SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Microcosting”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2025

A microcosting and cost consequence analysis from a randomized controlled trial comparing genome sequencing with exome sequencing for genetic diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing rare diseases is costly. The objectives were to microcost exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) trios and estimate the incremental costs of GS per additional diagnosis from an institutional payer perspective. METHODS: Trios (proband plus biological parents) that are referred for sequencing were randomly assigned to ES or GS. Laboratory workflow and sequencing were microcosted. Total and category cost per trio were estimated probabilistically. Effectiveness was expressed as diagnostic yield (rates of diagnostic or partially diagnostic variants detected). Incremental costs and effectiveness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean total cost per trio was CAD 2888.79 (95% CI 2567.72, 3492.72) for ES (n = 329) and 4364.02 (95% CI 3984.94, 5013.67) for GS (n = 324). Reagents accounted for 34% and 61% of total costs for ES and GS, respectively. The incremental cost of GS was 1475.23. The diagnostic yield was 35.9% for ES and 32.7% for GS with a difference of 0.032 (95% CI: -0.041, 0.104, P value .397). CONCLUSION: GS demonstrated higher costs and a similar diagnostic yield to ES but was limited by technical capabilities at the time of the study. The study provides comprehensive costs for the economic evaluation comparing alternative diagnostic pathways and impetus for further evaluating variants uniquely detectable by GS.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

The cost and cost trajectory of genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis for Indigenous children with suspected rare diseases.

PURPOSE: Indigenous peoples are underrepresented in reference genome libraries. Consequently, rare disease diagnosis may require bespoke bioinformatics analyses of genome sequences. Establishing diagnostic cost is crucial to support policy development for equitable diagnosis of rare diseases. We estimated the cost and cost trajectory of diagnostic genome sequencing and bioinformatics for Indigenous participants with suspected rare diseases. METHODS: We conducted a microcosting study of Indigenous children and their families receiving genome sequencing through Canada's Silent Genomes Project. Invoice data informed the costs of genome sequencing. We conducted a time-and-motion study for bioinformatics analyses, including labor, computing, and data storage costs. RESULTS: With standard bioinformatics, costs ranged from C$3645 (SD: 455) for singletons to C$7402 (SD: 566) for trios. With advanced, bespoke bioinformatics, costs ranged from C$5344 (SD: 634) for singletons to C$9760 (SD: 822) for trios. Genome sequencing was a primary cost driver; however, sequencing costs decreased by 61% over 4 years. Bioinformatics costs ranged from 21.3% to 58.3% of the total costs. The time required for bioinformatics ranged from 71 hours to 215 hours for standard and advanced analyses, respectively. CONCLUSION: Genome sequencing costs decreased over time. Bioinformatics is a significant cost driver, particularly for bespoke analyses arising from nonrepresentative reference libraries.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Linking women leaving jail to medications for opioid use disorder: Costs to implement pre-release telehealth and peer navigation services.

AIMS: Telehealth and peer navigation are feasible strategies for connecting women in the criminal-legal system with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), yet implementation costs are not well understood. This study conducted a microcosting analysis of two interventions for women leaving jail in Kentucky: pre-release, PreTreatment Telehealth with a MOUD provider (TH-Only) and PreTreatment Telehealth combined with peer navigation (TH+PN) through the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN). METHODS: From the provider perspective, we estimated total start-up costs, total intervention costs, and average cost per participant. Women participating in the clinical trial were randomly assigned to TH-Only (n=299) or TH+PN (n=301). Start-up costs were incurred primarily in 2019 - 2020; intervention costs represent expenses in 2021 - 2023. Cost data were collected from study and agency financial records and interviews with research staff and analyzed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.90.2). RESULTS: Start-up costs were $36,320, comprising planning, meetings, travel, and supplies. The total cost of TH-Only was $60,767, representing 259 telehealth sessions with an average duration of 47 minutes. Total cost of TH+PN was $472,148 based on 270 telehealth sessions (48 minutes), 268 peer navigation (PN) sessions (30 minutes), and 12 weeks of PN support post-release per participant. Average cost per TH-Only participant was $235 and per TH+PN participant was $1,760. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth may be a relatively low-cost approach for jails lacking on-site MOUD services. Although more costly, combining telehealth with PN may add value by supporting service continuity and facilitating linkage to treatment during the jail to community transition.

Humans↗