SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Mitotane”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Mitotane associated with cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin in advanced childhood adrenocortical carcinoma: mitotane monitoring and tumor regression.

PURPOSE: To define a mitotane dose for pediatric patients with adrenocortical cancer (ACC) that maintains therapeutic plasma levels (TL) between 14 and 20 microg/mL and to verify its antitumor efficacy in association with 8 cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin (CED). METHODS: Powdered mitotane was dissolved in a medium chain triglyceride oil and administered to 11 children with ACC (2.4 to 15.4 y of age); an initial low dose was increased to 4 g/m2/d. Ten of the 11 children had a germline TP53 R337H mutation. Mitotane plasma levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The mitotane dose to maintain TL in 7 patients ranged from 1.0 to 5.3 g/m2/d. Six children reached mitotane levels of 10 microg/mL in 3.6 months (1.5 to 5.0 mo), whereas 5 children took 8 months (6.5 to 12.5 mo). Minor to partial tumor remission was found in 5 patients (<1 y) and complete remission was found in 2 patients. Of the 3 patients who are alive at the time of report, 1 patient has been without disease for 16 months, and 2 patients have progressive disease. All patients had recurrent metastatic disease (2 to 9 times). Mitotane toxic effects were nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, neurologic alterations, gynecomastia, a rare case of hypertensive encephalopathy, and CED-related hematologic toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Mitotane daily dose to maintain TL is variable and monitoring should start 1.5 months after the beginning of treatment. CED combined with mitotane is the best available pharmacologic treatment for ACC, but further studies are required to characterize different profiles of therapeutic response.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1999

Changes in neoplastic cell features and sensitivity to mitotane during mitotane-induced remission in a patient with recurrent, metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma.

A 58-year-old man had adrenocortical carcinoma in the right adrenal gland. The tumour secreted excessive cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEA-S), and had invaded the right hepatic lobe and vena cava. Eleven months after surgical tumour resection, the serum DHEA-S levels again increased. Local tumour recurrence and a metastasis was found in the lung. Eleven months after surgery chemotherapy with mitotane (o,p'-DDD) was initiated. Twelve weeks of mitotane reduced serum DHEA-S levels and caused these tumours to disappear. The patient was then treated with low-dose mitotane (1.5-2.0 g/day) for 2 years. Serum levels of mitotane remained at less than 10 microg/ml. Although such low serum levels of mitotane and delayed initiation of mitotane after surgery have been proposed to weaken the antineoplastic effect of mitotane, the patient had a remission for 2 years. However, there was then local re-recurrence with an increase in serum DHEA-S and death 4 months later. The histological features of neoplastic cells were quite different comparing tumour resected at surgery and tumour at autopsy. The latter had more frequent mitotic nuclei. This tumour was initially sensitive to mitotane, but later became insensitive.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗

PubMed2006

A new simple HPLC method for measuring mitotane and its two principal metabolites Tests in animals and mitotane-treated patients.

A new C18 reversed-phase column and UV HPLC method for the detection of mitotane, its principal metabolites, dichlorodiphenylacetate and dichlrodiphenylethene, and its precursor DDT is described. In this article mitotane, dichlorodiphenylacetate, and dichlrodiphenylethene concentrations in organs of rats fed on a mitotane diet, and the effects of erythromycin and grapefruit juice as cytochrome P450 common inhibitors are presented. Tissue accumulation of mitotane and dichlrodiphenylethene, the acquired ability to eliminate dichlorodiphenylacetate, and inhibition of beta-hydroxylation by both inhibitors are illustrated here. Blood samples from mitotane-treated patients revealed two correlations: plasma mitotane/dichlrodiphenylethene and plasma mitotane/red cell mitotane.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Comparison of the adrenalytic activity of mitotane and a methylated homolog on normal adrenal cortex and adrenal cortical carcinoma.

Mitotane is an important adrenalytic drug for the treatment of adrenal cancer whose use is limited by toxicity. Reports from another laboratory indicated that a methylated homolog of Mitotane (Mitometh) tested in guinea pigs possessed comparable adrenalytic activity but was less toxic than Mitotane. This observation prompted us to undertake a comparative study of these two drugs on the basis that Mitometh may be a superior agent for the treatment of adrenal cancer. Preliminary studies in guinea pigs failed to show a significant adrenalytic effect for either Mitotane or Mitometh. Thus, we extended the study to 13 mongrel dogs weighing 12-15 kg that were treated daily with Mitometh or Mitotane (50-100 mg/kg) for 6 or 12 days. Cortisol decreased to undetectable levels and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) rose to 10 times the baseline levels within 72 h in Mitotane-treated animals. Despite the achievement of similar drug levels, Mitometh treatment in dogs failed to suppress cortisol or increase ACTH. To determine whether these differences were due to differences in bioavailability, we measured the relative concentration of Mitotane and Mitometh in homogenates of adrenal cortex obtained from Mitotane- and Mitometh-treated dogs. The adrenal concentration of Mitometh determined in Mitometh-treated dogs was 5 times higher than the concentration of Mitotane measured in Mitotane-treated animals. Whereas the adrenal glands of Mitotane-treated dogs showed hemorrhage and necrosis, the Mitometh-treated animals showed no adrenal damage. Despite the lack of adrenalytic activity, Mitometh maintained its toxicity as demonstrated by microscopic evidence of hepatic necrosis and an increase in hepatic enzymes. The adrenalytic effects of both agents was also studied in vitro using a human functioning adrenal cortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295. Whereas Mitotane strongly suppressed cell growth, Mitometh had a weaker effect. We conclude that Mitometh is not likely to be effective in the therapy of adrenal cancer. Moreover, the results of this study are supportive of the view that metabolic transformation of Mitotane is in some way linked to its adrenalytic action.

Adrenal Cortex↗

PubMed2006

Effect of mitotane on pituitary corticotrophs in clinically normal dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of mitotane administration on the function and morphology of pituitary corticotrophs in clinically normal dogs. ANIMALS: 12 clinically normal adult Beagles. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned to the control group or the mitotane treatment group. In mitotane treatment group dogs, mitotane was administered for 1 month. In both groups, ACTH stimulation testing and corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation testing were performed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland and brain was performed in mitotane treatment group dogs before and after administration of mitotane. After CRH stimulation testing and MRI, dogs were euthanatized and the pituitary gland and adrenal glands were excised for gross and histologic examination. RESULTS: ACTH concentrations in mitotane treatment group dogs were significantly higher than in the control group dogs following CRH stimulation. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that pituitary glands were significantly larger in treatment group dogs after administration of mitotane, compared with before administration. On gross and histologic examinations, the adrenal cortex was markedly atrophied. Immunohistochemistry revealed hypertrophy of corticotrophs in pituitary glands of mitotane treatment group dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings indicate that inhibition of the adrenal cortex by continuous administration of mitotane leads to functional amplification and morphologic enhancement of corticotrophs in clinically normal dogs. In instances of corticotroph adenoma, hypertrophy of individual corticotrophs induced by mitotane may greatly facilitate enlargement of the pituitary gland and increases in ACTH secretion.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

PubMed2000

Low-dose monitored mitotane treatment achieves the therapeutic range with manageable side effects in patients with adrenocortical cancer.

Eight patients with adrenocortical cancer were treated with low doses of mitotane (2-3 g daily) while monitoring drug plasma levels. When the mitotane concentrations reached the therapeutic range (defined as mitotane plasma levels between 14-20 microg/mL), a dose reduction was performed to avoid toxicity. Thereafter, the mitotane dose was tailored according to plasma levels. A progressive increase in plasma mitotane concentrations was observed during treatment, and a highly significant linear correlation was found between plasma drug levels and the total mitotane dose. The therapeutic threshold was reached in all patients after 3-5 months and a total mitotane dose of 283-387 g/days (median, 363). The duration of treatment was 8-40 months (median, 9). Toxicity was manageable in all but one patient, who discontinued treatment. It is therefore possible to design a standard low dose schedule, e.g. 3 g/daily for about 3-4 months with following dose adjustments guided by the monitoring of plasma mitotane levels. This approach is able to provide therapeutic mitotane concentrations and limit the unwanted effects. The present data provide a rationale to change the approach to mitotane treatment in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma from high dose to low dose regimens.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗

PubMed1982

Modification of radiation damage in rat spinal cord by mitotane.

Modification of the paralytic response in rats after 6-MV photon irradiation of the spinal cord with either single or split exposures (two equal fractions given in a 24-hour period) by mitotane was investigated. Mitotane was administered as a suspension in physiologic saline (300 mg/kg/day) for either 5 days prior to or 5 days after irradiation. For rats receiving split doses of 6-MV photons, either the last two doses of mitotane were given 2 hours prior to each radiation fraction or mitotane was begun 2 hours after the second fraction and continued for 5 days. The data to 6 months after irradiation indicate that, in rats given mitotane for 5 days prior to single-dose photon irradiation, the paralytic response (as defined by the dose needed to produce paralysis in 50% of the irradiated groups of rats) was enhanced by a dose-enhancement factor (DEF) of 1.40. The DEF in the group of rats given mitotane after single doses of 6-MV photons was 1.15. In the split-dose irradiation experiments, the DEF for the groups of rats given mitotane prior to each radiation fraction was 1.36; while the DEF for the group of rats receiving mitotane beginning after the second fraction was 1.18. These data indicate that mitotane can potentiate the effects of 6-MV photon irradiation to the central nervous system, with mitotane administered prior to irradiation being the most effective sequence.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients.

Mitotane is considered to be the drug of choice for patients with inoperable, recurrent and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma, although a favourable effect of this drug on survival has never been documented. We evaluated the efficacy of mitotane treatment of 96 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma followed up in our department between 1959 and 1992. Complete tumour resection was the goal of the initial treatment. Mitotane treatment was classified according to serum trough concentrations on maintenance therapy: low (< 14 mg l-1) or high (> or = 14 mg l-1). Total tumour resection was feasible in 47 patients (49%), and subtotal resection was performed in 37 patients (39%). Patients who underwent total tumour resection survived significantly longer than those who did not (P < 0.001). Adjuvant mitotane therapy (n = 11) did not influence survival after total resection. Sixty-two patients were given mitotane treatment at some time during their illness, only 30 of whom reached high maintenance serum levels. Mitotane treatment with high serum levels had an independently favourable influence on patient survival, using univariate (P < 0.01) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.01). Mitotane treatment resulting in low serum levels was tantamount to not giving mitotane at all. We conclude that mitotane treatment in adrenocortical carcinoma is effective only when high serum levels can be achieved.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Mitotane for adrenocortical carcinoma treatment.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm with poor prognosis. Mitotane is the only adrenal-specific agent available for the treatment of ACC, and although it has been used for several decades, many of its pharmacological properties, as well as its exact mechanism of action, remain to be fully elucidated. It is known that metabolic activation is essential for the adrenolytic activity of mitotane. Most published clinical reports of mitotane use are retrospective analyses of small numbers of patients, however, the collective findings of these studies indicate that mitotane has activity against ACC; in approximately 25% of cases mitotane led to an objective tumor regression and, in the majority of patients, control of hormone excess could be achieved. Side effects occur frequently during mitotane treatment and they mainly affect the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system. As not all patients respond to mitotane therapy, it is one of the challenges for the future to define the subset of patients who do respond to mitotane to avoid treatment of patients who are unlikely to respond to this toxic drug. The pharmacological properties of mitotane and its efficacy in the treatment of ACC are analyzed in this review.

Adrenocortical Carcinoma↗

PubMed1991

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study 1879: mitotane and adriamycin in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

From November 1979 to July 1986, 52 patients (27 women and 25 men; median age 52 years) with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma entered a prospective, nonrandomized study evaluating moderate-dose mitotane and doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin). Thirty-two tumors (62%) were well differentiated and evidence of hormone production was present in 24 patients (46%). Patients with well-differentiated or functional tumors received mitotane, 6 gm daily; patients for whom mitotane failed or those with poorly differentiated, non-hormone-producing tumors received Adriamycin, 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Initially, 36 patients were treated with mitotane and 16 patients with Adriamycin. Eight patients (22%) responded to mitotane and three (19%) responded to Adriamycin. No response was noted in the 15 patients for whom mitotane failed and who then received Adriamycin. Severe toxicity occurred in 36% of patients who received mitotane and in 26% who received Adriamycin. Overall median survival after onset of treatment was 14 months. We conclude that mitotane or Adriamycin used initially can induce tumor regression in about 22% and 19% of selected patients, respectively. However, Adriamycin is ineffective as second-line chemotherapy for patients with well-differentiated or functioning tumors for whom mitotane is ineffective.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗

PubMed2002

A phase II trial of combination chemotherapy and surgical resection for the treatment of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: continuous infusion doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide with daily mitotane as a P-glycoprotein antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is rare, nearly always fatal, and to the authors' knowledge has few nonsurgical treatment options. Based on in vitro studies demonstrating the efficacy of mitotane as a P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist, and expression of high levels of Pgp in ACC, the authors conducted a study of infusional doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide with oral mitotane +/- surgical resection in patients with metastatic ACC. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with metastatic ACC received daily oral mitotane (mean, 4.6 g/day) and 96-hour infusional doxorubicin (10 mg/m(2)/day), etoposide (75 mg/m(2)/day), and vincristine (0.4 mg/m(2)/day). Four responding patients (11%) underwent surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluable; all had metastatic disease. Eleven patients had not undergone resection of the primary tumor. Approximately 53% of patients had functional tumors. A total of 190 cycles were administered to 36 patients. Responses were observed in 8 patients (22%): 1 complete, 4 partial, and 3 minor responses. The mean duration of response was 12.4 months. Using a landmark method, the median survival of patients who did not respond to chemotherapy was 11.6 months from a point 4 months after the initiation of therapy, whereas that of 8 patients who demonstrated a response to chemotherapy was 34.3 months from that same landmark. High levels of Pgp expression were documented in nine of nine tumors. Mitotane levels > 10 microg/mL, previously shown to antagonize Pgp in vitro, were achieved in 25 of 36 patients (69%). However, rhodamine efflux from CD56-positive cells was not impaired, suggesting poor in vivo Pgp inhibition. The predominant Grade 3/4 toxicity (according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute) was neutropenia in 66% of cycles; however, fever occurred in only 3% of cycles. Daily mitotane was associated with Grade 1/2 nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and neuropsychiatric changes in 31 of 36 patients (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Using a combination regimen of daily mitotane with infusional doxorubicin, vincristine, and etoposide in patients with metastatic ACC, responses were observed in 22% of patients. The superiority of this combination over single-agent mitotane is uncertain. The side effects of mitotane made treatment difficult. More effective Pgp antagonists are needed.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed1990

Successful treatment of a metastatic hormone-producing adrenal cancer by a combination of mitotane, tegafur and surgical resection.

A 34-year-old man had a huge hormone-producing adrenal cancer with multiple lung metastases, direct liver invasion and a tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava. Initial treatment was mitotane alone. The dose of mitotane was 2 g/day initially and gradually increased to 15 g/day in combination with 600 mg of tegafur per day. During the initial phase of chemotherapy, the serum mitotane level was relatively low (2.9-4.6 micrograms/ml) and the pulmonary metastases tended to grow in size in spite of a gradual decline in urinary 17-KS and 17-OHCS and a regression of the primary tumor. A seemingly marked increase in serum mitotane (20.5-34.5 micrograms/ml) was coincident with the addition of tegafur. Rapid and consistent regression of the primary tumor occurred. This excellent response to the chemotherapy made the primary tumor with liver invasion and the metastases resectable. The adverse effect of mitotane, central nervous toxicity, appeared to be serum mitotane level dependent. The present results, together with previous reports in the literature, seem to recommend the following therapeutic approaches to advanced adrenal cancer: monitoring of the serum level may be useful in predicting the efficacy as well as the occurrence of side effects of mitotane, surgical treatment of the lesions should be performed whenever possible, even though it may be only palliative, and the combination of mitotane and tegafur is a choice of chemotherapy which should be evaluated in future studies.

17-alpha-Hydroxypregnenolone↗

PubMed2000

Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and etoposide followed by mitotane at disease progression in patients with locally advanced or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: A previous Southwest Oncology Group study demonstrated a 30% response rate with the combination of cisplatin and mitotane in the treatment of patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Several case reports suggested that the combination of etoposide and cisplatin may be an active regimen in this disease. Because of these reports of potential activity, the authors conducted a Phase II trial evaluating the combination of etoposide and cisplatin. Due to the lack of data regarding the objective response rates to mitotane, the authors planned to evaluate the response rate to mitotane after disease progression on etoposide and cisplatin in patients with no prior mitotane therapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma with objectively measurable disease or biochemical abnormalities received cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2), intravenously on Days 1 and 2, and etoposide, 100 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 2, and 3. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. At the time of disease progression, patients who had not previously received mitotane received 1000 mg orally 4 times a day along with cortisone acetate and fludrocortisone acetate. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients entered onto the study, 45 were eligible. Nine patients had received mitotane previously and 36 had not. Objective responses were noted in 11% of patients (5 of 45 patients) (95% confidence interval, 3.7-24%). The median survival was 10 months. The most common toxic effects were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and neurologic. Only 16 patients with no prior mitotane therapy went on to receive mitotane at the time of disease progression. An objective response was noted in 13% of patients (2 of 16 patients). The most common toxic effects were edema and gastrointestinal effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrates that the combination of cisplatin and etoposide has minimal activity in advanced and metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma and other treatment strategies are warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Metabolic activation and binding of mitotane in adrenal cortex homogenates.

Mitotane [1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane, o,p'-DDD] is an adrenocorticolytic agent of value in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma and Cushing's syndrome. In support of a program to develop agents superior to mitotane, it is the purpose of this study to explore the relationship of the metabolism of mitotane to its binding to adrenal cortex tissue from several sources. The objective was to detect the mitotane moiety responsible for its covalent binding in various test systems. Studies were conducted with an 125l-labeled analog of mitotane, 1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-iodophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane, prior to a comparison to results with lower specific activity [14C]mitotane. With dog adrenal cortical whole homogenates, the majority of covalent binding was to proteins with an additional one-sixth of the total bound radioactivity associated with a phospholipid fraction. No radioactivity was associated with DNA. The rank order of species in regard to metabolism and protein binding was bovine > dog > rat adrenal homogenates > human normal adrenal or tumor homogenates. The percentage of radioactivity recovered from the hydrolysates of those fractions was uniformly high. In addition, the only metabolite present in the hydrolysates corresponded to 1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-iodophenyl)acetic acid from the iodo analog of o,p'-DDD and the corresponding o,p'-dichlorodiphenylacetic acid (o,p'-DDA) from o,p'-DDD. Our results are consistent with an acyl chloride being the reactive intermediate formed from the dichloromethyl moiety of mitotane, which leads to both DDA metabolite formation and binding to adrenal cortical bionucleophiles.

Adrenal Cortex↗

PubMed1995

A high-pressure liquid chromatographic method for measuring mitotane [1,1-(o,p'-Dichlorodiphenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane] and its metabolite 1,1-(o,p'-Dichlorodiphenyl)-2,2-dichloroethene in plasma.

The adrenolytic agent mitotane [o,p'-DDD or 1,1-(o,p'-dichlorodiphenyl)-2, 2-dichloroethane] has been employed in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with adrenal carcinoma for several decades. Its use is hampered by serious side effects, which may be limited by analytically guided dose modifications in the individual patient. Mitotane analyses have previously been undertaken by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. A sensitive high-pressure liquid chromatographic method for measuring mitotane in plasma is described. After protein precipitation with 1.5 vol of acetone, mitotane and its metabolite 1,1-(o,p'-dichlorodiphenyl)-2,2-dichloroethene (o,p'-DDE) are resolved by isocratic elution from a C18 reversed-phase support and quantified by ultraviolet detection at 230 nm. Recoveries of mitotane and o,p'-DDE after deproteinization were quantitative. Within-run and between-day coefficients of variation were < 4% over the entire therapeutic range. The limit of detection was 0.25 mumol/L and the standard curve was linear in the 1-100 mumol/L range. The method has been evaluated using samples obtained from an adolescent girl who had metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma. Data from this single patient may suggest that systemic absorption of mitotane is adequate, and toxicity possibly decreased, when mitotane is administered by the rectal route.

Absorption↗

PubMed2000

Clinical results of the use of mitotane for adrenocortical carcinoma.

Mitotane (o,p'-DDD) acts mainly as an inhibitor of intramitochondrial pregnenolone and cortisol synthesis. Its adrenolytic effect depends on metabolic activation due to conversion to o,p'-DDA and o,p'-DDE. The drug has been used for 40 years in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma, mainly its regional and metastatic stage, as an adjuvant to surgical resection of the tumor. In the medical literature there are controversial opinions about its efficacy for the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. In our experience, mitotane administered immediately after surgery appeared to be much more efficient than when administered later. We have administered this drug in all cases of microscopically confirmed adrenocortical carcinoma, irrespectively of stage at the time of surgery, for fear of a false too optimistic classification. In our series of 82 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma, 59 patients have been treated with mitotane, 32 of them immediately after surgery, and 27 with a delay of 2 to 24 months. Today there are 18 survivors in the group of patients treated with mitotane soon after the operation and only 6 survivors in the group receiving mitotane with a delay. All patients were simultaneously given replacement therapy. Undesired effects of mitotane administration included increased aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase activity, decreased white cell, platelet or red cell number, and myasthenia. Furthermore, we used mitotane with good results in Cushing's syndrome of non-malignant origin as pre-treatment before surgery or in long-term treatment for patients with poor tolerance of other adrenal inhibitors.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Mitotane associated with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. Italian Group for the Study of Adrenal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The use of either mitotane or chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has led to scanty and controversial results. The recent finding that mitotane is able to reverse in vitro multidrug resistance has provided a rational basis for combining this agent with cytotoxic drugs. The association of mitotane with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EDP) in the treatment of patients with advanced, inoperable ACC was tested in an Italian multicenter Phase II trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (18 women and 10 men; median age, 47 years; range, 27-65 years) with measurable disease were enrolled in the study and evaluated for toxicity and response. There were 18 patients with clinical and/or biochemical evidence of steroid hypersecretion. An EDP schedule (etoposide 100 mg/m2 on Days 5-7, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 9) was administered intravenously every 4 weeks; concomitantly, patients were given up to 4 g/day of oral mitotane or the maximum tolerated dose, without any interruption between chemotherapy cycles. RESULTS: According to World Health Organization criteria, complete response was achieved in 2 patients and partial response in 13, for an overall response rate of 53.5% (95% CI, 35-72%). Stable disease was observed in 8 patients and progressive disease in 5. Responses occurred in patients with both functioning and nonfunctioning tumors, and more often in those bearing lymph node and lung metastases. Time to progression in responding patients was 24.4 months. Generally, the EDP regimen was well tolerated. Only 4 patients received reduced doses, whereas 3 discontinued early chemotherapy due to toxicity. The addition of mitotane increased neurologic and gastrointestinal side effects. Due to these additional toxicities, only 9 patients regularly took the drug at the planned dose (4 g/day); 11 received the maximum tolerated dose of 3 g/day, 6 received 2 g/day, and 1 received 1 g/day. Mitotane was also responsible for raised serum levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. A complete hormone response (normalization of altered biochemical parameters) was observed in 9 of 16 evaluable patients with functioning tumors. CONCLUSIONS: EDP plus mitotane combination chemotherapy appears to be active and manageable treatment for patients with advanced ACC.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Impact of adjuvant mitotane on the clinical course of patients with adrenocortical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare and aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Adjuvant mitotane administration has been suggested as a strategy that might improve the outcome of patients with localized disease. METHODS: The authors analyzed the clinical outcome of patients with localized or regional adrenocortical cancer. The study included 19 patients who were registered at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center during a 3-year period and who had localized or regional disease at the time of surgery. Of these, eight patients received mitotane postoperatively and continued the drug until their last contact or recurrence (Group A, adjuvant); five patients began taking mitotane after surgery but discontinued it after 2-12 months for reasons unrelated to the disease (Group P, postoperative); and six patients did not receive mitotane (Group N, no mitotane). All patients have been followed for at least 12 months. RESULTS: The treatment groups differed significantly in their time to recurrence; the disease-free interval was shortest in Group A (P = 0.0055, by log-rank test). There was no statistical difference in survival among the groups, but the profile remained unfavorable for Group A. The 2-year survival rate was 100% for Groups N and P but only 43% for Group A. Of the potentially confounding factors, gender, age, steroid hypersecretion, and tumor size, none had any influence on recurrence or survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the conclusion that adjuvant mitotane is beneficial in patients with localized or regional adrenocortical cancer. Neither the disease-free interval nor survival was improved by the drug. The authors suggest that alternative therapeutic strategies be explored for the management of these patients.

Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms↗