PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Open Bite”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Electropalatographic and cephalometric assessment of tongue function in open bite and non-open bite subjects.

Anterior open bite (AOB) and tongue thrust swallowing are frequently associated, but the relationship between the two remains unclear. Electropalatography (EPG), which is used in speech pathology to measure dynamic tongue function for diagnostic, therapeutic, and research purposes, is a suitable technique for the investigation of this relationship. The present clinical study examined the dentofacial pattern and tongue function in AOB and non-open bite children. EPG recordings of speech and swallowing, and lateral head radiographs were obtained from eight 10-year-old boys with tongue thrust swallowing behaviour and AOB, and from eight age-matched non-open bite controls. Analysis of data from the two groups indicated that although differences were small, the open bite children displayed trends for longer face morphology and greater upper incisor proclination, less consistent production of closures during speech, a more posterior pattern of EPG contact, and relatively sparse EPG contact during swallowing. The discovery of differing patterns of contact for the /d[symbol: see text]/ and /t[symbol: see text]/ phonemes indicates that these should be included when speech is used to test for the presence of fronted tongue behaviour.

Analysis of Variance↗

Comparison of the functional occlusal plane in adults with class III malocclusion showing open bite and non-open bite.

A retrospective study of lateral cephalograms of 24 Japanese adults with Class III malocclusion was made in order to compare the angles of the horizontal plane between open bite and non-open bite cases. The following results were obtained: i) There was no significant difference in the angle of the NF-upper occlusal plane between the open bite and non-open bite groups. ii) There were significant differences between the two groups in the angle of the SN-upper and lower occlusal planes, the FH-upper and lower occlusal planes and MP-lower occlusal plane. There was also a significant difference between the groups in the distance from the Xi point to the upper occlusal plane. iii) In both the open bite and non-open bite groups there was a wide variation in occlusal plane angles, compared with normal cases.

Adolescent↗

A case of open bite accompanied by temporomandibular joint disorder. A comparison of occlusal conditions before and after treatment in lateral-oblique radiogram.

According to the authors' clinical experience, malocclusion accompanied by temporomandibular joint disorder involves mainly cross bite, open bite, deep overbite or axillary protrusion. However, it is possible that the symptoms of this disorder are associated with other types of malocclusion or even with nearly normal occlusion. In fact, it can be said that temporomandibular joint disorder may develop with any type of occlusion. This paper reports a case of open bite accompanied by temporomandibular joint disorder occurring in a patient who visited our hospital because of pain in the left temporomandibular joint region, vertigo and partial deafness. In this patient, the temporomandibular symptoms disappeared after orthodontic treatment. The patient received no particular treatment thereafter because follow-up observation confirmed that the therapeutic results were favorable without any relapse of the symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. The positions of the temporomandibular joint and mandibular condyle were determined in lateral-oblique radiograms obtained using our radiographic system, by which the mandibular condyle is radiographed using a projection consistent with its long axis.

Adult↗

Open-bite relapse. Report of a case.

Although the tooth positioner was initially helpful in promoting improved esthetics and stability, it in effect became an orthodontic appliance by maintaining the original, treated occlusal plane. Subsequently, the lower third molars erupted above the occlusal plane and caused the mandible to rotate downward and backward, resulting in an unsightly bite opening. Removal of the etiologic factors, the tooth positioner, and third molars corrected the open-bite relapse.

Child↗

The causes, diagnosis and treatment of anterior open bite.

Anterior open bite has multiple aetiologies, but can be broadly described as being dental or skeletal in origin. Accurate differentiation is essential in determining the appropriate treatment plan: dental open bites may close spontaneously in the growing patient and are generally amenable to orthodontic treatment, whereas skeletal open bites frequently worsen with growth and usually require a combination of orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. The incidence of post-treatment relapse is high, making these malocclusions a challenge to treat successfully.

Fingersucking↗

Surgical treatment of the open bite deformity. Surgical correction of combined mandibular prognathism and open bite by oblique sliding osteotomy of the mandibular rami.

Treatment of open bite deformity combined with a prognathic mandible using the oblique, sliding osteotomy of the mandibular rami has been followed for 2 1/2 years to evaluate the final outcome of the operation. The clinical and radiographic examination during the control period show a remarkably stable result with a relapse magnitude the same or slightly less than that for a straight, set-back procedure. A certain dental compensation occurs during the skeletal relapse. The thought of creating a certain "freedom-space" in the muscular fibres during the set-back procedure, thus facilitating closure of the open bite is proposed. Surgical correction of the anterior open bite today is otherwise most frequently focused on solutions with maxillary le Fort I or subapical procedures to ensure minimal influence from the jaw muscles.

Cephalometry↗

[Morphological study of open bite. Skeletal Class I and Class II open bite].

The purpose of this study was to quantify the morphological features of class I and II openbite. The subjects were 151 female patients, over 7 years old, and as a control group, 180 female cases of normal overbite. The subjects were classified into 6 subgroups by ANB angles and ages as follows: 1. Class I A group (7 y less than or equal to age les than 10 y): openbite (30 cases), control (34 cases) 2. Class I B group (10 y less than or equal to age less than 15 y): openbite (23 cases), control (31 cases) 3. Class I C group (15 y less than or equal to age): openbite (20 cases), control (23 cases) 4. Class II A group (7 y less than or equal to age less than 10 y): openbite (38 cases), control (45 cases) 5. Class II B group (10 y less than or equal to age less than 15 y): openbite (20 cases), control (26 cases) 6. Class II C group (15 y less than or equal to age): openbite (20 cases), control (21 cases) The following results were obtained: 1. The combined features of class I and II openbite groups in all the 6 groups were an especially large anterior facial height and remarkable downward of lower occl. pl. angle. Mand. pl. angle was large, and the lower part of the face was tapered. 2. The primary factors of openbite were not only over-eruption of the upper molars but also vertical excess of the mandible with a large alveolar bone. 3. The clearest differences between classes I and II openbite were the mand. pl. and lower occl. pl. angles. The class I openbite groups had a large gonial angle, depending on the subgroup. On the other hand, the class II openbite groups exhibited backward and downward shifting of the mandible depending on the subgroup. 4. In the lower age groups (7 y less than or equal to age less than 10 y) both class I and class II openbite already had denture and alveolar factors, as well as skeletal problems. In the class II openbite, especially in adult cases there were unusual morphological problems both in antero-posterior and vertical relations. 5. Contrary to most reports, the nasal floor did not show an upward cant. In the adult class II openbite even a downward cant, resulting from the backward and downward shifting of the mandible was observed.

Adolescent↗

Treating the open bite.

Tongue thrust is involved in nearly all open bites. An open bite can be created by tongue thrust, tongue posture or mandibular posture. Tongue is an unusual muscle in that its contraction allows it to assume many shapes; its influence in the swallow can create an open bite in the area dictated by the contraction, thrust or rest position. Once space has been created between the upper and lower teeth by the tongue it continues to enter the space created, consequently enlarging the space. Skeletal open bites do not occur in patients whose masseter muscles are active during the swallow (an open bite can develop in these individuals due to habit or during orthodontic therapy). In these individuals the masseters fully contract during the swallow. The weaker the masseter muscles, the more likely an open bite will either be present or may develop during orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic movement will always result in occlusal interferences at some point in treatment. Occlusal interferences during orthodontic treatment make it difficult for patients to find a comfortable biting position. At this point they do not fully contract--"squeeze"--the masseters during the swallow to avoid traumatizing the teeth. Once the masseter squeeze is reduced, the tongue must contribute more to the swallow than when the masseters were more actively involved. The tongue becomes the cushion for the dentition during the swallow. The tongue now positions itself between the teeth during the swallow and the open bite during orthodontic treatment is born. Once the open bite occurs it is best to treat it immediately as the open bite thus created will only worsen with time. If the patient was originally a counterclockwise grower (brachycephalic), it is easier to correct. A clockwise grower (dolichocephalic) is hardest to correct, but can be corrected with patience, perseverance, exercise and a properly constructed tongue thrust appliance. While it is true that some skeletal configurations (i.e. clockwise growers, dolichocephalic facial types) lend themselves to the development of an open bite, the skeletal configuration itself seldom produces an open bite. The tongue is the main progenitor of open bites and it is also responsible for perpetuating the open bite. Dolichocephalic facial types lend themselves to open bite development as any orthodontic treatment which either distalizes molars or allows molars to extrude will tend to wedge the mandible and dentition open. (In this type of patient the masseter muscles develop insufficient force on closure to intrude the molars.) Once the bite opens, the tongue now enters the picture in order to complete the swallow. The open bite immediately worsens. The open bite thus created may require several months to correct. In the clockwise growth patient it is imperative that all precautions be taken during treatment to counteract open bite development. It is also imperative that an open bite, once detected, be treated immediately as the longer it persists the more difficult it becomes to treat. If left untreated, it becomes a habit and the more engrained a habit the more effort needed to change it.

Adolescent↗

Outcome prediction in open bite cases.

Some anterior open bites close spontaneously, others do not. It would be advantageous if the orthodontist had some means of predicting the spontaneous outcome in open bite patients. One-hundred-and-twenty-seven patients having open bite were recorded longitudinally for a minimum period of 3 years using cephalometric radiographs. The open bite closed spontaneously in 50 per cent of a prepuberal group aged between 7 and 10 years, in 49 per cent of a puberal group aged 11-14 years, and in 44 per cent of a post-puberal group aged between 14 and 21 years when first seen. Data from cephalometric analysis of the first film in each case was analysed using discriminant function analysis. The analysis correctly predicted the outcome in 88 per cent of the prepuberal group, in 74 per cent of the puberal group, and in 94 per cent of the post-puberal group. The accuracy of the prediction equation was checked in a new sample of 35 subjects with open bite observed over at least 2 years so that the spontaneous outcome was known. The equation correctly predicted the outcome in 79 per cent of prepuberal, in 80 per cent of puberal, and in 100 per cent of post-puberal patients in the second sample.

Adolescent↗

The anterior open bite problem (infraclusion).

Anterior open bite is a major orthodontic problem that is very difficult to treat (Fig. 1). It may not be the most frequent problem but it is a major functional problem. Quite often it is very difficult to correct an anterior open bite problem and even more difficult to treat in an adult after growth. Most of the time anterior open bite is a myofunctional problem related to a bad habit like thumb or finger sucking and/or is related to a breathing and swallowing problem. How can we understand the functional open bite problem? What are the available treatment options? This article will try to answer some of these questions.

Adolescent↗