SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Osteoporosis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 5. Physical activity as therapy for osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine exercise as a therapy for people with osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Immobilization, standing low-load and high-load physical activities. OUTCOMES: Risk of injury, quality of life, risk of falls and fractures, strength and posture and pain management. EVIDENCE: Relevant epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and reviews were examined, including the large-scale FICSIT trial in the United States, a prospective 4-year study of women enrolled in an exercise program in Toronto and the large-scale Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. VALUES: Minimizing risk of injury and increasing quality of life were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Moderate physical activity in people with osteoporosis can reduce the risk of falls and fractures, decrease pain and improve fitness and overall quality of life. It may also stimulate bone gain and decrease bone loss. Its positive effects are an adjunct to other interventions, such as hormonal therapy. It may give patients the confidence to resume regular activity and can provide social interaction and support. During exercise programs, proper nutrition is necessary to prevent excessive weight loss and impaired immune function resulting from inadequate protein, vitamin and mineral intake. RECOMMENDATIONS: Immobilization should be avoided if possible in anyone with osteoporosis or at increased risk for osteoporosis. Regular, moderate physical activity is recommended for those with osteoporosis. Elderly people should be assessed for risk of falling to identify those in greatest need of an exercise program. Community group exercise programs are beneficial. Younger people with osteoporosis also need exercise that will preserve or improve bone mass, muscular strength, endurance and cardiovascular fitness. Weight loss as a result of physical activity should be avoided and adequate intake of protein, vitamins and minerals assured. Because the benefits of physical activity are independent of the effect of other therapies, physical activity is an essential adjunct to appropriate nutrition and other therapies. VALIDATION: These recommendations were developed by the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada at its 1995 Consensus Conference. They are in agreement with the position taken on osteoporosis and exercise by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. SPONSORS: Sponsors of the 1995 conference included the Dairy Farmers of Canada, Eli Lilly Canada, Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche Canada Ltd., Merck Frosst Canada Inc. and Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 8. Vitamin D metabolites and analogs in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To review recent findings on the skeletal actions of vitamin D and to examine results of the latest clinical trials of vitamin D in the treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: The vitamin D analog 1-alpha hydroxycholecalciferol (1 alpha-OH-D3); the vitamin D metabolite calcitriol. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with vitamin D therapies. EVIDENCE: Relevant laboratory and clinical studies and reports were examined. Greatest reliance was placed on recent large-scale, randomized, controlled trials; others were noted and their methods critiqued. Clinical practice in Japan was also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Vitamin D maintains the dynamic nature of bone and so presumably helps to keep it healthy. Calcitriol and 1 alpha-OH-D3 may be effective in increasing bone mass and preventing fractures in osteoporosis. Calcitriol may be an alternative treatment in the prevention and management of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Possible side effects of vitamin D analogs and metabolites are hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, renal calcification and renal stones. RECOMMENDATIONS: The use of 1 alpha-OH-D3 for the treatment of osteoporosis in Canada cannot be supported without larger and longer randomized, controlled clinical trials. Calcitriol appears to prevent vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporosis. More information is needed on its mechanism of action and efficacy in preventing hip fractures. Future studies should focus on comparisons with other effective therapies and on determining whether its effect on fractures is greater than that achieved through improved vitamin D nutrition. Patients taking calcitriol at dose levels required for antifracture effects should be monitored for serum and urine calcium response to the drug. Calcitriol should not be given to patients whose calcium intake is at current generally recommended levels. At present, prescription of calcitriol for the treatment of osteoporosis should be reserved for physicians with a special interest in the treatment of metabolic bone disease.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 6. Use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis and compare bisphosphonate therapy with other treatments. OPTIONS: The bisphosphonates, etidronate, alendronate, clodronate, pamidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate and risedronate; combined bisphosphonates and estrogen; combined bisphosphonates and calcium supplements. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with bisphosphonate treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined with emphasis on recent controlled trials. The availability of treatment products in Canada was also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Treatment with bisphosphonates may be an acceptable alternative to ovarian hormone therapy in increasing bone mass and decreasing fractures associated with osteoporosis. Compared with estrogens, bisphosphonates are bone-tissue specific, have equal or greater antiresorptive effect and have few side effects and no known risk for carcinogenesis. They also hold promise in treating male osteoporosis and steroid-induced bone loss. Prolonged, continuous treatment with etidronate may lead to impaired calcification of newly formed bone; therefore, etidronate is administered cyclically. This risk is not present in newer generations of bisphosphonates. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bisphosphonate therapies may be considered as an alternative to ovarian hormone therapy in postmenopausal osteopenic or osteoporotic women who cannot or will not tolerate ovarian hormone therapy. They should also be considered in treating male osteoporosis and steroid-induced bone loss. Combination therapy with estrogen may be effective, although more research is needed. Combination therapy with calcium supplements is recommended. Bisphosphonate therapies should be restricted to postmenopausal patients with osteopenia or established osteoporosis and are not yet recommended for younger perimenopausal women as prophylaxis.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 9. Calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe potential therapeutic uses of calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Parenterally and intranasally administered calcitonin (eel, salmon or human). OUTCOMES: Fracture, fracture pain and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures, reduction of pain and improved quality of life associated with calcitonin treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, with an emphasis on recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials. In vitro and in vivo studies of osteoclast activity were also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures and fracture pain, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Calcitonin reduces acute pain associated with osteoporotic fractures and has been found useful in treating chronic back pain following vertebral fractures in spinal osteoporosis. It can prevent bone loss and may be effective in preventing fractures. Side effects are dose related and generally mild; they include gastrointestinal, vascular and dermatologic conditions that can be treated symptomatically or by varying the dosage. Side effects are much rarer with nasal administration than with injection. True allergic reactions are rare. RECOMMENDATIONS: Calcitonin in both intramuscular and intranasal forms can reduce the pain of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures and may be effective in treating that associated with chronic vertebral osteoporotic fractures. Calcitonin may also prevent postmenopausal bone loss and increase bone density in those with established osteoporosis. Current evidence for long-term prevention of fractures is limited and does not support the use of calcitonin as a first-line treatment for established osteoporosis. Most side effects can be avoided with nasal administration. Further trials are needed to assess fracture prevention and effective dose ranges for treating pain and increasing bone mineral density and to determine the long-term efficacy of calcitonin in secondary osteoporosis, in premenopausal women, in men and in elderly people.

Aged↗

PubMed2007

[Secondary osteoporosis. A review of recent evidence focusing on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and osteoporosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis].

Various pathogenic conditions including endocrine, inflammatory, gastrointestinal and hematological disorders, medication, and immobilization cause secondary osteoporosis. Secondary osteoporosis occurs not only in postmenopausal women but also in premenopausal women and men. Therefore, the fractures have a great impact on their social lives. Serial articles regarding secondary osteoporosis will appear in this journal, especially focused on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and osteoporosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the best method of diagnosing osteoporosis and determining fracture risk and to promote standards in the use of bone densitometry and the reporting of results. OPTIONS: Methods of bone mineral density measurement: dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), radiographic absorptiometry, single-photon absorptiometry, dual-photon absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, quantitative ultrasound, neutron activation analysis. The options of using bone densitometry in individual patient management and as a mass screening tool are also considered. OUTCOMES: Appropriate use of densitometry to promote accurate diagnosis and assessment of fracture risk and timely, appropriate treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined. Clinical practice in Canada was also considered. VALUES: Accurate assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk and diagnosis of osteoporosis and assuring low exposure to medical radiation were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Early diagnosis through bone density measurement allows proper management of osteoporosis to minimize injury and disability, improve quality of life and reduce the personal and social costs associated with the condition. Potential harms include radiation exposure and cost. The harms and costs of appropriate use of DXA are minimal compared with the harms and costs associated with osteoporosis. RECOMMENDATIONS: Bone mineral density should be measured only to assist in making a clinical management choice. DXA is the best method of measuring bone density and, thus, the best available indicator of osteoporotic fracture risk. Plain radiographs may supplement DXA if there is a specific reason for their use. Measurement of the lumbar spine and femoral neck is standard, but a different site or a single measurement is recommended in specific cases. Unless accelerated bone loss is suspected, DXA should be repeated every 2 to 4 years for patients receiving ovarian hormone therapy and 1 to 2 years for patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Measurements and reporting of results must be standardized. Reports should refer to the World Health Organization's recommended definitions of osteopenia and osteoporosis and provide actual measurement and its relation to peak bone mass.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 4. Calcium nutrition and osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To recommend appropriate levels of calcium intake in light of the most recent studies. OPTIONS: Dietary calcium intake, calcium supplementation, calcium and vitamin D supplementation; ovarian hormone therapy in postmenopausal women. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with osteoporosis prevention. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, in particular those published since the 1988 Osteoporosis Society of Canada position paper on calcium nutrition. Only studies in humans were considered, including controlled, randomized trials and prospective studies, using bone mass and fractures as end-points. Studies in early and later phases of skeletal growth were noted. The analysis was designed to eliminate menopause as a confounding variable. VALUES: Preventing osteoporosis and maximizing quality of life were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Adequate calcium nutrition increases bone mineral density during skeletal growth and prevents bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Risks associated with high dietary calcium intake are low, and a recent study extends this conclusion to the risk of kidney stones. Lactase-deficient patients may substitute yogurt and lactase-treated milk for cow's milk. True milk allergy is probably rare; its promotion of diabetes mellitus in susceptible people is being studied. RECOMMENDATIONS: Current recommended intakes of calcium are too low. Revised intake guidelines designed to reduce bone loss and protect against osteoporotic fractures are suggested. Canadians should attempt to meet their calcium requirements principally through food sources. Pharmaceutical calcium supplements and a dietician's advice should be considered where dietary preferences or lactase deficiency restrict consumption of dairy foods. Further research is necessary before recommending the general use of calcium supplements by adolescents. Calcium supplementation cannot substitute for hormone therapy in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss and fractures. Adequate amounts of vitamin D are necessary for optimal calcium absorption and bone health. Elderly people and those who use heavy sun screens should have a dietary intake of 400 to 800 IU of vitamin D per day.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 7. Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To present the latest findings on the use of fluoride in the treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Plain sodium fluoride (NaF), enteric-coated sodium fluoride (EC-NaF), sodium monofluorophosphate (Na2FPO4), slow-release sodium fluoride (SR-NaF); fluoride with a calcium supplement. OUTCOMES: Fracture and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures and improved quality of life associated with treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, with an emphasis on recent prospective, randomized, controlled trials. Clinical practices in European countries were also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: NaF therapy stimulates bone formation and may be effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures. It may be an acceptable alternative treatment to estrogen or bisphosphonate therapy and useful in premenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and in some patients with mild osteogenesis imperfecta. Toxic effects are dependent on formulation and dosage. They include a range of gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal conditions. EC-NaF is associated with less toxicity than plain NaF; its gastrointestinal toxicity is negligible. Na2FPO4 has no gastrointestinal toxicity, but can give rise to skeletal toxicity. SR-NaF appears to have no side effects when given intermittently. Carcinogenicity has not been found in vivo with fluoride therapy, despite in vitro results. RECOMMENDATIONS: New data indicate that fluoride therapy should be re-evaluated as a potentially effective treatment of osteoporosis with minimal side effects. More studies are needed of slow-release fluoride formulations, intermittent treatment schedules and calcium supplementation of fluoride. Studies should be undertaken to see if it is advantageous to initiate treatment with antiresorptive agents before or in combination with fluoride. Conclusive data have not been presented regarding the benefit of any specific type of calcium supplement. Further studies on the basic mechanism of action of fluoride on the skeleton are necessary to evaluate fluoride's potential to stimulate bone formation therapeutically.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Underuse of procedures for diagnosing osteoporosis and of therapies for osteoporosis in older nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis, the prevalence of utilization of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements for diagnosis of osteoporosis, and prevalence of use of calcium and vitamin D supplements and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in an academic nursing home. METHODS: The charts of all women aged 56 years and older residing in an academic nursing home were analyzed by one of the authors for the prevalence of osteoporosis, the prevalence of use of BMD measurements to diagnose osteoporosis, and the prevalence of use of calcium and vitamin D supplements and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis. RESULTS: Of 136 postmenopausal women, mean age 79 +/- 10 years, 66 (49%) had measurements of BMD. Of these 66 women, 31 (47%) had osteoporosis, 21 (32%) had osteopenia, and 14 (21%) had normal BMD. Elemental calcium carbonate 1500 mg daily was prescribed to 17 of 31 women (55%) with osteoporosis, to 12 of 21 women (57%) with osteopenia, to 2 of 14 women (14%) with normal BMD, and to 27 of 70 women (39%) with no BMD obtained. Any dose of calcium was prescribed to 78 of 136 elderly women (58%). Vitamin D supplements were prescribed to 13 of 31 women (42%) with osteoporosis, to 9 of 21 women (43%) with osteopenia, to 2 of 14 women (14%) with normal BMD, and to 20 of 70 women (29%) with no BMD obtained. Vitamin D supplements were prescribed to 44 of 136 elderly women (32%). Biphosphonates were prescribed to 19 of 31 women (61%) with osteoporosis. Of 20 women on medications that increased the risk of osteoporosis, 6 (30%) had BMD measured. Nine of these 20 women (45%) were on calcium supplements. CONCLUSIONS: Older postmenopausal women in an academic nursing home have a high prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia, a low prevalence of measurement of BMD, and underuse of calcium, vitamin D supplements, and other antiresorptive therapies for treatment of osteoporosis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed1998

Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model?

The objectives of the study were: to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in women in their seventh decade; to determine the number of women who conformed to at least one of the current East Yorkshire Clinical Referral Criteria for Osteoporosis; and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these referral criteria in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and to compare this with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of a logistic regression model incorporating variables that were significantly associated with the risk of osteoporosis. An observational study was carried out at the Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Hull Royal Infirmary, on women in their seventh decade from three general practices. Densitometric assessment of lumbar spine and femoral neck was carried out using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a detailed medical history taken. The main outcome measures were prevalence of osteoporosis in women in their seventh decade and efficacy of agreed clinical referral criteria at osteoporosis case finding. Of 823 Caucasian women who underwent DXA, 24% proved to have osteoporosis at hip, spine or both according to WHO criteria. A further 49% had osteopenia detected at hip, spine or both. At least one of the referral criteria was present in 47% of the women assessed. The sensitivity of the clinical referral criteria for detection of osteoporosis was 58% with a corresponding specificity of 60%. This point lies below the ROC curve (area under fitted curve, Az = 0.73) of a logistic regression model incorporating weight, age at menopause and current use of hormone replacement therapy. In conclusion, osteoporosis according to WHO criteria was found in almost 25% of women in their seventh decade. A simple logistic regression model provided a more sensitive method of osteoporosis case finding than the selective screening component of the clinical referral criteria employed in our practice.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2003

Management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older with osteoporosis-related fractures in a managed care population.

This study describes the pattern of evaluation and management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older following an osteoporosis-related fracture, conducted as a retrospective cohort study using the administrative claims database of a managed care organization. Subjects were women, aged 50 years and older, with at least one osteoporosis-related fracture in the years 1996-1998 who were continuously enrolled in the system's health plan for at least 6 months prior to and post-fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and treatment with any Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for osteoporosis were identified using CPT, ICD-9, and National Drug Codes for the 6-month post-fracture period. There were 658 women with an osteoporosis-related fracture: 189 (29%) hip fractures, 226 (34%) wrist fractures, 127 (19%) vertebral fractures, and 116 (18%) rib fractures. In the post-fracture period, 46 (7%) underwent BMD testing, 153 (23%) had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, and 220 (31%) were treated with a medication approved for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis. Of the 220 women with medication claims, 124 (56%) were for estrogen, and 96 (44%) were for other antiresorptive agents. Of the 507 women who did not have medication claims during the 6 months prior to the fracture, only 17% had new fills after the fracture. Management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older with fractures was inadequate, despite the high risk of subsequent fractures and recommendations that osteoporosis be the presumptive diagnosis. Significant opportunity exists for improvement in assuring post-fracture followup care.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT).

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis knowledge is an important contributor to improving exercise and calcium intake behaviour. However, there are few validated instruments for measuring osteoporosis knowledge levels. The aim of this study was to design a valid and reliable instrument to measure osteoporosis knowledge in Australian women. METHODS: A 20 item instrument with true, false and don't know responses was drafted, based on the Osteoporosis Australia Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-management course and the information leaflet "Understanding Osteoporosis". The scoring range was 1 to 20. This was administered to a 467 randomly-selected, healthy women aged 25-44 years. Questionnaire performance was assessed by Flesch reading ease, index of difficulty, Ferguson's sigma, inter-item and item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha and principal component factor analysis. RESULTS: Flesch reading ease was higher than desirable at 45, but this was due to the use of the word osteoporosis in many items. Of the individual items 17 had an index of difficulty less than 0.75. The questionnaire had a Ferguson's sigma of 0.96, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and factor analysis consistent with only one factor (osteoporosis knowledge) being measured. Levels of osteoporosis knowledge were low with a mean score of 8.8 out of 20 which suggests the OKAT may be sensitive to change. CONCLUSIONS: The OKAT for measuring osteoporosis knowledge has good psychometric properties in Australian 25-44 year old females. While it should be applicable to other Caucasian populations, this will require confirmation by further research.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Osteoporosis-related life habits and knowledge about osteoporosis among women in El Salvador: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder, characterized by reduced bone mass, deterioration of bone structure, increased bone fragility, and increased fracture risk. It is more frequent to find among women than men at a 4:1 ratio. Evidence suggests that to adopt changes on some life habits can prevent or delay development of osteoporosis. Several osteoporosis-risk factors have been confirmed in the US and western Europe, but in El Salvador there are neither reliable epidemiological statistics about this skeletal disorder nor studies addressing osteoporosis-risk factors in women. The aim of this study was to determinate the extent of osteoporosis knowledge, the levels of both daily calcium intake and weight-bearing physical activity, and the influence of several osteoporosis-risk factors on these variables in three age groups of Salvadorean women. METHODS: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, an osteoporosis knowledge assessment questionnaire including a food frequency and a physical activity record section were used to collect data and it was delivered through a face-to-face interview. A convenience sample (n = 197) comprised of three groups of women aged 25-35 years, 36-49 years, and over 49 years was taken. Among-group comparisons of means were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. To determinate the overall influence of osteoporosis-risk factors, the multivariate analysis was used. RESULTS: Study results indicated that better educated women had more knowledge about osteoporosis than women with a low education level, regardless of age, even though this knowledge was rather fair. Older women got more weight-bearing physical activity at home and less at place of employment than reported by the younger women; however, neither group performed sufficient high-intensity WBPA to improve bone mass. Regardless of age, the most women consumed 60% or less than the Dietary Reference Intake of calcium and depend on household income, lactose intolerance and coffee rather than milk consumption. CONCLUSION: In summary, the majority of women in this study have modest knowledge on osteoporosis. The knowledge base is not linked to preventive health habits, including sufficient calcium intake and performance of weight-bearing physical activities. They are thus at increased risk for low bone mass.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Regional osteoporosis screening, referral, and monitoring program in community pharmacies: findings from Project ImPACT: Osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To identify patients at risk for osteoporosis through community pharmacy-based bone mineral density (BMD) screening, to refer at-risk patients to primary care and/or specialty practice physicians, and to follow-up with at-risk patients; (2) to treat and manage osteopenic and osteoporotic patients referred to the pharmacy for medication therapy management services; and (3) to test a payment methodology for pharmacists who deliver community health management services to a population at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Single-cohort observational study. SETTING: Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc. Grocery and Pharmacy, a 29-store chain with 22 pharmacy locations in Richmond, Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Consumers with one or more known risk factors for osteoporosis in Ukrop's customer service area. INTERVENTION: During the initial phase (health promotion and disease prevention) of the project, pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening with referral and follow-up was provided to consumers who responded to Ukrop's screening promotions. The second phase-provision of collaborative community health management services focused on osteoporosis monitoring and management--is ongoing and includes patients who are at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis and are covered by a regional payer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of screenings; responses of patients and physicians to notifications; and long-term results during collaborative care. RESULTS: The pharmacists screened 532 patients and were able to contact 305 of these patients for follow-up interviews 3 to 6 months later. The stratification for risk of fracture was 37%, high risk; 33%, moderate risk; and 30%, low risk. A total of 78% of patients indicated that they had no prior knowledge of their risk for future fracture. In the moderate- and high-risk categories, 37% of patients scheduled and completed a physician visit, 19% had a diagnostic scan, and 24% of those patients were initiated on osteoporosis therapy subsequent to the screening. Participating pharmacies received payment for both the osteoporosis screening and the collaborative health management services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists can play a useful role in the identification, education, and referral of patients at risk for osteoporosis through pharmacy-based BMD screening. Patients are willing to pay for pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening services. Third-party payers are willing to compensate pharmacists for collaborative community health management services.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis treatment in nursing home residents with known osteoporosis or recent fracture.

SUMMARY: We studied nursing home residents with osteoporosis or recent fracture to determine the frequency and predictors of osteoporosis treatment. There was wide variation in performance, and both clinical and systems variables predicted use. This study shows that improvement in osteoporosis care is possible and important for many nursing homes. INTRODUCTION: We determined the prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis evaluation and treatment in high-risk nursing home residents. METHODS: We identified 67 nursing facilities in North Carolina and Arizona with > 10 residents with osteoporosis or recent hip fracture. Medical records (n=895) were abstracted for osteoporosis evaluation [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vitamin D level, serum calcium), treatment (calcium, vitamin D, osteoporosis medication, hip protectors), clinical, and systems covariates. Data were analyzed at the facility level using mixed models to account for the complex nesting of residents within providers and nursing facilities. RESULTS: Calcium and vitamin D was prescribed for 69% of residents, bisphosphonates for 19%, calcitonin for 14%, other pharmacologic therapies for 6%, and hip protectors for 2%. Overall, 36% received any bone protection (medication or hip protectors), with wide variation among facilities (0-85%). Factors significantly associated with any bone protection included female gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, (1.5-3.7)] and nonurban/suburban location [1.5, (1.1-2.2)]. Residents with esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), or dysphagia [0.6, (0.4-0.9)] and alcohol abuse [0.2, (0.0-0.9)] were less likely to receive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in the quality of osteoporosis treatment across nursing homes. Interventions that improve osteoporosis quality of care are needed.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Characterization of patients with an inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis therapy: the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO).

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures remain a major public health problem. Currently available osteoporosis therapies significantly reduce the risk of fractures, but up to 50% of patients have an inadequate clinical outcome to therapy. AIM: To describe the clinical and quality of life (QOL) of a study population meeting a proposed definition of inadequate clinical outcome to osteoporosis therapy, recruited for the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. METHODS: Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis (n = 2314) were divided into Group 1 (those who had previously experienced a fragility fracture despite osteoporosis drug therapy for at least 12 months) (n = 1309, 57%), or Group 2 (those who had previously discontinued osteoporosis drug therapy due to non-compliance or side-effects) (n = 1005; 43%). Baseline clinical characteristics, quality of life (QOL) and osteoporosis/falls risk factors were analysed. RESULTS: The overall population had low BMD (mean +/- SD T-score at lumbar spine -3.1 +/- 1.1), and risk factors for fracture such as previous fractures (67.8%), family history (15.1%), and prolonged glucocorticoid use (17.5%). QOL was poor: total QUALEFFO and EQ-5D scores were 46.8 +/- 18.7, and 0.50 +/- 0.33, respectively. Patients in Group 1 had higher age and body mass index, fewer hours of exercise, more previous fragility fractures and falls, and poorer QOL scores. DISCUSSION: Our definition of inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis drug therapy identifies a severe osteoporosis cohort with poor QOL and increased fracture risk. Using such a definition may lead to earlier recognition of inadequate clinical outcome to osteoporosis therapy, and improved interventions and results.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2001

Osteoporosis in children and adolescent girls: case report of idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis and review of the literature.

UNLABELLED: The diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis is an important aspect of gynecologic training and practice. Idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis (IJO) is a rare disease of children and adolescents that resolves after the onset of puberty. A case report is presented and current methods of diagnosis and treatment of IJO are discussed as well as the differential diagnosis. A MEDLINE search was performed of the following terms: idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, pediatric osteoporosis, adolescent osteoporosis, bisphosphonates pediatric adolescent, and pregnancy osteoporosis, and references from bibliographies of selected papers were used as well. All papers in English, French, and German are considered in this review. There were 114 papers selected as relevant to the topic. Data relevant to the diagnosis, pathogenesis, methods of imaging, laboratory evaluation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of IJO are presented. IJO is a diagnosis of exclusion in the pediatric and adolescent patient with osteoporosis. Although bone density gradually improves after the onset of puberty, treatment of currently affected children and adolescents involves activity restriction, calcium, vitamin D, and bisphosphonate therapy. Future reproductive concerns are discussed and areas requiring additional study are reviewed. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to describe the condition idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, compare the clinical features of this condition to other similar conditions, outline the diagnostic workup of a child with this condition, and list the potential therapeutic options for a patient with idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

What do men who are at risk of osteoporosis know about osteoporosis in developing countries? A pilot study in Isparta, Turkey.

The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge, health beliefs and the knowledge sources of osteoporosis in Turkish males who are at risk of secondary causes of osteoporosis. One hundred and sixty men who had one of the systemic diseases or drugs which negatively affects bone metabolism were included in the study. Patients were asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire which was modified from a validated questionnaire for Turkish female patients with osteoporosis. Twenty-two patients (15.7%) had never heard of a disease named osteoporosis. The mean score for general knowledge was 31.86 +/- 20.56 (over 100 points). Only 20 (16.9%) patients had received information from a doctor. Seventy-three (61.8%) of the patients stated that osteoporosis may be seen in men and only 42 (35.6%) patients were aware that they had a risk factor for osteoporosis. Most of the patients were unable to identify significant risk factors. Statistically significant positive correlation was found between KOS and patients' education levels (r = 0.453, p < 0.01). The findings in our study show that Turkish men who are at risk of osteoporosis do not have sufficient knowledge about osteoporosis and its consequences. We conclude that low education level of our patients accounts for poor osteoporosis knowledge.

Aged↗