PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PERPHENAZINE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Time-related changes in serum perphenazine, striatal 3H-spiperone binding and regional brain acid metabolites of dopamine and 5-hydroxy-tryptamine after a single dose of perphenazine.

A single dose of perphenazine (5.0 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to male Wistar rats. The time-related alterations in serum levels of perphenazine, striatal 3H-spiperone binding ex vivo and the regional brain metabolism of dopamine and 5-hydroxy-tryptamine were studied. Low serum levels of perphenazine were observed together with increased Kd of 3H-spiperone. No significant changes in Bmax were observed. Since Kd of 3H-spiperone binding peaked several hours after the maximal serum levels of perphenazine, perphenazine in serum appeared not to directly reflect the events at the receptor level. The concentrations of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and 3-methoxy, 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (HVA) in the striatum were increased after perphenazine. They were maximal 1-3 h after the drug administration and showed positive correlations (correlation coefficient 0.93 and 0.80, respectively) with the serum levels of perphenazine. Increased levels of HVA were also observed both in the olfactory tubercle and in the frontal cortex. However, in the olfactory tubercle, administration of perphenazine did not significantly increase the DOPAC concentrations. In the olfactory tubercle 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) was decreased 1-24 h after administration of perphenazine. In the striatum and in the frontal cortex only slight changes in 5-HIAA were seen. Thus, in the olfactory tubercle 5-hydroxytryptaminergic mechanisms could modulate the dopaminergic neurotransmission.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗
PubMed1979

Gas chromatographic determination of amitriptyline, nortriptyline and perphenazine in plasma of schizophrenic patients after administration of the combination of amitriptyline with perphenazine.

A specific and sensitive gas-chromatographic technique using a common extraction procedure for the quantitative determination of amitriptyline, endogenous nortriptyline and perphenazine in plasma of schizophrenic patients receiving therapeutic doses of a combination of amitriptyline and perphenazine (Etrafon) has been developed. The lower limits of detection are 20 ng/ml for amitriptyline, 1 ng/ml for nortriptyline and 5 ng/ml for perphenazine. Amitriptyline is estimated with a flame ionization detector. Nortriptyline is quantitated using an electron capture detector after converting it to its heptafluorobutyryl derivative by reaction with the appropriate anhydride. Perphenazine is also determined using an electron capture detector after forming its stable, trimethylsilyl derivative by reaction with N,O-bis-(trimethylsilyl)-acetamide. In individual patients, the steady-state plasma levels ranged from 44 to 215 ng/ml for amitriptyline, from 49 to 270 ng/ml for nortriptyline and from less than 5 to 20 ng/ml for perphenazine. Steady-state plasma levels data on amitriptyline, nortriptyline and perphenazine in 23 patients treated with Etrafon are presented.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Perphenazine decanoate vs. perphenazine enanthate: efficacy and side effects in a 6 week double-blind, comparative study of 50 drug monitored psychotic patients.

In a six-week randomized, double-blind study the efficacy and side effects of perphenazine decanoate (PD) and perphenazine enanthate (PE) were evaluated and compared in 26 and 24 acute psychotic patients respectively. Of either formulation 100 mg were administered intramuscularly every two weeks. Maximum and minimum plasma concentrations of perphenazine were measured for each injection period using gas liquid chromatography. There was no statistically significant difference between PD and PE in terms of overall antipsychotic efficacy, assessed by means of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). However, when an 'Amelioration Score' (AMS) of at least 50% of the totally obtainable scores was defined as individual response criterion it was revealed that the PD group only one patient (4%) did not meet this criterion, compared with six patients (25%) in the PE group. Extrapyramidal side effects were significantly more pronounced in the PE-treated patients, who also required significantly higher amounts of antiparkinson medication. The mean maximum concentration of perphenazine in plasma was 5.0 nmol/l in the PD, and 10.6 nmol/l in the PE-treated patients. The ratio of the mean maximum to the mean minimum concentration was 1.41 and 4.02 in the decanoate and enanthate groups respectively. In the patients treated with PD there were signs of accumulation indicating the possibility of prolonging dosage intervals. The present study yielded further support to previous findings demonstrating that intramuscular administration of PD dissolved in sesame oil, in contrast to PE, results in even and flat plasma perphenazine concentration curves, which not only provides a stable antipsychotic effect but also most likely carry the responsibility for the low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Perphenazine decanoate in sesame oil vs. perphenazine enanthate in sesame oil: a comparative study of pharmacokinetic properties and some clinical implications.

Ten schizophrenic inpatients were each treated with perphenazine enanthate (PE) and perphenazine decanoate (PD). Following a cross-over study design it was possible to evaluate differences in plasma profiles between the two preparations, and to relate these to encountered side effects. All patients had previously been receiving neuroleptic treatment and had been diagnosed according to DSM-III. The dosage and intervals between injections were on an individual basis. The results indicate that at all dosage levels, the decanoate preparation showed significantly lower peak plasma concentrations of perphenazine. Extrapyramidal side effects and sedation were also less pronounced after the administration of PD. The more even and flat plasma concentrations obtained with PD, may facilitate plasma monitored therapy by using minimum concentration values.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Paroxetine potentiates the central nervous system side effects of perphenazine: contribution of cytochrome P4502D6 inhibition in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Paroxetine is a frequently used antidepressant and a potent inhibitor of the CYP2D6 isozyme in vitro (inhibition constant [Ki] = 0.15 micromol/L). Most classic antipsychotic agents such as perphenazine are metabolized by the CYP2D6 isozyme and are often coadministered with antidepressant agents. This study assessed the extent of changes in CYP2D6 isozyme activity in vivo after pretreatment with paroxetine and its consequences on perphenazine kinetics and central nervous system effects. METHODS: Eight extensive metabolizers for CYP2D6 were administered a single dose of perphenazine (0.11 mg/kg orally) or placebo following a randomized double-blind design. Perphenazine plasma concentrations and effects were assessed for a period of 8 hours. Subsequently, subjects were treated with a standard therapeutic dose of paroxetine (20 mg/day orally) for 10 days and test sessions with perphenazine and placebo were repeated. RESULTS: Paroxetine treatment resulted in a twofold to 21-fold decrease in CYP2D6 activity (p < 0.001). After pretreatment with paroxetine, perphenazine peak plasma concentrations increased twofold to 13-fold (p < 0.01). This was associated with a significant increase in central nervous system side effects of perphenazine, including oversedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, and impairment of psychomotor performance and memory (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Coadministration of perphenazine after pretreatment with a standard therapeutic dose of paroxetine increased the plasma concentration and central nervous system side effects of perphenazine, primarily as a result of inhibition of the CYP2D6 isozyme. In patients who are at steady state with paroxetine, a reduction of perphenazine dose may be required to prevent central nervous system side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacologic profile of perphenazine's metabolites.

The authors have previously reported that in elderly patients treated with low doses of perphenazine, few extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) developed in those who were not poor CYP2D6 metabolizers. The authors hypothesized that this atypical side effect profile is due to perphenazine's principal metabolite, n-dealkylperphenazine (DAPZ), which is usually present in vivo at concentrations 1.5 to 2 times that of the parent drug. Perphenazine, DAPZ, and 7-hydroxyperphenazine affinities were examined in vitro by competition-binding analysis to isolated human receptors expressed in transfected cell lines. Perphenazine and metabolite effects were examined in vivo in 54 older patients who were treated with perphenazine, at a target dose of 0.1 mg/kg, for 10 to 17 days. Drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. In in vitro binding studies, DAPZ demonstrated a higher affinity for serotonin-2A receptors than for dopamine-2 receptors to an extent comparable to that of some atypical neuroleptic agents. In contrast, perphenazine and 7-hydroxyperphenazine demonstrated a higher affinity for dopamine-2 receptors than for serotonin-2A receptors. The mean +/- SD concentrations in the 54 subjects were the following: perphenazine, 1.5 +/- 1.4 ng/mL; DAPZ, 2.0 +/-1.6 ng/mL; and 7-hydroxyperphenazine, 0.8 +/- 1.9 ng/mL. The mean +/- SD quotient for the DAPZ/perphenazine concentration was 1.7 +/- 1.1 and for the 7-hydroxyperphenazine/perphenazine was 0.54 +/-1.6. EPS onset was not correlated with the perphenazine concentration, the metabolite concentrations, the DAPZ/perphenazine quotient, or the 7-hydroxyperphenazine/perphenazine quotient. Despite a moderately atypical receptor-binding profile, DAPZ does not seem to moderate perphenazine effects in vivo in older patients. This outcome likely reflects the low potency of DAPZ for dopamine-2 and serotonin-2A receptors relative to the potency of perphenazine for these receptors. Further exploration of atypical properties of DAPZ should include de novo administration of this metabolite in animal models.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Anti-psychotic drugs are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to extensive use of depots as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Perphenazine decanoate and enanthate are depot antipsychotics that belong to the phenothiazine family and have a piperazine ethanol side chain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate versus placebo, oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) were searched. References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies and industry contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Peto odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. MAIN RESULTS: One study of six months duration, compared perphenazine enanthate to clopenthixol decanoate. There was no differences between the two for outcomes of global improvement, relapse and leaving the study early. More people in the perphenazine enanthate group required anticholinergic drugs than those allocated to clopenthixol decanoate (OR 3.6 CI 1.2-10, NNT 10). A single study (n=64, duration six weeks) compared perphenazine enanthate and its longer acting decanoate ester. Data on relapse and leaving the study early failed to show convincing differences. The enanthate group, however, experienced more movement disorders (OR 0.2 CI 0.06-0.7) than those allocated the decanoate ester of the same drug (NNT 4.0) and required more anticholinergic drugs (OR 0.2 CI 0.08-0.7, NNT 3.7). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Depot perphenazine is in clinical use in the Nordic countries, Belgium, Portugal and the Netherlands. At a conservative estimate a quarter of a million people suffer from schizophrenia in those countries and could be treated with depot perphenazine. The total number of participants in the two trials with useful data is 236. Neither study observes the effect of oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs. Until well conducted and reported randomised trials are undertaken clinicians will be in doubt as to the effects of perphenazine depots and people with schizophrenia should exercise their own judgement or ask to be randomised.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Safety and efficacy of olanzapine versus perphenazine in patients with schizophrenia: results of multicenter, 18-week, double-blind clinical trial].

AIM: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms during treatment with olanzapine (10-20 mg) versus perphenazine (8-40 mg) using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS). The secondary objective was to assess the safety profile and clinical efficacy of the investigated drugs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 95 patients with schizophrenia who met the criteria for DSM-IV were randomized to a double-blind, 18 week prospective comparative trail conducted in Poland. The tolerance of treatment was assessed with the use of scales: BAS, SAS and UKU. The efficacy of treatment was evaluated with BPRS, PANSS and CGOI scales. RESULTS: For olanzapine patients, the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms improved after 3 first weeks of treatment, and significantly decreased from the baseline to endpoint. Perphenazine patients showed an increase of extrapyramidal symptoms. The difference of the SAS scores change was statistically significant between olanzapine and perphenazine groups. Akathisia symptoms decreased significantly in the olanzapine group during the treatment period, whereas symptoms of akathisia increased in the perphenazine group. Statistically significant differences of mean change of BAS total score from baseline to endpoint were noted between treatment groups Treatment--emergent adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving perphenazine (46%), than in patients receiving olanzapine (17%). The proportion of patients complying with improvement criteria for CGI scale score was statistically greater in the olanzapine group (72.7%) than in the perphenazine group (47.9%). Results of this study showed that the tolerance profile in patients taking olanzapine is superior to perphenazine. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine was better tolerated than perphenazine. After olanzapine treatment more subjects fulfilled the criterion of improvement and schizophrenic symptoms were less severe than in patients treated with perphenazine.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed1990

The relationship between blood perphenazine levels, early resolution of psychotic symptoms, and side effects.

Serum perphenazine concentrations and early resolution of psychosis were examined to determine if blood level monitoring could be used to maximize drug efficacy while limiting extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). Sixty-six acutely psychotic inpatients were given perphenazine 0.5 mg/kg/day for 10 days, and their response was rated blind to blood level. Although 36 of 66 patients showed resolution of psychosis, neither perphenazine nor N-dealkylated perphenazine levels were related to global response or to Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) totals. Improvement in two individual BPRS items (hallucinations and conceptual disorganization) was related to serum perphenazine levels and suggestive of a lower therapeutic threshold of 0.8 ng/mL. Perphenazine level was not correlated with EPS; but benztropine, given only if required for serious EPS, was more likely to be used when perphenazine levels were elevated. The data suggest that higher perphenazine levels were no more effective than moderate levels but that higher levels may be associated with increased EPS; the data also suggest that individual symptoms rather than global response were associated with a lower therapeutic perphenazine threshold.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Effects of ADP on different inhibitory properties of brain glutamate dehydrogenase isoproteins by perphenazine.

Incubation of glutamate dehydrogenase isoproteins (GDH I and GDH II) from bovine brains with perphenazine resulted in a time-dependent loss of enzyme activity. 2-Oxoglutarate and NADH, separately or together, gave partial but not complete protection against the inhibition. Although there were no detectable differences between GDH I and GDH II in inhibition by perphenazine in the absence of ADP, the sensitivities to the inhibition by the drug were significantly distinct for the two isoproteins in the presence of ADP. Low concentrations of ADP (0.05-0.20 mM) did not interfere with the inhibition of GDH I and GDH II by perphenazine. However, in the presence of high concentrations of ADP (0.5-1.0 mM), inhibitory effects of perphenazine on GDH isoproteins were significantly diminished as determined by enzyme kinetics and quantitative affinity chromatography on perphenazine-Sepharose. GDH I was more sensitively reacted with ADP than GDH II on the inhibition by perphenazine. Since physiological ADP levels can vary from 0.05 to > 1.0 mM depending on the rate of oxidative phosphorylation, our results suggest a possibility that two types of GDHs are differently regulated by the antipsychotic actions of perphenazine depending on the physiological concentrations of ADP. GTP and L-leucine, other well-known allosteric regulators, did not affect the inhibitory actions of perphenazine on bovine brain GDH isoproteins.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗
PubMed1986

Prolactin and blood pressure responses to perphenazine in human subjects: comparison of the oral and intramuscular routes.

Although several phenothiazines are known to stimulate prolactin (PRL) secretion, only chlorpromazine is in general use for this purpose in humans. However, chlorpromazine has severe sedative and hypotensive effects. Therefore, the effects of perphenazine on human PRL release and on blood pressure were evaluated. Perphenazine was administered orally (8mg) and intramuscularly (5mg and 2mg) to determine the optimal route and dose for evaluating PRL release. The postural hypotensive effect of perphenazine was evaluated with the 2mg intramuscular (IM) dose. The mean time of peak PRL response (hr +/- SD) was significantly shorter (p less than 0.05) for the 5mg IM (1.7 +/- 0.4) than the oral (4.5 +/- 0.6) route. Also, the mean ratio of peak/baseline PRL was significantly greater for the 5mg IM (8.87 +/- 5.69) than the oral (5.12 +/- 2.90) route. The major side-effect produced by perphenazine was drowsiness, which was moderate to severe with the 5mg IM dose. A lower IM dose (2 mg) retained PRL releasing activity, reduced drowsiness, and did not produce hypotension. For clinical testing, intramuscular perphenazine is preferred over oral perphenazine because of the shorter latency period and the higher PRL levels. Intramuscular perphenazine (2 mg) is preferred to chlorpromazine since it did not produce a clinically significant hypotensive effect. This is the first report on the dynamic responses of PRL and blood pressure to intramuscular perphenazine in humans.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

The effects of perphenazine on the concentration of nortriptyline and its hydroxymetabolites in older patients.

Twenty-five older patients who presented with psychotic depression were treated with a combination of nortriptyline and perphenazine. Plasma levels of nortriptyline, E-, and Z-10-OH nortriptyline (E- and Z-10-OH-NT) were measured before and after addition of perphenazine. The mean (+/-SD) initial nortriptyline dose was 59 +/- 24 mg/day, whereas the mean final nortriptyline and perphenazine doses were 56 +/- 24 and 19 +/- 13 mg/day, respectively. The mean plasma level to dose quotient for perphenazine (0.45 +/- 0.34 nM/mg/day) was comparable to the mean quotient reported previously in older psychotic patients treated with perphenazine alone. After addition of perphenazine, the median quotient of nortriptyline plasma level to nortriptyline dose (L/D) increased significantly (from 6.1 to 8.6). This change was inversely correlated with baseline nortriptyline L/D. The median ratio of E-10-OH-NT to nortriptyline plasma level decreased significantly (from 1.6 to 1.3), whereas the median ratio of Z-10-OH-NT to nortriptyline plasma level did not change significantly. These results are consistent with the known inhibition by perphenazine of the cytochrome P450 2D6 (sparteine/debrisoquine hydroxylase), the major enzyme involved in the oxidative metabolism of nortriptyline, mostly through the formation of E-10-OH-NT. This complex alteration in the metabolism of nortriptyline induced by perphenazine emphasizes the relevance of measuring plasma levels not only of nortriptyline but also of its hydroxymetabolites in older patients who are more likely to be sensitive to their differing cardiovascular, anticholinergic, and cognitive effects.

Aged↗
PubMed1977

Effect of simultaneous treatment with low doses of perphenazine on plasma and urine concentrations of nortriptyline and 10-hydroxynortriptyline.

Plasma levels of nortriptyline and perphenazine were measured in six patients on continuous nortriptyline treatment before, during and after oral administration of perphenazine 4 mg t.i.d. In four patients the plasma levels of the conjugated and unconjugated principal metabolite 10-hydroxynortriptyline were also measured. Urinary excretion of conjugated and unconjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline and plasma levels of perphenazine were determined in all six patients. During treatment with perphenazine two patients showed a slight increase in the plasma level of nortriptyline. The changes in metabolite excretion rate were inconclusive. Thus, there did not appear to be any important pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs at the doses used, which were normal therapeutic doses. The previously reported inhibitory effect of perphenazine on the metabolism of nortriptyline probably depended therefore, either on administration of a higher dose of perphenazine, or on treatment in the reverse sequence--a single dose of nortriptyline was given to patients already receiving perphenazine.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prophylaxis for vomiting by children after tonsillectomy: dexamethasone versus perphenazine.

UNLABELLED: The effects of dexamethasone and perphenazine on vomiting after tonsillectomy in children were compared in 226 healthy children aged 2-12 yr. The study was randomized, stratified, blocked, and double-blind. Anesthesia was induced intravenously (I.V.) with propofol or by inhalation with halothane and N2O. Dexamethasone 150 microg/kg or perphenazine 70 microg/kg was administered I.V. after the induction of anesthesia in a double-blind fashion. Perioperative management of emesis, pain, fluids, and patient discharge was all standardized. The groups had similar demographic characteristics. Perphenazine significantly reduced the incidence of in-hospital vomiting compared with dexamethasone (13% vs 36%, P < 0.001). The incidence of out-of-hospital vomiting was almost identical. Overall, the incidence was significantly different for perphenazine vs dexamethasone (33% vs 46%, P = 0.04) using logistic regression analysis. Of note, sex and induction technique were significant predictors of postoperative vomiting (P < 0.05) using logistic regression analysis, with male patients and those patients undergoing I.V. induction vomiting less. In conclusion, perphenazine more effectively decreases vomiting by children after tonsillectomy in an ambulatory hospital setting compared with dexamethasone. IMPLICATIONS: Postoperative vomiting can have many debilitating effects, and children undergoing tonsillectomy are at particular risk. We compared the effects of dexamethasone and perphenazine on vomiting after tonsillectomy in 266 children. We found perphenazine more effective than dexamethasone before discharge from hospital but that the two drugs have similar effects after discharge.

Anesthesia↗