PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “NARMS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: Three Decades of Advancing Public Health Through Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) occurs when bacteria and other microorganisms adapt in ways that make medicines less effective, causing infections that are harder to treat and more likely to spread. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), AMR infections affect millions of Americans each year and contribute to thousands of deaths (CDC, 2019). After three decades of operation, the U.S. National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) stands as a model of sustained, collaborative public health surveillance. What began in 1996 as an effort to track resistance in Salmonella and E. coli O157 has evolved into a One Health surveillance network monitoring AMR across the farm-to-fork continuum. Through a partnership among CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), state and local health departments, and universities, NARMS has become the backbone of foodborne AMR surveillance in the United States. The past decade has been particularly transformative. NARMS explored new sampling to include companion animals, minor livestock, aquaculture, surface water, and wildlife. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revolutionized the program's capabilities, enabling timely identification of emerging pathogens and revealing how resistance genes spread. Near real-time public dashboards make NARMS data accessible to researchers, clinicians, regulators, and policymakers. NARMS data shape decisions about new animal drug approvals, guide stewardship programs, and inform clinical treatment guidelines nationwide. As NARMS enters its fourth decade with a 2026-2030 strategic plan, the program will leverage artificial intelligence and metagenomics while expanding surveillance to fill remaining gaps ensuring this vital system continues to protect the food supply and both human and animal health from AMR.

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of commensal fecal bacteria isolated from pigs with an intentional genomic alteration that included the selectable marker gene nptII.

INTRODUCTION: Animals with intentional genomic alterations (IGAs) hold promise for meeting increasing worldwide demand for animal-source proteins. As part of regulatory risk assessment for introducing animals with IGAs into the food chain, monitoring commensal bacterial microbiota is recommended due to concern that antimicrobial resistance genes used during IGA selection could be transferred, via horizontal gene transfer, to gastrointestinal or environmental bacterial populations, potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to assess the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in commensal bacteria isolated from fecal samples of GalSafe™ pigs that have an IGA that includes the aminoglycoside resistance gene nptII. METHODS: Antimicrobial resistance rates observed in Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus isolated from GalSafe™ pigs were compared to resistance rates observed in conventional pigs at slaughter. Bacterial isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance genes by PCR and one isolate underwent whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: In total, 137 bacterial isolates recovered from 55 fecal samples collected from 47 individual adult GalSafe™ pigs were evaluated. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in GalSafe™ pigs was generally similar to, or lower than, resistance prevalence reported from conventional pigs at slaughter, based on National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) data. Higher resistance rates in GalSafe™ pigs were observed only for quinolones in Campylobacter coli (ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid) and nitrofurantoin in Enterococcus spp. One isolate (E. coli) was positive for nptII neomycin resistance gene, the same gene used for IGA selection in GalSafe™ pigs, and the remaining 136 isolates were negative for nptII. However, the positive isolate did not appear to contain nptII derived from the GalSafe™ pig genome as the sequences flanking the gene did not match the IGA. DISCUSSION: We did not detect evidence of nptII gene transformation into bacterial species of potential human health importance in this population of GalSafe™ pigs.

NARMS