PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Obstetrics”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

ACOG committee opinion. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Number 275, September 2002. Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Effective rehabilitation and modern reproductive technology may increase the number of women considering pregnancy who have spinal cord injuries (SCIs). It is important that obstetricians caring for these patients are aware of the specific problems related to SCIs. Autonomic dysreflexia is the most significant medical complication seen in women with SCIs,and precautions should be taken to avoid stimuli that can lead to this potentially fatal syndrome. Women with SCIs may give birth vaginally, but when cesarean delivery is indicated adequate anesthesia (spinal or epidural if possible) is needed.

Autonomic Dysreflexia↗

Charges for obstetric liability insurance and discontinuation of obstetric practice in New York.

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to determine whether New York physicians facing higher charges for obstetric liability insurance coverage are more likely to discontinue obstetric practice than physicians experiencing lower levels of increases in liability insurance charges. METHODS: We performed a physician-level analysis of factors predicting discontinuation of hospital-based obstetric practice by 1989 for physicians active in obstetrics in 1980. We examined both physicians who became completely clinically inactive in New York between 1980 and 1989, and physicians who remained clinically active but restricted their hospital practice to areas other than obstetrics. Multiple logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of discontinuation of obstetrics, including regional malpractice insurance charges, physician characteristics, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Although increases in malpractice insurance charges differed considerably among regions within New York State, there was no association between level of increase of charges for liability insurance and discontinuation of obstetric practice. A greater number of years since medical licensure was associated both with complete discontinuation of hospital practice in New York and selective discontinuation of obstetrical practice. Compared with obstetrician-gynecologists, family physicians were less likely to become completely clinically inactive. Among physicians who remained clinically active in hospital care, however, family physicians were less likely than obstetrician-gynecologists to continue to include obstetrics in their practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is no relationship between the level of increase in liability insurance premiums and the likelihood of discontinuing obstetric practice in New York. Discontinuation of obstetric practice appears to mainly reflect trends in the physician's life cycle of practice activity and in the scope of family and general practice.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Physician perceptions regarding competence of obstetrical providers and attitudes about other issues in obstetrical care.

BACKGROUND: Access to obstetrical care in the United States is unevenly distributed and is limited by provider availability, geography, and finances. Obstetrical care is provided by three distinct groups: obstetricians, family physicians, and certified nurse midwives (CNMs). Outcomes among these groups have not been shown to differ, but the attitudes and perceptions of these groups may impact access to obstetrical care. We examined physicians' perceptions regarding competence of obstetrical providers for low- and high-risk care and attitudes regarding CNMs and malpractice insurance costs. METHODS: We mailed a survey containing twenty value-neutral questions on competency, attitudes, and demographics to a randomized list of 3,000 OB/GYNs and 3,000 FPs obtained from the American Medical Association. Physicians surveyed included obstetricians (OB/GYNs), obstetricians specializing in high-risk (HROBs), family physicians who include obstetrics in their practice (FPOBs), and family physicians who do not do obstetrics (FPs). RESULTS: The response rate was 14.5 percent. All respondent types expressed a high degree of confidence in OB/GYNs to provide low-risk obstetrical care. FPOBs were not perceived to be as competent to provide the same care, but FPOBs have more confidence in their ability to provide low-risk obstetrical care than OB/GYNs have (71.4% versus 43.8%, P = .0001). Attitudes differed among the physicians about malpractice insurance fees paid by OB/GYNs and FPOBs. OB/GYNs strongly supported a similar fee schedule for these two groups and FPs supported differential rates (P = .001). CNMs were generally perceived as competent and were thought to warrant hospital privileges for vaginal deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians view their own and others' obstetrical competence and outcomes differently, but not necessarily accurately. Malpractice rates are not perceived by OB/GYNs as fair. Specialty societies need to promote cooperation and enhance education of all providers of obstetrics.

Adult↗

[Norwegian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics--guidelines in obstetrics. Structure, process, results and evaluation].

This paper describes structure, process, results, and evaluation of the Norwegian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics' Guidelines in obstetrics. This work, which lasted for 2 1/2 years, involved almost all obstetrical departments in Norway and 1/4 of all members of the Norwegian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. All members of the Norwegian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics were invited to answer 24 questions. Of the 63% who replied to the questionnaire, 44% and 48% respectively stated that the Guidelines in obstetrics were very good or good. The introduction of the Guidelines in obstetrics led to changes in routines in more than 70% of the hospitals, and the different categories of hospital physicians changed their routines as well (55-65%). 83% of the heads of the departments stated that the Guidelines in obstetrics served partly or totally as the model for the obstetrical management guidelines. The evaluation and the experience of this quality assessment handbook serve as perspectives for future work.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Model of family medicine and obstetrics-gynecology collaboration in obstetric care at the University of Michigan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess concordance between family physician obstetric privilege delineation and actual care delivered, and describe associated clinical and educational collaborations between family medicine and obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive retrospective review of the care and complications of 962 consecutive patients admitted to a family medicine obstetric service in a research-intensive academic medical center, and compared the results with a structured obstetric privilege delineation. RESULTS: Of 962 women admitted by family medicine faculty members, 741 (77.9%) were managed exclusively by family physicians, 63 (6.6%) were comanaged by family physicians and obstetricians, and 147 (15.5%) were transferred to obstetricians (data missing for 11 patients). Spontaneous vaginal deliveries were performed in 772 patients (81%), cesarean delivery in 116 patients (12.2%), and assisted delivery by forceps or vacuum in 19 (2%) and 44 (4.6%) patients, respectively. Of 926 intrapartum obstetric complications identified in 604 obstetric deliveries, 615 complications (66.4%) in 418 deliveries were managed exclusively by family physicians consistent with privilege delineation, comanagement occurred in 56 patients with 92 complications (9.9%), and care was transferred in 130 patients with 219 complications (23. 7%). CONCLUSION: A structured method of obstetric privilege delineation for family medicine faculty members and associated guidelines for family physician-obstetrician interactions has led to a successful family medicine obstetric service at a research-intensive, tertiary-care medical center, with a high concordance between privilege delineation and actual care delivered. This success has resulted in incremental clinical and educational collaborations that have improved the quality of women's health care and education.

Family Practice↗

Integrated Obstetric Curriculum for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency, Radiology Residency and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Fellowship program at an accredited American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Diagnostic Ultrasound Center.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to demonstrate the approach to developing an integrated curriculum for obstetric ultrasound training by utilizing an accredited American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine teaching platform. METHODS: During the 1996-98 academic years, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine guidelines for ultrasound performance and training were integrated into a multifaceted training program for obstetric and radiological residents and maternal-fetal medicine fellows consisting of a structured reading program, self study of a 35-mm slide program of normal/abnormal anatomy, a basic ultrasound and fetal echocardiography interactive CD program, hands-on supervised scanning program and practical and certificate-bearing fetal echocardiography courses for fellows. All obstetric residents were given pretests and post-tests to measure learning performance in the program. The results from these tests were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: Thirteen obstetric residents completed the training program. The locally developed pretest showed a mean of 16/40 correct questions with an SD of 1.85. After completing the training, the mean obstetric resident scores on the post-test were 32/40 with an SD of 5.9. This difference was statistically significantly different, P < 0.009. Radiology residents showed an improvement from no residents passing the obstetric ultrasound portion on the 1996 Radiology Boards to 100% pass rate in 1997 (four residents per year) after completing the course. Maternal-fetal medicine fellows progressed from inability to perform acceptable fetal echocardiography to full ability to perform fetal echocardiographic examinations. CONCLUSION: An integrated approach to obstetric ultrasound training for obstetric and radiologic residents and maternal-fetal medicine fellows with multifaceted learning methods is easily achieved with available guidance from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

CD-I↗

The fourth-year medical school curriculum: recommendations of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

OBJECTIVES: The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology have proposed a fourth-year medical school curriculum for a student interested in pursuing a residency in obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: Faculty members and residents in North Carolina, Illinois, and Michigan were surveyed as to the ideal curriculum that they would recommend for fourth-year students. The committee members representing the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics then reviewed these surveys and proposed a final curriculum. RESULTS: A core curriculum of general medicine as an acting internship, an intensive care unit rotation, neonatology, and emergency medicine was recommended. Additional courses strongly considered were ambulatory obstetrics-gynecology, acting internship in obstetrics-gynecology, endocrinology, and general surgery. CONCLUSION: The committee recommends a curriculum that is broad and balanced in general medical education.

Curriculum↗

An audit of obstetric care in a university family medicine department and an obstetrics-gynecology department.

The care of obstetric patients in a university family medicine department was compared with that in the obstetrics-gynecology department of the same university. The obstetric service patients tended to be at higher risk due to a higher black population (24.2 percent vs 6.3 percent), greater prepregnancy weight (mean 154.0 lbs vs 113.9 lbs), and a greater number of patients referred from the community because of prenatal complications. However, the family medicine patients had a higher incidence of premature rupture of membranes (26 percent vs 11 percent), and were therefore at risk for several complications. Family medicine nulliparas had first stages of labor which lasted an average of 12.2 hours as opposed to obstetric service nulliparas whose first stages averaged only 9.2 hours. There were more family medicine than obstetric service patients who received no anesthesia (18.0 percent vs 10.2 percent). Elective low forceps were used more often by obstetric service physicians than by family physicians (28.2 percent vs 15.3 percent). Mothers on the family medicine service had more puerperal complications than those on the obstetric service (16.0 percent vs 5.6 percent). No serious discrepancies in quality of care could be found between the two services.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Surgical management of severe obstetric hemorrhage: experience with an obstetric hemorrhage equipment tray.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity and death. In addition to the appropriate use of oxytocic agents for uterine atony, surgical techniques, including uterine tamponade, major vessel ligation, compression sutures, and hysterectomy, may be required. On the rare occasions they are needed, the instruments and equipment required for these surgical techniques may not be readily available. OBJECTIVE: To record our experience with an obstetric hemorrhage equipment tray for surgical management of severe obstetric hemorrhage. METHODS: A severe obstetric hemorrhage equipment tray was established and included packing (5-yard roll) and balloon device for uterine tamponade, straight (10 cm) eyed-needles and large curved eyed-needles for use with No. 1 suture, 3 Heaney vaginal retractors, 4 sponge forceps, and diagrams and instructions for the various types of compression sutures and tamponade techniques. RESULTS: Of the 4400 deliveries that occurred at 1 tertiary maternity hospital during 2002, the obstetric hemorrhage tray was used on 9 occasions: 3 Caesarean sections with placenta previa (uterine tamponade used in 2 cases, compression sutures in 1); 2 Caesarean sections with uterine atony (compression sutures); 1 Caesarean section with placenta previa accreta (major vessel ligation and compression sutures); and 3 vaginal deliveries (suturing of cervical and vaginal lacerations in 2 of the cases, uterine tamponade used in the third case). In all cases, hysterectomy was avoided. CONCLUSION: The ready availability of an obstetric hemorrhage equipment tray on the labour ward facilitates prompt surgical management of severe obstetric hemorrhage, and may reduce the need for blood transfusion and hysterectomy.

Female↗

Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the higher levels of obstetric intervention and maternity service use among older women can be explained by obstetric complications. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank. PARTICIPANTS: All residents of Aberdeen city district delivering singleton infants at the Maternity Hospital 1988-1997 (28,484 deliveries). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios for each intervention in older maternal age groups compared with women aged 20-29. Interventions considered include obstetric interventions (induction of labour, augmentation, epidural use, assisted delivery, caesarean section) and raised maternity service use (more than two prenatal scans, amniocentesis, antenatal admission to hospital, admission at delivery of more than five days, infant resuscitation, and admission to the neonatal unit). METHODS: Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between maternal age and the incidence of interventions. The odds ratios for each intervention were then adjusted for relevant obstetric complications and maternal socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Levels of amniocentesis, caesarean section, assisted delivery, induction, and augmentation (in primiparae) are all higher among older women. Maternity service use also increases significantly with age: older women are more likely to have an antenatal admission, more than two scans, a hospital stay at delivery of more than five days, and have their baby admitted to a neonatal unit. Controlling for relevant obstetric complications reveals several examples of effect modification, but does not eliminate the age effect for most interventions in most groups of women. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of intervention among older women are not explained by the obstetric complications we considered.

Adult↗

Reported comfort with obstetrical emergencies before and after participation in the advanced life support in obstetrics course.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prior research has demonstrated a change in Advanced Life Support in Obstetrics (ALSO) course attendees' reported comfort with managing specific obstetrical emergencies and procedures before and immediately after participation in an ALSO course. Assessment of longer-term stability of these changes has not been performed. This study measured changes in comfort with obstetrical emergencies and reported practice patterns 1 year after ALSO training. METHODS: ALSO course attendees (275) were given a grounded Likert scale survey measuring reported comfort with the management of specific obstetrical emergencies and procedures before, immediately after, 6 months after, and 1 year after participation in an ALSO course. Practice patterns were also surveyed. Paired data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test at a 95% confidence interval for two-tailed significance. RESULTS: ALSO course participants reported a significant increase in their comfort with the management of each of 15 obstetrical emergencies and procedures taught in the ALSO curriculum. Reported comfort remained high at 6 months' and 1-year follow-up and was accompanied by a statistically significant change in reported practice patterns; more participants performed, in their practice 1 year after completion of ALSO training, amnioinfusion, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, and ultrasound for determining fetal position and placental location. CONCLUSIONS: Affective learning is important in translating knowledge and skills into the practice of medicine. Our study demonstrates that participation in the ALSO course increases participants' knowledge in the affective domain of learning.

Amnion↗

Obstetric characteristics profiles as quality assessment of obstetric care.

In The Netherlands only about 50% of all pregnancies are defined as high risk pregnancies and consequently come into the domain of care of an obstetrician. In order to qualify as a high risk pregnancy, the pregnancy must satisfy certain criteria contained in an officially approved list of indications. Due to varying perceptions of these selection criteria by the selectors, larger differences in the treated population, obstetric interventions and results, respectively, were expected than in other countries. Within the framework of the project 'Obstetric Peer Review' (Verloskundige Onderlinge Kwaliteitsspiegeling, VOKS) the type and the magnitude of the differences of the values of the obstetric characteristics of population, interventions and results, respectively have been investigated. For the high risk pregnancies the data contained in the Perinatal Database of The Netherlands were used for the years 1983-1987, both inclusive. Because the various obstetric departments in The Netherlands had been unaware of these differences, consequently they had to become conscious about these differences and be informed about their own position relative to the others. For an instant comparison a single sheet graphical method has been designed, affording the assessment of one's own obstetric characteristics relative to those of other departments for the above mentioned 5 years for each of the 25 items considered. All departments, which participated in the Perinatal Database of The Netherlands during the years 1983-1987, received their own profiles and were invited to reply. Large differences were observed for the various characteristics considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Databases, Factual↗

Use of anaesthetic rooms in obstetric anaesthesia; a postal survey of obstetric anaesthetists and departments in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Use of anaesthetic rooms has been much discussed in the UK in recent years, but attitudes and practices of obstetric anaesthetists regarding their use for caesarean section have never been sought. METHOD: A postal survey was conducted to discover the extent of use of anaesthetic rooms versus operating theatre for induction of anaesthesia and reasons for using or not using them. Questionnaires regarding individual practices were sent to 400 randomly selected members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association ( approximately 25% of UK membership). Questionnaires regarding departmental policies were sent to 100 "clinicians responsible for surveys" (approximately 38% of departments providing obstetric anaesthesia in the UK). RESULTS: For elective caesarean section, 70% of individual clinicians never used an anaesthetic room, 9% rarely, 5% usually, 9% for all regional anaesthetics and 6% always. For emergency caesarean section the corresponding figures were 83%, 5%, 5%, 3% and 2% respectively. Use of the anaesthetic room was independent of the seniority of anaesthetists. In 68% of departments it was standard practice or policy to induce all anaesthetics for caesarean section in the operating room. Conversely, only 1% of departments had a policy to induce all anaesthetics in the anaesthetic room. Patient safety was the usual reason given for anaesthetising in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The majority of obstetric anaesthetists have abandoned the use of anaesthetic induction rooms, the main reason being patient safety. For the same reason, two-thirds of departments providing obstetric anaesthesia consider induction of anaesthesia in the operating room their standard practice.

Anesthesia Department, Hospital↗

Obstetric recovery practice: a survey of UK obstetric anaesthetists.

BACKGROUND: The 1998 guidelines for obstetric anaesthesia services state: "postoperative care of the obstetric patient should be in accordance with that of any postoperative patient". We sought to discover whether this standard of care was provided. METHOD: A questionnaire designed to investigate recovery room practice was sent to 251 UK obstetric units. The survey took place between January and June 2003. RESULTS: The response rate was 78%. A total of 123 units (63%) had a dedicated obstetric recovery area. Midwives were exclusively responsible for postoperative parturient care in 113 units (58%) between 0900 and 1700 h and in 124 units (64%) after 1700 h. Dedicated recovery nurses were available in 59 units (30%) during the day, in contrast to 36 units (19%) after 1700 h. The level of background training ranged from no training (39%) to locally organised courses (32%), rotation through surgical areas (21%) and nationally organised English National Board courses (8%). CONCLUSION: The survey demonstrates that current obstetric recovery room practice does not always adhere to the recommended Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines. The provision of dedicated recovery staff or a cohort of specifically trained midwives may help to improve existing standards.

Adult↗

Private obstetric practice in a public hospital: mythical trust in obstetric care.

There is evidence to suggest the decline of trusting relationships in modern healthcare systems. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the role of trust in medical transactions in Thailand, using obstetric care as a tracer service. The paper proposes an explanatory framework of trust for further investigation in other healthcare settings. The study site was a 1300-bed tertiary public hospital in Bangkok which it provides two forms of obstetric care: regular obstetric practice (RP) and private obstetric practice (PP). Forty pregnant women were selected and interviewed using a set of guiding questions. A thematic analysis of the interviews was undertaken to generate understanding and develop an explanatory framework. It was found that patients' trust in obstetric services was influenced by their perceptions of risk and uncertainty in pregnancy and childbirth, and that these perceptions were linked to their social class. Social class also influenced the accessibility and affordability of care to patients. Middle class pregnant women with relatively high-level concerns about risk and uncertainty preferred using PP service as a means to achieve interpersonal trust. These women thought that an informal payment would provide the basis for interpersonal trust between themselves and the chosen obstetricians. In practice, however, obstetricians involved in PP rarely acknowledged this reciprocal relationship and hardly expressed the additional courtesy expected by patients. As a result, PP service only created an expensive impersonal trust that was mistaken as interpersonal trust by patients. Negative outcomes from PP often caused disappointment that could eventually lead to medical litigation. The study suggests that there are some negative impacts of PP within the health system. Negative experiences among PP users may undermine trust not only in the specific doctor but also trust in health professionals and hospitals more generally. Steps need to be undertaken to protect and strengthen existing impersonal trust, which combine institutional trust based on good governance and service quality with trust in the professional standard of practice. The explanatory framework developed through this study provides a foundation for further studies of trust in different specialties and care settings.

Adult↗

Have we met the educational challenges of obstetrics and gynecology? A response to the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Initiative of 1986.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the progress that has been made toward meeting the educational challenges in obstetrics and gynecology that were made at an Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology special forum in 1986. STUDY DESIGN: We placed the five major issues and specific problems that were identified within the context of developments that have occurred in medical education, the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the specialty over the last 15 years. We used the medical education literature and the accomplishments of the members of the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology to measure progress. RESULTS: Many of the challenges that were raised at the original forum remain. Significant progress, much of it spearheaded by the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology, has been made in the areas of teaching methods and skills, evaluation techniques, faculty development, computer usage, teaching recognition, counseling for the fourth-year student, and an integrated curriculum in women's health. CONCLUSION: Progress has occurred within the context and demands of a changing health care system that constricts the time and funding that are available for medical education.

Curriculum↗