PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neck Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1975

Radical neck dissection.

Radical neck dissection has evolved into a standard surgical technique over the past century. It has been the most effective method of attempting to control suspected or gross metastasis to the cervical region. The technique embraces the en masse removal of all tissue elements in the space between the subdermis and the fascia colli. The perimeters of the dissection extend from the midline anteriorly to the anterior border of the trapezius muscle posteriorly, and from the clavicle to the mandible. The essential portion of this large mass of tissue is the cervical lymph system with its lymph nodes and afferent and efferent connecting vessels. Controllability of the cancer process is in direct proportion to the number of nodes involved, their size and their position in the neck. Complications in the routine radical neck dissection are minimal. Cure rates are influenced by the type, size and site of the primary cancer, the possibilities for the adjunctive treatment such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and the, as yet, little understood immunological factors. The radical neck dissection has proven itself to be an essential tool in the management of cancer in the head and neck.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1976

Radical neck dissection.

Radical neck dissection was described in 1906, and the following half century saw it being increasingly accepted without any significant change. More recently a number of differing concepts have arisen. While the value of the original radical operation is established, the more recent modifications are not yet substantiated by proper trials.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1977

Indications for neck dissection in carcinoma of the lip.

In the past, neck dissections have been recommended only when nodes were clinically palpable or when they became so. A retrospective ten year study of thirty-seven patients with carcinoma of the lip and with an unusually high mortality has allowed reevaluation of indications for neck dissection. (1) Ten of thirty-seven patients died of this disease and nearly all of the ten died with and because of regional metastases. (2) Seven patients with nonpalpable nodes initally had nodal metastases later which, despite neck dissection at that later time, proved lethal. (3) Two patients who, despite nonpalpable nodes, had undergone neck dissections and were found to have occult bilateral nodal metastases were effectively cured with early neck dissection. This suggests that early bilateral supramohyoid neck dissections for small carcinomas of the lip and ipsilateral radical neck dissections for large primaries may yield higher cure rates than currently achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

The submandibular triangle in radical neck dissection.

Various modifications of the standard radical neck dissection operation have been advocated since its original description. An ideal operation would offer maximum cure rates with minimal cosmetic and functional disturbance. The validity of removing the submandibular triangle contents as part of radical neck dissection was studied by analyzing the involvement of this region by metastatic squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Only three of the 51 neck-dissection specimens that were examined contained metastases to submandibular triangle lymph nodes. The primary sites were nose, floor of mouth, and retromolar trigone. None of the 26 laryngeal tumors in this series had spread to the submandibular triangle. In the absence of palpable submandibular or upper, deep cervical lymph nodes, the contents of the submandibular triangle can probably be left undisturbed in radical neck dissections for laryngeal cancer.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1977

[Pain-sensation following classic neck-dissection (author's transl)].

Resulting neck-dissection surgery (including curative or conservative intervention) very complex pain-syndromes are next to losses of function at the top of complaints stated. The discussion of the case-reports of 242 patients with unilateral neck-dissection and the reexamination of 28 patients free of recurrence revealed several causes of head- and facial pain. The close relationship of functional disability and pain-sensation is discussed. The recommendation of elective neck-dissection - by critical indication - is supported. Resection of nervus accessorius may be necessary in some cases, immediate reconstruction by nerve sutures is recommended. By post-operative treatment the complaints often can be relieved.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Rehabilitation of the shoulder after radical neck dissection.

After classical radical neck dissection with removal of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and division of the spinal accessory nerve, there are certain disabling or disagreeable musculoskeletal defects. This paper describes the muscular deficiencies and gives a set of exercises which can be counted on to minimize the problems.

Humans↗
PubMed1978

Results in suprahyoid, modified radical, and standard radical neck dissections for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma: recurrence and survival.

Two hundred sixty-one patients who underwent three types of neck dissection for cervical lymphadenopathy in association with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck are analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into those with histologically negative nodes and those with histologically positive nodes. Statistical analyses for neck recurrence and survival rates were made using the sampled permutation method. The results show that suprahyoid neck dissection is associated with an unusually high recurrence rate in the neck in patients with histologically negative nodes. Modified radical neck dissection and standard radical neck dissection are equivalent with regard to recurrences in the neck and five year survival rates when the disease is above the juguloomohyoid lymph node group. The study suggests that simple upper neck dissection is contraindicated in patients with negative or positive nodes and that modified radical neck dissection can be used in selected patients instead of the formal radical neck operation.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

Conservative neck dissection.

The areolar tissue which fills the laterovisceral spaces of the neck is thought to be in close contact with the limiting muscle and the large vessels and nerves of the neck. The site of lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels in such tissue is not clearly defined. A more profound anatomical study shows that the areolar tissue contains the whole lymphatic system of the neck, limited by a series of aponeuroses. These are derived from the embryonal mesenchyme, surrounding muscles and vessels, giving origin to a series of compartments which are in continuity with each other. These compartments, which contain the lymphatic structures, may be entirely removed en bloc including their limiting aponeurotical membranes, as long as the latter are carefully stripped from the muscular and vascular structures. This technique of neck dissection originating with O. Suarez in Argentina, is as radical as any traditional neck dissection, providing that some technical details are respected and that the nodes are still mobile. By preserving many useful or necessary structures of the neck, which themselves are unrelated to the lymphatic spread of cancer, conservative neck dissection presents important functional and cosmetic advantages as compared with traditional neck dissection.

Humans↗
PubMed1978

Indications for radical neck dissection following radiation therapy.

The recent trend has been away from elective neck dissection in the management of patients with cancer of the head and neck. In addition, improved techniques of radiation therapy have demonstrated their capacity to eliminate and sterilize occult and even frank neck metastases. An unselected series of 409 radical neck dissections performed in 357 patients in a period of eight years has been critically reviewed to determine the incidence of microscopically negative nodes in patients who were previously radiated for cure and in whom a neck dissection had been performed as a part of the surgical procedure. Findings and results support our current position that a neck dissection in the presence of clinically negative nodes, particularly when they were never previously present, need not be included in the surgical procedure designed to salvage patients following radiation failure. Because of the documented increase of postoperative complications following such surgery, the decrease in morbidity and mortality seems to justify this policy.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Neck dissection: radical or conservative.

Four hundred and forty-five neck dissections for epidermoid carcinoma over a 10-year period are reviewed as to local recurrence of neck disease. Three hundred and forty-seven dissections were radical en bloc procedures and in 98 a modified conservative technique was utilized. Cervical lymph node classification was applied and a comparison made of the two techniques. A review of the anatomy of cervical fascias and the technique of conservative neck dissection is given. Evaluation of this series of cases indicate that the control of local disease in the neck in the N0 and N1 groups is is accomplished as well with conservative dissection as with radical neck dissection. The number of conservative neck dissections for N2 disease was too limited for accurate comparison. There were no conservative neck dissections done for N3 disease. We suggest that conservative neck dissection be utilized for subclinical and N1 disease and that the classic en bloc dissection be reserved for N2 and N3 situations.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1976

Neck dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the anterior two-thirds of the tongue.

The records of 340 patients treated surgically over the 20 year period 1950 through 1969 at this clinic for primary epidermoid carcinoma of the anterior two-thirds of the tongue were reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of elective versus therapeutic radical neck dissection in their treatment. There has been a change in the clinical presentation of this disease, with more people presenting at an earlier stage, with a smaller primary lesion and fewer cervical node metastases. The over-all survival rate has shown a marked improvement to 69 per cent at five years. The proportion of women afflicted has increased. The status of the cervical nodes is a major prognostic factor, the determining five year survival rate being reduced from 78 to 26 per cent if the nodes are metastatically involved. It cannot be directly proved that removal of occult metastasis to the neck by elective radical neck dissection before nodes are clinically detectable leads to a better survival rate partly because the two groups being compared are selected and not randomly assigned. However, the marked tendency for carcinoma of the tongue to metastasize regionally at some time in its course, the significant error in clinical evaluation of the neck, the significant conversion of clinically negative nodes to positive in patients not treated with radical neck dissection, the poor prognosis after treatment of conversion from clinically negative into positive and the fact that more than half of the deaths are due to uncontrolled disease of the neck alone, make us strongly favor the principle of elective radical neck dissection to enhance the survival time in the group of patients without clinical evidence of nodal involvement. With current surgical expertise, the mortality and morbidity rates of simultaneous radical neck dissection are low, and the potential benefit of the procedure outweighs its potential risks. Obviously, elective radical neck dissection, if beneficial, would most likely be so in patients with the highest likelihood of having occult metastasis.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1979

Technique of preserving the spinal accessory nerve during radical neck dissection.

Preserving the spinal accessory nerve during radical neck dissection eliminates shoulder disability and does not compromise the incidence of neck recurrence in properly selected cases. The literature and standard textbooks only superficially refer to the method dissecting this nerve. We describe our technique of preserving the spinal accessory nerve during radical neck dissection.

Accessory Nerve↗
PubMed1977

The case for elective prophylactic neck dissection.

The possibility of improving the cure rate of cancer of the head and neck by radical neck dissection of the clinically negative neck (elective neck dissection) continues to pose a therapeutic dilemma. This paper seeks to review the available information, analyze relevant aspects of the issue and attempt to draw conclusions which will be helpful both to physicians and their patients. The discussion is confined to squamous carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1976

Avoiding complications in radical neck dissection.

As reported previously, it remains our conclusion that the radical neck dissection can be performed expediently in a reasonable period of time, usually without the need of blood replacement, and is not characterized by major physiologic disability or wound complications secondary to the neck dissection alone. The presence of preoperative radiation, composite resections entering the oral cavity or pharynx, and systemic disease or debilitation, however, vastly enhance the risk of significant life threatening complications and prolong hospitalization; therefore, the use of postoperative radiation therapy in combined treatment, the use of planned fistulas and generally accepted reconstructive techniques, and a careful evaluation of the methods and technique for protection of the carotid artery are recommended.

Carotid Artery Diseases↗
PubMed1979

Incidence of lymph node metastasis in elective (prophylactic) neck dissection for oral carcinoma.

For cancers of the tongue, floor of mouth, mandibular gingiva and buccal mucosa, in which the widest diameter is greater than 2 cm, we perform neck dissection in continuity with resection of the primary growth as a part of the planned therapy,regardles of the clinical state of the cervical lymph nodes. Whenever the lesion is so situated that an in-continuity neck dissection cannot be performed (cancer of the palate) it may be wise to delay neck dissection until the lymph nodes become clinically apparent.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

Transsternal radical neck dissection. Postoperative complications and management.

In 1962, Sisson et al reported the use of the transsternal radical neck dissection for carcinoma recurring in the peristomal area after laryngectomy. We have performed over 50 transsternal radical neck dissections in the past 14 years. A significant number of early cases succumbed to the postoperative problems of fistula, infection, and large vessel rupture. Our two cases illustrate intraoperative and postoperative complications. Management of these complications is discussed. Morbidity and mortality has decreased as we have gained experience in the management of these problems.

Aneurysm↗