SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Oxaliplatin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin alone versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Mayo Clinic regimen) in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of both oxaliplatin as a single agent and oxaliplatin in combination with dailyx5 bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (5-FU/FA, Mayo clinic regimen) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. 73 advanced CRC patients were randomised to receive either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks (35 patients), or the same treatment combined with 5-FU 425 mg/m(2)/day and FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks (38 patients). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had documented inoperable disease and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, objective response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2-24%) in the oxaliplatin arm, and 45% (95% CI 27-64%) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.4 months) in the oxaliplatin arm and 3.9 months (95% CI 2.9-5 months) in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. Severe neutropenia was seen in 23% of patients in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, and none in the oxaliplatin arm. There were two treatment-related deaths, both in the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm. In the oxaliplatin+5-FU/FA arm, severe diarrhoea, vomiting and stomatitis were seen in 34, 14 and 14% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, oxaliplatin at a dose of 85 mg/m(2) given every 2 weeks was well tolerated and has limited activity in metastatic CRC, while the combination of this treatment with the full-dose Mayo clinic regimen (5-FU bolus 425 mg/m(2)/day+FA 20 mg/m(2)/dayx5 days every 4 weeks), although active, was unfeasible due to a high level of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternative lower dosing or other regimens are to be explored to ascertain the value of bolus 5-FU/FA combined with oxaliplatin.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Prevention of oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity by calcium and magnesium infusions: a retrospective study of 161 patients receiving oxaliplatin combined with 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin is active in colorectal cancer. Sensory neurotoxicity is its dose-limiting toxicity. It may come from an effect on neuronal voltage-gated Na channels, via the liberation one its metabolite, oxalate. We decided to use Ca and Mg as oxalate chelators. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 161 patients treated with oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced colorectal cancer, with three regimens of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)/2w, 100/2w, 130/3w) was identified. Ninety-six patients received infusions of Ca gluconate and Mg sulfate (1 g) before and after oxaliplatin (Ca/Mg group) and 65 did not. RESULTS: Only 4% of patients withdrew for neurotoxicity in the Ca/Mg group versus 31% in the control group (P = 0.000003). The tumor response rate was similar in both groups. The percentage of patients with grade 3 distal paresthesia was lower in Ca/Mg group (7 versus 26%, P = 0.001). Acute symptoms such as distal and lingual paresthesia were much less frequent and severe (P = 10(-7)), and pseudolaryngospasm was never reported in Ca/Mg group. At the end of the treatment, 20% of patients in Ca/Mg group had neuropathy versus 45% (P = 0.003). Patients with grade 2 and 3 at the end of the treatment in the 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin group recovered significantly more rapidly from neuropathy than patients without Ca/Mg. CONCLUSIONS: Ca/Mg infusions seem to reduce incidence and intensity of acute oxaliplatin-induced symptoms and might delay cumulative neuropathy, especially in 85 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin dosage.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Phase II trial of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor and is able to reverse the resistance to irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of cetuximab combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in the treatment of patients with mCRC progressing under oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND TREATMENT: Forty patients with mCRC were treated with cetuximab (loading dose 400 mg/m(2) and then 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly) in combination with CAPOX (d(1): L-OHP 85 mg/m(2) and d(1-7) capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks). Thirty-one (77.5%) and nine (22.5%) patients had oxaliplatin-refractory and -resistant disease, respectively; in addition, 32 (80%) patients had also progressed on prior irinotecan-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four cycles were administered (median of four cycles per patient). Main toxic effects included grade 3-4 neutropenia (12.5%), grade 3/4 diarrhea (7.5%), grade 3 fatigue (2.5%), and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity (22.5%). One (2.5%) complete and seven (17.5%) partial responses were achieved [overall objective response rate (ORR): 20%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9% to 32%)], whereas 11 (27.5%) patients had stable disease [disease control rate (DCR): 47.5%; 95% CI: 30.2% to 64.5%]. The ORR and DCR were 18.7% and 46.8%, respectively, in patients with oxaliplatin-refractory disease. The median time to tumor progression was 3 months, the median survival 10.7 months and the probability of 1-year survival rate 53.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab plus CAPOX is safe and has a promising activity in patients with mCRC refractory or resistant to oxaliplatin.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and non-hematological toxicity in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with chronomodulated oxaliplatin, 5-FU and sodium folinate in a pilot investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze in a pilot study the association between the pharmacokinetics of chronomodulated administered oxaliplatin and non-hematological toxicity in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: 16 patients received a 4-day chemotherapeutic regimen consisting of a 12-h chronomodulated infusion of oxaliplatin (25 mg/m2) followed by a 12-h chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2) and sodium folinate (150 mg/m2) daily. Plasma pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin, measured as ultrafiltrable platinum, were determined. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics and non-hematological adverse events could be assessed in all patients included in the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed moderate interpatient variability. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting, but not diarrhea, was significantly associated with the pharmacokinetics of ultrafiltrable platinum. Thus, increased AUC values were observed in patients who experienced nausea or vomiting. No differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found between patients with and without oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity or the other selected non-hematological toxicities. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results in this pilot study suggest an association between pharmacokinetics of ultrafiltrable platinum and non-hematological toxicity such as nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, although the sample size is limited, systemic exposure to ultrafiltrable platinum appears to predict the risk of non-hematological toxicity in patients treated with chronomodulated oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU and FS.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) versus protracted 5-fluorouracil venous infusion plus oxaliplatin (pvifox) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a GOAM phase II randomised study (FOCA trial).

UNLABELLED: This phase II randomised trial compares oxaliplatin plus protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (pviFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). METHODS: From December 2001 to March 2005, 118 patients were randomised to arm A (pviFOX: pvi5-FU by a central venous catheter 250 mg/m2/daily d1-21+oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) (56 pts) or arm B (XELOX: capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14+oxaliplatin at the same schedule) (62 pts). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. Median number of complete cycles was six. The objective responses were: CR 1 (1.7%) and 3 (4.8%), PR 26 (46.4 %) and 24 (38.7%), SD 13 (23.2%) and 20 (32.3%), P 13(23.2%) and 10 (16.1%), not evaluable 3 (5.4%) and 5 (8.1 %) in arms A and B, respectively; the CR+PR rate was 48.2% (95% confidence limits 34.6%-61.9%) versus 43.5 % (31.0%-56.7%). Median TTP was 7 versus 9 months, respectively. About 50% of the patients with symptoms or low performance status at baseline experienced improvement without major differences between the two arms. G3-4 diarrhoea was observed in 14.0% versus 8.2%, G3 stomatitis in 3.7% versus 0, and G3 neurotoxicity in 18.5% versus 24.6% in arms A and B, respectively. Eight patients in arm A (14.8%) had venous line problems that obliged the temporary suspension (six cases) or stopping (two cases) of the 5-FU infusion. CONCLUSION: Both pviFOX and XELOX are effective and safe first-line treatments for patients with ACRC. By avoiding intravenous (i.v.) administration by a central catheter, XELOX is favoured in clinical practice.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Randomized multicenter phase II study comparing a combination of fluorouracil and folinic acid and alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in fluorouracil-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m(2) followed by a 400-mg/m(2) 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m(2) continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Phase II study of oxaliplatin versus oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil in hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, multicenter phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA) and oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil combination (OXFU) in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic, pathologically proven prostate carcinoma patients, progressing despite anti-androgen therapy, received intravenous OXA (130 mg/m(2 )over 2 h), alone or with 5-FU (1000 mg/m(2)/day, continuous intravenous infusion, days 1-4), every 3 weeks. OXA patients could receive OXFU after treatment failure. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (26 OXA, 28 OXFU) from nine centers received 269 treatment cycles (106 OXA, 163 OXFU; median 3.5 OXA or 5 OXFU cycles per patient; range 1-10 or 1-14, respectively). Patient characteristics were similar in both arms. Three partial responses (PR) occurred in 21 evaluable OXA patients [14%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 30%], and in five of 26 evaluable OXFU patients (19%; 95% CI 7% to 39%). Clinical benefit response (pain, performance status and weight changes) was assessed in 20 OXA and 22 OXFU symptomatic patients, with more responders in the OXFU arm (39% compared with 12%). Median time to progression in the OXA and OXFU arms was 2.6 and 3.4 months, and median overall survival was 9.4 and 11.4 months, respectively. Hematotoxicity was common, but mostly mild to moderate. Neutropenia was more common in OXFU than OXA patients. After oxaliplatin failure, 12 patients received 46 cycles of OXFU and one of 11 evaluable patients had a PR. CONCLUSION: The objective response rate, palliation benefit, survival and manageable toxicity obtained in this heavily pretreated HRPC population with OXFU merit further study.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone, oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-FU, and infusional 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II, open-label multicenter study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, histologically/cytologically proven pancreatic carcinoma with measurable disease, received OXA [130 mg/m2, 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] alone, OXA combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), or 5-FU alone, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (42 males/21 females) were treated: 17 patients/52 cycles OXA, 31 patients/ 175 cycles OXFU, 15 patients/41 cycles 5-FU, with a median of three, six and two cycles/patient, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in all arms. Median age was 57 years (range 21-75), and 83% of patients had PS 0-1. Most patients (62%) had moderate to well-differentiated tumors, 90% had metastatic disease, 81% with liver metastases. All responses (three partial responses; WHO) occurred in the OXFU arm (10% response rate). Five of 32 patients evaluable for clinical benefit were responders (OXA, 14%; OXFU, 21%). Median time to progression and overall survival were higher in the combination arm (4.2 and 9.0 months, respectively) than either single-agent arm (OXA, 2.0 and 3.4 months; 5-FU, 1.5 and 2.4 months, respectively). Moderate hematotoxicity without morbidity was seen in all arms. Two OXFU patients had grade 3 oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With a 10% response rate, median overall survival of 9 months and an encouraging safety profile, the OXFU combination is effective, appears superior to infusional 5-FU and warrants further studies in APC patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Oxaliplatin reintroduction in patients previously treated with leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOX, a bimonthly combination of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, is active in metastatic colorectal cancer, but sometimes causes cumulative sensory neurotoxicity. This retrospective study investigated FOLFOX reintroduction after a break in treatment or following disease progression on another regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FOLFOX was reintroduced in 29 patients. During their previous FOLFOX therapy, 24 had achieved a response, four were stable and one had progression. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 33 weeks. Grade 3 neuropathy developed in nine and grade 2 neuropathy in eight patients. RESULTS: Following FOLFOX reintroduction, six patients (21%) showed a response, 15 (52%) were stable and eight (28%) had progression. Median PFS was 18 weeks. Grade 3 neuropathy developed in four patients and grade 2 neuropathy in 11. Two patients with previous grade 3 neuropathy had no recurrence of neuropathy after eight and 18 cycles, respectively. Among 13 patients who received no treatment between periods of FOLFOX therapy, four (31%) had a response and eight (62%) had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin was feasible and achieved a response or stabilization in 73% of patients. These results support the concept of intensified, repeated short courses of FOLFOX, a strategy currently being evaluated prospectively in the OPTIMOX study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Expression of genes related to activity of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in endoscopic biopsies of primary esophageal cancer in patients receiving oxaliplatin, 5-flourouracil and radiation: characterization and exploratory analysis with survival.

With a goal of identifying relations between gene expression and response (mucosal or pathological) or survival in esophageal cancer patients (stages II to IV) receiving oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and radiation, we measured in endoscopic primary tumor biopsies from 38 patients, the expression of seven genes (gammaGCS, gammaGT, MRP-2, ERCC-1, XPA, TS and DPD) prior to treatment, 1 week following oxaliplatin alone and at the end of the combined radio-chemotherapy cycle using real time QRT-PCR. A higher pretreatment level of XPA was related to shorter survival with a hazard ratio of 2.43 (90% confidence interval 1.09 to 5.43) using Cox regression modeling. However, multivariate analysis with a Cox model indicated low expression of XPA or TS and combined stages II and III had a higher probability of survival (for XPA: hazard ratio 3.0 and 90% C.I. of 1.3 to 6.9, with adjustment for stage included; for TS: hazard ratio is 1.98 with 90% C.I. of 0.94 to 4.20. The expression of TS, gammaGCS, ERCC-1 and MRP-2 declined from D 1 to the end of the cycle (p<0.05, sign test). A validation and further understanding of the findings need to be carried out in a larger study with a more homogeneous population of patients.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Hepatic artery infusion using oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and mitomycin C: oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics and feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of systemic oxaliplatin (Oxa) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, nothing is presently known about the pharmacokinetics of Oxa administered via the hepatic artery and only very little about the feasibility and toxicity of Oxa used for hepatic artery infusion (HAI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We designed a phase II trial using Oxa in combination with 5-FU/FA and mitomycin C (MMC) for HAI treatment of patients with isolated non-resectable CRLM. Oxa (130 mg/m2) was delivered on day (d) 1 as a 120-min infusion followed by FA (140 mg/m2) for 10 min and 5-FU (480 mg/m2) for 120 min from d1 to d5 and MMC (7 mg/m2) for 30 min on d5 every 35 days. For Oxa pharmacokinetics, peripheral venous blood was collected before, during and after arterial infusion. Oxaliplatin was determined by liquid chromatography with post-column derivatization in blood ultra filtrate. RESULTS: A total of 33 HAI cycles were administered to 5 patients with tolerable toxicity, which mainly consisted of grade I and II nausea, vomiting, leucopenia, thrombopenia and abdominal pain. During 4 cycles nausea/vomiting III degree occurred, during 3 cycles diarrhoea and abdominal pain III degree. No neurotoxicity > or = II degree and no catheter occlusion was observed. Staging showed 4 PR and 1 PD. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed an AUC value of 85.3 micrograms x min/ml after HAI. Recalculating these values with the previously reported AUC value for systemic administration (161 micrograms x min/ml) revealed a liver extraction ratio of 0.47 for Oxa. CONCLUSION: We conclude from our results that Oxa in combination with 5-FU/FA and MMC may be a feasible protocol for HAI treatment without major toxicity, especially avoiding higher grade neurotoxicity. This is probably attributable to the low systemic bioavailability of Oxa.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Chronomodulated irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin-modulated 5-Fluorouracil as ambulatory salvage therapy in patients with irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and tolerability of salvage chronomodulated chemotherapy combining irinotecan (I), 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), and oxaliplatin (O) (chronoIFLO) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) and prior progression on four drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven nonhospitalized MCRC patients received chronoIFLO every 3 weeks, with day 1: I (180 mg/m2 over 6 hours, with peak infusion rate at 05:00) and days 2-5: 5-FU/LV (700/300 mg/m2 per day over 12 hours, with peak flow rate at 04:00), and O (20 mg/m2 per day over 12 hours, with peak flow rate at 16:00). Toxicity and response were assessed every 3 weeks and every 2 months, respectively. RESULTS. Three or more prior chemotherapy lines were given to 75% of the patients. Two or more organs had metastatic disease in 65% of the patients. A median number of six courses of chronoIFLO was given. The main grade 3-4 toxicities were diarrhea (39% of the patients, 9% of the courses) and neutropenia (30% of the patients and 7% of the courses). Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred in 14% of the patients. Two patients achieved a partial response and 61 had stable disease, resulting in disease control for 82% of the patients. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-6.0). The median overall survival time was 14.2 months (9.8-17.3). Baseline performance status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and CEA doubling time were independent prognostic factors of TTP. CONCLUSIONS: ChronoIFLO safely and durably halted tumor progression in most extensively pretreated MCRC patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Expression analysis of genes involved in oxaliplatin response and development of oxaliplatin-resistant HT29 colon cancer cells.

The interrelationship between platinum resistance and clinical response is not well established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the expression of 14 genes involved in platinum resistance in a colon cancer cell line (HT29) and its oxaliplatin (OXA)-resistant sublines. Resistant cells exhibited lower expression of many of these genes suggesting that several pathways may be implicated in OXA resistance. Particularly, OXA resistance is accompanied by defects in drug uptake (downregulation of the hCTR1 transporter) and enhanced DNA repair (upregulation of the XPD gene). Our data also confirmed that copper transporters and chaperones are involved in OXA resistance in colorectal cancer cells as evidenced by the overexpression of ATP7A and CCS in response to OXA exposure. Moreover, increased CCS expression suggests a role for SOD1 in OXA detoxification. Whereas exposure to OXA in HT29 induced significant changes in expression of many of the genes analyzed, only ATP7A, XPD and SRPK1 gene expression was increased in OXA-treated HTOXAR3 resistant cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report of implicating SRPK1 in OXA resistance. This study provides the basis for further evaluation of these putative markers of OXA response and resistance in colorectal cancer patients who are candidates for treatment with OXA.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed2004