SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neuronavigation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

A data fusion environment for multimodal and multi-informational neuronavigation.

OBJECTIVE: Part of the planning and performance of neurosurgery consists of determining target areas, areas to be avoided, landmark areas, and trajectories, all of which are components of the surgical script. Nowadays, neurosurgeons have access to multimodal medical imaging to support the definition of the surgical script. The purpose of this paper is to present a software environment developed by the authors that allows full multimodal and multi-informational planning as well as neuronavigation for epilepsy and tumor surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have developed a data fusion environment dedicated to neuronavigation around the Surgical Microscope Neuronavigator system (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). This environment includes registration, segmentation, 3D visualization, and interaction-applied tools. It provides the neuronavigation system with the multimodal information involved in the definition of the surgical script: lesional areas, sulci, ventricles segmented from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), vessels segmented from magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), functional areas from magneto-encephalography (MEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for somatosensory, motor, or language activation. These data are considered to be relevant for the performance of the surgical procedure. The definition of each entity results from the same procedure: registration to the anatomical MRI data set (defined as the reference data set), segmentation, fused 3D display, selection of the relevant entities for the surgical step, encoding in 3D surface-based representation, and storage of the 3D surfaces in a file recognized by the neuronavigation software (STP 3.4, Leibinger; Freiburg, Germany). RESULTS: Multimodal neuronavigation is illustrated with two clinical cases for which multimodal information was introduced into the neuronavigation system. Lesional areas were used to define and follow the surgical path, sulci and vessels helped identify the anatomical environment of the surgical field, and, finally, MEG and fMRI functional information helped determine the position of functional high-risk areas. CONCLUSION: In this short evaluation, the ability to access preoperative multi-functional and anatomical data within the neuronavigation system was a valuable support for the surgical procedure.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery.

Neuronavigation, today a routine method in neurosurgery, has not yet been systematically assessed in direct comparison with conventional microsurgical techniques. The aim of the present study was the direct comparison of the impact of neuronavigation on glioblastoma surgery regarding time consumption, extent of tumor removal and survival. For each of 52 patients operated for primary glioblastoma with neuronavigation, a patient operated on without navigation was matched. Completeness of tumor resection, including volumetric analysis, was examined by early post-operative MRI. Operating and survival times were obtained for all patients. At a rate of 86.5%, surgeons' opinions about neuronavigation were positive. Operating times were identical in the two groups, while preparation times were 30.4 min longer with navigation. Radiological radicality was achieved in 31% of navigation cases vs. 19% in conventional operations. The absolute and relative residual tumor volumes were significantly lower with neuronavigation. Radical tumor resection was associated with a highly significant prolongation in survival (median 18.3 vs. 10.3 months, p < 0.0001). Survival was longer in patients operated on using neuronavigation (median 13.4 vs. 11.1 months). Neuronavigation increases radicality in glioblastoma resection without prolonging operating time. Regarding the problem of brain shift, neuronavigation should be optimized by intraoperative real-time imaging.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Neuronavigation in surgery of intracranial and spinal tumors.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the new possibilities and advantages of neuronavigation in the surgery of intracranial and spinal tumors, based on patient populations treated in our hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An infrared navigation system with integrated microscope guidance was used for frameless intracranial neuronavigation. The biopsies of intracranial tumors were carried out using a frame-based stereotactic technique. Intracranial navigation was, in part, combined with the use of an intraoperative CT scanner and a three-dimensional ultrasound system for data acquisition, correction of brain shifts, and intraoperative quality control. The navigation was also supported by presurgical brain mapping with magnetic source imaging. Navigation in spinal surgery was exclusively performed using an infrared navigation system in combination with an intraoperative CT scanner. RESULTS: The stereotactic tumor biopsies (n = 57) were carried out with an accuracy of 91.4% as compared with the histological diagnosis. The work flow of stereotactic procedures could be increased by using the intraoperative CT scanner. Fifty-seven patients with intracranial tumors were treated with the aid of neuronavigation between July 1997 and December 1999. These patients showed an improvement from 80% to 86% on the Karnofsky index 8 weeks postoperatively. The majority of intracranial cases were primary brain tumors (n = 30) and metastases (n = 13) in functionally important areas of the brain. In four patients, a significant brain shift was observed during neuronavigation, and could be corrected by an image update using either the intraoperative CT scanner (n = 2) or the three-dimensional ultrasound system (n = 2). The presurgical brain mapping with magnetoencephalography was shown to be reliable in the sensory cortex (n = 25). Eleven patients with a thoracic or lumbar tumor were treated by open surgery or stabilization, using a combination of spinal neuronavigation and the intraoperative CT scanner. Two patients with spinal tumors underwent navigated biopsies. Neither of them showed a reduction in the clinical stage, but the Karnofsky index improved from 63% up to 72% 8 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Neuronavigation allows very precise intracranial and spinal surgery. The problem of brain shift during the navigation procedures has been solved by intraoperative image acquisition. The use of neuronavigation was shown to improve the postoperative quality of life of patients suffering from brain and spinal tumors.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Virtual pointer projection of the central sulcus to the outside of the skull using frameless neuronavigation -- accuracy and applications.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to localize the central sulcus by frameless neuronavigation and to project this anatomical structure to the outside of the skull on the skin. This method was analyzed in respect to its practicability, accuracy, and potential applications. METHOD: In 27 patients investigated (28 unaffected hemispheres), the central sulcus was virtually projected to the outside of the skull using frameless neuronavigation and a virtual pointer elongation of 15 or 20 mm. The following parameters were measured on the scalp: 1. the distance between the bregma and the midline junction of the central sulcus, and 2. the angle between the central sulcus and the midline. These dada were compared with measurements based on the original axial MR images of these patients. Finally, a laboratory phantom study was designed in analogy to a patient's examination for estimation of the overall accuracy of the neuronavigation system in the experimental setup used in this study. FINDINGS: Virtual pointer projection of the central sulcus to the outside of the skull using frameless neuronavigation was found to be easily possible. The distance between the bregma and the midline junction of the central sulcus amounted to a mean of 55 mm on the left and 56 mm on the right. The angle between the central sulcus and the midline reached a mean of 63 degrees on the left and 60 degrees on the right. These data confirmed results of other studies with no frameless neuronavigation devices. The phantom study revealed a mean overall inaccuracy of 0.9 mm at a virtual pointer elongation of 15 mm. At a virtual pointer elongation of 20 mm, the mean overall inaccuracy of our study was 1.1 mm. These results correspond to the inaccuracy of frame based stereotaxy. INTERPRETATION: It is easily possible, valid, and reliable to virtually project the central sulcus to the outside of the skull with an acceptably low inaccuracy using frameless neuronavigation. This is important for research studies that correlate and integrate different functional imaging methods with the aid of frameless neuronavigation.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Frameless neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery.

OBJECT: Frameless computerized neuronavigation has been increasingly used in intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. However, clear indications for the application of neuronavigation in neuroendoscopy have not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to determine in which intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures frameless neuronavigation is necessary and really beneficial compared with a free-hand endoscopic approach. METHODS: A frameless infrared-based computerized neuronavigation system was used in 44 patients who underwent intracranial endoscopic procedures, including 13 third ventriculostomies, nine aqueductoplasties, eight intraventricular tumor biopsy procedures or resections, six cystocistemostomies in arachnoid cysts, five colloid cyst removals, four septostomies in multiloculated hydrocephalus, four cystoventriculostomies in intraparenchymal cysts, two aqueductal stent placements, and fenestration of one pineal cyst and one cavum veli interpositi. All interventions were successfully accomplished. In all procedures, the navigational system guided the surgeons precisely to the target. Navigational tracking was helpful in entering small ventricles, in approaching the posterior third ventricle when the foramen of Monro was narrow, and in selecting the best approach to colloid cysts. Neuronavigation was essential in some cystic lesions lacking clear landmarks, such as intraparenchymal cysts or multiloculated hydrocephalus. Neuronavigation was not necessary in standard third ventriculostomies, tumor biopsy procedures, and large sylvian arachnoid cysts, or for approaching the posterior third ventricle when the foramen of Monro was enlarged. CONCLUSIONS: Frameless neuronavigation has proven to be accurate, reliable, and extremely useful in selected intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures. Image-guided neuroendoscopy improved the accuracy of the endoscopic approach and minimized brain trauma.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Neuronavigation: concept, techniques and applications.

Neuronavigation provides intraoperative orientation to the surgeon, helps in planning a precise surgical approach to the targetted lesion and defines the surrounding neurovascular structures. Incorporation of the functional data provided by functional MRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) with neuronavigation helps to avoid the eloquent areas of the brain during surgery. An intraoperative MRI enables radical resection of the lesions, the possibility of immediate control for tumor remnants and updates of neuronavigation with intraoperative images to compensate for brain shift. In this study, the experience of 432 patients undergoing neuronavigation assisted neurosurgical interventions using either the pointer-based or microscope-based navigational systems at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany is presented. The procedures included stereotactic biopsy (n=53), stereotactic cyst puncture/ventricular drainage (n=15), eloquent cortex/tumor localization to facilitate tumor resection, assessment of neurovascular structures in the vicinity of tumors of the sellar-suprasellar regions, skull base, posterior fossa and ventricular region (n=252), and, surgery for epilepsy (n=9). Functional brain mapping using fMRI and MEG and their integration with neuronavigation was carried out in 24 and 128 patients respectively. The simultaneous use of intraoperative MRI to look for the remaining tumor was done in 159 patients and the update of navigational data was carried out in 17 patients. The mean system accuracy obtained by using both the fiducial registration as well as anatomical landmark-surface fitting computer algorithm was 1.81 mm. This study reviews the relative merits and demerits of the pointer and microscope based navigational systems and also highlights the role of functional brain mapping and intraoperative MRI, when integrated with neuronavigation, in the surgical decision-making to offer the chances of more radical resections with minimal morbidity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

[Neuronavigation. Computer-assisted neurosurgery].

The use of stereotactic methods for the resection of subcortical lesions is heavily advocated in clinical neurosurgery introducing the term "neuronavigation". Though being an unequivocally elegant technique for the localisation and delineation of pathological lesions in the central nervous system neuronavigation has not been validated by any prospective randomized controlled trial. The method is prone to significant errors as to the intraoperative localisation based upon preoperative three-dimensional images. The maximum error can be up to 2.6 cm depending on the extent of the so-called brain shift. In comparison classical frame based stereotaxy has a mean error of +/- 1 mm and remains the gold standard for the exact three-dimensional localisation of a given lesion. The value of neuronavigation is evident for small deep seated vascular lesions. For metastatic tumors or skull base tumors the usefulness is rather marginal because alternative therapies are available with proven and equivalent efficacy and reduced morbidity on one hand, and because of the anatomy of the tumor which makes neuronavigation unnecessary. For the currently most common application of neuronavigation, i.e. surgery of gliomas, no significant improvements of therapeutic results can be expected from neuronavigation. The biology of gliomas limits any mechanical approaches.

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Intraoperative imaging with open magnetic resonance imaging and neuronavigation.

The Erlangen-concept of image-guided-surgery is based on the installation of an open magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (Magnetom Open, 0.2 T, Siemens AG) in a twin operating room in combination with two neuronavigation systems (Stealth NeuroStation, Sofamor Danek, MKM Zeiss). Since March 1996 this method has been used for a total of 402 patients, among them 44 children. In 214 patients, mainly with gliomas or pituitary adenomas or who needed surgery for epilepsy, we performed intraoperative MR imaging to monitor the extent of resection, allowing a second look for possible tumor remnants and also compensating for brain shift by an intraoperative update of neuronavigation. Functional neuronavigation, i.e. the combination of anatomical neuronavigation with functional imaging [e.g. magnetoencephalography (MEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)] was used in patients with lesions in brain areas such as the motor and speech areas. For MEG we used a MAGNES II biomagnetometer (Biomagnetic Technologies, San Diego, Calif.) and for fMRI a 1.5 T Siemens Symphony MR scanner. So far we have treated 89 patients with functional neuronavigation. Our preliminary experience indicates that intraoperative MR imaging, especially in combination with functional neuronavigation, allows more radical resections with lower morbidity.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2002

Accuracy evaluation of a 3D ultrasound-based neuronavigation system.

We have investigated the 3D navigation accuracy of a frameless ultrasound-based neuronavigation system (SonoWand) for surgical planning and intraoperative image guidance. In addition, we present a detailed description and review of the error sources associated with surgical neuronavigation based on preoperative MRI data and intraoperative ultrasound. A phantom with 27 precisely defined points was scanned with ultrasound by various translation and tilt movements of the ultrasound probe (180 3D scans in total), and the 27 image points in each volume were located using an automatic detection algorithm. These locations were compared to the physically measured locations of the same 27 points. The accuracy of the neuronavigation system and the effect of varying acquisition conditions were found through a thorough statistical analysis of the differences between the two point sets. The accuracy was found to be 1.40 +/- 0.45 mm (arithmetic mean) for the ultrasound-based neuronavigation system in our laboratory setting. Improper probe calibration was the major contributor to this figure. Based on our extensive data set and thorough evaluation, the accuracy found in the laboratory setting is expected to be close to the overall clinical accuracy for ultrasound-based neuronavigation. Our analysis indicates that the overall clinical accuracy may be as low as 2 mm when using intraoperative imaging to compensate for brain shift.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Visualization of the eloquent motor system by integration of MEG, functional, and anisotropic diffusion-weighted MRI in functional neuronavigation.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we visualized the eloquent motor system including the somatosensory-motor cortex and corticospinal tract on a neuronavigation system, integrating magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and anisotropic diffusion-weighted MRI (ADWI). METHODS: Four patients with brain lesions adjacent to the eloquent motor system were studied. Motor-evoked responses (MER) by finger-tapping paradigm were acquired with a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner, and somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields (SEF) by median nerve stimulation were measured with a 204-channel MEG system. In the same fMRI examination, ADWI and anatomic three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging (3-D MRI) were obtained. Activated areas of MER, estimated SEF dipoles, and the corticospinal tract on ADWI were coregistered to 3-D MRI, and the combined MR data were transferred to a neuronavigation system (functional neuronavigation). Intraoperative recording of cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials was performed for confirmation of the central sulcus. RESULTS: Combination of fMRI and MEG enabled firm identification of the central sulcus. Functional neuronavigation facilitated extensive tumor resection, having the advantage of sparing the motor cortex and corticospinal tract in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed functional neuronavigation allows neurosurgeons to perform effective and maximal resection of brain lesions, identifying and sparing eloquent cortical components and their subcortical connections. Potential clinical application of this technique is discussed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Frameless neuronavigation applied to endoscopic neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analyzed the indications, surgical techniques, and applicability of frameless neuronavigation to endoscopic procedures in a heterogeneous group of 15 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 8 patients indications for surgery were cystic lesions, in 3 patients intraventricular tumors, and in 4 patients occlusive hydrocephalus. The mean age was 39 years (range 9-76 years). The follow-up period ranged from 5-24 months (mean 10 months). Frameless neuronavigation was accomplished with the "operating arm system" in 10 cases and with the "optical tracking system" in 5 cases (RADIONICS, Burlington, USA). RESULTS: In all 15 cases, neuronavigation sufficiently provided anatomical orientation, preoperative planning, and intraoperative realization of the approach. The calculated mean calibration error was 2.1 mm. There have been no permanent morbidities and no mortalities related to the use of endoscopes and neuronavigation. CONCLUSION: In endoscopic neurosurgery, frameless neuronavigation is a useful tool in planning and realizing the approach and improving intraoperative orientation in selected cases. Indications are small or hidden lesions, impaired visual conditions, abnormal anatomy, and narrow ventricles. Endoscopic procedures include fenestration and resection of intraventricular or intraparenchymal cysts, biopsy of intraventricular tumors, and third ventriculostomy in selected cases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

BrainLab VectorVision Neuronavigation System: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The BrainLab VectorVision neuronavigation system was used in 131 cases of different brain pathological conditions. The neuronavigation system was used without problems in 125 cases. These cases included 114 microsurgical operations, 4 endoscopic procedures, 4 frameless stereotactic biopsies, and 3 catheter placements. METHODS: The BrainLab VectorVision neuronavigation system is an intraoperative, image-guided, frameless, localization system. The system consists of a computer workstation for registration of images and physical spaces, an intraoperative localization device, and a computer image display. The system provides real-time responses regarding the locations of surgical instruments. VectorVision is based on passive reflections of infrared flashes. Universal adapters with reflective markers for surgical instruments, endoscopes, and the operating microscope are used. RESULTS: In six cases, the system could not be used because of system failure or mishandling. In 125 neurosurgical cases, the neuronavigation system was useful, with a target-localizing accuracy of 4+/-1.4 mm (mean+/-standard deviation). For small cerebral lesions, we never performed an exploration with negative results. CONCLUSION: The BrainLab neuronavigation system has been shown to be very helpful and user-friendly for routine neurosurgical interventions. Its advantage lies in its mobility, based on wireless reflective adapters for surgical instruments, endoscopes, and the operating microscope.

Biopsy↗

PubMed2001

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative image data may be used not only to evaluate the extent of a tumor resection but also to update neuronavigation, compensating for brain shift. To date, however, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be combined only with navigation microscopes that are separated from the magnetic field, thus requiring time-consuming intraoperative patient transport. To help solve this problem, we investigated whether a new navigation microscope can be used within the fringe field of the MRI scanner. METHODS: The navigation microscope was placed at the 5-G line of a 0.2 MRI device. Patients were positioned lying down directly on the table of the scanner, with their heads placed approximately 1.5 m from the center of the magnet, fixed in an MRI-compatible ceramic head holder. Standard operating instruments were used. For intraoperative imaging, we slid the table into the center of the magnet in less than 30 seconds. RESULTS: By use of this setup, we operated on 22 patients. In all patients, anatomic neuronavigation could be used in combination with intraoperative MRI. In addition, in 12 patients, functional data from magnetoencephalographic or functional MRI studies were integrated, resulting in functional neuronavigation. We did not encounter adverse effects of the low magnetic field during navigation. Moreover, intraoperative imaging was not disturbed by the navigation microscope and vice versa. CONCLUSION: Functional neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI can be used essentially simultaneously without the need for lengthy intraoperative patient transport. The combination of intraoperative imaging with functional neuronavigation offers the opportunity for more radical resections and fewer complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound is an intraoperative imaging modality used in neuronavigation as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This article summarizes 4 years of clinical experience in the use of intraoperative 3-D ultrasound integrated into neuronavigation for guidance in brain tumor resection. METHODS: Patients were selected for inclusion in the study on the basis of the size and location of their lesion. Preoperative 3-D MRI data were registered and used for planning as in other conventional neuronavigation systems. Intraoperative 3-D ultrasound images were acquired three to six times, and tumor resection was guided on the basis of these updated 3-D images. RESULTS: Intraoperative 3-D ultrasound represents a good solution to the problem of brain shift in neuronavigation because it easily provides an updated, and hence more accurate, map of the patient's true anatomy in all phases of the operation. Ultrasound makes it possible to follow the progression of the operation, and it improves the radicality of tumor resection by detecting tumor tissue that would remain if the imaging technology had not been used (in 53% of the cases). Integration of 3-D ultrasound with navigation technology solves the orientation problem experienced previously with two-dimensional ultrasound in neurosurgery. The technology makes it possible to directly compare intraoperative ultrasound and MRI data regarding visualization of the lesion. Ultrasound image quality is useful for guiding surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative 3-D ultrasound seems to provide a time- and cost-effective way to update high-quality 3-D maps used in neuronavigation.

Brain Neoplasms↗

PubMed1993

Ultrasound-controlled neuronavigator-guided brain surgery.

The development of a unique neurosurgical navigator is described and a preliminary series of seven cases of intracerebral lesions approached with the assistance of this neuronavigation system under ultrasound control is presented. The clinical series included five low-grade astrocytomas, one chronic intracerebral hematoma, and one porencephalic cyst. Management procedures included biopsy in all cases, drainage of the hematoma, and endoscopy and fenestration for the cyst. The features of the neuronavigation system are interactive reconstructions of preoperative computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data, corresponding intraoperative ultrasound images, versatility of the interchangeable end-effector instruments, graphic presentation of instruments on the reconstructed images, and voice control of the system. The principle of a common axis in the reconstructed images served to align the navigational pointer, biopsy guide, endoscope guide, ultrasound transducer, and surgical microscope to the brain anatomy. Intraoperative ultrasound imaging helped to verify the accuracy of the neuronavigator and check the results of the procedures. The arm of the neuronavigation system served as a holder for instruments, such as the biopsy guide, endoscope guide, and ultrasound transducer, in addition to functioning as a navigational pointer. Also, the surgical microscope was aligned with the neuronavigator for inspection and biopsy of the hematoma capsule to rule out tumor etiology. Voice control freed the neurosurgeon from manual exercises during start-up and calibration of the system.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Functional cranial neuronavigation. Direct integration of fMRI and PET data.

OBJECTIVE: We report our first experiences with the direct integration of fMRI data into cranial neuronavigation. METHOD: For navigation we used the MKM system and thin-sliced T1 contrast enhanced images. As a first step 21 patients had fMRI for localization of the precentral gyrus, 2 patients for Broca area detection. By anatomical correlation, these functional data were indirectly compared to the intraoperative findings using cortical SSEP (n=20) or cortical stimulation (n=3). Encouraged by these preliminary results, we started the direct integration of fMRI into neuronavigation in June 1999, followed by PET in January 2000, enabling us to compare functional images with intraoperative findings directly. fMRI and PET data were integrated by landmark matching referring on skin fiducials. Meanwhile, fMRI data of 8 patients (6 motorcortex, 2 Broca) and PET images of 1 patient were directly integrated into neuronavigation. Six out of 8 patients had additional cortical monitoring, 2/8 were exclusively operated on by functional neuronavigation. RESULTS: Using indirect comparison between fMRI and intraoperative findings we observed a good correlation in every case for the motorcortex, but only in 1/2 for the speech area. In all 6 direct integrated fMRI cases, these findings corresponded well to the conventional ones. Both patients with sole functional navigation did not have any postoperative neurological deficit. The inaccuracy of the fMRI ifT1 matching was 2. 7 mm (sigma=0.9 mm) and 1.3 mm (sigma=0.4 mm) of the subsequent referenciation of the navigation. The tumor delinement shown by 11C-methionine PET could be proven by intraoperative biopsy outside its indicated tumor margin. The inaccuracy of the PET matching was 0. 8 mm. CONCLUSION: Functional neuronavigation enables to visualize and preserve relevant brain areas. Other functional areas like short-term memory, which solely can be detected by fMRI might also be monitored in the future. The integration of PET data expect to gain a better differentiation of tumor and edema.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

[The importance of neuronavigation in endoscopic operations in neurosurgery].

Intracranial endoscopy as minimal invasive surgery for the treatment of hydrocephalus and intracranial cysts cannot be disregarded after 10 years of clinical practicing. The advantages are low traumatization of brain tissue and good visual control of the operation field. Neuronavigation qualifies as a method of increased operation safety for lesions which are deep seated or difficult to access. A combination of both systems partially neutralizes the respective disadvantages. On the one hand, the neuronavigation ensures the endoscopic approach up to the intracranial caverns and especially supports the endoscopy in cases of bad vision or pathologic anatomy. Endoscopy, on the other hand, enables the surgeon to recognize discrepancies and mistakes of the neuronavigation due to optical control. Increased expenses and time and staff requirements are counterbalanced by the increased cumulated operation safety. An advantageous side-effect of the combination of neuronavigation and intracranial endoscopy is the high learning potential for assistants. For all these reasons the application of neuronavigation in intracranial endoscopy is considered very important and strongly recommended.

Brain↗

PubMed1999

[Neuronavigation for the resection of intracranial cavernous angiomas].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the Stealth Station neuronavigator in conjunction with preoperative computerized tomography (CT) in the resection of intracranial cavernous angiomas (CAs). METHODS: The Stealth Station neuronavigator was used to provide real-time correlation of the operating field and computerized images in 6 patients with CAs. All of them suffered from epileptic seizures. RESULTS: Neuronavigation-guided lesionectomy with removal of hemosiderin deposition, gliosis and calcification in all cases was performed precisely. Mean fiducial error, predicted accuracy at 10 cm, and sustained accuracy ranged from 1.65 to 4.53 mm, 1.82 to 3.28 mm, and 0.50 to 3.45 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Stealth Station neuronavigator is reliable and accurate in the resection of CAs.

Adolescent↗