SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is an easy, extremely fast and versatile method for the isolation of morphologically defined cell populations from complex primary tissues for molecular analyses. However, the optical resolution is limited due to the use of dried sections without coverslip necessary for tissue capture, and routine stains such as hematoxylin and eosin are sometimes insufficient for precise microdissection, especially in tissues with diffuse intermingling of different cell types and lack of easily discernible architectural features. Therefore, several groups have adapted immunohistochemical staining techniques for LCM. In addition to providing high contrast targets for microdissection, immunostaining allows selection of cells not only according to morphological, but also phenotypical and functional criteria. In order to allow reliable tissue transfer on one hand and preserve the integrity of the target of analysis such as DNA, RNA and proteins on the other hand, immunostaining protocols have to be modified for the purposes of LCM. The following review gives an overview of immuno-LCM and describes some applications, e.g. in the field of hematopathology.
Available genetic information places the mouse db gene approximately 5 cM distal to Ifa on mid/distal mouse chromosome 4. These data have indicated that there is a relevant paucity of genetic markers that map to this region of chromosome 4. To increase the density of the genetic map on mid-chromosome 4, we have applied the techniques of microdissection and microcloning of the mid-portion of mouse chromosome 4. A total of 47 RFLPs from the microdissection library were used to type the progeny of three C57BL/6J Mus spretus backcrosses. The resulting composite genetic map positions seven known genes, 41 microclones, and three other anonymous markers to a region of approximately 21 cM on mid-chromosome 4 extending from b to Lck. The density of markers in this region of chromosome 4 should be sufficient to initiate the physical mapping of this subchromosomal segment, facilitating efforts to clone the db gene, as well as other uncloned mutant loci in this region of chromosome 4.
Whole-chromosome painting probes (WCPs) and chromosome-arm painting probes (CAPs) are an integral part of the cytogenetic analysis of chromosome abnormalities. While these are routinely made by chromosome microdissection, multiple copies of the dissected region have been necessary to achieve a library sufficiently complex to provide adequate painting. Performing multiple dissections of chromosomes or chromosome regions is time consuming and occasionally impossible, such as when working with species whose banded karyotype is not well defined. We have developed a method whereby chromosome paints can be reliably generated by dissecting single chromosomes. The technique consists of performing degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) in situ on the chromosomes, prior to dissection. Enough amplification occurs to enable a single dissected chromosome to be used to create a painting probe sufficiently complex for use in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The amplification products remain localized on the chromosomes; this allows region-specific chromosome paints to be made. We detail this novel technique and show whole-chromosome, arm-specific, and contiguous region-specific probes for human and rat, each created from single dissected fragments of chromatin.
UNLABELLED: CO2 lasers have become an important technological advance and an integral tool for the laryngeal surgeon since the 1960s. Surgeons have used lasers for a variety of benign and malignant lesions in the larynx with good success. With better understanding of the microarchitecture of the vocal folds and the recognition of heat distribution into surrounding tissues that occurs with the use of standard CO2 lasers, questions and concerns have been raised regarding the use of the CO2 laser for benign lesions of the vocal folds. With the advent of the microspot CO2 laser with a spot size of less than 250 microm, the potential heat distribution to the deeper layers of the lamina propria has been reduced. The microspot CO2 laser has been suggested to be an appropriate tool for the excision of superficial benign lesions of the vocal fold and may be considered as an appropriate treatment alternative to microdissection. Only a limited number of studies have compared the efficacy of microdissection versus microspot CO2 laser surgery in the larynx, and no prospective, randomized trials have been performed. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare microspot CO2 laser excision and microdissection for superficial benign lesions confined to the free margin of the vocal fold. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, prospective trial comparing microspot CO2 laser excision and microdissection in the removal of nodules, polyps, and mucous retention cysts of the vocal fold. METHODS: Acoustic and aerodynamic measures and videostroboscopic and perceptual audio recordings evaluated by a panel of blinded viewers and listeners were studied preoperatively and 2 to 3 weeks and 5 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Surgical and recovery times were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients met selection criteria and were enrolled, 21 in the microdissection group and 16 in the laser excision group. Significant improvements in videostroboscopic parameters were found over time in both groups. Significant improvements were noted for perceptual analysis over time for the laser excision group with nonsignificant improvements over time for the microdissection group. There was no difference in any measure between laser excision and microdissection at the two postoperative visits. There was no difference in surgical or recovery time between laser excision and microdissection. Acoustic and aerodynamic parameters were noncontributory in evaluating outcomes of treatment, since most values were normal before surgery. CONCLUSION: No differences in clinical outcomes are identified when comparing microdissection with laser excision of nodules, polyps, and mucous retention cysts of the vocal folds.
We combined laser-assisted microdissection from H&E-stained paraffin sections, degenerated oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to analyse chromosomal imbalances in small tumour areas consisting of 50-100 cells. This approach was used to investigate intratumour genetic heterogeneity in a case of metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma and chromosomal changes in areas of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) adjacent to the invasive tumour. In four microdissected invasive tumour areas with different histological patterns (acinar, cribriform, papillary and solid) marked intratumour heterogeneity was found by CGH. Recurrent chromosomal imbalances detected in at least two microdissected tumour areas were gains on 1p32-->p36, 2p22, 3q21, 7, 8q21-->q24, 11q12-->q13, 16p12-->p13, 17, 19 and loss on 16q23. Additional chromosomal changes were found in only one of the microdissected areas (gains on 16q21-->q23, 20q22 and losses on 8p21-->p23, 12p11-->q12, 12q21-->q26, 13q21-->q34, 16q12, and 18q22). In PIN, gains on chromosomes 8q21-->q24 and 17 were found in both samples investigated (low and high grade PIN), while gains on chromosomes 7, 11q, 12q, 16p, and 20q and losses on 2p, 8p21-->p23, 12q were found only in one PIN area. Controls to ensure reliable CGH results consisted in CGH analyses of (i) approximately 80 microdissected normal epithelial cells, which showed no aberrations after DOP-PCR and (ii) larger cell numbers (approximately 10(5) or 10(7) cells) of the primary tumour investigated without DOP-PCR and partially displaying the chromosomal imbalances (gain on 16p12-->p13, losses on 2p25, 8p21-->p23, 12p11-->p12, 12q21-->q26, 18q22) found in the small microdissected areas. Microsatellite and FISH analyses further confirmed our CGH results from microdissected cells. The combined approach of laser-assisted microdissection, DOP-PCR and CGH is suitable to identify early genetic changes in PIN and chromosomal imbalances associated with the particular histological patterns of invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Microdissection in combination with reverse painting fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is a very effective method to identify breakpoints and rearrangements of derived chromosomes and reveal the chromosomal origin of marker chromosomes. We describe an innovation that allows a convenient, fast and safe isolation of microdissected fragments as currently available protocols. The microdissected chromosomes are harvested in a collection drop located in a movable micropipette adjusted to a second micromanipulator under microscopic observation. We used this technique to analyze several cytogenetic aberrations. In order to evaluate the efficiency of our microdissection procedure, we compared the results obtained with microdissection probes made from only one fragment with those obtained with more than six microdissected fragments. In all cases, the single-fragment microdissections were sufficient to provide probes.
BACKGROUND: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with ICSI is becoming the first-line treatment for non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Recently, the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection TESE was reported to be higher than by conventional TESE. However, a comprehensive comparison between multiple and microdissection TESE patients including histological findings has not been reported. METHODS: Patients with NOA who underwent microdissection TESE (n = 56) or multiple TESE (n = 37) were compared. Pre-operative characteristics were similar between groups. In addition, microscopic findings during microdissection TESE also were investigated. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer for microdissection TESE than for multiple TESE. Histological examination suggested that spermatogenesis was relatively more impaired in the microdissection TESE group than in the multiple TESE group. Despite this, SRR by microdissection TESE (42.9%) appeared higher than by conventional TESE (35.1%) although this observation failed to reach statistical significance. Seventeen of 26 patients (65.4%) with heterogeneous tubule were successful for sperm retrieval. No severe operative complications occurred in any patient in either group, and no patient required post-operative hormone replacement to treat hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical technique is safe and may improve SRR for TESE in a variety of patients with NOA, especially patients with heterogeneous testicular tubules.
AIMS: Laser capture microdissection is a recent development that enables the isolation of specific cell types for subsequent molecular analysis. This study describes a method for obtaining proteome information from laser capture microdissected tissue using colon cancer as a model. METHODS: Laser capture microdissection was performed on toluidine blue stained frozen sections of colon cancer. Tumour cells were selectively microdissected. Conditions were established for solubilising proteins from laser microdissected samples and these proteins were separated by two dimensional gel electrophoresis. Individual protein spots were cut from the gel, characterised by mass spectrometry, and identified by database searching. These results were compared with protein expression patterns and mass spectroscopic data obtained from bulk tumour samples run in parallel. RESULTS: Proteins could be recovered from laser capture microdissected tissue in a form suitable for two dimensional gel electrophoresis. The solubilised proteins retained their expected electrophoretic mobility in two dimensional gels as compared with bulk samples, and mass spectrometric analysis was also unaffected. CONCLUSION: A method for performing two dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry using laser capture microdissected tissue has been developed.
BACKGROUND: The presence of a dominant T-cell clone is an important diagnostic criterion in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and in atypical T-cell cutaneous infiltrates. Procedures based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the most sensitive to detect clonality, but heteroduplex analysis is less sensitive than other methods such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a gross hand microdissection of the superficial (papillary) portion of the dermal infiltrate may improve the sensitivity of T-cell clonality detection by PCR-heteroduplex analysis in CTCL. SETTING: Regional university hospital (secondary or tertiary referral center). Patients A total of 29 patients with a definite diagnosis of mycosis fungoides based on typical histologic and immunophenotypic features were selected with patch (16) or plaque (13) stages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of T-cell clonality by PCR amplification of the T-cell receptor gamma chain followed by heteroduplex analysis using DNA extracted from the entire biopsy specimen and after gross microdissection of the subepidermal bandlike dermal infiltrate. RESULTS: T-cell clonality was demonstrated in 24 of 29 cases when hand microdissection was used compared with 16 of 29 cases with DNA analysis from entire biopsy specimens; thus, hand microdissection resulted in a sensitivity improvement of approximatively 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Hand microdissection substantially improves the detection of a T-cell clone in CTCL when using a PCR-heteroduplex analysis and could be used routinely in the clinical evaluation of T-cell infiltrates. Importantly, the microdissection method was found to be more useful for the detection of T-cell clones in early patch stages of CTCL than in plaque-stage disease.
PURPOSE: We established a practical and safe strategy for testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and compared conventional with microdissection TESE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective comparative study 46 patients, including 22 with obstructive and 24 with nonobstructive azoospermia, underwent conventional TESE. Another 100 patients, including 26 with obstructive and 74 with nonobstructive azoospermia, underwent microdissection TESE. Conventional TESE was performed via 3 small 5 mm. incisions in the tunica albuginea. Microdissection TESE was performed by making a 3 to 4 cm. incision in the tunica albuginea under operating microscopy, avoiding the underlying testicular artery. Seminiferous tubules that appeared dilated and opaque were harvested. Sperm recovery rates were compared, as were complication rates assessed by ultrasonographic and endocrinological evaluations. RESULTS: In obstructive azoospermia cases the sperm recovery rate was 100% for each procedure. In nonobstructive azoospermia cases sperm were recovered in 16.7% and 44.6% by conventional and microdissection TESE, respectively (p = 0.0271). In cases of histologically diagnosed maturation arrest the sperm recovery rate was 37.5% and 75%, respectively (p = 0.22585). In cases of the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome the sperm recovery rate was 6.3% and 33.9%, respectively (p = 0.0494). We identified dilated and opaque seminiferous tubules containing spermatozoa under operating microscopy in 22.2% of patients with maturation arrest and in 63.2% with the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. The complication rate was significantly lower for microdissection than for conventional TESE. CONCLUSIONS: In nonobstructive cases, especially those of the Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, microdissection TESE can effectively retrieve spermatozoa and minimize the risk of complications.
Solid tumors are composed not only of tumor cells but also of stromal nonneoplastic cells. In whole tumor samples, stromal cells retaining their alleles may therefore obscure detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in tumor cells. An increasing number of studies have used laser-assisted tissue microdissection to improve LOH detection, but the real gain in sensitivity has been poorly quantified. We studied a group of 16 inflammatory breast carcinomas that were submitted to both standard DNA extraction from frozen whole tumor samples and laser microdissection performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples. Using PCR with fluorescence-labeled primers, we comparatively analyzed ten polymorphic markers with both sources of DNA. With the LOH detection threshold set at -25%, we showed that 25 LOHs could not be diagnosed with whole tumor samples out of 73 LOHs positively diagnosed in microdissected samples (34%). With the LOH detection threshold set at -50%, the respective figures were 39 LOHs not diagnosed out of 55 LOHs (71%). Measuring the intensity of the allelic decrease, we showed that the mean decrease of the lost allele is -34% with whole tumor samples and -67% with microdissected samples. The increase in sensitivity of LOH detection with microdissection is associated with the density of stromal cells. This strong improvement in LOH detection in this aggressive type of breast cancer indicates that many other molecular studies performed on heterogeneous solid tumors may benefit from a first step of laser microdissection.
Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is often an effective method for sperm retrieval from men with non-obstructive azoospermia. However, TESE has been a blind procedure that does not identify the focal sperm-producing areas of the testicle until after tissue has been excised from the patient. Experience with a new technique of microdissection of testicular tubules is presented here that identifies sperm-containing regions before their removal. Identification of spermatogenically active regions of the testicle is possible by direct examination of the individual seminiferous tubules. The underlying concept for this technique is simple: seminiferous tubules containing many developing germ cells, rather than Sertoli cells alone, are likely to be larger and more opaque than tubules without sperm production. In a sequential series of TESE cases for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, the ability to find spermatozoa increased from 45% (10/22) to 63% (17/27) after introduction of the microdissection technique. Microdissected samples yielded an average of 160,000 spermatozoa per sample in only 9.4 mg of tissue, whereas only 64,000 spermatozoa were found in standard biopsy samples that averaged 720 mg in weight (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For men where microdissection was attempted, successful identification of enlarged tubules was possible in 56% (15/27) of cases. However, spermatozoa were retrieved with microdissection TESE for six men in whom sperm retrieval was unsuccessful with standard TESE approaches (35% of all men with spermatozoa retrieved). These findings suggest that microdissection TESE can improve sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia over that achieved with previously described biopsy techniques.
The molecular examination of pathologically altered cells and tissues at the DNA, RNA, and protein level has revolutionised research and diagnostics in pathology. However, the inherent heterogeneity of primary tissues with an admixture of various reactive cell populations can affect the outcome and interpretation of molecular studies. Recently, microdissection of tissue sections and cytological preparations has been used increasingly for the isolation of homogeneous, morphologically identified cell populations, thus overcoming the obstacle of tissue complexity. In conjunction with sensitive analytical techniques, such as the polymerase chain reaction, microdissection allows precise in vivo examination of cell populations, such as carcinoma in situ or the malignant cells of Hodgkin's disease, which are otherwise inaccessible for conventional molecular studies. However, most microdissection techniques are very time consuming and require a high degree of manual dexterity, which limits their practical use. Laser capture microdissection (LCM), a novel technique developed at the National Cancer Institute, is an important advance in terms of speed, ease of use, and versatility of microdissection. LCM is based on the adherence of visually selected cells to a thermoplastic membrane, which overlies the dehydrated tissue section and is focally melted by triggering of a low energy infrared laser pulse. The melted membrane forms a composite with the selected tissue area, which can be removed by simple lifting of the membrane. LCM can be applied to a wide range of cell and tissue preparations including paraffin wax embedded material. The use of immunohistochemical stains allows the selection of cells according to phenotypic and functional characteristics. Depending on the starting material, DNA, good quality mRNA, and proteins can be extracted successfully from captured tissue fragments, down to the single cell level. In combination with techniques like expression library construction, cDNA array hybridisation and differential display, LCM will allow the establishment of "genetic fingerprints" of specific pathological lesions, especially malignant neoplasms. In addition to the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic markers, this approach could help in establishing individualised treatments tailored to the molecular profile of a tumour. This review provides an overview of the technique of LCM, summarises current applications and new methodical approaches, and tries to give a perspective on future developments. In addition, LCM is compared with other recently developed laser microdissection techniques.
The anatomic heterogeneity of the nephron poses obstacles to microdissection of individual renal compartments for analysis of gene expression. We have systematically analyzed the effects of fixation time and nuclear staining on the ability to recover nucleic acid from individual renal compartments by laser capture microdissection (LCM). Formalin-fixed kidney sections from Wistar rats and archival human renal biopsies were used for DNA analysis. From 1 to 10 individual glomeruli and from 1 to 10 individual proximal tubules were captured sequentially onto polymer films. DNA for beta-globin could be amplified by PCR from even a single glomerulus or tubule. Optimal conditions for DNA amplification were brief (1- or 2-day) formalin fixation. Use of nuclear counterstains, including Weigert's hematoxylin, Harris's hematoxylin, Mayer's hematoxylin, or methyl green, did not adversely affect the ability to extract and amplify DNA. For RNA extraction, glomeruli and tubules were microdissected from renal cryostat sections stored for up to 6 months. By RT-PCR, mRNA expression of the glomerulus-specific gene, Wilms' tumor-1, was identified in as few as 5 microdissected glomeruli and of the tubule-specific gene, aminopeptidase N, in as few as 5 microdissected tubules, with no cross-contamination between renal compartments. Our findings indicate that the LCM method can successfully microdissect pure glomerular and tubular tissue compartments and that the optimal fixation and staining conditions are those employed routinely for renal biopsies, namely overnight formalin fixation and hematoxylin counterstain for DNA extraction, and cryostat sectioning with hematoxylin counterstain for RNA extraction. The specificity of LCM coupled with the sensitivity of RT-PCR should prove a powerful tool for the analysis of gene expression in specific renal compartments from archival human renal biopsies.
Carcinomas with productive fibrosis are the most common forms of breast cancer. Analysis of tumor-specific genomic alterations can be compromised by the presence of normal cells, demanding microdissection of small tumor areas to detect loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability (MSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of precise laser microdissection for microsatellite analyses and investigation of tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer. 39 primary breast tumor samples were analyzed for MSI and LOH by PCR followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver staining using 15 microsatellite markers. Different tumor areas were processed separately in 30 patients. Both intraductal and invasive breast cancer regions were investigated in 11 patients. The following results were obtained: (1) accurate microdissection revealed MSI in 3 or more of the investigated markers (> or =20%) in 33% of the patients, a higher frequency than reported previously; (2) laser microdissection was 43% more sensitive in detection of LOH compared to manual microdissection due to a reduction of contamination by normal cells, and (3) 29 of 30 investigated tumors showed heterogeneity of genetic alterations in different tumor regions. Laser-based microdissection is a valuable tool in genetic analysis of desmoplastic tumors and allows an accurate determination of genetic alterations in histologically different tumor regions.
One difficulty in studying molecular changes of tumours has been the inability to isolate DNA and RNA from a homogeneous cell population. The combination of several new technologies should help overcome these hurdles. Microdissection is a technique for rapid and easy procurement of a pure cellular subpopulation away from its complex tissue milieu. Laser-assisted microdissection has recently been identified as a quick, simple and effective method by which microdissection of complex tissue specimens can be routinely performed for molecular analysis. With the advent of laser microdissection, cDNA libraries can be developed from pure cells obtained directly from stained neoplastic tissue, and microarrays of thousands of genes can now be used to examine gene expression in microdissected tumour tissue samples. This review will concentrate on the application of different microdissection techniques in the area of cancer research.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Microdissection has become indispensable for the selective analysis of stroma-free tumor cell. However, To obtain sufficient RNA from microdissected cells is difficult. The study was designed to seek a specific way to separate nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells from stromal cells and to amplify the RNA from microdissected NPC cells. METHODS: NPC cells were obtained using microdissection from frozen NPC tissue sections, then RNA was extracted from the microdissected NPC cells and reverse transcribed in vitro. The expression levels of beta-actin and GADPH in amplified RNA were detected using RT-PCR. RESULTS: About 20,000-40,000 NPC cells were obtained, RNA was extracted from the cells, about 0.5-2.5 kb RNA fragments were obtained after RNA linear amplification and beta-actin and GADPH levels were integral. CONCLUSION: Microdissection combined with RNA linear amplification can be used to successfully obtain pure NPC cells, the integrity of amplified RNA is good and can be used in further research.