[Third Instructional Workshop of the European Academy of Otology and Neuro-Otology (EAONO): 20-24 September 2006 in Cologne].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Medical publication continues to be important to academicians, physicians in private practice, researchers and corporate sponsors. This article provides valuable dos and don'ts for authors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review and personal experience of the author. RESULTS: Advice is provided for understanding the publishing world, the peer-review process, duplicate publication, authorship, and dos and don'ts for successful authors. CONCLUSIONS: Publishing is a competitive art and science. The key to success is the submission of a proper manuscript that contains important, new, scientific information of value to the readers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Otologic syphilis (luetic inner ear disease) usually is diagnosed by positive serologic tests and by exclusion of other possible causes. Because the FTA-ABS for syphilis is exquisitely sensitive in all but early primary cases, a positive FTA-ABS result and coincident inner ear disease often are thought to be diagnostic of syphilitic inner ear disease. The result is a management dilemma: are there false-positive results in misdiagnosed cases? Over 4 years, the authors performed a prospective study with time-matched controls to determine the predictive value of serologic tests and prevalence of syphilis in otology. Thirty-one cases of otologic syphilis were diagnosed in 5,439 new (different) patients with otologic complaints. In the geographic area studied, this prevalence (570/100,000) was 25-fold greater than that of all reported cases of syphilis in the general population (22.7/100,000). The defined sensitivity of the FTA-ABS (100%) was nearly twofold greater than the measured sensitivity of the rapid plasma reagin (RPR, 55%) in otologic syphilis. Specificities were comparable; therefore, a positive FTA-ABS had higher predictive value than a positive RPR. The prevalence-related predictive value of a positive FTA-ABS (22%) was more than twice that of the RPR (9%) in otology. The predictive value of a positive FTA-ABS in otology was 11-fold greater than that of the FTA-ABS in the general population (2%). Therefore, in suspect cases the FTA-ABS should be used to screen for otologic syphilis in an otologic practice. At a prevalence of 570 cases in 100,000 patients, only 22% of otologic patients with positive FTA-ABS results actually have otologic syphilis. Because disease morbidity can be far worse than treatment morbidity, however, positive results should be considered true-positives to avoid misdiagnosis in potentially infected patients. In suspect cases with positive FTA-ABS, therefore, treatment should be recommended unless specific contraindications exist.
Long-term clinical neurologic and otologic sequelae of traumatic head injury are well recognized. In this article, we describe the relationship among neurophysiologic, neuro-otologic, and neuroradiologic findings in a series of fifty patients with acute, severe head injury. Seventy percent of the patients had one or more otologic abnormalities, of which hemotympanum was most common. Outcome of computerized tomography (CT), auditory brainstem response (ABR), and otologic examination findings were not mutually dependent. For example, otologic disease was found in 50% of the patients with normal ABR. All but one patient in the series showed brain damage by CT; yet only 14% of the series had evidence of temporal bone fracture and, unexpectedly, one third of this group yielded normal otologic findings and a normal ABR. We conclude that combined application of otologic examination, CT scanning, and auditory evoked response assessment provides complementary information on structural and functional neuro-otologic status in persons with acute, severe head injury.
Recounted are some, not all, of the most significant contributions to otology. The history of otology has, for the most part, followed the history of medicine: Little was known of otology by the ancient physicians, but their work must be reviewed to appreciate the progress that has been made. Most of the otology produced during the Middle Ages was limited to those structures that were readily accessible; otologic surgery was confined to trauma and removal of foreign bodies from the external auditory canals. Examination of the ear began after studies of the ear by Italian anatomists during the seventeenth century. It was not until the end of the eighteenth century that magnification was used so that the minute anatomic details could be observed. The clinical specialty of otology started in France (1850s), emerged as a scientific specialty in England, and received explosive progress from the German-speaking countries at the end of the nineteenth century. Otology has a remarkable background.
PURPOSE: To study and understand the contribution made by Adam Politzer (1835-1920) to 20th century otology and analyze his place in the history of otology. METHOD: A study of his four reference works, some of his hundreds of publications in medical journals, and diverse publications written about him. RESULTS: All areas of otology have been studied, compiled, and improved through his assorted publications, notably his atlas of otoscopy published in 1865, the first work of its kind, expanded and reedited in 1896; his 10 tables of the anatomy of the ear amended in 1873; his textbook of the diseases of the ear, which was first published in two volumes in 1878 and 1882 and subsequently reedited four times as one volume, the last time being in 1908; his anatomy and histology book published in 1889; and his book on the history of otology, which up to now is the most complete tome existing on the subject, edited in two volumes in 1907 and 1913. No other has been as prolific as he. He invented, in particular, a revolutionary method of making the eustachian tube permeable--a method that made him famous and carries his name. He also developed an acoumeter to measure hearing and was the first to describe certain pathologic conditions histologically, of which otosclerosis is one. CONCLUSION: Politzer is certainly the greatest otologist of the 19th century and probably one of the greatest of all time. His influence on the 50 years of otology has never been equaled. He deserves a double mention in the history of otology: as an otologist and as a historian. It is in his honor that the International Society of Otology bears his name.
The authors report on 5 observations of necrotising angiitis with a specifically otological onset, namely 4 Wegener's syndromes and one periarteritis nodosa. In all 5 cases, the initial symptomatology consisted of otological signs in a feverish context, producing pictures of serous or sero-purulent otitis. Its resistance to usual forms of therapy led in 3 cases to the installation of transtympanic aerators, and in 2 cases to the performance of an antro-attico-mastoidectomy. One of the observations led to the discovery in the middle ear of a histological aspect specific to the disease, from which it can be considered that the otologic impairment could be a specific seat of the disease. The 5th observation is particular in that it was the otological signs which revealed each time a new progression of the disease, enabling the immediate implementation of an adapted treatment prior to the occurrence of the systemic signs. 3 observations proved the difficulty of diagnosis at the initial stage, when at times only the otological signs are present, together with the importance of its discovery prior to the occurrence of systemic lesions that are occasionally irreversible. Any isolated otological symptomatology in a feverish context, resisting usual therapies, should evoke the diagnosis, and lead to the performance of further duly adapted examinations (sedimentation rate, pulmonary X-ray, proteinuria, hematuria).
PURPOSE OF STUDY: To analyze Ambroise Paré's otologic knowledge and thus his contribution to otology. METHOD: Written materials on otology, taken from the fourth and final edition of Ambroise Paré's complete works, were reviewed. These works were published in French in 1585, which was during his lifetime. This study also includes a review of the international literature on the subject. RESULTS: Ambroise Paré did not have as much effect on otology as he did on 16th Century surgery. Nevertheless, his otologic knowledge was vast for the period, and he developed numerous treatments for auricular traumas. CONCLUSION: Because of his long experience as a war surgeon, Ambroise Paré's contribution to the discipline of the treatment of auricular traumas is undeniable.