PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Myogenin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A hypomorphic myogenin allele reveals distinct myogenin expression levels required for viability, skeletal muscle development, and sternum formation.

The myogenic basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor myogenin plays an essential role in the differentiation of skeletal muscle and, secondarily, in rib and sternum formation during mouse development. However, virtually nothing is known about the quantitative requirements for myogenin in these processes. Here, we describe the generation of mice carrying a hypomorphic allele of myogenin, which expresses myogenin transcripts at approximately one-fourth the level of the wild-type myogenin allele. The hypomorphic allele in combination with wild-type and myogenin-null alleles was used to create an allelic series. Embryos representing the complete range of genotypes from homozygous wild type to homozygous null were analyzed for their viability, ability to form normal ribs and sternum, and extent of skeletal muscle differentiation. Embryos carrying the hypomorphic myogenin allele over a wild-type allele were normal. In embryos bearing homozygous hypomorphic alleles, the sternum developed normally and extensive skeletal muscle differentiation occurred. However, muscle hypoplasia and reduced muscle-specific gene expression were apparent in these embryos, and the mice were not viable as neonates. When the hypomorphic allele was placed over a myogenin-null allele, the resulting embryos had sternum defects resembling homozygous myogenin-null embryos, and there was severe muscle hypoplasia. Our results demonstrate that skeletal muscle formation is highly sensitive to the absolute levels of myogenin and that correct sternum formation, skeletal muscle differentiation, and viability each require distinct threshold levels of myogenin.

Alleles↗

Mapping of myogenin transcription during embryogenesis using transgenes linked to the myogenin control region.

During vertebrate embryogenesis, the muscle-specific helix-loop-helix protein myogenin is expressed in muscle cell precursors in the developing somite myotome and limb bud before muscle fiber formation and is further upregulated during myogenesis. We show that cis-acting DNA sequences within the 5' flanking region of the mouse myogenin gene are sufficient to direct appropriate temporal, spatial, and tissue-specific transcription of myogenin during mouse embryogenesis. Myogenin-lacZ transgenes trace the fate of embryonic cells that activate myogenin transcription and suggest that myogenic precursor cells that migrate from the somite myotome to the limb bud are committed to a myogenic fate in the absence of myogenin transcription. Activation of a myogenin-lacZ transgene can occur in limb bud explants in culture, indicating that signals required for activation of myogenin transcription are intrinsic to the limb bud and independent of other parts of the embryo. These results reveal multiple populations of myogenic precursor cells during development and suggest the existence of regulators other than myogenic helix-loop-helix proteins that maintain cells in the early limb bud in the myogenic lineage.

Animals↗

Accelerated response of the myogenin gene to denervation in mutant mice lacking phosphorylation of myogenin at threonine 87.

Gene expression in skeletal muscle is regulated by a family of myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins. The binding of these bHLH proteins, notably MyoD and myogenin, to E-boxes in their own regulatory regions is blocked by protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated phosphorylation of a single threonine residue in their basic region. Because electrical stimulation increases PKC activity in skeletal muscle, these data have led to an attractive model suggesting that electrical activity suppresses gene expression by stimulating phosphorylation of this critical threonine residue in myogenic bHLH proteins. We show that electrical activity stimulates phosphorylation of myogenin at threonine 87 (T87) in vivo and that calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), as well as PKC, catalyzes this reaction in vitro. We find that phosphorylation of myogenin at T87 is dispensable for skeletal muscle development. We show, however, that the decrease in myogenin (myg) expression following innervation is delayed and that the increase in expression following denervation is accelerated in mutant mice lacking phosphorylation of myogenin at T87. These data indicate that two distinct innervation-dependent mechanisms restrain myogenin activity: an inactivation mechanism mediated by phosphorylation of myogenin at T87, and a second, novel regulatory mechanism that regulates myg gene activity independently of T87 phosphorylation.

Animals↗

Strong immunostaining for myogenin in rhabdomyosarcoma is significantly associated with tumors of the alveolar subclass.

Rhabdomyosarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with respect to their molecular basis, degree of differentiation, histology, and clinical behavior. Because of the wide variation of tumor morphology, it is often difficult to distinguish between the distinct subtypes of rhabdomyosarcomas. By using cryosections of tumor specimens and immunohistochemistry, in the present study we show that strong expression of myogenin in rhabdomyosarcoma is associated with alveolar histology (P = <0.0001, Fisher's exact test). Although staining for myogenin was observed in 22 of 26 rhabdomyosarcomas, all alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (nine of nine) showed high levels of staining for myogenin, as defined by the frequency and intensity of staining of the tumor cells. The staining pattern suggests that the tumor cells are clonally derived from myogenin-positive progenitor cells. In contrast, most embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (13 of 15) were either negative or showed a low level of staining for myogenin. In these tumors a larger proportion of tumor cells were distinctly negative for myogenin. Six of seven alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas that strongly stained for myogenin were also positive for Pax3-7/Forkhead (FKHR) by polymerase chain reaction/reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. One of two embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas that strongly stained for myogenin was retrospectively found to be positive for Pax3/FKHR transcripts. Quantitative analysis for myogenin by Western blotting using a smaller subset of rhabdomyosarcomas revealed that in general there was a good correlation between immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting (P = 0.01, Pearson Correlation), although the former technique was more sensitive for detecting tumors with low levels of the protein. On average, alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas expressed at least threefold more myogenin than embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas. Our data show that staining for myogenin will be a simple, rapid, and accurate adjunct for distinguishing between alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas. We propose that embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas result from an early block in myogenesis, before the expression of myogenin. In contrast, we propose that alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas either originate from a late block in myogenesis (after expression of myogenin) or that the pathological mechanisms involved in these neoplasms also induce strong expression of this protein.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Are myogenin and myoD1 expression specific for rhabdomyosarcoma? A study of 150 cases, with emphasis on spindle cell mimics.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood, displays a variety of histologic patterns. Immunohistochemistry is used extensively to distinguish RMS from its mimics. Myogenin and MyoD1, myogenic transcriptional regulatory proteins expressed early in skeletal muscle differentiation, are considered sensitive and specific markers for RMS and are more specific than desmin and muscle-specific actin and more sensitive than myoglobin. Previous studies have focused on expression of myogenin and MyoD1 in small round cell tumors. This study assesses myogenin and MyoD1 in rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes and spindle cell tumors considered in the differential diagnosis of RMS. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue from 32 RMS, 107 non-RMS, and 11 benign skeletal muscle samples was stained for myogenin and MyoD1 with standard immunohistochemical techniques. Nuclear positivity was scored on a three-tiered scale. All RMSs expressed myogenin. Alveolar RMS (ARMS) showed strong nuclear staining, especially in tumor cells lining fibrous septae and perivascular regions. In cases with a subtle alveolar architecture on routinely stained sections, myogenin highlighted and enhanced visualization of the alveolar morphologic pattern. Embryonal RMSs (ERMSs) were more variable in myogenin staining pattern and intensity. No cases of nodular fasciitis, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, myofibrosarcoma, leiomyoma, leiomyosarcoma, or alveolar soft part sarcoma stained for myogenin. Focal nuclear reactivity was seen in desmoid (2 of 10), infantile myofibromatosis (2 of 10), synovial sarcoma (1 of 10), and infantile fibrosarcoma (2 of 10). Non-neoplastic skeletal muscle fiber nuclei stained positively for myogenin in both tumor-associated samples (25 of 40) and benign skeletal muscle samples (5 of 11). Although all RMSs were immunoreactive for MyoD1, cytoplasmic and nonspecific background staining and reactivity of nonmyoid tissues hindered its practical utility in paraffin-embedded samples in this study. Although myogenin is a highly sensitive and specific marker for RMS, it is rarely seen in other spindle cell soft tissue tumors. As previously reported, ARMS stained more strongly than ERMS. In contrast to previous studies, rare non-RMS (7 of 107) displayed focal nuclear reactivity, and entrapped atrophic or regenerative skeletal muscle fibers also stained positively. Although these are potential pitfalls in the interpretation of myogenin, careful attention to morphology and other features, to the relative paucity of myogenin-positive nuclei in non-RMS. and to the presence of entrapped muscle fibers should prevent incorrect interpretation. Because the extent of myogenin expression in RMS is much greater than in non-RMS, it is a very useful marker when interpreted in the context of other clinicopathologic data.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Opposing early inhibitory and late stimulatory effects of insulin-like growth factor-I on myogenin gene transcription.

Insulinlike growth factors (IGFs) stimulate skeletal muscle cell differentiation in association with an increase in the mRNA of myogenin, a member of the MyoD family of skeletal muscle-specific transcription factors that plays an essential role in the differentiation process. However, this is a relatively late effect, requiring treatment periods of >24 h. In contrast, IGFs initially inhibit skeletal muscle cell differentiation, associated with a marked reduction in myogenin mRNA. The mechanisms by which IGF-I initially inhibits and subsequently stimulates myogenin expression are unknown. In the first 24 h, we find that IGF-I inhibits myogenin gene transcription by >80% but has no effect on myogenin mRNA stability. Similarly, in the first 24 h, IGF-I markedly inhibits myogenin promoter activity; the sequence -145 to -9 of the myogenin gene is sufficient to confer this inhibitory effect of IGF-I. In contrast, 48 h of treatment with IGF-I results in an increase in myogenin promoter activity that parallels the increase in myogenin steady-state mRNA. This increase in promoter activity is completely prevented in constructs lacking the sequence -1,565 to -375 of the myogenin gene. These data indicate that the early inhibitory and late stimulatory effects of IGF-I on myogenin expression are mediated at the level of transcription, and that these time-dependent, opposing effects of IGF-I on myogenin transcription are mediated by distinct regions of the myogenin gene. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a gene whose promoter activity is initially inhibited and subsequently stimulated by IGF-I.

Animals↗

MRF4 can substitute for myogenin during early stages of myogenesis.

MRF4, myogenin, MyoD, and Myf-5 are the four members of the basic helix-loop-helix family of muscle-specific regulatory factors (MRFs). We examined whether MRF4 could substitute for myogenin in vivo by determining if the myofiber- and MRF4-deficient phenotype of myogenin (-/-) mice could be rescued by a myogenin promoter-MRF4 transgene. When the transgene was expressed at a physiological level in myogenin-deficient fetuses, we found that expression of the endogenous MRF4 gene was restored to normal levels, whereas MyoD levels were unchanged. Thus, MRF4 can participate in a positive autoregulatory loop and can substitute for myogenin to activate its own promoter. Myogenin-deficient fetuses that expressed the transgene also had more myosin, more and larger myofibers, and a more normal ribcage morphology than myogenin-deficient littermates without the transgene. The transgene failed, however, to restore normal numbers of myofibers or viability to myogenin-deficient mice, because the approximately 1.6 kb myogenin promoter fragment was not expressed in most late-forming myofibers. These results demonstrate that MRF4 is able to substitute for myogenin to activate MRF4 expression and promote myofiber formation during the early stages of myogenesis.

Animals↗

MyoD cannot compensate for the absence of myogenin during skeletal muscle differentiation in murine embryonic stem cells.

myogenin (-/-) mice display severe skeletal muscle defects despite expressing normal levels of MyoD. The failure of MyoD to compensate for myogenin could be explained by distinctions in protein function or by differences in patterns of gene expression. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we compared the abilities of constitutively expressed myogenin and MyoD to support muscle differentiation in embryoid bodies made from myogenin (-/-) ES cells. Differentiated embryoid bodies from wild-type embryonic stem (ES) cells made extensive skeletal muscle, but embryoid bodies from myogenin (-/-) ES cells had greatly attenuated muscle-forming capacity. The inability of myogenin (-/-) ES cells to generate muscle was independent of endogenous MyoD expression. Skeletal muscle was restored in myogenin (-/-) ES cells by constitutive expression of myogenin. In contrast, constitutive expression of MyoD resulted in only marginal enhancement of skeletal muscle, although myocyte numbers greatly increased. The results indicated that constitutive expression of MyoD led to enhanced myogenic commitment of myogenin (-/-) cells but also indicated that committed cells were impaired in their ability to form muscle sheets without myogenin. Thus, despite their relatedness, myogenin's role in muscle formation is distinct from that of MyoD, and the distinction cannot be explained merely by differences in their expression properties.

Animals↗

Activation of the myogenin promoter during mouse embryogenesis in the absence of positive autoregulation.

Myogenin, a member of the MyoD family of helix-loop-helix proteins, can induce myogenesis in a wide range of cell types. In addition to activating muscle structural genes, members of the MyoD family can autoactivate their own and cross-activate one another's expression in transfected cells. This has led to the hypothesis that autoregulatory loops among these factors provide a mechanism for amplifying and maintaining the muscle-specific gene expression program in vivo. Here, we make use of myogenin-null mice to directly test this hypothesis. To investigate whether the myogenin protein autoregulates the myogenin gene during embryogenesis, we introduced a myogenin-lacZ transgene into mice harboring a null mutation at the myogenin locus. Despite a severe deficiency of skeletal muscle in myogenin-null neonates, the myogenin-lacZ transgene was expressed normally in myogenic cells throughout embryogenesis. These results show that myogenin is not required for regulation of the myogenin gene and argue against the existence of a myogenin autoregulatory loop in the embryo.

Animals↗

Myogenin and the SWI/SNF ATPase Brg1 maintain myogenic gene expression at different stages of skeletal myogenesis.

Many studies have examined transcriptional regulation during the initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation; however, there is less information regarding transcriptional control during adult myogenesis and during the maintenance of the differentiated state. MyoD and the mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes containing the Brg1 ATPase are necessary to induce myogenesis in cell culture models and in developing embryonic tissue, whereas myogenin and Brg1 are critical for the expression of the late genes that induce terminal muscle differentiation. Here, we demonstrate that myogenin also binds to its own promoter during the late stages of embryonic muscle development. As is the case during embryonic myogenesis, MyoD and Brg1 co-localize to the myogenin promoter in primary adult muscle satellite cells. However, in mature myofibers, myogenin and Brg1 are preferentially co-localized to the myogenin promoter. Thus, the myogenin promoter is occupied by different myogenic factors at different times of myogenesis. The relevance of myogenin in the continued expression from its own promoter is demonstrated in culture, where we show that myogenin, in the absence of MyoD, is capable of maintaining its own expression by recruiting the Brg1 ATPase to modify promoter chromatin structure and facilitate myogenin expression. Finally, we utilized in vivo electroporation to demonstrate that Brg1 is required for the continued production of the myogenin protein in newborn skeletal muscle tissue. These findings strongly suggest that the skeletal muscle phenotype is maintained by myogenin and the continuous activity of Brg1-based SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes.

Animals↗

Myogenin resides in the nucleus and acquires high affinity for a conserved enhancer element on heterodimerization.

Myogenin is a member of a family of muscle-specific factors that can activate the muscle differentiation program in nonmyogenin cells. Using antibodies directed against unique domains of myogenin, we show in the present study that myogenin resides in the nucleus of differentiated muscle cells. Myogenin translated in vitro does not exhibit detectable DNA binding activity; however, when dimerized with the ubiquitous enhancer-binding factor E12, it acquires high affinity for an element in the core of the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) enhancer that is conserved among many muscle-specific genes. Antibody disruption experiments show that myogenin, synthesized during differentiation of the BC3H1 and C2 muscle cell lines, is part of a complex that binds to the same site in the MCK enhancer as myogenin-E12 translated in vitro. Mutagenesis of the myogenin-E12-binding site in the MCK enhancer abolishes binding of the heterodimer and prevents trans-activation of the enhancer by myogenin. The properties of myogenin suggest that its functions as a sequence-specific DNA-binding factor that interacts directly with muscle-specific genes during myogenesis. The dependence of myogenin on E12 for high-affinity DNA binding activity also suggests that the susceptibility of various cell types to the actions of myogenin may be influenced by the cellular factors with which it may interact.

Base Sequence↗

Role of tyrosine kinase in the regulation of myogenin expression.

Using an affinity-purified anti-myogenin antibody, three stages of mouse myoblast C2C12 cells during myogenesis could be identified: proliferating myoblasts as myogenin-negative mononucleated cells, differentiating myoblasts as myogenin-positive mononucleated cells, and myotubes as myogenin-positive multinucleated cells. We found differential effects of genistein, an inhibitor of protein-tyrosine kinase, on myogenic cells during these three stages. Genistein severely inhibited myotube formation and myogenin production in differentiating myoblasts by inhibiting the transcription of the myogenin gene in a dose-dependent manner. We also found that genistein inactivated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) accompanied by suppression of myogenin expression. In contrast, genistein failed to inactivate MAP kinase and eliminate myogenin from myotubes. The results suggest that protein-tyrosine kinase plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of myogenin through the MAP kinase cascade during myogenesis. Furthermore, genistein inhibited the transactivation of the myosin heavy chain gene by constitutively expressed myogenin. Therefore, it is suggested that protein-tyrosine kinase is involved in the post-translational regulation of myogenin as well as in transcriptional regulation during myogenesis.

Animals↗

Myogenin's functions do not overlap with those of MyoD or Myf-5 during mouse embryogenesis.

The four myogenic basic helix-loop-helix proteins, MyoD, myogenin, Myf-5, and MRF4, can each activate skeletal muscle differentiation when introduced into nonmuscle cells. During embryogenesis, each of these genes is expressed in a unique but overlapping pattern in skeletal muscle precursors and their descendants. Gene knockout experiments have shown that MyoD and Myf-5 play seemingly redundant roles in the generation of myoblasts. However, the role of either of these genes during differentiation in vivo has not been determined. In contrast, a myogenin-null mutation blocks differentiation and results in a dramatic decrease in muscle fiber formation, yet the role of myogenin in the generation or maintenance of myoblast populations is not known. Because myogenin possesses the same myogenic activity as MyoD and Myf-5 in vitro and the expression patterns of these three genes overlap in vivo, we sought to determine if myogenin shares certain functions with either MyoD or Myf-5 in vivo. We therefore generated mice with double homozygous null mutations in the genes encoding MyoD and myogenin or Myf-5 and myogenin. These mice showed embryonic and perinatal phenotypes characteristic of the combined defects observed in mice mutant for each gene alone. As shown by histological analysis and expression of muscle-specific genes, the numbers of undifferentiated myoblasts and residual myofibers were comparable between myogenin-mutant homozygotes and the double-mutant homozygotes. Myoblasts isolated from neonates of the combined mutant genotypes underwent myogenesis in tissue culture, indicating that no more than two of the four myogenic factors are required to support muscle differentiation. These results demonstrate that the functions of myogenin do not overlap with those of MyoD or Myf-5 and support the view that myogenin acts in a genetic pathway downstream of MyoD and Myf-5.

Animals↗

Calpastatin in rat myoblasts: transient diminution and decreased phosphorylation depend on myogenin-directed myoblast differentiation.

The formation of skeletal muscle fibers involves cessation of myoblast division, followed by myoblast differentiation and fusion to multinucleated myofibers. The myogenic regulatory factor myogenin appears at the onset of differentiation; it is required for muscle fiber formation, and cannot be replaced by other factors. The myogenin-dependent pathways and targets are not fully known. Previous studies, indicating an involvement of calpain-calpastatin and caspase in myoblast fusion, were based on the use of various inhibitors. The availability of myogenin deficient cell lines that are incapable of fusion, but regain the ability to differentiate when transfected with myogenin, provide a convenient means to study calpain-calpastatin and caspase in fusing and non-fusing myoblasts without the use of inhibitors. The differentiating wild type myoblasts exhibit decreased calpastatin phosphorylation, transient diminution in calpastatin mRNA, caspase-1 dependent diminution in calpastatin protein, and calpain-promoted proteolysis. In the myogenin-deficient myoblasts, calpastatin phosphorylation is not diminished, caspase-1 is not activated, calpastatin mRNA and protein are not diminished, and protein degradation does not occur. The myogenin-deficient myoblasts transfected with myogenin gene regain the ability to fuse, and exhibit the alterations in calpastatin and proteolysis observed in the wild type cells. Overall, the results demonstrate that the regulation of calpain in these myoblasts is independent of myogenin. In contrast, the regulation of calpastatin depends on myogenin function. The temporary diminution of calpastatin during myogenin-directed differentiation of myoblasts allows calpain activation and calpain-induced protein degradation, required for myoblast differentiation and fusion.

Animals↗

Muscle-specific expression of myogenin in zebrafish embryos is controlled by multiple regulatory elements in the promoter.

Myogenin is a member of the basic Helix-Loop-Helix transcription factor family that play key roles in myoblast specification and differentiation. Myogenin is specifically expressed in developing somite and skeletal muscles in zebrafish embryos. To determine the regulation of myogenin expression, we reported here the characterization of zebrafish myogenin gene and analysis of its promoter activity in zebrafish embryos. Our data showed that a 0.8-kb myogenin promoter was sufficient to direct correct temporal and spatial muscle-specific green fluorescence protein expression in zebrafish embryos. Sequence analysis identified two putative E box sites in the myogenin gene promoter. In addition, a MEF2 recognition site and a MEF3 binding site were also found in the promoter. Mutation of the E boxes, MEF2 or MEF3 binding site individually had little effect on the muscle-specificity and activity of the myogenin promoter. However, mutating these sites in various combinations, e.g. E boxes and MEF2 binding site, or MEF2 and MEF3 sites significantly reduced the activity of the promoter. Moreover, mutating the E boxes, MEF2 and MEF3 sites together almost abolished the activity of the promoter. These data indicate that muscle-specific expression of myogenin in zebrafish embryos is controlled by multiple regulatory elements in the promoter. In addition, because these regulatory elements control myogenin expression in mouse and human embryos, these data suggest that the regulatory mechanism controlling myogenin expression might be conserved during evolution.

Animals↗

Myogenin and MyoD join a family of skeletal muscle genes regulated by electrical activity.

Myogenin and MyoD are proteins that bind to the regulatory regions of a battery of skeletal muscle genes and can activate their transcription during muscle differentiation. We have recently found that both proteins interact with the enhancer of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) alpha subunit, a gene that is regulated by innervation. This observation prompted us to study if myogenin and MyoD transcript levels are also regulated by skeletal muscle innervation. Using Northern blot analysis, we found that MyoD and myogenin mRNA levels begin to decline at embryonic day 17 and attain adult levels in muscle of newborn and 3-week-old mice, respectively. In contrast, nAChR mRNAs are highest in newborn and 1-week-old mouse muscle and decline thereafter to reach adult levels in 3-week-old mice. To determine if the down-regulation of myogenin and MyoD mRNA levels during development is due to innervation, we quantitated message levels in adult calf muscles after denervation. We found that in denervated muscle myogenin and MyoD mRNAs reach levels that are approximately 40- and 15-fold higher than those found in innervated muscle. Myogenin mRNAs begin to accumulate rapidly between 8 and 16 hr after denervation, and MyoD transcripts levels begin to increase sharply between 16 hr and 1 day after denervation. The increases in myogenin and MyoD mRNA levels precede the rapid accumulation of nAChR alpha-subunit transcripts; receptor mRNAs begin to accumulate significantly after 1 day of denervation. The effects of denervation are specific because skeletal alpha-actin mRNA levels are not affected by denervation. In addition, we found that the repression of myogenin and MyoD expression by innervation is due, at least in part, to "electrical activity." Direct stimulation of soleus muscle with extracellular electrodes repressed the increase of myogenin and MyoD transcripts after denervation by 4- to 3-fold, respectively. In view of these results, it is interesting to speculate that myogenin and/or MyoD may regulate a repertoire of skeletal muscle genes that are down-regulated by electrical activity.

Aging↗

Transforming growth factor beta represses the actions of myogenin through a mechanism independent of DNA binding.

Myogenin belongs to a family of regulatory factors that can activate myogenesis when transfected into nonmyogenic cells. A conserved DNA sequence, known as an E box, serves as the target for binding and trans-activation by myogenin. Using 10T1/2 fibroblasts that constitutively express a transfected myogenin cDNA, we show that myogenin accumulates in the nucleus but is unable to initiate myogenesis when cells are maintained with transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) or high serum. Although the final effect of TGF-beta and high serum--inhibition of myogenesis--was the same, their effects on the DNA-binding properties of myogenin in vitro differed. TGF-beta did not affect the ability of myogenin to bind DNA, whereas serum diminished the in vitro DNA-binding activity of myogenin. The helix-loop-helix (HLH) protein Id, postulated to inhibit DNA binding of other HLH proteins, was induced by high serum but not by TGF-beta. The presence of Id correlated with the failure of myogenin to bind the muscle creatine kinase enhancer in vitro. These findings suggest that serum can inhibit myogenesis by attenuating the DNA-binding activity of myogenin, possibly as a consequence of Id protein expression, whereas TGF-beta acts through a mechanism distal to DNA sequence recognition by myogenin and independent of Id.

Animals↗

MyoD, myogenin independent differentiation of primordial myoblasts in mouse somites.

The accumulation of two myogenic regulatory proteins, MyoD and myogenin, was investigated by double-immunocytochemistry and correlated with myosin heavy chain expression in different classes of myoblasts in culture and during early myogenesis in vivo. During in vitro differentiation of fetal myoblasts, MyoD-positive cells were detected first, followed by the appearance of cells positive for both MyoD and myogenin and finally by the appearance of differentiated myocytes and myotubes expressing myosin heavy chain (MHC). A similar pattern of expression was observed in cultures of embryonic and satellite cells. In contrast, most myogenic cells isolated from newly formed somites, expressed MHC in the absence of detectable levels of myogenin or MyoD. In vivo, the appearance of both myogenin and MyoD proteins was only detected at 10.5 d postcoitum (d.p.c.), when terminally differentiated muscle cells could already be identified in the myotome. Parasagittal sections of the caudal myotomes of 10.5-d-old embryos showed that expression of contractile proteins preceded the expression of myogenin or MyoD and, when coexpressed, MHC and myogenin did not co-localize within all the cells of the myotome. In the limb bud, however, many myogenin (or MyoD) positive/MHC negative cells could be observed in the proximal region at day 11. During further embryonic development the expression of these proteins remained constant in all the muscle anlagens examined, decreasing to a low level during the late fetal period. Western and Northern analysis confirmed that the myogenin protein could only be detected after 10.5 d.p.c. while the corresponding message was clearly present at 9.5 d.p.c., strongly suggesting a posttranscriptional regulation of myogenin during this stage of embryonic development. These data show that the first myogenic cells which appear in the mouse myotome, and can be cultured from it, accumulate muscle structural proteins in their cytoplasm without expressing detectable levels of myogenin protein (although the message is clearly accumulated). Neither MyoD message or protein are detectable in these cells, which may represent a distinct myogenic population whose role in development remains to be established.

Animals↗