SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “National Data Portals”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

The Network of National COVID-19 Data Portals: public health equity through collaboration.

The network of the national COVID-19 Data Portals was developed and linked to the COVID-19 Data Portal (https://www.covid19dataportal.org/)inresponsetothe need for rapid data sharing and analysis during the 2020-2022 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Built on open-source code developed by the Swedish COVID-19 Data Portal (now the Swedish Pathogens Portal, www.pathogens.se) the network included 12 national portals addressing demand for local open data sharing and access, across data types and resources. It provides a robust case study of national initiatives for FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) resources and a foundation for future pandemic preparedness across pathogens globally. In this paper we outline the structure of the origins of the network of National COVID-19 Datal Portals, the technical aspects and code originating from the Swedish Portal and provide an overview of the services and tools offered by each Portal. The paper showcases the process and operation of four Portals: Sweden, Poland, Spain, Norway and The Netherlands. In this study, we observe that pandemic response greatly benefits from an established infrastructure that can be quickly mobilised, developed and extended. Collaborations and preparation built on solid foundations over several years, supported by investment in the form of national and international research grants, is key for sustainability, continuation and readiness to deploy such efforts.

COVID-19↗

PubMed2026

Robust replication of associations across patient-mediated and provider-sourced EHR data in the All of Us research program.

The All of Us Research Program is assembling a nationwide cohort with electronic health record (EHR) resources through two complementary pathways: healthcare provider organization (HPO)-sourced EHRs and patient-mediated EHR (PME) contributed through patient portal linkages. The comparative research utility of these two data sources has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we compared PME and HPO EHRs with respect to disease prevalence, phenotype-phenotype associations, and replication of established genotype-phenotype associations using data from 19,703 PME and 373,887 HPO participants. We benchmarked disease prevalence against national estimates, conducted phenome-wide association studies for 10 commonly studied diseases, and tested replication of more than 5000 established genotype-phenotype associations across multiple ancestral groups. Disease prevalence was consistently lower in PME than in HPO, although prevalence of most diseases in both cohorts exceeded national estimates. Both data sources reproduced known phenotype-phenotype associations and showed moderate-to-strong concordance in effect sizes across the phenome. The overall genotype-phenotype replication rate was 49.1% (5399/10,999) in HPO and 5.9% (381/6482) in PME across ancestral groups, with effect sizes strongly correlated among well-powered associations (R = 0.84, P < 0.001). To disentangle the impact of sample size from data quality, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching. After matching, the replication gap in genotype-phenotype associations narrowed from 8.3-fold to 1.3-fold, with equivalent replication rates among adequately powered associations and strongly concordant effect sizes; comorbidity patterns were also consistent across all 10 diseases tested. These findings demonstrate that both data sources are valuable for clinical and genomic research and can inform other cohorts integrating provider-derived and patient-mediated EHRs.

Computational biology and bioinformatics↗

PubMed2026

SCLC TumorMiner: A genomics platform for small cell lung cancer precision oncology.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is among the most aggressive malignancies. Unlike many other cancers, it is not represented in The Cancer Genome Atlas, and available datasets are fragmented across institutions, disease stages, and treatment settings. RNA sequencing provides a powerful and cost-effective approach, but the high dimensionality of transcriptomic data and the heterogeneity of patient cohorts pose significant challenges. To address such challenges, we developed SCLC TumorMiner (https://discover.nci.nih.gov/SclcTumorMinerCDB/), which includes 50 tumor samples from relapsed patients at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and 154 samples from untreated patients at the University of Cologne and Tongji University. SCLC TumorMiner enables molecular classification, genomic pathway analyses, risk stratification, identification of predictive cell-surface biomarkers such as DLL3 or TROP2, and drug-response biomarkers such as SLFN11. SCLC TumorMiner illustrates profound differences between untreated and relapsed patient samples. Additionally, "MyPatient", one of SCLC TumorMiner's modules, is presented as a medical assistant application prototype.

SCLC↗

PubMed2025

Evaluating 12 automated, whole-genome sequencing analysis pipelines for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Reliance on complex, custom-built bioinformatics pipelines is a barrier to the implementation of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in high-burden settings in some low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Automated analysis pipelines could address this inequity in access to WGS-based diagnostics and surveillance. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the performance and usability of publicly available WGS pipelines for M tuberculosis. METHODS: We identified automated M tuberculosis WGS analysis pipelines through searches of PubMed and GitHub from database inception up to Aug 31, 2024. Accuracy, cost, accessibility, and scalability were assessed for each pipeline. We evaluated the accuracy of genotypic drug susceptibility testing (gDST) using publicly available sequences with phenotypic susceptibility data for 12 antituberculosis drugs. We estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity for each pipeline, across all drugs, by conducting a bivariate meta-analysis, with random effects representing between-drug variability. Lineage classifications were compared, and a previously epidemiologically well-characterised dataset was used to compare measures of genomic relatedness. FINDINGS: Among 28 candidate pipelines, 16 were excluded as they were unmaintained and inexecutable. 12 pipelines (11 compatible with Illumina and four compatible with Nanopore), all free to use, were included for evaluation. Six pipelines processed and stored data remotely, but for five of these six, scalability was limited by the need to upload sequences through web portals. For local processing pipelines, scalability was dependent on substantial local computational resources, data storage capacity, and command-line interfaces that limited user-friendliness. Only one of six remote-processing pipelines removed human DNA sequences before server upload. gDST was similarly accurate across ten of 11 Illumina-compatible pipelines and three of four Nanopore-compatible pipelines. All pipelines classified the main lineages consistently, although there were differences at sublineage resolution. Outputs from three of four pipelines reporting genomic relatedness were compatible with commonly cited single nucleotide polymorphism difference thresholds. INTERPRETATION: Numerous automated analysis pipelines capable of enhancing equity in M tuberculosis WGS are available. Given the overall similarities between the pipelines evaluated in this study in terms of gDST performance, lineage classification, and genomic relatedness inference, non-functional attributes such as availability, accessibility, scalability, and privacy could represent the point of difference for prospective users in LMICs with a high burden of tuberculosis. FUNDING: The Rhodes Trust, Wellcome, Ellison Institute of Technology, and the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis↗

PubMed1976

Long term results of venesection therapy in idiopathic haemochromatosis.

Observations on the clinical effects of venesection therapy in 85 treated, as compared with 26 untreated, patients with idiopathic haemochromatosis showed decreased pigmentation and hepatomegaly together with a return to normal tests of liver function in half the patients who had abnormal tests at presentation. Control improved in 28 per cent of those patients with diabetes mellitus, although some patients developed it during the period of observation, despite venesection. Portal hypertension, testicular atrophy and arthropathy were not improved. In only 12 patients was there sufficient reaccumulation of iron after the initial course of venesection to merit further treatment. Rates of iron accumulation in these patients varied between 1-4 mg and 4-8 mg per day and chelatable iron levels were noted to be inappropriately high in relation to body iron stores during the early stages of the reaccumulation period. Life table data shows that the percentage survival five and ten years after diagnosis was 66 and 32 per cent respectively for the treated patients, and 18 and 6 per cent respectively for the untreated patients, both statistically highly significant differences (p less than 0-01). Possible clinical differences such as age of presentation, the presence of diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, clinical hepatic failure and hepatoma between the treated and untreated groups that might otherwise have weighted survival in favour of the treated group were corrected by the use of covariant analysis. This gave mean log survival values of 4-15 and 2-88 for the treated and untreated patients respectively, equivalent to 63-4 months and 17-8 months, a highly significant difference (p less than 0-01). Ten patients, all of whom had cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis, died of malignant hepatoma between three and 15 years after completing venesection therapy. There was also a high rate of death from neoplasms in a variety of other sites--22 per cent in the venesected group, strikingly higher than that rate predicted for a similarly aged population using national cancer mortality rates.

Adult↗