SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PRR agonists”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Prophylactic Inhaled Pattern Recognition Receptor Agonists Reprogram Lung Epithelial Response and Prevent Type 2 Allergic Inflammation.

Prophylactic inhalation of the synergistic agents ODN M362 and Pam2CSK4 ("Pam2ODN") protects mice against allergic lung disease, including allergic inflammation caused by house dust mite (HDM). By preventing sensitization, Pam2ODN reduces HDM-induced eosinophilic and lymphocytic inflammation. How Pam2ODN affects interactions among lung epithelial cells, dendritic cells, and T cells to prevent eosinophilic lung inflammation remains unclear. In the present study, we show that a single inhaled dose of Pam2ODN before HDM sensitization reduces airway Th2 polarization without affecting Th1 or Treg responses. Furthermore, Pam2ODN pretreatment inhibits the recruitment of lung monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) and conventional Type 2 dendritic cells (DC2s), while preventing the HDM-induced decrease in conventional Type 1 dendritic cells (DC1s). Bulk RNA-seq of the whole lung reveals that Pam2ODN pretreatment restricts the expression of proinflammatory transcripts induced by HDM sensitization. This tolerogenic effect is also reflected at the single-cell level in lung epithelial cells, where proinflammatory transcripts, pathways, and chromatin accessibility are inhibited. These results indicate that Pam2ODN reprograms lung epithelial cells to attenuate allergen-induced Th2-promoting cytokines and DCs while maintaining the population of protective DC1s. These findings suggest a strategy to mitigate chronic allergic lung diseases.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of therapeutic gain with therapeutic ratio for the assessment of selective 5HT(1B/1D) agonist efficacy in migraine.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of use of therapeutic gain (TG) and therapeutic ratio (TR) for relative assessments of selective 5HT(1B/1D) agonist efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. BACKGROUND: Comparison of selective 5HT(1B/1D) agonist efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine is complicated by the impracticality of conducting high-quality head-to-head active comparator trials for all permutations of drug, dose, and route of administration; the clinical trials that are available are usually noncontemporaneous, and have fluctuating active and placebo response rates (ARR and PRR, respectively) for the necessarily subjective endpoints. The standard primary endpoint is conversion of headache score 2 (moderate pain) or score 3 (severe pain) into score 0 (no pain) or score 1 (mild pain) at a single timepoint (usually 2 or 4 hours postdose). Two principal methods have been used for comparison of ARR between studies: TG = ARR - PRR and TR = ARR/PRR. Secondary endpoints can be treated in the same way, although the 24-hour remedication rate is the only secondary endpoint that is subject to regulatory authority standardization. Does either TG or TR have an advantage over the other? METHODS: Efficacy data were collected from published sources and included pain score conversion at 2- and 4-hour, as well as 24-hour remedication rates. TG and TR were calculated for each endpoint, as shown above. The ranges of these variables were found from all observed measures. Correlations between TG and TR were found using least squares methods. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for TG and TR were then found for all clinical trials, and for the whole range of observed PRR. RESULTS: Values for TR and TG generally were well correlated for pain score conversion at 2 hours postdose (n = 51 clinical trials). Deviations from this correlation were greatest for drugs that were evidently very efficacious. When standardized for the observed ranges of PRR and ARR, the 95% CI for TR were narrower than for TG. A subset of these studies also reported 4-hour data (n = 23 clinical trials), but the correlation between TR and TG was again good, with narrower 95% CI for TR than TG. For the 24-hour remedication data (n = 18 trials), PRR was less variable; TR and TG again correlated well, but there was little difference in their relative 95% CI. CONCLUSIONS: For comparison of drugs in noncontemporaneous studies, when PRR fluctuates, relative ranges for TR are narrower than for TG. For assessing single clinical trial results (ie, point estimates of efficacy) TR will generally be relatively nearer to its mean than TG. For both these reasons, TR is a more robust statistic than TG.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2021

Viral infection of cells within the tumor microenvironment mediates antitumor immunotherapy via selective TBK1-IRF3 signaling.

Activating intra-tumor innate immunity might enhance tumor immune surveillance. Virotherapy is proposed to achieve tumor cell killing, while indirectly activating innate immunity. Here, we report that recombinant poliovirus therapy primarily mediates antitumor immunotherapy via direct infection of non-malignant tumor microenvironment (TME) cells, independent of malignant cell lysis. Relative to other innate immune agonists, virotherapy provokes selective, TBK1-IRF3 driven innate inflammation that is associated with sustained type-I/III interferon (IFN) release. Despite priming equivalent antitumor T cell quantities, MDA5-orchestrated TBK1-IRF3 signaling, but not NFκB-polarized TLR activation, culminates in polyfunctional and Th1-differentiated antitumor T cell phenotypes. Recombinant type-I IFN increases tumor-localized T cell function, but does not mediate durable antitumor immunotherapy without concomitant pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signaling. Thus, virus-induced MDA5-TBK1-IRF3 signaling in the TME provides PRR-contextualized IFN responses that elicit functional antitumor T cell immunity. TBK1-IRF3 innate signal transduction stimulates eventual function and differentiation of tumor-infiltrating T cells.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Proteinase activated receptor 2: Role of extracellular loop 2 for ligand-mediated activation.

1. Rat proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) variants were stably expressed in rat KNRK cells: (a) wild-type (wt) - PAR2; (b) PAR2PRR, with the extracellular loop 2 (EL-2) sequence P231E232E233mutated to PRR and (c) PAR2NET, with the EL-2 sequence, PEEV changed to NETL. Cell lines were evaluated for their sensitivity (calcium signalling) towards trypsin and the receptor-activating peptides, SLIGRL-NH2, SLIGEL-NH2, trans-cinnamoyl(tc)-LIGRLO-NH2, and SFLLR-NH2. 2. SLIGEL-NH2 exhibited low potency (1 : 200 relative to SLIGRL-NH2) in wild-type PAR2. Its activity was increased 5 fold in PAR2PRR, but it was inactive in PAR2NET. 3. In PAR2PRR, the potencies of SLIGRL-NH2, tc-LIGRLO-NH2, and SFLLR-NH2 were decreased by 80 - 100 fold. But, the potency of trypsin was decreased by only 7 fold. 4. In PAR2NET, highly homologous in EL-2 with proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), the potency of the PAR1-derived peptide, SFLLR-NH2, was reduced by 100 fold compared with wt-PAR2, whereas the potency of the PAR2-derived AP, SLIGRL-NH2 was reduced 10 fold. In contrast, the potency of trypsin in PAR2NET was almost the same as in wt-PAR2. 5. We conclude that the acidic EL-2 tripeptide, PEE, in PAR2 plays an important role in governing agonist activity. 6. The data obtained with the PEEV-->NETL mutation suggested: (a) that SLIGRL-NH2 and SFLLR-NH2 interact in a distinct manner with PAR2 and (b) that SFLLR-NH2 may interact differently with PAR2 than it does with PAR1. 7 The differential reductions in the potencies of SLIGRL-NH2, compared with trypsin in the PAR2PRR and PAR2NET cell lines point to differences between the interactions of the trypsin-revealed tethered ligand and the free receptor-activating peptide with PAR2.

Amino Acid Sequence↗