PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Midazolam”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Ketamine Plus Midazolam versus Fentanyl Plus Midazolam for Sedation and Analgesia during Image-guided Procedures in Interventional Radiology: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background Opioid-benzodiazepine regimens remain common for radiologist-administered procedural sedation despite respiratory and analgesic effectiveness concerns. Purpose To compare intraprocedural pain and patient-reported experience between ketamine/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation. Materials and Methods This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single academic center between June 2025 and February 2026. Adults undergoing image-guided lung or bone biopsy or abscess drainage were randomized to fentanyl/midazolam or ketamine/midazolam administered by interventional radiologists. Procedures were performed using US, CT, CT fluoroscopy, or combined CT and US guidance. The primary outcome was maximum intraprocedural pain (0-10 on the Numeric Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, physiologic parameters, oxygen desaturation, patient-reported experience assessed using a modified Heidelberg questionnaire, and complications. Results Among 264 randomized procedures (132 procedures per group) in 260 participants (median age, 68 years [IQR, 61-75 years]; 135 [52%] female), ketamine/midazolam resulted in lower maximum intraprocedural pain than fentanyl/midazolam (mean difference, -1.4 points [95% CI: -2.0, -0.8]; P < .001). Pain scores greater than 4 occurred less frequently with ketamine/midazolam (2.3% vs 17%; absolute difference, 14 percentage points [95% CI: 8, 21]; P < .001). Ketamine/midazolam was associated with higher nadir oxygen saturation (mean difference, +1.4% [95% CI: 0.6, 2.2]; P = .001) and fewer oxygen desaturation events below 90% (three [2.3%] vs 13 [9.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.9, 13.3]; P = .02). Ketamine/midazolam produced deeper sedation and higher intraprocedural systolic blood pressure. Hallucinations occurred more frequently with ketamine/midazolam (15 [11.4%] vs five [3.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.3, 13.9]; P = .03), though overall procedural comfort, reduced recall, and perceived adequacy of sedation were improved. Procedure-related and sedation-related complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion Radiologist-administered ketamine/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation improved analgesia and patient-reported experience with fewer hypoxemic events and no increase in complications compared with fentanyl/midazolam. Clinical trial registration no. NCT07040163

Aged↗
PubMed2026

Electro-clinical efficacy and safety of midazolam in neonatal seizures: a systematic review with individual level exploratory analysis of gestational age-related treatment response.

UNLABELLED: Neonatal seizures are the most common neurological emergency during the neonatal period and are associated with increased mortality and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Despite current recommendations supporting phenobarbital as first-line therapy, seizure control remains suboptimal in a large proportion of neonates, prompting the use of second-line antiseizure medications. Midazolam is increasingly administered in refractory neonatal seizures but evidence regarding its electro-clinical efficacy and safety remains limited and heterogeneous. To systematically review the available evidence on the electro-clinical efficacy and safety of midazolam in neonatal seizures and to perform an exploratory individual-level analysis investigating the association between gestational age and treatment response. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies including neonates with EEG- or aEEG-confirmed seizures treated with midazolam were included. Binary logistic regression was performed to assess the individual-level association between gestational age and treatment response. Eleven studies involving 146 neonates treated with midazolam were included. Electro-clinical response was observed in 101/146 neonates (69.2%), while seizure cessation was achieved in 61/146 neonates (41.8%). In an exploratory complete-case logistic regression analysis, higher gestational age appeared to be associated with a greater probability of electro-clinical response. The predicted probability curve crossed the 50% response probability at approximately 36.5&#xa0;weeks of gestation. Hypotension was the most frequently reported adverse event, while respiratory depression, sedation-related effects, and transient EEG/aEEG suppression were reported less frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam may have a role as an add-on antiseizure medication in neonatal seizures, particularly in refractory cases. However, the evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in study design, EEG monitoring strategies, outcome definitions, and incomplete individual-level data. The observed association between gestational age and response is hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation. WHAT IS KNOWN: &#x2022; Phenobarbital often provides incomplete seizure control in neonates, making second-line antiseizure therapies necessary in refractory cases. &#x2022; Evidence supporting midazolam for neonatal seizures remains limited and heterogeneous. WHAT IS NEW: &#x2022; This systematic review summarizes the electro-clinical efficacy and safety of midazolam and includes an exploratory patient-level analysis suggesting that higher gestational age may be associated with improved treatment response. &#x2022; These findings support further prospective studies on developmental determinants of response to GABAergic therapy.

Humans↗
PubMed1979

Cardiovascular responses to diazepam and midazolam maleate in the dog.

Previous clinical studies establishing the efficacy of midazolam maleate (RO 21-3981), a new water-soluble benzodiazepine for induction of anesthesia, have not critically evaluated the effects of this agent on the cardiovascular system. The present study compares the cardiovascular effects of midazolam maleate and diazepam in conscious dogs. Systemic arterial, pulmonary arterial and central venous pressures, cardiac output, LVmax dP/dt, heart rate and regional coronary blood flow were measured 3 min following intravenous administration of diazepam (0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/kg) or midazolam maleate (0.25, 1.0, and 10.0 mg/kg). Midazolam maleate increased heart rate 10--20 per cent with all three doses and decreased mean arterial blood pressure approximately 10--20 per cent at 1.0 and 10 mg/kg. Cardiac output was increased 10--12 per cent with all three doses of midazolam maleate, and LVmax dP/dt was decreased 13--16 per cent at the two higher doses. Diazepam at all three doses did not alter heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure. Diazepam, 1.0 and 2.5 mg/kg, produced significant (17 per cent) decreases in LVmax dP/dt, and 2.5 mg/kg produced a significant (10 per cent) increase in cardiac output. Neither drug in any dosage altered regional coronary blood flow, systemic or coronary vascular resistance, stroke volume, or stroke work. Maximum alterations in cardiovascular variables occurred with doses of midazolam maleate that are 10--15 times the recommended clinical induction dosage. It is concluded that in concentrations necessary for induction of anesthesia midazolam maleate has minimal effects on cardiovascular function.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Midazolam compared with thiopentone as a hypnotic component in balanced anaesthesia: a randomized, double-blind study.

Midazolam is a short-acting water soluble benzodiazepine derivative. It is a hypnotic used for intravenous anaesthesia induction. The present investigation was designed in a prospective double-blind fashion to compare midazolam with thiopentone as hypnotic components in balanced anaesthesia. The study included 50 healthy patients undergoing relatively short surgical procedures. The results revealed that thiopentone is faster in onset than midazolam for induction of anaesthesia, with less variation of dose response. However, maintenance of anaesthesia was superior with midazolam, requiring fewer supplemental anaesthetic drugs, having better patient acceptance and providing more amnesia. Postoperative complications were very low with both techniques. Midazolam was surprisingly similar to thiopentone in most parameters including emergence time from anaesthesia. Midazolam is a new drug with potential both for induction of anaesthesia and maintenance of balanced anaesthesia.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Effect of ketofol versus Fentanyl-Midazolam sedation on neurological recovery in traumatic brain Injury: A randomised study.

Neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is multifactorial, and sedation is a cornerstone of neurocritical care because of its neuroprotective role. Although ketofol is widely used for anaesthesia, its effectiveness as a sedative regimen in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been well studied. This preliminary exploratory double-blind, randomised study compared ketofol (KP) with fentanyl-midazolam (FM) sedation in adults with moderate-to-severe TBI. Sedation was administered for 72&#xa0;h and titrated to a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score&#xa0;&#x2264;&#xa0;&#xa0;-&#xa0;3. The primary outcome was the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at 30&#xa0;days. Secondary outcomes included GOSE at 90&#xa0;days, incidence of propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS), duration of mechanical ventilation, haemodynamic stability, and ICU and hospital length of stay. Of 120 enrolled patients, 111 were included in the final analysis (57 FM, 54 KP). Baseline characteristics, including injury severity and Marshall CT scores, were comparable. At 30&#xa0;days, good neurological recovery (GOSE 7-8) was more frequent in the KP group than the FM group (26% vs. 10.5%, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.03). At 90&#xa0;days, recovery remained higher with KP (44.4% vs. 33.3%), though the difference was not statistically significant (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.16). Multivariate analysis confirmed ketofol as an independent predictor of good recovery at 30&#xa0;days (adjusted OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.11-11.85, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.033). No PRIS occurred, and secondary outcomes were similar. Ketofol-based sedation was safe and may be associated with improved early neurological recovery compared with fentanyl-midazolam, with a favourable trend toward improved long-term neurological recovery.

Humans↗
PubMed1979

Ro21-3981/ketamine anesthesia for the treatment of poor risk patients.

Two consecutive anesthetics were given to a young severely debilitated patient, who had recently had bone marrow transplantation. On both occasions a combination of a new benzodiazepine, Ro21-3981, and ketamine was used, the first with the patient breathing oxygen spontaneously, and the second under relaxation and artificial ventilation with pure oxygen. The findings suggest that this technique provides cardiovascular stability during anesthesia and rapid return to consciousness, free from emergence phenomena. The technique facilitated the early transport of the patient away from the recovery facilities.

Adult↗