PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pain Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Topology of EEG coherence changes may reflect differential neural network activation in cold and pain perception.

Pain perception in the brain can be analyzed by neuroimaging (PET, fMRI) and electrophysiological parameter mapping (EEG, ERP/MEG, MEF). These studies have generally been focused on the localization of cerebral activation. Whether pain can be conceptualized as localized function or best be understood by distributed function is important to the theory of human pain processing in the brain. Here, we report that cold and pain perception in the brain is characterized by webs of EEG coherence changes which may reflect coupling or de-coupling of different cortical areas during cold and pain processing. EEG was recorded during cold and pain perception (right hand immersion in 15 degrees C cool-water vs. 0.3 degrees C ice-water for 3 min.) with eyes opened. Subjects rated the cold perception at 2.3 (cool to cold, but no pain) and the pain perception at 6.7 (moderate-strong pain) in a 1-10 scale. The obtained EEG spectral parameters were compared with the corresponding parameters of the resting baseline using paired Wilcoxon tests in the sense of statistical filters to depict those differences which differ clearly from changes by chance. The results were presented in probability maps. The EEG results indicated highly differential coherence networks between cold and pain perception. The cold perception was characterized as decreased coherence in the theta band mainly between frontal electrodes and increased interhemispheric coherence in the alpha range mainly between central and frontal positions. During pain perception almost no coherence changes in the theta band were observed, but great coherence increase in the delta band between central, parietal and frontal electrodes. The network of coherence changes in the alpha band showed strong involvement of electrode C3 concerning coherence increases with frontal positions. In the beta-1 band coherence increase within the left hemisphere was much more pronounced during pain than during cold. The differential characteristics of EEG coherence changes based on neural networks and their spatial organization in the neocortex indicate the distributed brain processing between cold and pain perception in man. This study may contribute to our understanding of the large scale neural networks in cognition based on neurophysiological binding hypothesis and network connections of neural ensembles.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Pain and pain perception].

Pain is both sensual perception and sense of touch, and it leads to emotional change of health, which has an effect back to a pain perception. Experience of pain is modified by intern and extern influences, and it can appear very multiformly in the chronicity. A part of these factors are described.

Arousal↗
PubMed2006

Psychophysically determined thresholds for thermal perception and pain perception in healthy women across the menstrual cycle.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have indicated changes in sensation and/or pain sensitivity among women across the menstrual cycle, but the pattern of the changes varies considerably. One reason for the reported discrepancies could reside in lack of biochemical definition of menstrual cycle phase. The aim was to quantify temperature and temperature pain thresholds at biochemically defined stages of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Nineteen healthy women were included in the study. Temperature and temperature pain thresholds were evaluated by quantitative sensory testing, performed at 3 occasions during the menstrual cycle (early follicular phase, late follicular phase, and mid-luteal phase). At each test session, serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone were assessed. RESULTS: Thermal cold perception threshold at the mammilla was significantly lower in the late follicular and mid-luteal phases, compared with the early follicular phase (P<0.05, respectively). For the remaining test sites, no cycle related differences in thermal perception or thermal thresholds could be documented. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has indicated no major changes in thermal pain thresholds related to phase of the menstrual cycle for the tested locations, although thermal cold perception threshold at the mammilla was a significantly lower in the late follicular and mid-luteal phases, compared with the early follicular phase. The findings of the present study further underlines the need for strict criteria for menstrual cycle phase when studying pain sensitivity in relation to hormonal events in women.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Changes in pain perception and pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials in humans produced by exposure to oscillating magnetic fields.

Nociception has been reported to be influenced by exposure to magnetic fields (MFs). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 2 h exposure to weak, oscillating MFs on pain perception thresholds and on pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). In 11 healthy volunteers, pain perception thresholds and pain-related SEPs were assessed by intracutaneous electrical stimulation. After sham treatment, pain thresholds significantly increased, whereas after MFs a slight non-significant decrease in thresholds was found. After both treatments pain-related SEP amplitude was reduced, but this decrease was more evident and statistically significant only after MF exposure. The increase found in thresholds after sham exposure may be due to stress-induced analgesia (SIA) and the contrasting behaviour recorded after MF exposure might indicate a suppression of SIA. The significant reduction in pain-related SEP amplitude observed after MF exposure provides the first evidence that human SEPs are influenced by MFs.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Fetal pain perception and pain management.

This paper gives an overview of current science related to the concept of fetal pain. We have answered three important questions: (1) does fetal pain exist? (2) does management of fetal pain benefit the unborn child? and (3) which techniques are available to provide good fetal analgesia?

Analgesia↗
PubMed1987

[Leading symptom of angina pectoris. Psychophysiologic mechanisms of pain perception in chest pain complaints].

Anginal chest pain represents an important cardiac symptom which proved to have a high pretest probability for the existence of potential heart disease. The occurrence of clinically unapparent or atypically exposed myocardial ischemia, as well as discrepancies in effort angina, provide evidence that the release of a nociceptive stimulus does not guarantee pain perception of the same proportion. The connections between sequential nociceptive nerve impulses at different central nervous regions and particularly at non-specified thalamic nuclei allow learning processes in the development of pain perception. The intensity of pain may be altered to a great extent by the anxiety level. The patient might develop habits of vigilance for low threshold abnormal signals generated from the interior of the body; he might, however, also reach a stage of complete pain suppression by centrifugal control of the nociceptive input. Heart pain is probably one of the moderators in a more complex warning system.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed2006

Are there gender differences in pain perception?

Chronic pain conditions are increasingly prevalent. However, very little is known about the relationship between pain and gender. The purposes of this study were to determine gender differences in pain threshold and tolerance among Chinese adults in Hong Kong and to examine the role of anxiety in pain perception. One hundred seventy-eight healthy, pain-free adults (89 men and 89 women) were recruited from a local university by convenience sampling to participate in the study. All participants completed the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory and underwent a laboratory pain task to determine their pain threshold and tolerance levels. Pain was assessed by using the Pain Intensity Verbal Rating Scale-Chinese version. Compared to men, women had a lower threshold (p < .001) and tolerance (p < .001) for pressure pain, and women reported more pain (p < .01) at the pain tolerance level. Higher trait anxiety scores were associated with higher pain report in men only (r [89] = .22, p = .04). The study indicated that gender differences in pain perception exist among the Chinese population in Hong Kong. A better understanding of the factors that contribute to gender differences in pain perception could reduce gender bias in pain management.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Pain perception and brain evoked potentials in patients with angina despite normal coronary angiograms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of nociception in patients with angina despite normal coronary angiograms and to investigate whether any abnormality is confined to visceral or somatosensory perception. METHODS: Perception, pain threshold, and brain evoked potentials to nociceptive electrical stimuli of the oesophageal mucosa and the sternal skin were investigated in 10 patients who had angina but normal coronary angiograms, no other signs of cardiac disease, and normal upper endoscopy. Controls were 10 healthy volunteers. The peaks of the evoked potential signal were designated N for negative deflections and P for positive. Numbers were given to the peaks in order of appearance after the stimulus. The peak to peak amplitudes (P1/N1, N1/P2) were measured in microV. RESULTS: (1) Angina pectoris was provoked in seven patients following continuous oesophageal stimulation. (2) Distant projection of pain occurred after continuous electrical stimulation of the oesophagus in four patients and in no controls. (3) Patients had higher oesophageal pain thresholds (median 16.3 mA v 7.3 mA, P = 0.02) to repeated stimuli than controls, whereas the values did not differ with respect to the skin. There were no intergroup differences in thresholds to single stimuli. (4) Patients had substantially reduced brain evoked potential amplitudes after both single oesophageal (P1/N1, median values: 7.2 microV, controls: 29.0 microV; N1/P2: 16.5 microV, controls: 66.0 microV; P < 0.001 for both) and skin (N1/P2: 13.5 microV; controls: 76.0 microV; P < 0.001) stimuli despite the similar pain thresholds. CONCLUSION: Central nervous system responses to visceral and somatosensory nociceptive input are altered in patients who have angina despite normal coronary angiograms.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex attenuates pain perception in complex regional pain syndrome type I.

In complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) many clinical symptoms suggest involvement of the central nervous system. Neuropathic pain as the leading symptom is often resistant to therapy. In the present study we investigated the analgesic efficiency of repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) applied to the motor cortex contralateral to the CRPS-affected side. Seven out of ten patients reported decreased pain intensities. Pain relief occurred 30 s after stimulation, whereas the maximum effect was found 15 min later. Pain re-intensified increasingly 45 min after rTMS. In contrast, sham rTMS did not alter pain perception. These findings provide evidence that in CRPS I pain perception can be modulated by repetitive motor cortex stimulation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease.

CONTEXT: The perception of pain due to an acute injury or in clinical pain states undergoes substantial processing at supraspinal levels. Supraspinal, brain mechanisms are increasingly recognized as playing a major role in the representation and modulation of pain experience. These neural mechanisms may then contribute to interindividual variations and disabilities associated with chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature regarding how activity in diverse brain regions creates and modulates the experience of acute and chronic pain states, emphasizing the contribution of various imaging techniques to emerging concepts. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and PRE-MEDLINE searches were performed to identify all English-language articles that examine human brain activity during pain, using hemodynamic (PET, fMRI), neuroelectrical (EEG, MEG) and neurochemical methods (MRS, receptor binding and neurotransmitter modulation), from January 1, 1988 to March 1, 2003. Additional studies were identified through bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected based on consensus across all four authors. The criteria included well-designed experimental procedures, as well as landmark studies that have significantly advanced the field. DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-eight hemodynamic studies of experimental pain in normal subjects, 30 in clinical pain conditions, and 30 using neuroelectrical methods met selection criteria and were used in a meta-analysis. Another 24 articles were identified where brain neurochemistry of pain was examined. Technical issues that may explain differences between studies across laboratories are expounded. The evidence for and the respective incidences of brain areas constituting the brain network for acute pain are presented. The main components of this network are: primary and secondary somatosensory, insular, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortices (S1, S2, IC, ACC, PFC) and thalamus (Th). Evidence for somatotopic organization, based on 10 studies, and psychological modulation, based on 20 studies, is discussed, as well as the temporal sequence of the afferent volley to the cortex, based on neuroelectrical studies. A meta-analysis highlights important methodological differences in identifying the brain network underlying acute pain perception. It also shows that the brain network for acute pain perception in normal subjects is at least partially distinct from that seen in chronic clinical pain conditions and that chronic pain engages brain regions critical for cognitive/emotional assessments, implying that this component of pain may be a distinctive feature between chronic and acute pain. The neurochemical studies highlight the role of opiate and catecholamine transmitters and receptors in pain states, and in the modulation of pain with environmental and genetic influences. CONCLUSIONS: The nociceptive system is now recognized as a sensory system in its own right, from primary afferents to multiple brain areas. Pain experience is strongly modulated by interactions of ascending and descending pathways. Understanding these modulatory mechanisms in health and in disease is critical for developing fully effective therapies for the treatment of clinical pain conditions.

Afferent Pathways↗
PubMed1994

Effects of experimental and clinical noxious counterirritants on pain perception.

It is commonly accepted that application of a sustained noxious stimulus frequently suppresses the perception of pain. In this investigation, we have determined whether painful forearm ischemia suppresses tooth pain resulting from an acute irreversible pulpitis. We have also determined whether the physiological responses to toothache alter the perception of pain evoked by experimental procedures. Ten male subjects experiencing a painful toothache (group TA) and 7 age-matched pain-free male subjects (group PF) participated in these studies. During session 1, heat pain threshold and tolerance values were determined for both groups. The times to ischemic pain onset and ischemic pain tolerance were determined for both groups using the submaximal effort tourniquet procedure. The effect of the tourniquet procedure on the intensity, unpleasantness, and spatial distribution of toothache was also assessed. Session 2 was conducted on 7 TA and 7 PF subjects 1 week later and was conducted like session 1 with the exception that group TA was not experiencing tooth pain during this session. Measures of thermal pain perception and forearm ischemic pain perception were not altered by the occurrence of toothache. In contrast, sustained noxious forearm ischemia produced a marked reduction in the intensity, unpleasantness and spatial distribution of pulpal pain. These effects on pulpal pain remained for at least 5 min after removal of the tourniquet while the arm was pain free. These findings suggest that a noxious conditioning stimulus does not universally inhibit pain perception but instead depends on unidentified interactions between the noxious test and conditioning stimuli.

Acute Disease↗