn's disease. The mesalamine used in this study releases the drug throughout the small bowel and colon. Therefore, this study was designed to detect benefit for Crohn's disease involving the small bowel alone or both the colon and small bowel. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, multicenter prospective controlled trial compared placebo and three daily doses of mesalamine in 310 patients. The primary outcome criterion was change in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) from baseline to final study visit. RESULTS: Patients taking 4 g/day mesalamine experienced a decrease of 72 CDAI points compared with 21 points in the placebo group (P < 0.01). Remission occurred in 43% of the 4-g group and 18% of the placebo group. Patients with ileum-only disease showed a 93-point improvement on 4 g mesalamine, compared with a 2-point improvement in similar patients on placebo. Mesalamine in this trial was not associated with clinically significant toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This controlled-release mesalamine preparation is safe and effective at 4 g/day as a single agent in treatment of active Crohn's disease of the ileum and colon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Mesalamine blocks tumor necrosis factor growth inhibition and nuclear factor kappaB activation in mouse colonocytes.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine) represent a mainstay in inflammatory bowel disease therapy, yet the precise mechanism of their therapeutic action is unknown. Because tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha is important in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, we investigated the effect of mesalamine on TNF-alpha-regulated signal transduction and proliferation in intestinal epithelial cells. METHODS: Young adult mouse colon cells were studied with TNF-alpha, epidermal growth factor, or ceramide in the presence or absence of mesalamine. Proliferation was studied by hemocytometry. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation and IkappaBalpha expression were determined by Western blot analysis. Nuclear transcription factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) nuclear translocation was determined by confocal laser immunofluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: The antiproliferative effects of TNF-alpha were blocked by mesalamine. TNF-alpha and ceramide activation of MAP kinase were inhibited by mesalamine, whereas epidermal growth factor activation of MAP kinase was unaffected. TNF-alpha-stimulated NF-kappaB activation and nuclear translocation and the degradation of Ikappa-Balpha were blocked by mesalamine. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine inhibits TNF-alpha-mediated effects on intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and activation of MAP kinase and NF-kappaB. Therefore, it may function as a therapeutic agent based on its ability to disrupt critical signal transduction events in the intestinal cell necessary for perpetuation of the chronic inflammatory state.

Animals↗