SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In order to evaluate the preventive efficacy, safety and usefulness of mesna (Sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) against ifosfamide-induced urinary disorders, a placebo-controlled double-blind comparative study was performed. Ifosfamide was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a daily dose of 2 g/m2 for 5 consecutive days, and mesna was intravenously administered at 20% of the ifosfamide dose, three times daily for 5 consecutive days. The results obtained are as follows. (a) Of 101 accrued patients, 91 patients were evaluated consisting of 45 for the mesna group and 46 for the placebo group. There was no intergroup difference in the number of the evaluated cases and patient characteristics. (b) Micturition pain and feeling of residual urine graded as moderate or severe were not observed for the mesna group, but were observed for the placebo group with incidences of 19.6% (9/46) for micturition pain and 15.2% (7/46) for feeling of residual urine; the intergroup differences in the appearance of these urinary symptoms were statistically significant (P = 0.0003 for micturition pain; P = 0.0009 for feeling of residual urine). The incidence of hematuria graded as moderate or severe was 6.7% (3/45) in the mesna group, which was significantly lower than the 32.6% (15/46) in the placebo group (P = 0.0008). (c) No side-effect attributable to mesna was observed. (d) A judgment of "useful" was obtained in 80.0% (36/45) of the patients treated with mesna, which was significantly higher than the 34.8% (16/46) of the patients treated with placebo (P = near 0). On the basis of the above results, we conclude that the preventive efficacy, safety and usefulness of mesna against ifosfamide-induced urinary disorders have been well demonstrated in this study.
The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects of ifosfamide and mesna are described separately, followed by a discussion of the adverse effects of concurrent ifosfamide and mesna, the clinical spectrum of ifosfamide, and the dosage and administration of the two drugs. Ifosfamide, an active analogue of cyclophosphamide, differs from other direct alkylating substances in that it requires biotransformation in the liver before it can exert its alkylating effects. The bioavailability of ifosfamide after oral administration exceeds 95%. The adverse effects of ifosfamide include hematologic, urinary tract, GI tract, and CNS toxicity. Mesna is a thiol compound designed to function as a regional detoxificant of urotoxic oxazaphosphorine cytostatics such as ifosfamide. The drug is rapidly oxidized in the plasma to its dimeric form, dimesna, one third of which is converted back to mesna by glutathione reductase. The mean total urinary availability of mesna administered orally is 76%. Mesna may produce gastrointestinal and allergic reactions. The adverse effects of concurrent ifosfamide and mesna include urinary tract and renal toxicity. Although current FDA-approved labeling is limited to refractory germ cell testicular cancer, ifosfamide has also shown efficacy in the treatment of lymphoma, lung cancer, and sarcomas. Optimum dosage and scheduling remain to be determined; studies suggest that a fractionated dosage schedule provides antineoplastic activity with tolerable toxicity. Ifosfamide, used in combination with mesna for uroprotection, provides a useful therapeutic option for the management of patients with testicular cancer, soft tissue sarcomas, or high-grade malignant lymphomas.
2-Mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna), which is used as an uroprotector during oxazaphosphorine therapy of cancer patients, was found to inhibit growth of several cultured human malignant cell lines in vitro. Dimesna, which is rapidly formed in the blood of mesna treated patients, had no effect and did not interfere with the growth inhibitory activity of mesna. For sensitive cell lines, complete growth inhibitions were usually observed at mesna concentrations of 10(-4) M. Higher concentrations were less toxic or even stimulated proliferation of some cell lines. There was no experimental evidence that the biphasic dose-response profiles were due to a more complete dimesna formation at high mesna concentrations. Since mesna, which is excreted in its monomeric form in urine, was reported to inhibit growth of superficial bladder cancer in patients, we examined the effects of repeated mesna administrations in cultures of bladder cancer cells. The results showed that this treatment caused growth inhibition of 2/4 "resistant" cell lines. The mechanisms by which mesna inhibits cell growth are unknown and it is not known if it acts selectively on malignant cells.
The reactive and rapidly excreted thiol mesna (2-mercaptoethane-sulphonate sodium) has the potential to reduce the dose-limiting nephrotoxicity of cisplatin by chemical neutralisation of the latter in the kidney. The reaction kinetics of cisplatin with mesna and its disulphide, dimesna, was studied at 37 degrees C in unbuffered 0.15 mol/l NaCl (pH 5.3) and in 0.15 mol/l NaCl buffered with 0.02 mol/l Hepes (pH 7.4). The reaction mixtures were analysed for intact cisplatin. In the presence of mesna or dimesna 0.5 mol/l as anticipated in urine for conditions of renal protection, the half-life (t1/2) of 0.2 mmol/l cisplatin was less than 6 min. t1/2 of 151 and 629 min were found in the presence of mesna and dimesna concentrations of 5 mmol/l and 3 mmol/l, respectively, anticipated in plasma under conditions of renal protection. Cis-diamminemonoaquamonochloroplatinum(II) 0.2 mmol/l reacted rapidly with 50 mmol thiosulphate and 0.5 mol/l (di)mesna (t1/2 less than or equal to 1 min). This platinum species also reacted rapidly with 2.6 mmol/l thiosulphate (t1/2 less than 1 min), a concentration reached in plasma for conditions under renal protection. Reaction of the monoaquated form of cisplatin proceeded slowly in the presence of dimesna or mesna concentrations (less than 5 mmol/l), as anticipated in plasma under renal protecting conditions. It is hypothesised that renal protection by the strong nucleophiles, thiosulphate, mesna and dimesna occurs rather by neutralisation of the aquated species in the lumen of the renal tubulus than by neutralisation of intact cisplatin, and that neutralisation of these species in plasma contributes significantly to the protecting effect.
2-Mercaptoethanesulfonate (mesna) is a nontoxic drug which upon intravenous and oral administration effectively prevents urothelial toxicity in cancer patients treated with oxazaphosphorines. Mesna is rapidly oxidized to dimesna in the blood. It is then taken up by kidney tubular cells in which it is reduced and excreted into the urine as mesna where it reacts with toxic metabolites. We have observed that mesna, but not dimesna, may inhibit growth of several human malignant cell lines in vitro. Some are extremely sensitive, whereas others are more or less resistant. It was found that 2/4 relatively resistant human bladder cancer cell lines turned sensitive upon repeated administrations of mesna and 5/5 cell lines appeared to be sensitive to mesna when grown in serum-free medium. The results seem to provide an explanation of the remarkable positive clinical effects of prolonged oral mesna treatment in patients with superficial bladder cancer.
We evaluated the stability of the aqueous formulation of mesna during storage in syringes and after dilution in beverages and syrups. Measurements of the concentrations of mesna showed that the undiluted formulation was stable for at least 9 days in standard polypropylene syringes at 5 degrees, 24 degrees, and 35 degrees C. There was no detectable oxidation of mesna to dimesna over the course of at least 1 week when mesna was diluted 1:2 and 1:5 in syrups and incubated at 24 degrees C in capped tubes. Concentration changes were clinically negligible for 1:2, 1:10, and 1:100 dilutions of mesna in six carbonated drinks, two juices, and milk after incubation for 24 h at 5 degrees C. Thus, the aqueous mesna formulation is stable when diluted and stored in a variety of beverages and syrups under conditions suitable for oral administration.
Hemorrhagic cystitis is a major complication of high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy used in preparation for allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation. Although previous reports had suggested that the sulfhydryl-containing compound mesna might be superior to forced diuresis in preventing hemorrhagic cystitis, there were concerns about the effect of mesna on engraftment in these studies. To address these concerns, 100 patients were randomized to receive mesna or forced saline diuresis while undergoing bone marrow transplant conditioning with regimens that included high-dose cyclophosphamide. To try to minimize the likelihood of graft rejection, patients who were being transplanted with cyclophosphamide as a sole agent were excluded from the study. After randomization and administration of therapy, patients were monitored by microscopic and dip-stick urinalyses; they were also followed for effects of therapy on engraftment. The incidence of consistent or severe hematuria was 33% in the mesna arm and 20% in the hyperhydration arm (P = .31). Severe bleeding occurred in 12.5% of mesna patients and 7.5% of hyperhydration patients (P = .71). No unexpected toxicities were encountered, and engraftment times did not differ. Based on this randomized trial of 100 patients, we conclude that mesna and hyperhydration are equally effective in preventing cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplantation patients.
The sulfhydryl mesna is increasingly used to protect the bladder and kidney from effects of chemotherapy with ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide. Mesna reacts with reagents on urinary test strips designed to detect ketones. Test-strip results were correlated to sulfhydryl concentrations in 931 urine specimens obtained after infusions of mesna. These data may be used to estimate urinary mesna concentrations at the bedside or to test compliance in outpatients given oral mesna therapy.
From January 1983 through August 1988, 318 consecutive patients with refractory germ cell neoplasms were treated with ifosfamide-containing combination chemotherapy. The patients received ifosfamide at 1.2 gm/m2/day with cis-platin 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days and etoposide 75 mg/m2/day for 5 days or vinblastine 0.11 mg/kg on days 1 and 2 for each cycle. Of 277 evaluable patients, NAC was used as an uroprotector in the initial 86 patients while the latter 191 consecutive patients received mesna to reduce urothelial toxicity. Dosages of NAC was 2.0 gm po q 6 hr and for mesna 120 mg/m2 IV push prior to ifosfamide and then 1200 mg/m2/day as continuous infusion of 5 consecutive days. All patients received 3.0 liters of normal saline per day. The number of courses of chemotherapy given in the two groups were similar. Twenty-four of the 86 patients (27.9%) receiving NAC developed hematuria (13 patients - grade 1, 4 patients - grade 2, and 7 patients - grade 3 toxicity). While 8 out of 191 (4.2%) mesna patients developed hematuria (6 - grade 1 and 2 - grade 3) (p < 0.0001). The incidence of severity of renal toxicity was similar in the two groups. Ifosfamide dosage was reduced solely for urothelial toxicity in 11 patients receiving NAC compared with none of the patients receiving mesna (p < 0.0001). Chemotherapy response was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, mesna provides better urothelial protection from ifosfamide-induced toxicity than NAC and allows better maintenance of the drug dosage.
The effects of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (Mesna) on the mutagenicity of cyclophosphamide (CP) were assessed in vitro by the Ames test and in vivo in rats by analyzing micronuclei in bone marrow and mutagenic activity in urine. Mesna alone was negative in all test systems, while CP gave a positive response in all of them. In a combined treatment there was no significant reduction of the CP-induced mutagenicity in Salmonella. In rats the frequency of bone marrow micronuclei was not diminished when Mesna was given together with CP. May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining and Hoechst-Pyronin fluorescent staining techniques for micronuclei yielded similar results. The urine of rats treated with CP was mutagenic to Salmonella and no significant difference was observed when the rats had received both Mesna and CP. The results give support to the theory that Mesna acts primarily by reducing the toxicity of metabolites of CP, particularly acrolein, in the urinary tract and not by suppressing the mutagenicity of the active metabolites of CP.
BACKGROUND: Mesna is used to abolish urotoxicity of cyclophosphamide and related compounds in immunosuppressive and antineoplastic treatment schedules. Adverse reactions to this drug have been reported only rarely. OBSERVATIONS: Drug eruptions to mesna have developed in seven of 15 patients with autoimmune disorders treated with monthly pulses of intravenous cyclophosphamide. Two different types of drug eruptions were observed: five patients had development of a macular and partly papular or urticarial rash and angioedema and two patients had a generalized fixed drug eruption, primarily and predominantly at the sites of previous skin lesions of their underlying condition. The results of prick, patch, and intradermal tests were similar in both types of rash; however, the two patients with fixed drug eruption had developed a generalized eruption upon prick testing with mesna. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct eruptions to mesna have been induced in these patients during cyclophosphamide/corticosteroid therapy; these eruptions are not thought to share a common pathogenic mechanism. The results of skin and challenge tests do not support the hypothesis that a type 1 or a type 4 immune reaction may be responsible for these eruptions. The unusually high incidence (about 50%) of these reactions and their clinical presentation make it important to distinguish them from an exacerbation of the preexistent autoimmune disorder.
Twenty patients received 27 courses of ifosfamide administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion for 14 days without Mesna. The goal of the study was to deliver a dose rate and total cumulative dose of ifosfamide that would be comparable to standard bolus or short-term infusions administered with Mesna. Dose escalations proceeded from 200 to 300, 400, 450, 500, and 550 mg/m2/d. Four patients developed transient microscopic hematuria at 400, 450, and 500 mg/m2/d. There were no instances of macroscopic hematuria. At 550 mg/m2/d, three patients experienced nonurologic toxicity; confusion (1), nausea (1), and Grade 2 leukopenia (1). The recommended dose of 500 mg/m2/d delivers a total dose of 7 g/m2 per cycle, which is comparable to that delivered in clinical practice for bolus or short-term infusion. Because few patients received multiple courses over time, the cumulative effects are indeterminate in the present trial. The frequency and predictability of hematuria are not precise, and at least daily monitoring by urine Hematest is essential, adding Mesna to the infusate in patients with persistent hematuria. The protracted infusion schedule for ifosfamide permits convenient outpatient administration without Mesna and reduces the drug cost of clinical usage of this agent by up to $890 per cycle. Clinical activity was demonstrated in a single patient, but a comparative trial of standard bolus schedules with the protracted infusion schedule will be necessary to determine if the clinical effectiveness of the drug is maintained.
This study examined the characteristics of urinary bladder lesions (cystitis) induced by ifosfamide (IF), an antitumor agent, and their inhibition by mesna in rats. Single i.v. doses of 50 mg/kg or more of IF induced cystitis characterized by increased bladder weight with mucosal hemorrhage and edema within 3 hr, with a plateau being reached 1 to 3 days after the injection. This change occurred earlier than myelotoxicity. Injection of IF to ureter-ligated rats did not induce the cystitis. Also, when IF was infused to one of a pair of rats in which the ureters had been crossed, the cystitis occurred only in the non-injected member of the pair whose bladder received urine flow from the IF-injected rat. Cystitis did not occur with direct injection of 10 mg of IF into the urinary bladder, but did with injection of the metabolite, 14 micrograms of acrolein. These findings show that IF-induced cystitis is not a systemic effect like myelotoxicity or an antitumor effect but a local effect. The cystitis could be completely inhibited by mesna, and this effect, which was dose-dependent, occurred from one-tenth of the IF dose. The effect was strongest when mesna was administrated within 1 hr of the IF injection. There was little difference in the effect between single and divided doses. The combined administration of IF with mesna did not lower the antitumor effect of IF.
Oral administration of mesna can facilitate outpatient ifosfamide therapy. Blood and urinary mesna concentrations are more steady and prolonged after oral delivery compared with after intravenous delivery. The incidence of hematuria observed during partial oral mesna therapy is no greater than that during intravenous mesna therapy. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and reported schedules of administration are reviewed.
In two sequential trials, 154 patients were treated with dosages of ifosfamide, ranging between 8 and 18 g/m2 divided over 4 days, with mesna uroprotection. The first was a phase II efficacy trial in 125 advanced sarcoma patients (Antman et al: J Clin Oncol 7:126-131, 1989), while the second was a dose escalation trial involving 29 patients (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990). In the first trial, patients received 8 to 10 g/m2 ifosfamide either by bolus or continuous infusion. The response rate for the 64 patients receiving bolus administration was 23% compared with 12% for the 60 patients receiving a continuous infusion schedule (P = .09). Of the 154 patients, 144 had sarcoma and had failed at least one previous regimen. Of these 144, 4% responded completely and 23% had a complete or partial response. The maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide was 16 g/m2 in the second trial. Dose-limiting renal toxicity was observed at 18 g/m2 ifosfamide (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990). The duration of myelosuppression and the frequency and severity of mucositis and renal tubular acidosis were dose-dependent. A median of 11 days (range, 8 to 18) of granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) were observed. Thus, autologous bone marrow reinfusion was not required. Severe central nervous system toxicity (transient confusion, hallucinations, and somnolence) was observed sporadically at both low- and high-dose levels. The first four patients on the standard-dose study did not receive mesna because it was unavailable; three developed gross hematuria. In patients who received mesna, hematuria was uncommon. Hematuria in the group as a whole was significantly associated with a lack of uroprotection, but was not associated with prior cyclophosphamide, pelvic radiotherapy, age, or bolus versus a continuous infusion schedule. Patients receiving ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection can tolerate considerable dose escalation over the usual prescribed doses before nonhematologic toxicity becomes dose-limiting. Ifosfamide, with its broad activity in solid tumors, may prove to be an important addition to high-dose combination-chemotherapy regimens (Elias et al: J Clin Oncol 8:170-178, 1990).
Mesna (sodium-2-mercaptoethansulfonate) is used in the prophylaxis of cyclophosphamide (CYC)-induced hemorrhagic cystitis. Four patients being treated with "low dose" CYC and prednisone for vasculitis developed severe side effects to Mesna. Fever, arthralgia, myalgia, tachycardia, electrocardiogram changes consistent with perimyocarditis, erythroderma, bullous skin and mucous membrane lesions, and abdominal complaints with profuse diarrhea were noted approximately 3 weeks after the initiation of therapy for CYC-induced leukopenia and a conservatively reduced prednisone dosage. Positive reexposure tests confirmed the association to Mesna use, and hypersensitivity skin tests demonstrated a delayed hypersensitivity reaction.
The object of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ifosfamide/etoposide and mesna therapy in advanced breast cancer. A total of 44 patients with breast cancer were included in the trial. Eligibility criteria included measurable, refractory disease; prior anthracycline therapy (or its contraindication); a life expectancy of at least 3 months; and adequate hepatic, renal, CNS and bone marrow function. All patients were less than or equal to 70 years of age and had a Karnofsky performance status of greater than or equal to 50%. There were 36 evaluable cases. Sites of metastatic disease included bone (19), skin (18), liver (9), lung (14), lymph node (19), and miscellaneous (7). Treatment consisted of 1,500 mg/m2 ifosfamide given i.v. on days 1-5, 120 mg/m2 etoposide given i.v. on days 1-3, and 400 mg i.v. mesna given with and at 4 and 8 h after ifosfamide. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Initial doses were reduced by 25% or 50% in patients who had previously undergone both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A median of 4 cycles (range, 2-8) were given. The myelotoxicity was marked: WHO grades 3/4 leukopenia (n = 37), grades 3/4 thrombocytopenia (n = 12), and grades 2/3 anemia (n = 13). Due to myelotoxicity, dose reduction or prolongation of treatment-free intervals was necessary in 28 cases. Alopecia was seen in 35 patients and CNS toxicity, in 8. Partial remission (PR) was obtained in five cases and complete remission (CR), in three. Sites of response included the lung (5), skin (4), lymph node (5), and peritoneum (1). The duration of response was 4 (n = 2) and 8 (n = 1) months for CR and 2 (n = 2), 6 (n = 2), and 10 (n = 1) months for PR. We conclude that the ifosfamide/etoposide and mesna regimen is effective, but its myelotoxicity is treatment-limiting.