SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “OSTEOPOROSIS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 5. Physical activity as therapy for osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine exercise as a therapy for people with osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Immobilization, standing low-load and high-load physical activities. OUTCOMES: Risk of injury, quality of life, risk of falls and fractures, strength and posture and pain management. EVIDENCE: Relevant epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and reviews were examined, including the large-scale FICSIT trial in the United States, a prospective 4-year study of women enrolled in an exercise program in Toronto and the large-scale Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. VALUES: Minimizing risk of injury and increasing quality of life were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Moderate physical activity in people with osteoporosis can reduce the risk of falls and fractures, decrease pain and improve fitness and overall quality of life. It may also stimulate bone gain and decrease bone loss. Its positive effects are an adjunct to other interventions, such as hormonal therapy. It may give patients the confidence to resume regular activity and can provide social interaction and support. During exercise programs, proper nutrition is necessary to prevent excessive weight loss and impaired immune function resulting from inadequate protein, vitamin and mineral intake. RECOMMENDATIONS: Immobilization should be avoided if possible in anyone with osteoporosis or at increased risk for osteoporosis. Regular, moderate physical activity is recommended for those with osteoporosis. Elderly people should be assessed for risk of falling to identify those in greatest need of an exercise program. Community group exercise programs are beneficial. Younger people with osteoporosis also need exercise that will preserve or improve bone mass, muscular strength, endurance and cardiovascular fitness. Weight loss as a result of physical activity should be avoided and adequate intake of protein, vitamins and minerals assured. Because the benefits of physical activity are independent of the effect of other therapies, physical activity is an essential adjunct to appropriate nutrition and other therapies. VALIDATION: These recommendations were developed by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada at its 1995 Consensus Conference. They are in agreement with the position taken on osteoporosis and exercise by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. SPONSORS: Sponsors of the 1995 conference included the Dairy Farmers of Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche Canada Ltd., Merck Frosst Canada Inc. and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 8. Vitamin D metabolites and analogs in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To review recent findings on the skeletal actions of vitamin D and to examine results of the latest clinical trials of vitamin D in the treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: The vitamin D analog 1-alpha hydroxycholecalciferol (1 alpha-OH-D3); the vitamin D metabolite calcitriol. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with vitamin D therapies. EVIDENCE: Relevant laboratory and clinical studies and reports were examined. Greatest reliance was placed on recent large-scale, randomized, controlled trials; others were noted and their methods critiqued. Clinical practice in Japan was also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Vitamin D maintains the dynamic nature of bone and so presumably helps to keep it healthy. Calcitriol and 1 alpha-OH-D3 may be effective in increasing bone mass and preventing fractures in osteoporosis. Calcitriol may be an alternative treatment in the prevention and management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Possible side effects of vitamin D analogs and metabolites are hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, renal calcification and renal stones. RECOMMENDATIONS: The use of 1 alpha-OH-D3 for the treatment of osteoporosis in Canada cannot be supported without larger and longer randomized, controlled clinical trials. Calcitriol appears to prevent vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. More information is needed on its mechanism of action and efficacy in preventing hip fractures. Future studies should focus on comparisons with other effective therapies and on determining whether its effect on fractures is greater than that achieved through improved vitamin D nutrition. Patients taking calcitriol at dose levels required for antifracture effects should be monitored for serum and urine calcium response to the drug. Calcitriol should not be given to patients whose calcium intake is at current generally recommended levels. At present, prescription of calcitriol for the treatment of osteoporosis should be reserved for physicians with a special interest in the treatment of metabolic bone disease.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 6. Use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis and compare bisphosphonate therapy with other treatments. OPTIONS: The bisphosphonates, etidronate, alendronate, clodronate, pamidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate and risedronate; combined bisphosphonates and estrogen; combined bisphosphonates and calcium supplements. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with bisphosphonate treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined with emphasis on recent controlled trials. The availability of treatment products in Canada was also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Treatment with bisphosphonates may be an acceptable alternative to ovarian hormone therapy in increasing bone mass and decreasing fractures associated with osteoporosis. Compared with estrogens, bisphosphonates are bone-tissue specific, have equal or greater antiresorptive effect and have few side effects and no known risk for carcinogenesis. They also hold promise in treating male osteoporosis and steroid-induced bone loss. Prolonged, continuous treatment with etidronate may lead to impaired calcification of newly formed bone; therefore, etidronate is administered cyclically. This risk is not present in newer generations of bisphosphonates. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bisphosphonate therapies may be considered as an alternative to ovarian hormone therapy in postmenopausal osteopenic or osteoporotic women who cannot or will not tolerate ovarian hormone therapy. They should also be considered in treating male osteoporosis and steroid-induced bone loss. Combination therapy with estrogen may be effective, although more research is needed. Combination therapy with calcium supplements is recommended. Bisphosphonate therapies should be restricted to postmenopausal patients with osteopenia or established osteoporosis and are not yet recommended for younger perimenopausal women as prophylaxis.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 9. Calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe potential therapeutic uses of calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Parenterally and intranasally administered calcitonin (eel, salmon or human). OUTCOMES: Fracture, fracture pain and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures, reduction of pain and improved quality of life associated with calcitonin treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, with an emphasis on recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials. In vitro and in vivo studies of osteoclast activity were also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures and fracture pain, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Calcitonin reduces acute pain associated with osteoporotic fractures and has been found useful in treating chronic back pain following vertebral fractures in spinal osteoporosis. It can prevent bone loss and may be effective in preventing fractures. Side effects are dose related and generally mild; they include gastrointestinal, vascular and dermatologic conditions that can be treated symptomatically or by varying the dosage. Side effects are much rarer with nasal administration than with injection. True allergic reactions are rare. RECOMMENDATIONS: Calcitonin in both intramuscular and intranasal forms can reduce the pain of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures and may be effective in treating that associated with chronic vertebral osteoporotic fractures. Calcitonin may also prevent postmenopausal bone loss and increase bone density in those with established osteoporosis. Current evidence for long-term prevention of fractures is limited and does not support the use of calcitonin as a first-line treatment for established osteoporosis. Most side effects can be avoided with nasal administration. Further trials are needed to assess fracture prevention and effective dose ranges for treating pain and increasing bone mineral density and to determine the long-term efficacy of calcitonin in secondary osteoporosis, in premenopausal women, in men and in elderly people.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best method of diagnosing osteoporosis and determining fracture risk and to promote standards in the use of bone densitometry and the reporting of results. OPTIONS: Methods of bone mineral density measurement: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), radiographic absorptiometry, single-photon absorptiometry, dual-photon absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, quantitative ultrasound, neutron activation analysis. The options of using bone densitometry in individual patient management and as a mass screening tool are also considered. OUTCOMES: Appropriate use of densitometry to promote accurate diagnosis and assessment of fracture risk and timely, appropriate treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined. Clinical practice in Canada was also considered. VALUES: Accurate assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and diagnosis of osteoporosis and assuring low exposure to medical radiation were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Early diagnosis through bone density measurement allows proper management of osteoporosis to minimize injury and disability, improve quality of life and reduce the personal and social costs associated with the condition. Potential harms include radiation exposure and cost. The harms and costs of appropriate use of DXA are minimal compared with the harms and costs associated with osteoporosis. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bone mineral density should be measured only to assist in making a clinical management choice. DXA is the best method of measuring bone density and, thus, the best available indicator of osteoporotic fracture risk. Plain radiographs may supplement DXA if there is a specific reason for their use. Measurement of the lumbar spine and femoral neck is standard, but a different site or a single measurement is recommended in specific cases. Unless accelerated bone loss is suspected, DXA should be repeated every 2 to 4 years for patients receiving ovarian hormone therapy and 1 to 2 years for patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Measurements and reporting of results must be standardized. Reports should refer to the World Health Organization's recommended definitions of osteopenia and osteoporosis and provide actual measurement and its relation to peak bone mass.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 4. Calcium nutrition and osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To recommend appropriate levels of calcium intake in light of the most recent studies. OPTIONS: Dietary calcium intake, calcium supplementation, calcium and vitamin D supplementation; ovarian hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with osteoporosis prevention. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, in particular those published since the 1988 Osteoporosis Society of Canada position paper on calcium nutrition. Only studies in humans were considered, including controlled, randomized trials and prospective studies, using bone mass and fractures as end-points. Studies in early and later phases of skeletal growth were noted. The analysis was designed to eliminate menopause as a confounding variable. VALUES: Preventing osteoporosis and maximizing quality of life were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Adequate calcium nutrition increases bone mineral density during skeletal growth and prevents bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Risks associated with high dietary calcium intake are low, and a recent study extends this conclusion to the risk of kidney stones. Lactase-deficient patients may substitute yogurt and lactase-treated milk for cow's milk. True milk allergy is probably rare; its promotion of diabetes mellitus in susceptible people is being studied. RECOMMENDATIONS: Current recommended intakes of calcium are too low. Revised intake guidelines designed to reduce bone loss and protect against osteoporotic fractures are suggested. Canadians should attempt to meet their calcium requirements principally through food sources. Pharmaceutical calcium supplements and a dietician's advice should be considered where dietary preferences or lactase deficiency restrict consumption of dairy foods. Further research is necessary before recommending the general use of calcium supplements by adolescents. Calcium supplementation cannot substitute for hormone therapy in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss and fractures. Adequate amounts of vitamin D are necessary for optimal calcium absorption and bone health. Elderly people and those who use heavy sun screens should have a dietary intake of 400 to 800 IU of vitamin D per day.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 7. Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To present the latest findings on the use of fluoride in the treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Plain sodium fluoride (NaF), enteric-coated sodium fluoride (EC-NaF), sodium monofluorophosphate (Na2FPO4), slow-release sodium fluoride (SR-NaF); fluoride with a calcium supplement. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, with an emphasis on recent prospective, randomized, controlled trials. Clinical practices in European countries were also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: NaF therapy stimulates bone formation and may be effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures. It may be an acceptable alternative treatment to estrogen or bisphosphonate therapy and useful in premenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and in some patients with mild osteogenesis imperfecta. Toxic effects are dependent on formulation and dosage. They include a range of gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal conditions. EC-NaF is associated with less toxicity than plain NaF; its gastrointestinal toxicity is negligible. Na2FPO4 has no gastrointestinal toxicity, but can give rise to skeletal toxicity. SR-NaF appears to have no side effects when given intermittently. Carcinogenicity has not been found in vivo with fluoride therapy, despite in vitro results. RECOMMENDATIONS: New data indicate that fluoride therapy should be re-evaluated as a potentially effective treatment of osteoporosis with minimal side effects. More studies are needed of slow-release fluoride formulations, intermittent treatment schedules and calcium supplementation of fluoride. Studies should be undertaken to see if it is advantageous to initiate treatment with antiresorptive agents before or in combination with fluoride. Conclusive data have not been presented regarding the benefit of any specific type of calcium supplement. Further studies on the basic mechanism of action of fluoride on the skeleton are necessary to evaluate fluoride's potential to stimulate bone formation therapeutically.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Underuse of procedures for diagnosing osteoporosis and of therapies for osteoporosis in older nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis, the prevalence of utilization of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for diagnosis of osteoporosis, and prevalence of use of calcium and vitamin D supplements and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in an academic nursing home. METHODS: The charts of all women aged 56 years and older residing in an academic nursing home were analyzed by one of the authors for the prevalence of osteoporosis, the prevalence of use of BMD measurements to diagnose osteoporosis, and the prevalence of use of calcium and vitamin D supplements and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis. RESULTS: Of 136 postmenopausal women, mean age 79 +/- 10 years, 66 (49%) had measurements of BMD. Of these 66 women, 31 (47%) had osteoporosis, 21 (32%) had osteopenia, and 14 (21%) had normal BMD. Elemental calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily was prescribed to 17 of 31 women (55%) with osteoporosis, to 12 of 21 women (57%) with osteopenia, to 2 of 14 women (14%) with normal BMD, and to 27 of 70 women (39%) with no BMD obtained. Any dose of calcium was prescribed to 78 of 136 elderly women (58%). Vitamin D supplements were prescribed to 13 of 31 women (42%) with osteoporosis, to 9 of 21 women (43%) with osteopenia, to 2 of 14 women (14%) with normal BMD, and to 20 of 70 women (29%) with no BMD obtained. Vitamin D supplements were prescribed to 44 of 136 elderly women (32%). Biphosphonates were prescribed to 19 of 31 women (61%) with osteoporosis. Of 20 women on medications that increased the risk of osteoporosis, 6 (30%) had BMD measured. Nine of these 20 women (45%) were on calcium supplements. CONCLUSIONS: Older postmenopausal women in an academic nursing home have a high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia, a low prevalence of measurement of BMD, and underuse of calcium, vitamin D supplements, and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1998

Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model?

The objectives of the study were: to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in women in their seventh decade; to determine the number of women who conformed to at least one of the current East Yorkshire Clinical Referral Criteria for Osteoporosis; and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these referral criteria in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and to compare this with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of a logistic regression model incorporating variables that were significantly associated with the risk of osteoporosis. An observational study was carried out at the Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Hull Royal Infirmary, on women in their seventh decade from three general practices. Densitometric assessment of lumbar spine and femoral neck was carried out using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a detailed medical history taken. The main outcome measures were prevalence of osteoporosis in women in their seventh decade and efficacy of agreed clinical referral criteria at osteoporosis case finding. Of 823 Caucasian women who underwent DXA, 24% proved to have osteoporosis at hip, spine or both according to WHO criteria. A further 49% had osteopenia detected at hip, spine or both. At least one of the referral criteria was present in 47% of the women assessed. The sensitivity of the clinical referral criteria for detection of osteoporosis was 58% with a corresponding specificity of 60%. This point lies below the ROC curve (area under fitted curve, Az = 0.73) of a logistic regression model incorporating weight, age at menopause and current use of hormone replacement therapy. In conclusion, osteoporosis according to WHO criteria was found in almost 25% of women in their seventh decade. A simple logistic regression model provided a more sensitive method of osteoporosis case finding than the selective screening component of the clinical referral criteria employed in our practice.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2003

The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT).

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis knowledge is an important contributor to improving exercise and calcium intake behaviour. However, there are few validated instruments for measuring osteoporosis knowledge levels. The aim of this study was to design a valid and reliable instrument to measure osteoporosis knowledge in Australian women. METHODS: A 20 item instrument with true, false and don't know responses was drafted, based on the Osteoporosis Australia Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-management course and the information leaflet "Understanding Osteoporosis". The scoring range was 1 to 20. This was administered to a 467 randomly-selected, healthy women aged 25-44 years. Questionnaire performance was assessed by Flesch reading ease, index of difficulty, Ferguson's sigma, inter-item and item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha and principal component factor analysis. RESULTS: Flesch reading ease was higher than desirable at 45, but this was due to the use of the word osteoporosis in many items. Of the individual items 17 had an index of difficulty less than 0.75. The questionnaire had a Ferguson's sigma of 0.96, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and factor analysis consistent with only one factor (osteoporosis knowledge) being measured. Levels of osteoporosis knowledge were low with a mean score of 8.8 out of 20 which suggests the OKAT may be sensitive to change. CONCLUSIONS: The OKAT for measuring osteoporosis knowledge has good psychometric properties in Australian 25-44 year old females. While it should be applicable to other Caucasian populations, this will require confirmation by further research.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Osteoporosis in children and adolescent girls: case report of idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis is an important aspect of gynecologic training and practice. Idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis (IJO) is a rare disease of children and adolescents that resolves after the onset of puberty. A case report is presented and current methods of diagnosis and treatment of IJO are discussed as well as the differential diagnosis. A MEDLINE search was performed of the following terms: idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, pediatric osteoporosis, adolescent osteoporosis, bisphosphonates pediatric adolescent, and pregnancy osteoporosis, and references from bibliographies of selected papers were used as well. All papers in English, French, and German are considered in this review. There were 114 papers selected as relevant to the topic. Data relevant to the diagnosis, pathogenesis, methods of imaging, laboratory evaluation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of IJO are presented. IJO is a diagnosis of exclusion in the pediatric and adolescent patient with osteoporosis. Although bone density gradually improves after the onset of puberty, treatment of currently affected children and adolescents involves activity restriction, calcium, vitamin D, and bisphosphonate therapy. Future reproductive concerns are discussed and areas requiring additional study are reviewed. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe the condition idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, compare the clinical features of this condition to other similar conditions, outline the diagnostic workup of a child with this condition, and list the potential therapeutic options for a patient with idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Osteoporosis Clinical Guideline. South African Medical Association--Osteoporosis Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: This Guideline aims to improve the efficacy of both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for osteoporosis. All health care workers are targeted in the Guideline. A rather detailed summary, which is cross-referenced to the full guideline, is provided to cater for the busy general practitioner. The motivation for the development of this Guideline is based on the facts that: Osteoporosis is a common, costly disease which carries a significant morbidity and mortality, yet is still too often regarded as an inescapable part of normal ageing. Early detection and intervention will be more cost-effective than the treatment of advanced disease. Much confusion exists regarding diagnostic criteria, the assessment of fracture risk, and therapeutic intervention thresholds. A rational approach to drug selection is seldom considered. No consensus guideline on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis has been published in this country. OUTCOMES: Prevention of fracture and a reduction in morbidity and mortality were the major considerations in the development of this Guideline. Although no formal economic analysis was undertaken, the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions was considered in all recommendations. EVIDENCE: A combination of descriptive, boundary (minimum standards) and algorithmic guidelines was employed. The highest level of evidence (meta-analyses, randomised and controlled studies) was used as far as possible and isolated descriptive studies and expert opinions were largely ignored. A draft guideline was developed, debated at a consensus meeting and finalised on the basis of written comments following the distribution of a second draft. METHODOLOGY: See Annexure B. RECOMMENDATIONS: In the absence of a sound health economic justification for a screening policy, it is recommended that the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis is best managed using a case-finding approach. It is recommended that clinical risk factors--related to bone mineral density (BMD), bone strength or falls--provide indications for further assessment, in particular bone mass measurement. Axial, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the preferred technique to assess BMD, to diagnose osteoporosis and to assess rates of bone loss/gain. While the four diagnostic categories proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO, 1994) provide a practical basis to identify those at risk of fracture, cognisance should be taken of its limitations. We recommend that the BMD of both spine and hip should be measured, that the NHANES III reference data for Caucasians be used for subjects of all races (until local reference ranges for different ethnic groups are established), and that the same absolute thresholds be employed to diagnose osteoporosis in men and women. Recommendations are also made regarding indications for bone mass measurement and selected routine laboratory tests. The differences between diagnostic criteria and intervention thresholds are emphasised. The need to treat should not depend on a BMD value alone, but should also be determined by the patient's age, general health and willingness to consider treatment; the presence of clinical risk factors; prevalent vertebral fractures; and the rate of bone loss/turnover; as well as the cost-effectiveness and side-effects of available treatment. Non-pharmacological measures to improve bone strength include a balanced diet, physical exercise, limiting alcohol consumption, the avoidance of smoking and bone toxic drugs and the prevention of falls. No ideal drug can be recommended for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in all patients. The choice of drug is largely determined by the nature of the disease (e.g. antiresorptive agents like calcium (+/- vitamin D) for mild osteopenia, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or bisphosphonates for moderate bone loss and the addition of a bone formation-stimulating agent in patients with more severe osteoporosis) and the pati

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Osteoporosis. Guidelines for general practitioners. Osteoporosis Australia.

Osteoporosis and its associated problems are major health concerns in Australia, and are commonly encountered in general practice. As the population ages, the incidence of osteoporosis will continue to increase. Hence, it is important for general practitioners and healthcare professionals to remain up to date with the strategies involved in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Over the last few years, there have been significant advances in our understanding and treatment of osteoporosis. It is now clear that osteoporosis is a problem for men as well as for women. Accurate and reliable measurements to diagnose osteoporosis, and effective medications to treat it, are now available. These guidelines have been prepared to help general practitioners identify people at risk of developing osteoporosis, and to inform general practitioners on the current diagnosis and treatment strategies of the condition. We commend these guidelines to you as a reference source for the treatment of people with osteoporosis.

Australia↗

PubMed1997

Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

To assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent osteoporosis, it is necessary to estimate total health care expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Resources utilized for the treatment of many diseases can be estimated from secondary databases using relevant diagnosis codes, but such codes do not indicate which fractures are osteoporotic in nature. Therefore, a panel of experts was convened to make judgments about the probabilities that fractures of different types might be related to osteoporosis according to patient age, gender, and race. A three-round Delphi process was applied to estimate the proportion of fractures related to osteoporosis (i.e., the osteoporosis attribution probabilities) in 72 categories comprised of four specific fracture types (hip, spine, forearm, all other sites combined) stratified by three age groups (45-64 years, 65-84 years, 85 years and older), three racial groups (white, black, all others), and both genders (female, male). It was estimated that at least 90% of all hip and spine fractures among elderly white women should be attributed to osteoporosis. Much smaller proportions of the other fractures were attributed to osteoporosis. Regardless of fracture type, attribution probabilities were less for men than women and generally less for non-whites than whites. These probabilities will be used to estimate the total direct medical costs associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Calcitriol. A review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and its potential in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

A synthetic form of calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol; 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3), the most physiologically active metabolite of vitamin D, has shown efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and promise in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Although results of small studies investigating calcitriol in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis have been conflicting, a clinical trial in 622 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis demonstrated that patients with mild to moderate disease who received calcitriol (0.25 microgram twice daily) had a significant 3-fold lower rate of new vertebral fractures after 3 years of treatment, compared with patients receiving elemental calcium 1000 mg/day. In patients commencing long term treatment with prednisone or prednisolone, calcitriol 0.5 to 1.0 micrograms/day plus calcium 1000 mg/day, administered with or without intranasal calcitonin 400 IU/day, prevented steroid-induced bone loss. Overall, calcitriol is well tolerated. As shown in clinical studies, at recommended dosages hypercalcaemia is infrequent and mild, generally responding to reductions in calcium intake and/or calcitriol dosage. The narrow 'therapeutic window' of calcitriol requires that its use be adequately supervised, with periodic monitoring of serum calcium and creatinine levels. However, significant renal toxicity has not been seen in patients with osteoporosis treated with calcitriol in high dosages for several years in comparative and noncomparative trials. In conclusion, as with other drugs currently used in the management of patients with osteoporosis, questions remain to be answered regarding the efficacy of calcitriol relative to other agents, and its tolerability in such patients during the very long term. Nonetheless, at this stage, calcitriol should be considered a useful treatment option in patients with mild to moderate postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed2001

The need for comprehensive educational osteoporosis prevention programs for young women: results from a second osteoporosis prevention survey.

OBJECTIVE: To assess osteoporosis knowledge, beliefs, and preventive behaviors among young adult women and to identify sources that they would mostly likely utilize to learn more about the disease. METHODS: Information was gathered through a cross-sectional survey of 321 women (mean age 21.6 years; 63.5% were white, 29.2% were black) enrolled in a required undergraduate health course at a southeastern state university. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven (86%) of the survey participants had heard about osteoporosis, but only 3.8% of respondents reported getting both adequate exercise and the recommended 1,200 mg of calcium per day. Respondents believed that they were unlikely to develop osteoporosis and that osteoporosis is less serious than other common causes of morbidity and mortality in women, such as heart disease and breast cancer (P < 0.0001). Brochures, magazines, and short counseling sessions were preferred information sources for learning about osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS. The majority of young women studied are at risk for developing premature osteoporosis. They prefer brochures, magazines, and short counseling sessions during medical office visits to learn about osteoporosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

The implication of assessing a polymorphism in estrogen receptor alpha gene in the risk assessment of osteoporosis using a screening tool for osteoporosis in Asians.

Both genetic and environmental factors interact to determine bone mass and the risk for developing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recently, an Asian-specific tool, the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), has been developed to assess the risk of osteoporosis in women. An index is calculated by multiplying the difference in body weight in kilograms and age in years by 0.2 and disregarding the decimal digits. The risk of osteoporosis is classified as high, intermediate or low according to the OSTA index less than -4, -4 to -1 and greater than -1. In the present study we examined how a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in exon 8 of the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) gene affected the predictive value of the OSTA index. Subjects consisted of 358 postmenopausal women who were at least 55 years old. BMDs were measured by DXA, and the SNP in the ERalpha gene was assessed by PCR-RFLP. When considering both the OSTA index and ERalpha genotype in a logistic regression model, it was found that both the OSTA index and the ERalpha genotype independently contributed to the risk of osteoporosis. The odds ratios were 1.58 (95% CI 1.26-1.91) and 2.51 (95% CI 1.42-4.44) for one unit decrement in the OSTA index and each copy of the A allele of the ERalpha genotype, respectively. The joint effect conformed more to a multiplicative model of interaction than an additive model. This suggests that persons with the high-risk genotype are at far greater risk of developing osteoporosis with advancing age or decreasing body weight, the two variables from which the OSTA index is derived. Targeting preventive measures for osteoporosis subjects with risk factors and also disease-susceptibility alleles is likely to be more cost effective.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Rationale for treatment of involutional osteoporosis in women and for prevention and treatment of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis with alfacalcidol.

Increased cytokine release and increased activity of osteoclasts (reduced osteoclast apoptosis) due to a fall in estrogen is of causal significance in postmenopausal bone loss as well as malfunction of the vitamin D activation and concomitant calcium (Ca) malabsorption. Alfacalcidol prevents rapid postmenopausal bone loss by elimination of Ca malabsorption and by blocking resorbing cytokines. Established osteoporosis in older patients of both sexes is characterized by decoupled bone remodeling induced by sex hormone deficits and by a so-called somatopause (insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-deficit), but also by lack of vitamin D and, very importantly, by reduced synthesis of D-hormone (Calcitriol) in kidneys and bone as well as by a lack of receptors or receptor affinity for D-hormone in the target organs. As a consequence of these facts, a rise in parathormone (PTH) frequently occurs. The lack of D-hormone and IGF-1 evidently causes a reduction in muscle strength as well and reinforces the risk of falling and, thus, the risk of a fracture. Alfacalcidol, a prodrug of D-hormone, is a specific antiosteoporotic therapy. In alfacalcidol therapy, D-hormone is provided to the body in circumvention of its own regulation, by means of which much higher hormone concentrations can be achieved in the target tissues than by administration of plain vitamin D. Chances have been significantly improved of reducing and frequently preventing the real osteoporosis complication for older male and female patients, i. e., bone fractures, by alfacalcidol. A clear distinction should be made between supplementation with low-dosed plain vitamin D and calcium as base supply in elderly housebound subjects or as adjuvant to antiosteoporotic drugs and the specific antiosteoporotic therapy with alfacalcidol in patients with osteoporosis. The expanded understanding of the pathogenesis of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis with its disturbed Ca homeostasis and the pharmacological effects of alfacalcidol, counteracting such iatrogenic bone loss, explain the particularly good clinical efficacy in this most frequent form of secondary osteoporosis. Normalizing de-coupled bone remodeling due to cytokine modulation and the potential influence on deteriorated bone quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease predestine this form of therapy for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis as a result of chronic inflammatory diseases as well as of transplantation osteoporosis cases in particular.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗