Supportive care guidelines stir debate.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The health care system in the United States, according to some, is on the verge of imploding. The rapidly rising cost of services is causing more and more Minnesotans to forego needed care. At the same time, the increasing costs are placing additional pressure on families, businesses, and state and local government budgets. The Minnesota Medical Association's (MMA) Health Care Reform Task Force has proposed a bold new approach that seeks to ensure affordable health care for all Minnesotans. The proposal is a roadmap to provide all Minnesotans with affordable insurance for essential health care services. In creating this plan, the task force strove to achieve three common reform goals: expand access to care, improve quality, and control costs. To achieve those ends, it has proposed a model built on four key features: (1) A strong public health system, (2) A reformed insurance market that delivers universal coverage, (3) A reformed health care delivery market that creates incentives for increasing value, (4) Systems that fully support the delivery of high-quality care. The task force believes that these elements will provide the foundation for a system that serves everyone and allows Minnesotans to purchase better health care at a relatively lower price. Why health care reform again? The average annual cost of health care for an average Minnesota household is about 11,000 dollars--an amount that's projected to double by 2010, if current trends continue. Real wages are not growing fast enough to absorb such cost increases. If unabated, these trends portend a reduction in access to and quality of care, and a heavier economic burden on individuals, employers, and the government. Furthermore, Minnesota and the United States are not getting the best value for their health care dollars. The United States spends 50 percent more per capita than any other country on health care but lags far behind other countries in the health measures of its population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Reducing violence is a critical health and economic priority. In Minnesota, as in other parts of the United States, violence is increasingly viewed as a public health problem. Helping people work together to prevent violence is one way that managed care organizations are collaborating with public health to improve the health of communities. In 1994, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota worked with community organizations to develop The Minnesota Action Plan to End Gun Violence, a broad-based solution to a community problem: violence in Minnesota. The goal of this initiative was to develop grassroots solutions to violence and to inspire community members to take action. Outcomes of the initiative included: participation by over 1,000 Minnesotans in 12 community violence prevention forums; a widely distributed action plan; Students Stop Guns, a school-based intervention to keep Minnesota schools gun-free; the Governor's Task Force on Violence as a Public Health Problem, which led to a commitment of resources to prevent violence and respond to the victims and consequences of violence, and the Health Care Coalition on Violence, to institutionalize strategies within the Minnesota health care environment. The project's qualitative evaluation resulted in lessons and advice on how to execute a collaborative health improvement initiative. These lessons have been widely shared with Minnesota community health advocates.
This article describes the experience of a private, nonprofit health plan in establishing a collaborative relationship with a state health department. Through a federal grant project, efforts toward assuring quality care for children with special health care needs in managed care settings provided unique opportunities to form partnerships between multiple health plans, community groups, and other stakeholders. Collaborative activities included (1) formation of a pediatric asthma task force and a performance measurement and quality assurance committee; (2) planning and execution of a statewide conference; (3) development of a teaching manual for incorporating asthma education into elementary classroom curricula; and (4) publication of a parent resource manual for health plan members. Key ingredients and influencing factors for successful public-private partnerships are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if a structured encounter form for well-child care improves documentation of well-child care. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review of a before-and-after trial. SETTING: Family practice residency clinic serving a primarily low-socioeconomic urban population. PATIENTS: Children younger than 6 years receiving well-child care visits. INTERVENTION: Detailed checklists were developed and implemented in 1994 for each of 12 well-child examinations for the assessment of children aged 2 weeks to 5 years based on recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Preventive Services Task Force. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documentation of multiple aspects of well-child care, including developmental assessment, safety and nutrition counseling, and laboratory tests for 6-month periods in 1993 and 1994, before and after implementation of the structured encounter form. RESULTS: A total of 842 well-child visits were reviewed. Documentation improved significantly with the use of the encounter form for 19 of the 23 aspects of well-child care that were studied. Screening test rates were less than optimal despite the encounter form. CONCLUSIONS: The structured encounter form was very effective in improving documentation of almost all aspects of well-child care. However, effective communication is needed among physicians, nurses, and parents to ensure optimal screening test rates.
In response to widespread physician noncompliance with "do not resuscitate" (DNR) guidelines in 1983, the ethics committee at St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Paul, MN, set out to clarify the confusion over "supportive care only" (SCO) and DNR orders. A task force of nurses and physicians developed tentative supportive care guidelines and a subcommittee related ethical principles to the supportive care concept. The completed draft, "Principles and Guidelines in Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment," was reviewed by the medical executive board and hospital attorney. St. Joseph's medical staff and board of trustees approved it in May 1985, and the document became hospital policy. The policy addresses patient autonomy, the burden/benefit principle, informed consent, and patient competency. It lists six guidelines for making supportive care plans. St. Joseph's has implemented the policy in several ways. Committee members make "ethics rounds" to discuss patient cases and the guidelines with hospital personnel. A brochure acquaints patients and their families as well as community groups with the guidelines. Nurses have introduced the guidelines to physicians in critical care units. When necessary, new insights will be incorporated into the guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To identify exemplary programs on midlife women's health issues that have been developed and implemented in managed care settings. METHODS: Members of The American Association of Health Plans (AAHP) were invited by mail to submit information on their exemplary programs on midlife women's health issues. AAHP and HealthPartners Research Foundation established 12 criteria by which to evaluate the programs submitted. Following telephone interviews with representatives of eligible programs, they were asked to complete an extensive survey about their successful practices. The Women's Health Task Force of AAHP then reviewed and evaluated every program submission and selected 4 model programs on midlife issues for women. RESULTS: The 4 model programs included the use of health assessment questionnaires to assist providers in identifying risk areas and patients' needs for information; group educational sessions focusing on midlife issues related to lifestyle and hormone replacement therapy; a module-based curriculum syllabus; and an osteoporosis disease management program. All groups utilize multidisciplinary teams to develop and promote educational programs. CONCLUSIONS: As study findings add to our knowledge of menopause treatment approaches and as new information and products become available, some managed care plans are using innovative channels of communication to keep women informed.
The purpose of this randomized controlled community trial is to evaluate the effects of a community intervention utilizing opinion leaders and educational strategies on the cancer pain management knowledge, attitudes, and the practices of physicians and nurses, and cancer pain reported by patients. Six Minnesota communities participated in the study. The three communities randomized to the intervention received educational programs over 15 months. The clinical community opinion leaders participated in a minifellowship, developed community task forces, and interacted with their peers. This strategy was reinforced with community outreach programs, clinical practice guidelines, educational materials, and media events. The primary study end point was patients' pain intensity score. Comparing intervention to control communities, pain prevalence declined slightly, pain management index improved slightly, pain intensity scores increased slightly, patient and family attitude scores did not change, and physicians' and nurses' knowledge and attitude scores improved slightly. None of these changes, however, reached statistical significance. Participation in at least one intervention program improved physicians' and nurses' knowledge and attitude scores that approached statistical significance. Our results suggest that community opinion leaders combined with other educational programs may improve cancer pain management, but this strategy requires further study. The results suggest that more intense intervention application may be effective. Effective strategies to improve cancer pain management remain elusive.