PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PRAME”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Targeting PRAME directly or via EZH2 inhibition overcomes retinoid resistance and represents a novel therapy for keratinocyte carcinoma.

Retinoids have demonstrated efficacy as preventative/treatment agents for keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs): basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, retinoid resistance mechanisms limit the efficacy of these compounds. A subset of KCs expresses Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME): a retinoid signaling corepressor. PRAME is proposed to repress retinoid signaling by guiding enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) to retinoic acid response elements (RARE) in promoters. We investigated the effects of PRAME on KC pathogenesis and retinoid response. High-PRAME expression in tumors was negatively correlated with epidermal differentiation gene signatures. PRAME overexpression downregulated epidermal differentiation gene signatures and impaired differentiation in 3D culture. PRAME overexpression attenuated retinoid-induced RARE activation, growth suppression, and differentiation responses. Conversely, low-PRAME tumors and PRAME-depleted KC cells demonstrated enriched epidermal differentiation gene signatures. PRAME downregulation restored retinoid-induced RARE activation, growth suppression, keratinization in SCC, and cell death signaling in BCC. Furthermore, combined retinoid and EZH2 inhibitor treatment augmented RARE activation and suppressed PRAME-expressing KC cell growth. Hence, PRAME confers retinoid resistance in KC, which may be overcome by EZH2 inhibition.

Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein↗
PubMed2025

Clinicopathologic and genomic analyses of SMARCA4-mutated non-small cell lung carcinoma implicate the needs for tailored treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathologic and therapeutic significance of SMARCA4 mutation in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains unclear. METHODS: We retrieved 575 NSCLC cases from the clinical target sequencing cohort (N = 2157) to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics of groups subclassified based on the presence of truncated or non-truncated SMARCA4 mutations (SMARCA4-truncated, SMARCA4-non-truncated, and SMARCA4-wild type [WT]). The differences in gene expression profiles between these groups were evaluated using the TCGA-LUAD dataset. RESULTS: Fifty (2.3%) SMARCA4-truncated and 63 (2.9%) SMARCA4-non-truncated NSCLCs were identified. The majority of SMARCA4-truncated NSCLCs were present in male smokers (94.0%) and pathologically diagnosed as adenocarcinoma (76.0%). The SMARCA4-truncated group showed rare targetable driver alterations with a higher tumor mutation burden than the SMARCA4-WT group. Gene expression profile analysis revealed that cancer/testis antigen (CTA) expression was enriched in the SMARCA4-truncated group, with up to 57% of the cases displaying immunoreactivities for MAGEA4, CT45A, and/or PRAME. The SMARCA4-non-truncated group showed heterogeneous clinicopathologic, genomic, and immunohistochemical features that fell between SMARCA4-truncated and WT groups. Both SMARCA4-truncated and non-truncated groups showed significantly poor prognosis with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy, yet there was no significant difference in survival following immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: SMARCA4-truncated NSCLC represents a variant of driver-negative NSCLC, mainly occurring in male smokers with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma histology. In contrast, SMARCA4-non-truncated NSCLC indicates a heterogeneous subpopulation, exhibiting intermediate characteristics between the SMARCA4-truncated and SMARCA4-WT groups. While showing poor response to pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy, increased CTA expression could be a novel therapeutic target in SMARCA4-mutated NSCLCs.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Histopathologic, Genomic, and Clinical Characteristics of Primary Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors With Concomitant NRAS Q61 and IDH1 R132C Mutations.

Cutaneous melanocytic tumors with concomitant NRAS Q61 and IDH1 R132C mutations have been described as intermediate-grade melanocytomas with characteristic biphasic morphology, but the malignant end of this genotype-defined spectrum remains poorly characterized. We assessed histopathologic, immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical features of 16 primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors harboring both mutations. Following integrated review, 7 tumors were classified as melanocytoma and 9 as melanoma. Melanocytomas showed reproducible biphasic architecture with congenital nevus-like features, a biphasic HMB-45 pattern, low Ki-67, PRAME negativity, retained p16, and minimal copy number variations (CNVs). Melanomas retained partial morphologic overlap in a subset but were distinguished by higher-grade cytology, immunohistochemical features supportive of malignancy, and progression-associated genomic alterations, including TERT promoter mutation (9/9), 9p21/CDKN2A loss (4/7), and higher CNV burden. NRAS and IDH1 variant allele frequencies were strongly concordant (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), supporting their presence in the same dominant clone. Clinically, two patients presented with stage IIIB disease, but no distant metastasis or melanoma-related death occurred during a median melanoma follow-up of 3.9 years (IQR, 2.5-5.1). In exploratory analyses, moderate-to-severe atypia (RR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.0-38.8; P = .009), Ki-67 &#x2265;10% (RR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.1-18.4; P = .003), lymphocytic infiltrate (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3; P = .03), absence of the typical biphasic pattern (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3; P = .03), and complete p16 loss (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3; P = .03) were associated with molecular or clinical progression to melanoma, defined as the presence of at least one of the following: TERT promoter mutation, pathogenic CDKN2A mutation, 9p21/CDKN2A loss, &#x2265;3 genome-wide segmental CNVs, or any metastasis. These findings support the existence of NRAS/IDH1 co-mutated melanoma as the malignant counterpart of NRAS/IDH1-mutated melanocytoma within a single genotype-defined spectrum.

IDH1 mutations↗
PubMed2026

Integrated Immunotherapy Target Atlas for Ewing Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Ewing sarcoma is a fusion-driven malignancy with low tumor mutational burden, making recurrent tumor-associated antigens with favorable tumor-to-normal contrast central to immunotherapy development. We converted the Deng et al.-defined 32-gene Ewing Sarcoma Specific Signature (ESS32) into a practical target atlas by integrating tumor RNA expression with normal-tissue context, protein evidence, subcellular localization, and therapeutic accessibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 38-gene set was analyzed, including ESS32 and six comparator antigens (STEAP1, LINGO1, PRAME, CD99, CD276/B7-H3, and ENPP1). Eight Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (n=854 samples) were assigned predefined roles spanning tumor-versus-skeletal-muscle comparison, broad normal-organ context, EWSR1::FLI1 perturbation, tumor-only support cohorts, cell-line models, and cross-sarcoma comparison. Results were overlaid with Human Protein Atlas and published proteomic/surfaceome evidence. RESULTS: In GSE17674, the strongest tumor-enriched transcripts included NKX2-2, NPY1R, STEAP1, RBM11, RNF182, LIPI, CD99, STEAP2, LOXHD1, and DCDC2. Normal-tissue and compartment data substantially reordered RNA-only ranking. NKX2-2 showed the strongest Ewing-associated signal but encodes a nuclear transcription factor, favoring peptide-HLA/T-cell receptor (TCR) or vaccine development. RBM11 and LIPI emerged as high-interest intracellular/secretome-associated candidates, with an explicit epididymal/male reproductive caveat for LIPI. CD99 and NPY1R illustrated normal-cell reservoir and receptor-distribution constraints. CONCLUSION: ESS32 should be interpreted as an EWSR1::FLI1-associated RNA discovery set, not as a pre-validated target panel. Practical nomination requires integration of RNA enrichment, normal-tissue distribution, protein evidence, cellular compartment, and modality compatibility before nomination of TCR, vaccine, antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), radioligand, or validation-first candidates.

Humans↗