PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Orlistat”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Weight loss, weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular risk factors after 2 years treatment with orlistat for obesity. European Orlistat Obesity Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of orlistat, a new lipase inhibitor, on long-term weight loss, to determine the extent to which orlistat treatment minimizes weight regain in a second year of treatment, and to assess the effects of orlistat on obesity-related risk factors. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This was a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Obese patients (body mass index 28 to 43 kg/m2) were randomized to placebo or orlistat (60 or 120 mg) three times a day, combined with a hypocaloric diet during the first year and a weight maintenance diet in the second year of treatment to prevent weight regain. Changes in body weight, lipid profile, glycemic control, blood pressure, quality of life, safety, and tolerability were measured. RESULTS: Orlistat-treated patients lost significantly more weight (p<0.001) than placebo-treated patients after Year 1 (6.6%, 8.6%, and 9.7% for the placebo, and orlistat 60 mg and 120 mg groups, respectively). During the second year, orlistat therapy produced less weight regain than placebo (p = 0.005 for orlistat 60 mg; p<0.001 for orlistat 120 mg). Several obesity-related risk factors improved significantly more with orlistat treatment than with placebo. Orlistat was generally well tolerated and only 6% of orlistat-treated patients withdrew because of adverse events. Orlistat leads to predictable gastrointestinal effects related to its mode of action, which were generally mild, transient, and self-limiting and usually occurred early during treatment. DISCUSSION: Orlistat administered for 2 years promotes weight loss and minimizes weight regain. Additionally, orlistat therapy improves lipid profile, blood pressure, and quality of life.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Randomised placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, in promoting weight loss and preventing weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. METHODS: 743 patients (body-mass index 28-47 kg/m2), recruited at 15 European centres, entered a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period on a slightly hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit). 688 patients who completed the lead-in were assigned double-blind treatment with orlistat 120 mg (three times a day) or placebo for 1 year in conjunction with the hypocaloric diet. In a second 52-week double-blind period patients were reassigned orlistat or placebo with a weight maintenance (eucaloric) diet. FINDINGS: From the start of lead-in to the end of year 1, the orlistat group lost, on average, more bodyweight than the placebo group (10.2% [10.3 kg] vs 6.1% [6.1 kg]; LSM difference 3.9 kg [p<0.001] from randomisation to the end of year 1). During year 2, patients who continued with orlistat regained, on average, half as much weight as those patients switched to placebo (p<0.001). Patients switched from placebo to orlistat lost an additional 0.9 kg during year 2, compared with a mean regain of 2.5 kg in patients who continued on placebo (p<0.001). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, LDL/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and concentrations of glucose and insulin decreased more in the orlistat group than in the placebo group. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the orlistat group. Other adverse symptoms occurred at a similar frequency during both treatments. INTERPRETATION: Orlistat taken with an appropriate diet promotes clinically significant weight loss and reduces weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. The use of orlistat beyond 2 years needs careful monitoring with respect to efficacy and adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and tolerability of orlistat in the treatment of obesity: a 6-month dose-ranging study. Orlistat Dose-Ranging Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the weight-reducing efficacy of orlistat, a novel gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, and to define the optimal dosage regimen and establish the tolerability of the drug when used for a 6-month treatment period. METHODS: The study was a multicentre randomised, double-blind, parallel group in design and involved 676 obese male and female subjects aged at least 18 years with a body mass index between 28 and 43 kg x m(-2) Following a 5-week placebo run-in period, subjects were randomised to receive orlistat 30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg, 240 mg or matching placebo three times a day (tid) for 24 weeks during meals. Patients were maintained on a mildly hypocaloric diet throughout the study period. The primary efficacy parameter was body weight change over time. RESULTS: Orlistat resulted in a significantly greater mean loss of body weight than observed in the placebo group. In absolute terms, mean weight loss was greatest in the 120 mg group (9.8%). More orlistat- than placebo-treated patients lost > 10% of initial body weight (37% of the 120 mg group vs 19% of the placebo group). Orlistat was well tolerated. Predictably, in view of its known pharmacological effects, more orlistat-treated patients experienced gastrointestinal events. Mean levels of vitamins A, D and E, and beta-carotene remained within the clinical reference ranges in all treatment groups and rarely required supplementation. After 24 weeks, plasma concentrations of orlistat were either non-measurable or detected at the assay's limit of quantitation. CONCLUSION: Orlistat treatment results in a dose-dependent reduction in body weight in obese subjects and is well tolerated. Orlistat 120 mg tid represents the optimal dosage regimen.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The interaction of the lipase inhibitor orlistat with ethanol in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to investigate the possible interference of ethanol on the orlistat effect on inhibition of dietary fat absorption and the possible interference of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol. Secondary objectives were to assess the tolerability during concomitant dosing of orlistat and ethanol and to determine the ethanol effect on plasma levels of orlistat. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized study performed in 30 (three parallel groups of ten subjects each) healthy normal weight male subjects between the ages of 20 and 30 years. A 5-day run-in period to accustom subjects to a standardized diet of 2500 kcal/day (30% fat) and to establish baseline fecal fat excretion was followed by a 6-day treatment period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (A = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and ethanol placebo, B = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g bid on days 1-5, and C = orlistat placebo tid and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g b.i.d. on days 1 5). Serial blood samples were collected for determination of ethanol serum concentrations at specified times over 5 h after each dose of ethanol on days -1 and 6, and for determination of orlistat plasma concentrations on days 1, 3, 5, and 6. Feces were collected quantitatively on days -5 through 8 for analysis of fecal fat. RESULTS: The means of baseline-corrected fecal fat excretion values were comparable: 23.7 g for group A (orlistat) and 22.7 g for group B (orlistat and ethanol). No significant difference was found regarding ethanol pharmacokinetic parameters between treatments with orlistat and placebo. No apparent differences existed between the number of plasma samples with measurable orlistat concentrations in groups A and B. CONCLUSION: Concomitant ingestion of social amounts of ethanol did not alter the inhibitory effect of orlistat on dietary fat absorption during short-term treatment (6 days) with orlistat. Short-term treatment with orlistat had no significant influence on ethanol pharmacokinetics.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity in developed societies is increasing. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of co-morbidity, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Following the withdrawal of fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine, interest has focused on a novel anti-obesity drug orlistat. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity. METHODS - SEARCH STRATEGY: Nineteen electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2000. Additionally, Internet searches were carried out, bibliographies of retrieved articles were examined and submissions were received from the manufacturer of orlistat. METHODS - INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of orlistat used for weight loss or maintenance of weight loss in overweight or obese patients were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcome measures were changes in body weight, fat content or fat distribution. Secondary outcomes were changes in obesity-related risk-factor profiles, such as lipid levels, indicators of glycaemic control and blood pressure. Studies recruiting people with eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa were excluded. METHODS - PROCESS OF STUDY SELECTION: Assessment of titles and abstracts was performed independently by two reviewers. If either reviewer considered a reference to be relevant, the full paper was retrieved. Full papers were assessed against the review selection criteria by two independent reviewers, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. METHODS - DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by one reviewer into structured summary tables and checked by a second reviewer. Any disagreements about data were resolved by discussion. METHODS - QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Each included trial was assessed against a comprehensive checklist for methodological quality. Quality assessment was performed independently by two reviewers with disagreements resolved by discussion. METHODS - METHODS OF ANALYSIS/SYNTHESIS: This report is a narrative summary, with results grouped according to study endpoint. Statistical pooling was undertaken in groups of trials that were considered to be sufficiently similar. METHODS - ESTIMATION OF QUALITY OF LIFE, COSTS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND/OR COST PER QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE-YEAR: Relevant economic evaluations were identified from the search strategy described above. Assessment of methodological quality was undertaken using principles outlined in published guidelines. METHODS - COMPANY SUBMISSIONS: Data from company submissions were subject to the same selection and appraisal processes as other studies considered for inclusion in the review, except that only RCTs with a duration of at least 1 year were selected. RESULTS - RESULTS OF THE SEARCH STRATEGY: Fourteen RCTs (including three company submissions) and two economic evaluations (including one company submission) were included in the review. RESULTS - RESULTS OF THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Methodological quality of trials was moderate to good. The main problems were lack of detail on methods used to produce true randomisation, small sample sizes in some cases and failure to use intention-to-treat analysis. It is likely that maintenance of blinding was difficult due to adverse effects associated with the study medication. RESULTS - EVIDENCE OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS: Most of the trials showed greater weight loss and better weight maintenance with orlistat compared to placebo at all endpoints (statistically significant differences for both outcomes). Orlistat 120 mg three times daily was the optimum regimen in terms of weight loss. Most trials showed significant improvement in at least some lipid concentration parameters, and, in three RCTs, orlistat produced statistically significant reductions in blood pressure relative to placebo. In obese patients with type 2 diabetes, orlistat resulted in a significantly greater weight loss at 1 year compared with placebo, and some parameters of glycaemic control and lipid concentration also showed significantly greater improvements compared with placebo. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was consistently higher in orlistat groups compared with placebo, and orlistat use was associated with lower serum levels of fat-soluble vitamins. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year for orlistat was 45,881 UK pounds. CONCLUSIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Although many trials have demonstrated statistically significant differences between groups in terms of weight loss in favour of orlistat versus placebo, the differences may not always be of clinical significance. The clinical significance of between-group differences for secondary outcomes may also be debatable. Possible adverse effects should be taken into account when prescribing orlistat, particularly gastrointestinal effects. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed2000

One-year treatment of obesity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat (Xenical) in producing and maintaining weight loss over a 12-month period. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with either orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily, in conjunction with a low-energy diet, for 12 months. SETTING: Five centres in the UK. SUBJECTS: 228 obese adult patients with body mass index between 30 and 43 kg/m2 and mean weight 97 kg (range 74-144 kg). INTERVENTIONS: All patients were prescribed a low-energy diet, providing 30% of energy from fat, designed to produce an individually tailored energy deficit of approximately 600 kcal/day, for a run-in period of 4 weeks and then 12 months, plus orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in body weight (the primary efficacy parameter), waist circumference and adverse events were reviewed regularly, together with serum lipids, insulin, glucose and plasma levels of fat-soluble vitamins and beta carotene. RESULTS: Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, after 1 y of treatment patients receiving orlistat had lost an average of 8.5% of their initial body weight compared with 5.4% for placebo-treated patients; 35% of the orlistat group lost at least 5% of body weight compared with 21% of the placebo group (P < 0.05), and 28% and 17%, respectively (P = 0.04) lost at least 10% of body weight. Orlistat-treated patients showed significant decreases (P < 0.05) in serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and in the low density lipoprotein: high density lipoprotein ratio in comparison with placebo. Both groups had similar adverse-event profiles, except for gastrointestinal events, which were 26% more frequent in the orlistat group but were mostly mild and transient. To maintain normal plasma levels of fat-soluble vitamins, supplements of vitamins A, D and E were given to 1.8%, 8.0% and 3.6%, respectively, of orlistat-treated patients, compared with 0.9% of placebo-treated patients for each vitamin type. After 1 y, the decrease in vitamin E and beta carotene was significantly greater in orlistat-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (P < 0.001). No significant change was found in the mean vitamin E:total cholesterol ratio in either group after 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat, in conjunction with a low-energy diet, produced greater and more frequent significant weight loss than placebo during 1 y of treatment. One-third of orlistat-treated patients achieved clinically relevant weight loss (> or = 5% initial body weight). There was also an improvement in relevant serum lipid parameters. Fat-soluble vitamin supplements may be required during chronic therapy. Orlistat was well tolerated and offers a promising new approach to the long-term management of obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The effects of orlistat on weight and on serum lipids in obese patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the effects of orlistat 120 mg three times daily vs placebo on weight loss and serum lipids in obese hypercholesterolemic patients. DESIGN: A 24 week multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. After a 2-week single-blind run-in period (placebo+diet (-600 kcal/day; < or =30% of calories as fat)), 294 patients were submitted to the hypocaloric diet and randomly assigned to either orlistat 120 mg or placebo three times daily. Patients who completed the double-blind study (n=255) were eligible for participation in a subsequent 24 week open-label orlistat extension phase. SUBJECTS: Patients with body mass index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m2 and hypercholesterolemia (low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, 4.1-6.7 mmol/l). MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy assessments included weight loss, lipid levels, other cardiovascular risk factors and anthropometric parameters. Safety assessments. RESULTS: Weight loss during run-in was similar in both groups. After randomization, orlistat-treated patients lost significantly more weight than placebo recipients: mean percentage weight loss from start of run-in to week 24 was-6.8% in the orlistat group and -3.8% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Moreover, more patients in the orlistat group than in the placebo group achieved clinically meaningful weight loss of > or =5% (64 vs 39%) or > or =10% (23 vs 13%) at week 24. Treatment with orlistat was associated with significantly greater changes in total cholesterol (-11.9% vs -4.0%; P<0.001) and LDL-C (-17.6 vs -7.6%; P<0.001). For any category of weight loss during the double-blind treatment period, change in LDL-C was more pronounced in orlistat-treated patients than in placebo recipients, indicating that orlistat had a direct cholesterol-lowering effect that was independent of weight reduction (P<0.001). Adjunction of orlistat during the extension phase in patients who initially received placebo induced a further decrease in weight, total cholesterol and LDL-C. Orlistat was generally well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to placebo, with the exception of a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events (> or =1 event in 64 vs 38% of patients). CONCLUSION: Orlistat as an adjunct to dietary intervention promotes weight loss and reduces LDL-C beyond the effect of weight loss in overweight or obese patients with concomitant hypercholesterolemia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that reduces dietary fat absorption by approximately 30%, may promote weight loss and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that orlistat combined with dietary intervention is more effective than placebo plus diet for weight loss and maintenance over 2 years. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from October 1992 to October 1995. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Obese adults (body mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters], 30-43 kg/m2) evaluated at 18 US research centers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received placebo plus a controlled-energy diet during a 4-week lead-in. On study day 1, the diet was continued and subjects were randomized to receive placebo 3 times a day or orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, for 52 weeks. After 52 weeks, subjects began a weight-maintenance diet, and the placebo group (n = 133) continued to receive placebo and orlistat-treated subjects were rerandomized to receive placebo 3 times a day (n = 138), orlistat, 60 mg (n = 152) or 120 mg (n = 153) 3 times a day, for an additional 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body weight change and changes in blood pressure and serum lipid, glucose, and insulin levels. RESULTS: A total of 1187 subjects entered the protocol, and 892 were randomly assigned on day 1 to double-blind treatment. For intent-to-treat analysis, 223 placebo-treated subjects and 657 orlistat-treated subjects were evaluated. During the first year orlistat-treated subjects lost more weight (mean +/- SEM, 8.76+/-0.37 kg) than placebo-treated subjects (5.81+/-0.67 kg) (P<.001). Subjects treated with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, during year 1 and year 2 regained less weight during year 2 (3.2+/-0.45 kg; 35.2% regain) than those who received orlistat, 60 mg (4.26+/-0.57 kg; 51.3% regain), or placebo (5.63+/-0.42 kg; 63.4% regain) in year 2 (P<.001). Treatment with orlistat, 120 mg 3 times a day, was associated with improvements in fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year treatment with orlistat plus diet significantly promotes weight loss, lessens weight regain, and improves some obesity-related disease risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Gastrointestinal side effects of orlistat may be prevented by concomitant prescription of natural fibers (psyllium mucilloid).

OBJECTIVES: This placebo-controlled open study was designed to test the hypothesis that most of the gastrointestinal (GI) side events induced by treatment of obese patients with orlistat (a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor) could be prevented or ameliorated by concomitant use of natural fibers (psyllium mucilloid). DESIGN: Two groups of obese women (BMI>27 kg/m(2)) were treated with orlistat 120 mg three times a day. One group (A, n=30) was randomized to receive orlistat and, approximately 6.0 g of orange-flavored psyllium mucilloid dissolved in water and the other group (B, n=30) received orlistat and orange-flavored placebo. At the end of 30 days and 2 weeks of washout, group A switched to placebo and group B received psyllium while continuing orlistat three times a day. SUBJECTS: Sixty professional women, more than 21-y-old with a body mass index (BMI) between 27.3 and 48.0 kg/m(2), who were not receiving any other medication. MEASUREMENTS: Assessments included weekly visits to attending physician, filling a form in which GI events were recorded, monthly measurements of body weight, blood pressure and serum lipids. The frequency and severity of GI events were evaluated by a score system, based on information provided by the patients. RESULTS: Both groups A and B significantly lost (P<0.01) weight after 60 days of orlistat (A=96.8 to 94.9 kg and B=98.7 to 96.5 kg). Similarly, BMI values declined significantly in both groups. While in the psyllium plus orlistat group (group A) the mean +/-s.e.m. of the scores reflecting GI events was 13.0+/-1.8, the placebo plus orlistat group (B) had a value of 35.9+/-2.7 (P<0.01). When the reverse situation was instituted the placebo and orlistat group presented a mean score of 36.1+/-3.6 and the psyllium plus orlistat a mean score of 8.9+/-1.5 (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid concomitantly prescribed to obese patients receiving 120 mg of orlistat three times a day is an effective and safe adjunct therapy that is helpful in controlling the GI side effects of this pancreatic lipase inhibitor.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Randomized placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients].

BACKGROUND: We undertook a randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerance of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, in promoting weight loss and preventing weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. METHODS: 743 patients (body-mass index 28-47 kg/m2), recruited at 15 European centres, entered a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period on a slightly hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit). 688 patients who completed the lead-in were assigned double-blind treatment with orlistat 120 mg (three times a day) or placebo for 1 year in conjunction with the hypocaloric diet. In a second 52-week double-blind period patients were reassigned orlistat or placebo with a weight maintenance (eucaloric) diet. FINDINGS: From the start of lead-in to the end of year 1, the orlistat group lost, on average, more bodyweight than the placebo group (10.2% [10.3 kg] vs 6.1% [6.1 kg]; LSM difference 3.9 kg [p < 0.001] from randomisation to the end of year 1). During year 2, patients who continued with orlistat regained, on average, half as much weight as those patients switched to placebo (p < 0.001). Patients switched from placebo to orlistat lost an additional 0.9 kg during year 2, compared with a mean regain of 2.5 kg in patients who continued on placebo (p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, LDL/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and concentrations of glucose and insulin decreased more in the orlistat group than in the placebo group. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the orlistat group. Other adverse symptoms occurred at a similar frequency during both treatments. INTERPRETATION: Orlistat taken with an appropriate diet promotes clinically significant weight loss and reduces weight regain in obese patients over a 2-year period. The use of orlistat beyond 2 years needs careful monitoring with respect to efficacy and adverse events.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Short-term orlistat treatment does not affect mineral balance and bone turnover in obese men.

Orlistat is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that is used to reduce dietary fat absorption and to enhance weight loss in subjects consuming a hypocaloric diet. To assess whether orlistat has an effect on the metabolism of six minerals, a 21-d, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled mineral balance study was conducted in obese (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) men. Subjects consumed a hypocaloric diet with a constant daily mineral content and received daily oral treatment with orlistat (120 mg three times daily) (n = 14) or placebo (three times daily) (n = 14) for 21 d. After a 14-d equilibration period, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, copper and zinc balances were assessed for d 15-21. In addition, the effect of diet and orlistat treatment on bone metabolism was estimated from measurement of biomarkers of bone formation and bone resorption. Serum and urine electrolytes were also measured at baseline and at the end of treatment. Orlistat inhibited fat absorption by approximately 33% (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mineral apparent absorption, urinary mineral loss or mineral balance between the orlistat and placebo groups. Markers of bone turnover and serum and urine electrolytes did not differ between the orlistat and placebo groups. Orlistat was well tolerated; adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, and the majority of these events were unrelated or remotely related to study treatment. In obese men consuming a hypocaloric diet, the administration of orlistat had no significant effect on the balance of six selected minerals. In addition, biomarkers of bone turnover, as well as serum and urine electrolytes, were not affected by orlistat treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Orlistat maintains biliary lipid composition and hepatobiliary function in obese subjects undergoing moderate weight loss.

OBJECTIVES: Orlistat, an intestinal lipase inhibitor, has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of obesity. The effects of orlistat on hepatobiliary function have not been previously defined. A 4 wk study was performed involving modest weight loss in obese subjects to observe any short-term hepatobiliary responses that occur after initiating treatment with orlistat and a hypocaloric diet. METHODS: A total of 23 obese (BMI 30-41 kg/m2) subjects were randomized to a double blind t.i.d. treatment with 120 mg of orlistat or a placebo in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet (1200-1500 kcal/day). The study was designed to achieve similar modest weight loss in both groups in order to be able to directly assess the effects of orlistat. Cholesterol saturation, bile composition, and gallbladder motility were measured. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment period, mean weight loss of 3.8 kg was achieved in the orlistat group (vs 2.3 kg with placebo, p = NS). Total bile acid concentration decreased significantly with placebo (-18.57 +/- 6.99 mmol/L; 95% CI = -32.26 to -4.87), but not with orlistat. Biliary phospholipid concentration decreased significantly with placebo (-4.38 +/- 1.91 mmol/L; 95% CI = -8.13 to -0.64) but not with orlistat. Mean changes from the baseline in cholesterol saturation index and gallbladder motility were similar in both groups. Microscopy of bile failed to reveal cholesterol microcrystals before or after treatment in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a primary initial effect of weight loss is a reduction in biliary bile acids and phospholipids. Orlistat blocks these adverse changes in biliary lipid composition and maintains hepatobiliary function. We speculate that the risk of formation of gallstones during weight loss may actually be lowered with orlistat.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Orlistat--a novel weight loss therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical safety and efficacy, drug interactions, and therapeutic issues related to the use of orlistat for treatment of obesity. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles were identified from MEDLINE (1966-July 2000), Roche Laboratories, organizational guidelines, National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration Web sites, and Doctor's Guide online. Key words included obesity, orlistat, and lipase inhibitors. References were also identified from reference sections of published articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, human trials were selected for review and discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: Orlistat is the first agent in the lipase inhibitor class of antiobesity drugs. Orlistat is minimally absorbed and has been shown to reduce body weight by inhibiting absorption (by approximately 30%) of ingested dietary fat. Safety and efficacy have been established in one- and two-year double-blind, placebo-controlled trials; adverse effects were primarily, and almost exclusively, gastrointestinal. Due to its ability to block fat absorption, orlistat also has the capability to inhibit absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. Therefore, a daily multiple vitamin is recommended while taking orlistat. CONCLUSIONS: By inhibiting fat absorption, orlistat offers a new treatment modality for weight loss and maintenance. Preliminary data from clinical trials suggest that orlistat may be beneficial in patients with comorbid conditions related to obesity, such as diabetes and hyperlipidemia. However, further studies during postmarketing surveillance are needed to fully establish orlistats long-term benefits and safety. Orlistat should be considered a useful adjunctive therapy for weight loss and maintenance in obese patients (i.e., body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 or > or = 27 kg/m2 if other risk factors are present) committed to lifestyle changes including diet, exercise, and behavioral modification.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Orlistat: selective inhibition of caloric absorption can affect long-term body weight.

Orlistat is a novel, noncentrally acting antiobesity agent that selectively inhibits gastrointestinal lipase activity, thereby reducing the absorption of dietary fat by approximately one-third. In a series of 1- and 2-yr randomized, placebo-controlled trials of obese subjects, treatment with orlistat in combination with a mildly calorie-restricted diet consistently produced significantly greater mean weight loss than diet alone. More orlistat-treated subjects than placebo recipients achieved clinically meaningful weight reduction (> or =5% or > or =10% of initial body weight) after 1 and 2 yr. Orlistat was also associated with a significant reduction in the regain of lost weight during long-term treatment. In addition, orlistat therapy resulted in significant improvements in several cardiovascular risk factors including serum total and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, serum insulin levels, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and waist circumference. Furthermore, obese subjects with type 2 diabetes achieved a significantly greater decrease in body weight with orlistat compared with placebo, as well as significant improvements in HbA1c and fasting glucose levels. Among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, orlistat compared with placebo reduced the proportion who developed type 2 diabetes. Conversely, orlistat increased the proportion of subjects who achieved a normalization of glucose tolerance. Orlistat acts locally in the gastrointestinal tract and is only minimally absorbed. In long-term clinical trials, orlistat was well tolerated by both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed1999

Orlistat: a review of its use in the management of obesity.

UNLABELLED: Orlistat is a novel non-systemic treatment for obesity. The drug inhibits lipases in the gastrointestinal tract, preventing the absorption of approximately 30% of dietary fat. Pharmacodynamic and dose-finding studies have established that a 120 mg dose of orlistat 3 times daily (with each main meal) is optimal. Controlled studies have established that orlistat 120 mg 3 times daily for 1 year, in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet, enables weight reduction of 7.9 to 10.2% in obese non-diabetic individuals. In 1 study the reduction was 6.2% in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Orlistat 120 mg 3 times daily was significantly more effective than placebo (also given in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet) in these studies. The drug was also significantly more effective than placebo in 2-year randomised double-blind studies involving >2000 patients. During the second year of treatment, when patients were switched from a hypocaloric diet to a eucaloric diet, orlistat recipients regained significantly less weight than placebo recipients. Orlistat appears to improve lipid profiles in non-diabetic obese patients, reducing levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. In a study of patients with obesity associated with type 2 diabetes, patients treated with orlistat lost more weight and had improved serum lipid profiles compared with placebo recipients. In addition, orlistat-treated patients achieved significant improvements in glycaemic control, enabling dosages of antidiabetic drugs to be reduced. Long term (1 to 2 years) tolerability data from 2038 patients in placebo-controlled trials revealed that the drug was generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events were related to decreased fat absorption and included oily faecal spotting, flatus with discharge, faecal urgency and oily stool. Systemic adverse events attributable to orlistat were negligible. CONCLUSION: Orlistat in conjunction with a hypocaloric diet has been shown to induce clinically significant weight loss in keeping with current guidelines for the management of obesity. This, together with its acceptable tolerability profile and lack of systemic adverse events, make it an attractive option in the treatment of obesity. The drug may have a positive effect on obesity-associated cardiovascular risk factors and type 2 diabetes.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed1997

A one-year trial to assess the value of orlistat in the management of obesity.

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methodology of a multicentre study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of orlistat 120 mg tid as therapy for inducing weight loss in excess of that achieved with a moderately calorie-restricted diet alone. The results from a single centre are presented to illustrate the nature of the response. DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multicentre study. A four-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period preceded a 52 week double-blind treatment period during which patients received either orlistat or placebo three times a day. At the start of the run-in period, all patients were placed on a diet containing approximately 30% of calories as fat and designed to cause an energy deficit of approximately 600 kcal/d. SUBJECTS: Patients of either sex, more than 18 y of age, with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 43 kg/m2 were eligible for enrolment. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy assessments included: measurements of body weight; anthropometry; quality of life; blood pressure; serum lipids; fasting serum glucose and insulin. Safety assessments included: adverse events; vital signs; ECG; renal and gallbladder ultrasound; haematology; serum biochemistry. OUTCOME: In the single centre there was a reduction in body weight of 5.5 +/- 4.5 (s.d.) kg (5.7% reduction) in the placebo group and 8.6 +/- 5.4kg in the orlistat-treated group (8.4% reduction) by six months. Thereafter, the placebo group tended to relapse whereas the orlistat group maintained their loss (2.6% vs 8.4% reduction from initial value at 52 weeks). Total and LDL cholesterol fell by 0.05 mmol/l (1.6%) and 0.14 mmol/l (4.2%), respectively, in orlistat treated patients. The drop-out rate was 48% in the placebo group and 39% in the orlistat group. Intestinal symptoms related to orlistat were significantly increased compared to placebo but were well tolerated. Fat soluble vitamin levels remained within the normal range in the treatment group; the reduction seen in alpha-tocopherol levels in patients receiving orlistat was normalized by the decrease in plasma cholesterol concentrations. Beta-carotene and vitamin D concentrations also decreased in orlistat-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis suggests that orlistat, when used with a health-promoting low-fat and moderately energy-restricted diet, confers advantages in the long-term management of obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability within primary care settings of orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor, for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. PARTICIPANTS: A group of 796 obese patients (body mass index, 30-44 kg/m2), treated with placebo 3 times a day (TID), 60 mg of orlistat TID, or 120 mg of orlistat TID, in conjunction with a reduced-energy diet for the first year and a weight-maintenance diet during the second year. SETTING: Seventeen primary care centers in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in body weight and obesity-related disease risk factors. RESULTS: Patients treated with orlistat lost significantly more weight (7.08 +/- 0.54 and 7.94 +/- 0.57 kg for the 60-mg and 120-mg orlistat groups, respectively) than those treated with placebo (4.14 +/- 0.56 kg) in year 1 (P<.001) and sustained more of this weight loss during year 2 (P<.001). More patients treated with orlistat lost 5% or more of their initial weight in year 1 (48.8% and 50.5% of patients in the 60-mg and 120-mg groups, respectively) compared with placebo (30.7%; P<.001), and approximately 34% of patients in the orlistat groups sustained weight loss of 5% or greater over 2 years compared with 24% in the placebo group (P<.001). Orlistat produced greater improvements than placebo in serum lipid levels and blood pressure and was well tolerated, although treatment resulted in a higher incidence of gastrointestinal events. CONCLUSIONS: This long-term study indicates that orlistat is an effective adjunct to dietary intervention in the treatment of obesity in primary care settings.

Adult↗