PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Corticotomy and compression osteogenesis in the posterior maxilla for treating severe anterior open bite.

A new technique is described for outpatient treatment of anterior open bite. The compression osteogenesis method with a two-stage corticotomy was used in the posterior maxilla to treat a woman with severe anterior open bite. Three-week post-surgical compression using anchor plates and elastics repositioned the posterior maxillary bone/teeth segments by 7 mm to the ideal superior position. The patient had a stable skeletal position of the maxilla at 14-month follow-up with satisfactory results and no complications after orthodontic treatment. This technique appears to be an efficient option for treating patients with anterior open bite.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Leveling of the second molar with a superelastic spring.

BACKGROUND: Second permanent molars often erupt during fixed appliance treatment. When they are to be incorporated into the fixed appliance, it is often not possible to bond the buccal tube in the correct position. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We describe herein a method for aligning second permanent molars by means of a superelastic segmental archwire. This involves the application of a rigid steel archwire extending from the right first molar to the left first molar for anchorage. This method was investigated in-vitro and in its clinical application. The in-vitro test was carried out with a hexapode simulating the vertical deviation of the second molar. RESULTS: A .016'' x .022'' stainless steel archwire achieved forces of 13 N; a TMA archwire attained 5 N (both with a deflection of 2 mm), and the superelastic late-leveler achieved a maximum force of 1.3 N with a 5 mm deflection. The maximum uprighting torquing moments were 55 Nmm with the stainless steel archwire, 25 Nmm with the TMA archwire and 2 mm deflection, and 4 Nmm with the late-leveler and 5 mm deflection. CONCLUSIONS: The forces and moments of stainless-steel and TMA archwires are too high for the alignment of second permanent molars. The moderate forces and moments occurring with the superelastic late-leveler are capable of intruding, derotating and uprighting the second molar. The vertical component prevents artificial opening of the bite.

Alloys↗
PubMed2005

Noncompliant treatment of skeletal open bite.

The purpose of this article is to illustrate the effects of the rapid molar intrusion appliance, a treatment alternative that does not require patient compliance, for counteracting excessive vertical dimensions in growing patients and adults. The rapid molar intrusion appliance has 2 elastic modules that are secured on the maxillary and mandibular first-molar tubes. It is used in combination with maxillary and mandibular soldered lingual arches. Patient acceptance is good, and the patient's only responsibilities are to keep the appliance clean and avoid breakage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental changes in patients who underwent distalization of their maxillary molars with pendulum appliances. METHODS: The sample consisted of 31 patients (initial mean age, 14.58 years) with Angle Class II molar relationships and all permanent teeth up to the second molars. The maxillary molars were distalized with pendulum appliances for a mean period of 5.87 months. Lateral cephalograms, 45 degrees oblique radiographs, and dental casts were obtained before and after distalization. Changes produced by the pendulum appliance were analyzed with paired t tests. RESULTS: Maxillary first molar distalization accounted for 63.5% of the space opening; mesial movement of the maxillary first premolars contributed 36.5% of the space. The mean space opening on lateral cephalograms was 7.25 mm, and the rate of molar movement was 1.23 mm per month. The mean distalization of the maxillary molars was 4.6 mm, with a mean distal crown tipping of 18.5 degrees The maxillary molars experienced expansion, with a smaller effect on the first molars than on the second molars. The pendulum appliance produced symmetrical expansion, with a rate of 1.04 mm per month on the right and 1.10 mm per month on the left. CONCLUSIONS: The pendulum appliance is effective for distalization of the maxillary molars and the establishment of a Class I molar relationship in a relatively short time. However, caution is needed to control collateral effects, including mesial movement of the first premolars and distal tipping of the molar crowns.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2007

Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary molar distalization is a common treatment approach for patients with Class II malocclusions who do not require extractions. Despite the many advantages of pendulum appliances, the maxillary incisors and premolars tend to shift mesially as the maxillary molars move distally. The purpose of this study was to investigate anchorage loss in patients treated with palatal osseointegrated implants combined with pendulum springs. METHODS: Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalometric films of 30 consecutively treated patients were examined. One group (n = 15) had been treated with conventional pendulum appliances, and the other group (n = 15) was treated with palatal osseointegrated implants combined with pendulum springs. RESULTS: In the pendulum group, significant distal tipping of the maxillary first molars and mesial tipping of the maxillary premolars were noted. Distalization of the maxillary first molars, mesialization of the maxillary first premolars, and proclination of the maxillary left central incisor were significant in the linear measurements. In the implant group, the distal tipping of the maxillary first molars and first premolars and the increases in SNGoGn, FMA, Na Me, and Na ANS were significant. Intergroup comparisons showed that changes in the maxillary first premolars, maxillary central incisors, and vertical measurements were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of palatal osseointegrated implants is reliable and provides absolute anchorage.

Cephalometry↗
PubMed2006

Correction of deep overbite and gummy smile by using a mini-implant with a segmented wire in a growing Class II Division 2 patient.

A boy, aged 10.5 years, with a Class II molar relationship and a very deep overbite, complaining of a gummy smile and anterior crowding, was treated nonextraction with a mini-implant and Twin-block and edgewise fixed appliances. Severely extruded and retroclined maxillary incisors were intruded and proclined with a nickel-titanium closed-coil spring anchored to a mini-implant and segmented wires; this resolved the gummy smile and deep overbite efficiently without extruding the maxillary molars or opening the mandible. The mandibular incisors were proclined without direct orthodontic force during intrusion of the maxillary incisors; this helped the nonextraction treatment of mandibular incisor crowding. The Twin-block appliance with high-pull headgear promoted mandibular growth, restrained maxillary growth, and changed the canine and molar relationship from Class II to Class I. The patient's overbite and overjet were overtreated, and, 1 year postretention, the patient maintained a good overbite and overjet.

Cephalometry↗
PubMed2006

Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage.

A 16-year-old girl with an anterior open bite was treated with nonextraction therapy that included intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth with microscrew implants. Implants (diameter, 1.2 mm; length, 8 or 6 mm) were placed into alveolar bone near the posterior teeth and used as anchorage for intrusive force. To prevent adverse side effects of buccoversion or linguoversion of the posterior teeth during intrusion, a transpalatal bar and a lingual arch were placed. The 3-mm anterior open bite was corrected in 11 months of treatment, after intrusion of the maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth and autorotation of the mandible. The posterior intrusion relapsed in the early stage of retention, at 8 months; thereafter, no obvious relapse was evident in the vertical position of the molars and the FMA. The treatment mechanics of anterior open bite with posterior intrusion by using microscrew implants were effective but still require a proper retention protocol.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.

Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage is a useful treatment approach for a patient with a Class I or Class II dentoalveolar-protrusion malocclusion. It can create a favorable counterclockwise skeletal change and a balanced face without patient compliance. In contrast, headgear force with high-pull J-hook can obtain similar results but depends on patient cooperation. This case report presents the treatment of a patient with Class I canine and molar relationships, a convex profile with retrognathic mandible and marked lip protrusion, and excessive lower anterior facial height. Good facial balance was obtained by Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage, which provided horizontal and vertical anchorage control in the maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth, and intrusion and torque control in the maxillary anterior teeth, resulting in a favorable counterclockwise mandibular response.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Restricting facial bone growth with skeletal fixation: a preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional orthodontic treatment of vertical or anterior maxillary excess by growth modification can be problematic in children because of the high levels of patient compliance required. The purpose of this preliminary study was to investigate the use of rigid skeletal fixation to modify facial bone growth without compliance. METHODS: Three 30-day old female pigs from the same litter were included in phase I. Pediatric miniplates were rigidly fixated with monocortical screws in the experimental pig to bridge the zygomaticomaxillary suture and both the frontonasal and nasomaxillary sutures, bilaterally. In the sham experimental pig, the same surgical protocol was followed, but miniplates were omitted (ie, screw placement only). In the control pig, surgery was not performed. All 3 pigs were housed and fed a normal diet under identical conditions postoperatively for 63 days; then they were killed, their right hemi-skulls were prepared for and underwent 3-dimensional coordinate landmark analysis, and en-bloc specimens from the zygomaticomaxillary, frontonasal, and nasomaxillary sutures of the left hemi-skulls underwent histologic analysis. Two 50-day-old female pigs from the same litter were used in phase II. The same experimental protocol was followed as before for the experimental pig and the sham experimental pig. Both pigs were fed a normal diet for 105 days; then they were killed, and their skulls were prepared for and underwent 3-dimensional coordinate landmark analysis. RESULTS: Rigid plating restricted zygomaticolacrimal suture length, maxillary bone length, nasal bone length, midfacial breadth, and frontal bone length by an average of -14% to -15% (range, -4% to -36%). No growth differences were noted between the animals in maxillary height, mid-premaxillary length, bregma-lambda length, palatal lengths, or mandibular length. Also, plating the sutures produced a clear depressed concavity in the infraorbital region, altered the alignment of the infraorbital plane lateral to the concavity, inhibited the anterior migration of the maxillary tuberosity, and resulted in raised folding on the bony surface adjacent to the zygomaticomaxillary suture. CONCLUSIONS: Rigidly fixating frontonasomaxillary and zygomaticomaxillary sutures inhibits growth of facial bones and might provide a means of restricting excess growth without having to rely on patient compliance. In addition, these altered growth patterns in the plated pig model produced similar and potentially homologous infraorbital features shared by living humans in comparison with ancestral fossil forms.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This prospective clinical study analyzed the distalization of maxillary molars achieved by the pendulum appliance and its effect on the anchorage teeth during and after fixed orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 22 adolescents (15 girls, 7 boys) taken pretreatment, after distalization, after leveling and aligning, and after fixed orthodontic treatment were evaluated. The initial mean age was 14.5 years (SD = 1.80). The mean time for distalization of the maxillary molars was 5.85 months (SD = 1.82), and the total treatment time was 3.61 years (SD = 1.83). RESULTS: The pendulum appliance moved the maxillary molars distally, but with significant distal inclination, protrusion of the anterior teeth, and increase in lower anterior facial height (LAFH) due to the clockwise mandibular rotation. After fixed orthodontic treatment, the maxillary incisors and the maxillary first premolars and first molars were returned to their pretreatment anteroposterior positions. Thus, at postdistalization, there was 2.1 mm of protrusion of the maxillary first molars, despite the anchorage reinforcement (Nance button and cervical headgear worn at night during fixed appliance therapy). However, at the end of treatment, all patients had Class I molar relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment corrected the Class II sagittal relationship, especially due to the dentoalveolar changes secondary to the spontaneous mandibular growth in the anterior direction during fixed appliance treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars.

INTRODUCTION: The pendulum appliance allows for rapid molar distalization without the need for patient compliance. Its efficiency has been confirmed in a number of clinical studies. However, the potential interactions and positional changes between the deciduous molars used for dental anchorage and the erupted and unerupted permanent teeth have yet to be clarified when this appliance is used for molar distalization in the mixed dentition. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients in the mixed dentition each received a modified pendulum appliance with a distal screw and a preactivated pendulum spring for bilateral distalization of the maxillary molars. The patients were divided into 4 groups based on dentition stages: patient group 1 (PG 1, n = 10) was in the early mixed dentition; patients had resorption of the distal root areas of the deciduous molars being used for dental anchorage, and the unerupted premolars were located at the distal margin of the deciduous molar root region. Based on radiographs taken before placement of the pendulum appliance, patient group 2 (PG 2, n = 10) was diagnosed as having a central location of the unerupted premolars. In the third group (PG 3, n = 4), the first premolars were already erupted and could be integrated into the dental anchorage, but the canines were not yet erupted. In the fourth group (PG 4, n = 5), the first premolars and both canines were fully erupted. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of the measured results showed significant differences in the side effects between PG 1 and PG 2. In patients being treated with pendulum appliances, the anchorage quality of the deciduous molars that were already partially resorbed in the distal root area was comparatively reduced. Consequently, the mesial drift of the deciduous molars and incisors was increased, without impairing the extent and quality of the molar distalization. Anchorage loss in the supporting area had no direct impact on the sagittal position of the unerupted premolars in the early mixed dentition. CONCLUSIONS: If permanent teeth have already started to erupt in the supporting area, additional space restrictions should be avoided in patients with critical topography, especially if there is little space for the unerupted canines. At this stage of the mixed dentition, premolar extraction or augmentation of the supporting area with extraoral headgear offers a therapeutic alternative to intraoral distalization appliances with exclusively dental anchorage.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2006

Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare and measure the amount of anchorage loss with titanium microimplants and conventional molar anchorage during canine retraction. METHODS: Subjects for this study comprised 10 orthodontic patients (7 women, 3 men) with a mean age of 19.6 years (range, 18 to 25 years), who had therapeutic extraction of all first premolars. After leveling and aligning, titanium microimplants 1.3 mm in diameter and 9 mm in length were placed between the roots of the second premolars and the first molars. Implants were placed in the maxillary and mandibular arches on 1 side in 8 patients and in the maxilla only in 2 patients. A brass wire guide and an intraoral periapical radiograph were used to determine the implant positions. After 15 days, the implants and the molars were loaded with closed-coil springs for canine retraction. Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after retraction, and the tracings were superimposed to assess anchorage loss. The amount of molar anchorage loss was measured from pterygoid vertical in the maxilla and sella-nasion perpendicular in the mandible. RESULTS: Mean anchorage losses were 1.60 mm in the maxilla and 1.70 mm in the mandible on the molar anchorage side; no anchorage loss occurred on the implant side. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium microimplants can function as simple and efficient anchors for canine retraction when maximum anchorage is desired.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Developmental occlusion, orthodontic interventions, and orthognathic surgery for adolescents.

This article addresses issues in orthodontics such as timing of treatment, expansion in the absence of a posterior crossbite, serial ex-tractions, treatment of Class II and III malocclusions, treatment of open bites, extraction versus nonextraction, preservation of E-space to resolve crowding, orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders, orthognathic surgery, and current trends in orthodontics. Although much information is presented on these topics, many controversies still exist. When more data from evidence-based systematic reviews become available, more predictable and standardized orthodontic treatments may develop.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The Rotterdam Palatal Distractor: introduction of the new bone-borne device and report of the pilot study.

Transverse maxillary hypoplasia, in adolescents and adults, is frequently seen as an acquired deformity and in congenital deformities patients and can be corrected by means of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Traditionally, the distractors for expansion are tooth-borne devices, i.e. hyrax appliances, which may have some serious disadvantages such as tooth tipping, cortical fenestration, skeletal relapse and loss of anchorage. In contrast, with bone-borne distractors most of the maxillary expansion is orthopedic and at a more mechanically desired level with less dental side effects. A new bone-borne palatal distractor has been developed. By activation the nails of the abutments plates automatically stabilizes the device and no screw fixation is necessary anymore. This new distractor is presented and the data of five acquired deformity and eight congenital deformity patients that were treated with this distractor are reported.

Acrocephalosyndactylia↗
PubMed2006

Special features of planning and application of orthodontic miniscrews in cleft patients.

Patients with clefts of lip, alveolus and palate or some facial syndromes need complex and long-lasting orthodontic therapy. The possibility of orthodontic anchorage is often limited by congenital absence of teeth, disturbed skeletal growth or failing compliance with extraoral sources of force. Correct positioning and insertion provided, miniscrews can serve as anchorages and shorten the period of active treatment in patients with clefts. With the help of a case presentation, an outline of using orthodontic miniscrews (like: Titan, Forestadent) for anchorage in patients with clefts of lip, alveolus and palate is given along with a discussion of advantages and disadvantages. Thus miniscrews are suited for use in cleft patients. However, they require careful orthodontic and surgical planning.

Bone Screws↗
PubMed2006

The role of orthodontics in implant dentistry.

Orthodontic treatment of partially edentulous patients is difficult, especially if a significant number of teeth are missing. With loss of teeth, adjacent or opposing teeth usually tip, drift or over-erupt leaving spaces that are not optimal for replacement of missing teeth. Orthodontic correction of these spatial relationships will aid prosthetic replacement of the missing teeth, function, hygiene and aesthetics. Orthodontists rely on teeth to provide the anchorage to correct malocclusions. With patients with an intact dentition dental anchorage is usually adequate to facilitate tooth movement. In some partially edentulous patients however, insufficient anchorage may present to correct the malocclusion. In these patients implants can provide additional anchorage. At times, osseointegrated implants can also be used to support restorations after completion of orthodontic therapy if treatment planning is precise. The use of implants for orthodontic anchorage requires an interdisciplinary approach and precise planning to achieve optimal results.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗