PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Particle Swarm Optimization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Prediction of gene expression using histone modification patterns extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization.

MOTIVATION: Histone modifications play an important role in transcription regulation. Although the general importance of some histone modifications for transcription regulation has been previously established, the relevance of others and their interaction is subject to ongoing research. By training Machine Learning models to predict a gene's expression and explaining their decision making process, we can get hints on how histone modifications affect transcription. In previous studies, trained models were either hardly explainable or the models were trained solely on the abundance of histone modifications. Based on other studies, which used histone modification patterns, rather than their abundance, to identify potential regulatory elements, we hypothesize the histone modification pattern in a gene's promoter to be more predictive for gene expression. We used an optimization algorithm to extract predictive histone modification profiles. RESULTS: Our algorithm called PatternChrome achieved an average area under curve (AUC) score of 0.9029 over 56 samples for binary classification, outperforming all previous algorithms for the same task. We explained the models decisions to deduce the effect of specific features, certain histone modifications or promoter positions on transcription regulation. Although the predictive histone modification patterns were extracted for each sample separately, they can be used to predict gene expression in other samples, implying that the created patterns are largely generalizable. Interestingly, the impact of histone modifications on gene regulation appears predominantly indifferent to cellular specificity. Through explanation of the classifier's decisions, we substantiate established literature knowledge while concurrently revealing novel insights into the intricate landscape of transcriptional regulation via histone modification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the PatternChrome algorithm, the scripts for the analyses and the required data can be found at (https://gitlab.gwdg.de/MedBioinf/generegulation/patternchrome).

Humans

Adversarial attack of sequence-free enhancer prediction identifies chromatin architecture.

MOTIVATION: The wide range of cellular complexity created by multicellular organisms is due in large part to the intricate and synergistic interplay of regulatory complexes throughout the eukaryotic genome. These regulatory elements "enhance" specific gene programs and have been shown to operate in diverse networks that are distinct across cell states of the same organism. Attempts to characterize and predict enhancers have typically focused on leveraging information-dense DNA sequence in parallel with epigenomic assays. We examined the viability of enhancer prediction using only a minimal set of epigenomic datasets without direct DNA information. RESULTS: We demonstrate that chromatin datasets are sufficient to identify enhancers genome-wide with high accuracy. By training networks leveraging data from multiple cell types simultaneously, we generated a cell-type invariant enhancer prediction platform that utilized only the patterns of protein binding for inference. We also showed the utility of swarm-based adversarial attacks [adversarial particle swarm optimization (APSO)] to deconvolute trained genomic neural networks for the first time. Critically, unlike saliency mapping or other game-theory based approaches, APSO is completely network-architecture independent and can be applied to any prediction engine to derive the features that drive inference. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All software and code for data downloading, processing, enhancer inference, eXplainable AI (XAI), and complete figure generation are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/EpiGenomicsCode/ChromEnhancer and Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15652797.

Enhancer Elements, Genetic

Optimising parent selection in plant breeding: comparing metaheuristic algorithms for genotype building.

Stacking desirable haplotypes across the genome to develop superior genotypes has been implemented in several crop species. A major challenge in Optimal Haplotype Selection is identifying a set of parents that collectively contain all desirable haplotypes, a complex combinatorial problem with countless possibilities. In this study, we evaluated the performance of metaheuristic search algorithms (MSAs)-genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimisation (PSO), and simulated annealing (SA) for optimising parent selection under two genotype building (GB) objectives: Optimal Haplotype Selection (OHS) and Optimal Population Value (OPV). Using a diverse wheat population of 583 lines genotyped for 29,972 SNPs, forming 7645 haplotype blocks and phenotyped for stripe rust scores, we assessed each algorithm's performance across fitness optimisation, convergence speed, and computational efficiency. GA consistently achieved high fitness and rapid convergence, while DE showed robustness but required longer runtime and careful tuning. PSO performed well under the OHS criterion but was less effective for OPV. SA, although computationally lighter, was less consistent in finding optimal solutions. Simulation over 100 breeding cycles showed that OHS outperformed both OPV and GEBV-based selection in long-term genetic gain and diversity retention. OHS maintained heterozygosity and additive variance, which are key for sustainable improvement, while GEBV selection led to early allele fixation. Our findings underscore the potential of GB strategies that prioritise the collective performance of parent sets rather than individual ranking to enhance selection outcomes in genomic-assisted breeding programmes.

Plant Breeding