PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Oral Rehydration”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

A comparative study of glycine fortified oral rehydration solution with standard WHO oral rehydration solution.

The safety, efficacy and acceptability of glycine-fortified oral rehydration solution (ORS) was compared with that of standard WHO-ORS in a controlled randomized trial. Fifty male infants with acute, watery, non-cholera diarrhea were studied. Glycine-fortified ORS at a concentration of 111 mmol/L (8.4 g/L) was used. The electrolyte and glucose concentrations of both the solutions was identical. The proportion of successfully treated patients was 92%. There were two failures in each group. Both solutions were found to be equally safe in correcting and maintaining the hydration status and in correcting hyponatremia and hypokalemia. The acceptability and efficiency of the solutions were also comparable. Addition of glycine does not add to the efficacy of conventional WHO-ORS, therefore offering no additional advantage but adds to the cost of production.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

[Treatment of acute diarrhea in infants and young children with a new formulated oral rehydration solution].

49 infants and children with acute diarrhea with mild to moderate dehydration have been rehydrated orally with a newly composed oral rehydration solution. This solution differs from the traditional WHO recommended rehydration solution in a lower sodium content of 60 mval/l and replacement of bicarbonate 25 mval/l by an equimolar amount of citrate. The taste of the solution was improved by addition of flavour. All infants and children - including 8 infants less than 3 months of age - were successfully rehydrated. The solution was well accepted; no side effects have been observed. The sodium content remained normal in all patients.

Bicarbonates↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Oral rehydration therapy in severely malnourished children with diarrheal dehydration.

Fifty patients of grade III & IV malnutrition with diarrhoeal dehydration were rehydrated using the WHO recommended ORS. Serum sodium and potassium levels were estimated at admission and 24 hours later. Forty seven patients were successfully rehydrated orally. In 7 patients the level of dehydration at initial assessment was overestimated. Periorbital edema developed in 25.5% of the patients rehydrated. No patient had cardiac failure or convulsions during therapy. Though persistent hyponatremia and hypokalemia were found in 10.6% and 19.15% cases respectively after rehydration, the incidence decreased as compared to the pre-hydration levels and was comparable to that found in malnourished children without diarrhea who served as controls in the present study. Oral rehydration was discontinued in three patients due to development of excessive vomiting in one case and paralytic ileus in two. Thus WHO ORS can be used safely in children with severe malnutrition but constant monitoring is required.

Bicarbonates↗
PubMed1989

Understanding instructions for oral rehydration therapy.

Oral rehydration mixtures are readily available in rural Kenya, but the instructions that accompany them are not always clear. Mothers will understand such instructions more readily if they explain the principles of oral rehydration and describe in a logical way the sequence of procedures to be followed.

Female↗
PubMed1998

Detrimental effects on villus form during conventional oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea in calves; alleviation by a nutrient oral rehydration solution containing glutamine.

This paper examines the possibility that treatment of diarrhoea with conventional oral rehydration solutions (ORSs) may be detrimental to villus structure by imposing nutrient deprivation and that such detrimental effects may be reduced or avoided by using a nutrient ORS. A conventional WHO-type ORS (W) was compared with two nutrient solutions (N and G) both containing high glucose concentrations and the latter containing glutamine; their effects on enteric structure were assessed by morphometric analysis of samples obtained from diarrhoeic calves after 96 h treatment. Comparisons were also made with samples from controls and diarrhoeic calves at the stage where oral rehydration would have begun in the treated groups. As in our previous ORS studies, diarrhoea was induced with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (09:K30:K99). We measured villus length and width, crypt depth and width and calculated villus surface area in proximal, mid and distal small intestine (PSI, MSI, DSI), using standard morphometric techniques. Proximal and distal spiral colon samples (PC, DC) were examined for crypt depth and width; mitoses per crypt were counted in samples from all regions. Non-diarrhoeic calves showed the expected gradient of villus length through PSI, MSI and DSI, hence data for each region are normalized as a percentage of the control value for that region. PSI showed the greatest loss of villus length and surface area (50%) with diarrhoea. In MSI and DSI the villus loss was greater with solution W and N or G, as were increased mitoses and crypt depth. Crypt depth and mitoses also increased in the colon with solution W. Colonic crypt width increased with diarrhoea and conventional oral rehydration but less so with G; there is reason to believe that such changes have functional significance. Crypt changes in colon, MSI and DSI were least with solution G. The changes developing in diarrhoeic calves prior to treatment were thus less apparent in those treated with a nutritional ORS, particularly if it contained glutamine.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Worldwide impact of oral rehydration therapy.

Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) has had a dramatic global impact. The worldwide consequences of this therapy are discussed in four categories: (1) adoption of ORT as the primary therapy for acute dehydrating diarrhea; (2) establishment of national ORT programs; (3) scientific knowledge gained from studies into intestinal absorption of oral rehydration solutions; and (4) implications of ORT for the next decade. The Diarrheal Disease Control Program has been assigned a high priority by the World Health Organization. It now includes 99% of the population of the developing world, although it is not uniformly implemented. Because knowledge of how to use ORT parallels implementation, it is hoped that expanded training of community health workers will increase implementation. In addition, specific indications for ORT need further study and refinement so that community health workers may learn to distinguish between diarrheal episodes that require such therapy and those that do not. Better scientific understanding of intestinal absorption of ORT fluids has led to the development of new formulations that enhance absorption of nutrients and repletion of electrolytes. The optimal composition of such revised solutions has yet to be established. In addition to these improvements in utilization, distribution, education, and application of ORT, other measures to reduce the morbidity and mortality from diarrhea can be expected in the areas of better infant feeding practices, improved sanitation, management of persistent diarrhea, targeted therapy for particular groups of infants at high risk, and immunization.

Diarrhea↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Importance of oral rehydration in acute infantile diarrhea. Comparison of 2 rehydration solutions].

Oral rehydration therapy has gained worldwide acceptance as the standard treatment for acute diarrhoeal diseases in infants and children. Besides the high sodium glucose-electrolyte solution based on the WHO/UNICEF recommendations, many diverse formulations of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) have withstood the trial of prolonged clinical use, their main differences concerning the concentration of sodium, the choice of the glycidic component, the use of bicarbonate as buffer or its substitution with acetate or citrate. It was recently hypothesized that glucose polymers-containing ORS markedly improve the intestinal sodium/glucose cotransport by delivering glucose at its critical site on the luminal villous membrane and therefore diminish stool output and duration of the diarrhoea. To investigate this hypothesis, the efficacies of two marketed ORS (table I), one containing sucrose and maltodextrin (solution A) and the other containing glucose (solution B) were compared. The study group comprised 13 infants and toddlers, 1 to 18 months old, who presented with acute diarrhea; 5 were males and 8 females; 7 were randomly allocated to receive solution A (Group A), 6 solution B (Group B). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, sex, causation of diarrhea or severity of dehydration before receiving ORS. Both groups showed a satisfactory response to 24 hours of treatment with either ORS, but a significantly lower stool output (number and global weight of stools) and higher blood glucose and bicarbonate levels were detected in group A (table II).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diarrhea, Infantile↗
PubMed1994

Oral rehydration therapy.

Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) with glucose-electrolyte solutions has been considered to be one of the greatest therapeutic advances of this century. ORT is effective in acute diarrheal disease of diverse etiology. The most widely used oral rehydration solution (ORS) worldwide is that recommended by the World Health Organisation (Na 90, K 20, glucose 111 and citrate 10 mmol/L). Attempts to improve the efficacy of ORS have been made by using complex substrates (rice and other cereals) in place of glucose, and by reducing osmolality by decreasing glucose and sodium concentrations in monomeric ORS. ORS may have wider applications in the management of patients with the short bowel syndrome and in post-surgical patients.

Diarrhea↗
PubMed1988

Effectiveness of slide tapes for instructing medical students in oral rehydration therapy.

Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) can save the lives of children suffering from diarrheal-induced dehydration. During the last five years major efforts have been made to train community health care personnel and mothers in developing countries in the use of oral rehydration therapy (ORT). However, efforts to train physicians in the community-based use of ORT have lagged behind. This paper reports the evaluation of a slide-tape show designed to teach Colombian medical students in Bogotá both technical information and culturally appropriate non-scientific ORT terminology to educate mothers in the local community.

Audiovisual Aids↗
PubMed1981

Comparison of simple sugar/salt versus glucose/electrolyte oral rehydration solutions in infant diarrhoea.

In a randomized double-blind trial, infants with mild or moderate diarrhoeal dehydration were rehydrated orally either with a simple solution containing table sugar and salt (without potassium or bicarbonate) or with a complete glucose/electrolyte formula. All 32 given glucose/electrolyte solution and 27 (93%) of 29 infants given sugar/salt were successfully rehydrated with similar improvement in metabolic acidosis and rapidity of rehydration. The drawbacks to oral therapy with simple sugar/salt solution were the frequent development of hypokalaemia and greater volume of vomiting during treatment. Carefully prepared sugar/salt solution, if accompanied by adequate potassium supplementation, may be used as an alternative to the preferred glucose/electrolyte formula when the latter is unavailable.

Acidosis↗
PubMed1984

Oral rehydration of neonates and young infants with dehydrating diarrhea: comparison of low and standard sodium content in oral rehydration solutions.

Oral rehydration among infants aged 0-3 months has not been adequately investigated. A controlled, randomized study was thus conducted in 65 young infants hospitalized with acute noncholera dehydrating diarrhea. The study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the standard WHO oral glucose-electrolyte solution containing 90 mmol of sodium per liter (Group A: 22 infants) with that of an oral glucose-electrolyte solution containing 60 mmol of sodium per liter (Group B: 22 infants) and with standard intravenous therapy (Group C: 21 infants). Among the 44 infants in Groups A and B, none required intravenous therapy. Dehydration, acidosis, and initial hyponatremia or hypokalemia were corrected with equal efficacy in all the three groups. In the critical first 8 h, the mean sodium absorption was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) in Group A. This resulted in hypernatremia (50%), periorbital edema (50%), mild pedal edema (27%), excessive irritability, and convulsions (4.5%). The mean serum sodium levels at 8, 24, and even 48 h were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) than those in Groups B and C. It is concluded that glucose-electrolyte oral solution containing 60 mmol of sodium per liter is as safe and effective as intravenous rehydration for the treatment of noncholera neonatal and early infantile diarrhea, while the standard WHO solution carries a significant risk of hypernatremia under similar conditions.

Body Weight↗
PubMed1995

Cereal-based oral rehydration solutions in Sudanese children with diarrhoea: a comparative clinical trial of rice-based and sorghum-based oral rehydration solutions.

A randomized controlled study was carried out at the Children's Emergency Hospital, Khartoum to evaluate the acceptability, safety and efficacy of (rice or sorghum) cereal-based oral rehydration solutions (ORS) relative to that of the standard WHO ORS formulation in children with acute diarrhoea. Ninety-six children whose ages ranged from 6 to 40 months were enrolled in the study. Thirty-two of them were allocated to the rice-based ORS group, 34 to the sorghum-based ORS group and 30 to the control group. Cereal-based ORS solutions were found to shorten the duration of diarrhoea and to reduce both the stool volume and the frequency of diarrhoea and vomiting as well as the mean total ORS intake. These effects were more marked with the sorghum-based ORS than with the rice-based ORS. By the end of day 3, 50% of patients in the rice ORS group and 67.6% in the sorghum ORS group had recovered compared with 40% from the standard ORS group.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1989

[The detoxication and rehydration effect of oral rehydration therapy in acute intestinal infection].

As many as 120 patients with food toxinfections were treated by intravenous injections of kvartasol solution and the oral solutions glucosolan and rehydron. The data obtained allow the conclusion that rehydration therapy is not only not inferior to intravenous treatment but also favours the quickest recovery of the disturbed parameters of homeostasis including most rapid elimination of intoxication. Rehydron solution should be regarded as the most effective one.

Acetates↗