PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Motion Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1977

Quantitation of motion perception in the digits: a psychophysical study in normal human subjects.

Threshold perception of motion of the digits was obtained in 14 normal subjects. The metacarpophalangeal joint of the index and the fifth finger of each hand and the metatarsophalangeal joint of the hallux of each foot were passively moved up and down with respect to a horizontal plane defined by the palmar or plantar surface. The motion was sinusoidal at frequencies of 0.5 and 5.0 Hz. A mpdified von Békésy paradigm similar to that used in audiometry was utilized to yield threshold levels of motion sensation. There was little difference in the thresholds obtained for the different joints. The difference between high- and low-frequency stimulation, however, was significant (p less than 0.001): the 0.5 Hz threshold was found to range from 0.8 to 1.0 degree, whereas the 5.0 Hz threshold varied from 0.4 to 0.6 degree. It is thought that motion sense is largely dependent on joint receptor contributions, but muscle and cutaneous receptors may also contribute to this proprioceptive sensation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1976

Stimulus length and orientation variables interact in peripheral motion perception.

To determine the effects of stimulus length and orientation on the perception of motion, 5 experienced subjects responded with a simple reaction to accelerating lines in peripheral vision while fixating on a reference cross at the center of a cathode-ray tube. Three experimental variables were involved: (a) line length, (b) direction of motion, and (c) orientation of the line with respect to the motion. Simple reaction time (RT) was significantly longer for vertical than for horizontal motion and for lines oriented in-line with the direction of motion than for lines oriented perpendicular to the direction of motion. A significant interaction was found between line length and orientation. The results show that the generalization that RT is shorter for small objects than for large objects must be modified in terms of the orientation of the object.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

The Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon: a temporal frequency effect on perceived velocity in afferent motion perception.

Apparent velocities of moving visual stimuli are known to be different depending on whether the subject pursues the stimulus (efferently controlled motion perception) or whether the eye is stationary and the image moves across the retina (afferent motion perception). Afferent motion perception of a periodic pattern or a moving single object causes overestimation of velocity (magnitude estimations) as compared to smooth pursuit. This socalled Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon is shown to depend on local temporal frequency stimulation on the retina caused by the repetitive passage of contrast borders of the moving periodic pattern. This is evidenced by the fact that for a given stimulus speed the amount of overestimation is a function of the spatial frequency of the pattern (or the angular subtend of a single moving object) and that the Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon is not observed if a single edge moves. Background characteristics seem not to influence the apparent velocity during smooth pursuit.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Insect motion perception.

The first step in this work of reconstruction of a theory of insect vision was to demonstrate that visual behaviour relies on scanning by self-motion and apparently involves measurement of angular velocities of contrasts moving across the eye. The next step was to demonstrate that parallax is also significant as a way of segmenting the visual scene into separate objects. There followed a series of experiments to rule out the existing theory that motion perception depends on autocorrelation, and at the same time an alternative theory was developed. The new theory assumes that at the level of the optic medulla there are numerous parallel channels on each visual axis, representing different neurons, all looking out for their specific combination of signals. The combinations are formed by positive, negative or no-change temporal contrasts at two adjacent visual axes at two successive times, forming 3(4) = 81 possible templates. Simulation of this highly parallel system shows that it can represent the moving image in a compact form that would be adequate to explain what is known for motion and form vision (but not colour vision) in insects. Form, like colour, would be seen as the ratio of numbers of responses of particular templates, in the same way that colours are seen as ratios of responses of receptors for different wavelengths.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Algorithms↗
PubMed1978

Subjective Lorentz transformations and the perception of motion.

It has been known for some 40 years that the perceived velocity of a moving object does not correspond to its physical velocity. It is also known that the perceived length and temporal duration of a moving objects is affected by its physical velocity. In this paper it is argued that such phenomenal distortions can be embedded in a model for motion perception that involves the concepts of moving frames, Lorentz transformations, perceived length contractions, and time dilations. Experimental results support this model and indicate that c, the maximum perceivable velocity of movement, plays a crucial role in determining motion effects.

Humans↗
PubMed1975

Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions.

The basic characteristics of the sensation of linear horizontal motion have been studied. Objective linear motion was induced by means of a moving cart. Visually induced linear motion perception (linearvection) was obtained by projection of moving images at the periphery of the visual field. Image velocity and luminance thresholds for the appearance of linearvection have been measured and are in the range of those for image motion detection (without sensation of self motion) by the visual system. Latencies of onset are around 1 sec and short term adaptation has been shown. The dynamic range of the visual analyser as judged by frequency analysis is lower than for the vestibular analyser. Conflicting situations in which visual cues contradict vestibular and other proprioceptive cues show, in the case of linearvection a dominance of vision which supports the idea of an essential although not independent role of vision in self motion perception.

Adaptation, Psychological↗