SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pharmacogenomic Testing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Perceptions of Pharmacogenomic Testing Among People With Treatment Resistant Depression: Legitimization as a Facilitator of Acceptance.

Pharmacogenomic testing for psychiatric medications has been proposed as both an early intervention to optimize treatment response, and for use among patients who have tried multiple medications without symptom remission. Therefore, this testing may be particularly salient to the subset of individuals with major depressive disorder for whom depression has been labeled as "treatment resistant". Understanding the impact of this diagnostic label on illness identity and attitudes towards new therapies is important as genomic technology expands and rates of depression increase. We sought to explore perceptions and attitudes towards pharmacogenomic testing among individuals who had received a diagnosis of treatment resistant depression. We conducted a qualitative study with a constructivist orientation. Participants were recruited from a larger genomic research study and interviewed by phone or video call. We took an inductive approach to coding guided by reflexive thematic analysis. Themes were then organized into a relational framework following principles of interpretive description. Twelve individuals were interviewed. Key themes included internalized acceptance/hopelessness, and external validation/frustration, which were cyclically interconnected. These themes were situated within a larger framework illustrating the ways that illness identity and modifying factors such as relief of guilt, social support, pharmacogenomic testing and depressive symptoms can either facilitate acceptance and validation or contribute to feelings of hopelessness and frustration. Though participants expressed some skepticism around its effectiveness, pharmacogenomic testing may contribute to the shift towards acceptance and validation by legitimizing individuals' experiences with lack of treatment response. Genetic counselors and other healthcare providers should be aware of the complex balance between hope and frustration underlying conversations around pharmacogenomic testing, and factors that are more likely to foster self-acceptance.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Evaluating Patient Experience With Genomic Medicine: A Content Analysis of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers' Websites.

BACKGROUND: National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers (NCI-CCs) throughout the United States are mandated to translate state-of-the-art cancer research to communities and enhance clinical care for patients within their catchment areas. NCI-CCs play a vital role in national cancer initiatives focused on optimizing cancer care via personalized medicine in which improved risk assessment, screening, and genetic testing are foundational. In this era of targeted personalized care, although genetics has been incorporated into cancer centers, it is unknown how these innovations are being communicated to the public and communities served on cancer center websites. There is particularly limited knowledge surrounding how NCI-CCs publicly communicate their efforts to integrate patient-reported experiences with genomics to fulfill their overall mission and reduce the cancer burden in their catchment areas. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate how NCI-CCs publicly share information on their websites related to cancer center programming and activities to measure and incorporate patients' experiences with the use of genetics to guide cancer care. METHODS: For all NCI-CCs providing clinical care (N=65), we conducted a review of publicly available and published information and assessed five domains relevant to patients' experiences with genomic medicine: whether NCI-CCs (1) provided genetic testing, (2) directly expressed a goal of delivering personalized care, (3) provided pharmacogenomic testing, (4) assessed patient-reported experience measures with genomic medicine (including patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and other patient experience measures [OPEMs]), and (5) indicated an established infrastructure or set of resources to evaluate patient experience. We conducted a content analysis of the publicly available websites of NCI-CCs using the validated directed approach to content analysis. We quantified the results of our content analysis using count measures based on a binary (yes or no) coding scheme. RESULTS: While almost all the NCI-CCs (64/65, 98%) discussed providing personalized care and performing genetic testing on their websites, we found that 58% (38/65) indicated online that they assessed PROs or other patient experience measures with genomic medicine. Fewer centers (25/65, 38%) discussed on their websites having a mechanism for evaluating patients' experiences with genomic medicine that captured broader types of information beyond PROs, such as measures of patient education or care team communication. Finally, approximately 1 in 3 NCI-CCs (23/65, 35%) indicated having an established infrastructure with departmental resources dedicated to monitoring patients' experiences. These centers reflecting a built-in infrastructure were 8% to 12% more likely to publicly communicate targeted activities to assess patients' experiences with genomic medicine. CONCLUSIONS: With the burgeoning use of genomics in research and clinical care, comprehensive evaluation and incorporation of measures of patients' experiences with genomic medicine present a key opportunity to enhance cancer care at NCI-CCs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pharmacogenomic and drug interactions risk in cardio-oncology: A precision medicine perspective for India.

Cardio-oncology patients may face complex treatment regimens due to the concurrent existence of cancer and cardiovascular disease, leading to a considerable polypharmacy burden. This significantly increases the prospect of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and gene-drug interactions. The majority of these interactions arise from comparable pharmacokinetic and pharmacological pathways associated with drug transporters and cytochrome P450 enzymes. The significance of pharmacogenomics in tailored treatment strategies are emphasised by the fact that genetic variability enhances individual differences in drug response, safety, and efficacy. This narrative review focus on the effects of key genetic polymorphisms (e.g., DPYD, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9) on the metabolism and efficacy of commonly prescribed anticancer and cardiovascular medications such as fluoropyrimidines, clopidogrel, and warfarin. In addition it explore the role of pharmacogenomic variants on drug-drug interactions within the field of cardio-oncology. The study ultimately emphasizes the necessity of precision medicine in India to address the genetic diversity and underrepresentation in global genomic databases. The absence of pharmacogenomic testing, infrastructural deficiencies, financial constraints, and insufficient clinical integration hinder the widespread use of this technology in India. The Genome India Project and other national initiatives establish the foundation for pharmacogenomic-guided therapy. Utilizing genetic data, together with artificial intelligence-based predictive tools, for clinical decision-making may enhance medication safety and yield optimal outcomes in Indian cardio-oncology patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genomic Medicine Sweden: Advancing precision medicine at the national level.

High-throughput sequencing has transformed clinical diagnostics of rare diseases (RD), cancer and infectious diseases by enabling the identification of disease-causing genetic alterations and facilitating individualised treatment and care. In response to these advances, Genomic Medicine Sweden (GMS) was established in 2017 as a national collaborative effort to accelerate implementation of genomics-based precision medicine within Sweden's regionally organized, publicly funded healthcare system. GMS brings together the seven university healthcare regions and their associated medical faculties, in collaboration with healthcare regions across Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, patient organizations, industry and governmental agencies. Activities are coordinated through national disease-specific expert groups, supported by cross-cutting functions in bioinformatics, health economics, ethics, education and patient engagement. At the operational level, seven Genomic Medicine Centres, embedded at university hospitals, develop and deliver harmonised genomic diagnostics nationwide. The National Genomics Platform provides secure infrastructure for large-scale data storage, analysis, and national and international data sharing. Following initial project-based funding, GMS now receives long-term governmental support. This review describes the national implementation of genomic-based precision diagnostics, discusses challenges and lessons learnt, and highlights key milestones across disease areas, including whole-genome sequencing in RD and paediatric cancer, comprehensive genomic profiling of haematological malignancies and solid tumours, pathogen genomics in microbiology, pharmacogenomic testing and emerging applications of polygenic risk scores in complex diseases. Collectively, these efforts have contributed to more than 500,000 genomic tests being performed within Swedish healthcare between 2017 and 2025. Finally, we outline future diagnostic needs and priority areas to ensure sustainable, scalable and equitable access to precision medicine.

Precision Medicine↗

PubMed2026

Human Variation-Informed Prioritization of MPHOSPH6 in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Source-Aware Multiomics Evidence Framework.

Moving from an association signal to a clinically credible biomarker requires several links that are often conflated: verified variant identity, aligned allelic effects, reproducible gene-level association, relevant cellular expression, and a plausible functional consequence. We developed a source-aware multiomics framework to assess MPHOSPH6 in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) while keeping those evidence classes separate. Six prespecified rsIDs were recovered from the harmonized TRICL LUAD dataset, of which five reached p < 5 × 10 - 8. Only rs112333466 and rs76474922 were available with alignable alleles in FinnGen R10, and both showed concordant directions. Fixed-effect estimates were OR = 1.592 for rs112333466-T (95% CI, 1.401-1.809; p = 9.91 × 10 - 13) and OR = 0.819 for rs76474922-C (95% CI, 0.773-0.867; p = 1.03 × 10 - 11). In a prespecified two-variant GTEx v8 lung model, genetically predicted MPHOSPH6 expression was positively associated with LUAD in TRICL (Z = 3.341, p = 8.35 × 10 - 4) and FinnGen (Z = 2.697, p = 0.0070). This gene-level result did not establish colocalization or connect MPHOSPH6 to the six susceptibility rsIDs. Patient-level analysis of 89,241 immune cells from six paired tumor and normal-adjacent lung samples found no significant difference in MPHOSPH6 pseudobulk abundance (exact paired Wilcoxon p = 0.3125). None of 688 lung-lineage pharmacogenomic tests remained significant after false-discovery-rate correction. Ten recorded MPHOSPH6 missense alleles, including five ClinVar variants of uncertain significance, were curated; structural analysis identified I58 at an experimental RNA-exosome interface and defined a focused perturbation series. MPHOSPH6 is therefore supported as a human-variation-informed candidate for functional evaluation, not as a validated LUAD biomarker, pathogenic gene, drug-response predictor, or therapeutic target.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Prevalence of pharmacogenomically implicated prescriptions in multi-ethnic populations in Singapore.

AIM: To assess the potential impact of implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in Singapore, focusing on prevalence and genetic actionability of PGx prescriptions. METHODS: Electronic Health Records from 2014 to 2021 were obtained from the National University Hospital (NUH), a tertiary medical centre serving approximately 6% of Singapore's population, which were filtered for pharmacogenomically implicated medicines (CPIC Level A or A/B), defined as PGx medications. Coupling this with published data of whole-genome sequencing of 9051 Singaporeans, we estimated the proportion of patients whose prescriptions might have been modified based on pre-emptive PGx at population level. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2021, a total of 1 157 359 unique patients were seen at NUH, with 38.1% to 43.0% of patients with prescriptions receiving at least one PGx medication annually, exhibiting minimal variance over year of prescription, sex or race/ethnicity. The most frequently prescribed PGx medications were omeprazole, statins and tramadol, while the most implicated pharmacogenes were CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and SLCO1B1. The age-dependent increase in PGx medication exposure varied significantly by sex, with males prescribed these medications earlier in life than females. Similarly, Indians and Malays were more likely to be prescribed these medicines at a younger age than Chinese. Based on frequency of PGx variants in Singaporeans, we estimate that 18.4% of patients could have their prescriptions modified from pre-emptive PGx testing. DISCUSSION: Pharmacogenomically implicated medication prescriptions are common in Singapore and are particularly prevalent in elderly populations. Strategic investments in infrastructure and policy development will be pivotal to the successful integration of pre-emptive PGx into clinical practice.

Asian genomes↗

PubMed2025

Pharmacogenomic Assessment of Genes Implicated in Thiopurine Metabolism and Toxicity in a UK Cohort of Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Thiopurine drugs are effective treatment options in inflammatory bowel disease and other conditions but discontinued in some patients due to toxicity. METHODS: We investigated thiopurine-induced toxicity in a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease cohort by utilizing exome sequencing data across a panel of 46 genes, including TPMT and NUDT15. RESULTS: The cohort included 487 patients with a median age of 13.1 years. Of the 396 patients exposed to thiopurines, myelosuppression was observed in 11%, gastroenterological intolerance in 11%, hepatotoxicity in 4.5%, pancreatitis in 1.8%, and "other" adverse effects in 2.8%. TPMT (thiopurine S-methyltransferase) enzyme activity was normal in 87.4%, intermediate 12.3%, and deficient in 0.2%; 26% of patients with intermediate activity developed toxicity to thiopurines. Routinely genotyped TPMT alleles associated with defective enzyme activity were identified in 28 (7%) patients: TPMT*3A in 4.5%, *3B in 1%, and *3C in 1.5%. Of these, only 6 (21%) patients developed toxic responses. Three rare TPMT alleles (*3D, *39, and *40) not assessed on routine genotyping were identified in 3 patients, who all developed toxic responses. The missense variant p.R139C (NUDT15*3 allele) was identified in 4 patients (azathioprine 1.6 mg/kg/d), but only 1 developed toxicity. One patient with an in-frame deletion variant p.G13del in NUDT15 developed myelosuppression at low doses. Per-gene deleteriousness score GenePy identified a significant association for toxicity in the AOX1 and DHFR genes. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association for toxicity was observed in the AOX1 and DHFR genes in individuals negative for the TPMT and NUDT15 variants. Patients harboring the NUDT15*3 allele, which is associated with myelosuppression, did not show an increased risk of toxicity.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Associations between (pharmaco-)genetic markers and postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair - a prospective study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a common complication following surgery, with severity and duration varying between patients. Chronic postoperative pain after inguinal hernia surgery has an incidence rate of approximately 10%. Risk factors for acute and chronic pain following hernia surgery include age, sex, psychosocial factors, and demographic background. Additionally, genetic polymorphisms in enzymes involved in pain mechanisms, as well as the metabolism of analgesics might influence pain perception, pain development, and response to pain medications. Key enzymes include the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT), the µ-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1), and the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). CYP2D6 plays a crucial role in metabolizing analgesics such as tramadol, codeine, and oxycodone. It is also suspected to be involved in the synthesis of catecholamines and endogenous morphines suggesting a potential role in pathophysiology of pain. We hypothesize that the CYP2D6 activity influences the development of postoperative pain after hernia surgery. METHODS: This study is a prospective, observational, multicenter association study investigating adult patients scheduled for inguinal hernia surgery using a robotic-assisted (rTAPP) approach. Patients are enrolled during the preoperative surgical consultation. A buccal swab is collected for genetic testing at this time. Pain at the site of the hernia is assessed using the validated EuraHSQoL score preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, information on co-medication and details of the surgery will be collected. The planned number of participants is 350 patients. The primary objective is to analyze the association between different genotype-predicted CYP2D6 phenotypes and patient-reported pain intensity 6 weeks after surgery. Secondary objectives include the association between further genetic variants, such as the COMT rs4680 and OPRM1 rs1799971 genotype, and pain severity. Additionally, the potential of pharmacogenetic panel testing to optimize analgesic therapy in hernia surgery patients will be explored. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights into identifying patients at higher risk for postoperative pain before surgery. This knowledge could pave the way for tailored interventions during and after surgery for these specific patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien https://www.drks.de/DRKS00034796 Registered on August 07, 2024.

Genetic Association Studies↗

PubMed2026

Fluoropyrimidine Cardiotoxicity: Role of Uridine Triacetate and Pharmacogenomic Insights from a Case of 5-FU-Induced Cardiogenic Shock.

Fluoropyrimidines, including 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are widely used antimetabolite agents and remain central to the treatment of several solid tumors, particularly gastrointestinal malignancies. However, they are a well-established cause of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. Although coronary vasospasm is the best recognized manifestation, fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity encompasses a broad clinical spectrum, ranging from chest pain and arrhythmias to acute heart failure, and, rarely, fulminant cardiogenic shock. This review discusses severe fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity through the illustrative presentation of a young woman without previous cardiovascular disease who developed acute biventricular dysfunction and cardiogenic shock shortly after first exposure to FOLFIRINOX, requiring temporary mechanical circulatory support. Administration of uridine triacetate within the recommended therapeutic window was associated with rapid recovery of ventricular function. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated diffuse myocardial edema without late gadolinium enhancement, consistent with reversible toxic-inflammatory myocardial injury. Expanded genomic analysis identified dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase variants not detected by standard pretreatment pharmacogenetic screening. In this study we examine the pathophysiological mechanisms of fluoropyrimidine cardiotoxicity, the rationale for uridine triacetate in severe presentations, and the potential role of expanded pharmacogenomic profiling within a precision cardio-oncology framework.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

UGT1A1 genotype testing for irinotecan: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is available as both non-pegylated and pegylated formulations. The non-pegylated formulation is licensed for use in advanced colorectal cancer either in combination with other agents or as monotherapy. However, it is also used off-label across a range of gastrointestinal malignancies and in rare malignancies such as glioblastoma and sarcomas. The pegylated formulation is licensed for use as combination therapy in adult patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Irinotecan is hydrolysed to its active metabolite, SN-38, which is predominantly inactivated by the enzyme uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1. UGT1A1 is encoded by the gene UGT1A1, which is polymorphically expressed, with allele frequencies varying across populations. Poor metabolizers carry two variants that reduce UGT1A1 enzyme expression or activity, leading to increased risk of irinotecan toxicity. Any patient who is about to be prescribed irinotecan for an epithelial malignancy should have pharmacogenetic testing, to identify clinically relevant UGT1A1 variants, where testing is available. Irinotecan dose should be reduced by 30% at Cycle 1 treatment in poor metabolizers for all indications, with doses titrated thereafter based on tolerability and neutrophil counts. The lack of evidence precludes us from making any recommendation for rare malignancies such as sarcomas. Our guideline is consistent with other international pharmacogenetics prescribing guidelines. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimized to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

MT-RNR1 genotype testing for preventing aminoglycoside-mediated ototoxicity: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Aminoglycosides are broad-spectrum antibiotics used in the management of severe infections. Aminoglycosides are associated with nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Although dosing strategies such as once-daily administration and therapeutic drug monitoring have reduced the incidence of nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity remains unpredictable and may occur at therapeutic concentrations. A strong association between specific mitochondrial DNA variants in MT-RNR1 (m.1555A > G, m.1494C > T and m.1095 T > C) and aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss exists. These variants (frequency ~1 in 330 individuals across populations) predispose to irreversible, sensorineural hearing loss following aminoglycoside exposure, sometimes after a single dose. Avoidance of aminoglycosides is recommended at any detectable variant level. In England, laboratory-based MT-RNR1 testing is nationally commissioned, whereas point-of-care testing in time-critical settings like neonatal sepsis is delivered in some centres. Approximately 20% of aminoglycoside use is predictable providing opportunities for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing. Where MT-RNR1 testing results are unavailable and clinical urgency is high, aminoglycoside treatment should not be delayed. Early health economic evidence suggests that point-of-care testing in neonates may be cost-saving by preventing lifelong hearing loss. Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment bodies support targeted implementation of testing alongside further evidence generation. Overall, integration of MT-RNR1 pharmacogenetic testing offers a feasible and proportionate strategy to reduce harm while preserving access to life-saving antibiotic therapy. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence in this field but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimized to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Advanced and underlying therapeutic strategies in transformed small cell lung cancer.

Transformed small-cell lung cancer (T-SCLC) is a clinically important form of histologic transformation and a mechanism of acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is associated with poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of only about 9-13 months. This review summarizes recent advances in the mechanisms, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of T-SCLC. Repeat biopsy remains the gold standard for confirming histologic transformation, whereas molecular profiling and liquid biopsy may facilitate early detection and longitudinal disease monitoring. Platinum-etoposide remains the most commonly used clinical standard after transformation, but its benefit is typically transient and durable disease control remains uncommon. Continuation of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with chemotherapy may prolong progression-free survival in selected patients but has not consistently improved overall survival. Anti-angiogenic therapy, particularly anlotinib, and chemo-immunotherapy have shown encouraging activity in selected patients, while emerging strategies targeting DLL3, MYC, SOX2, and epigenetic regulators may broaden the therapeutic landscape. Prospective studies integrating repeat tissue sampling, comprehensive genomic profiling, biomarker-guided patient stratification, pharmacogenomics, functional drug-sensitivity testing where feasible, and integrated multi-omics approaches are needed to advance molecularly guided and individualized treatment for T-SCLC.

advanced therapy↗

PubMed2026

Financing and health system capacity for precision medicine in Asia: a six country landscape analysis.

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine (PM) adoption is accelerating across Asia, but implementation remains uneven due to differences in financing, infrastructure, governance, and health-system readiness. OBJECTIVES: To examine how six Asian countries (Singapore, South Korea, China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia) adopt, finance, and integrate PM technologies, and identify common implementation patterns and challenges. METHODS: A landscape review of peer-reviewed literature, government publications, and HTA reports (2010-2026) was conducted, supplemented by stakeholder consultations. PM applications were grouped into public health screening (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [HBOC] and familial hypercholesterolemia [FH] cascade testing), next-generation sequencing (NGS) applications (rare diseases, oncology, pharmacogenomics), and AI-enabled PM. Evidence was synthesized across access, awareness, reimbursement, and implementation. RESULTS: Public health genomic screening demonstrated the highest implementation readiness, followed by precision oncology, while rare disease diagnostics remained infrastructure-dependent and pharmacogenomics and AI-enabled PM platforms were at earlier stages. Four readiness profiles emerged: highly aligned systems; reimbursement-constrained systems with strong governance and infrastructure; systems strengthening governance, public financing and infrastructure; and strategy-led systems expanding implementation through pilot programs and referral centers. CONCLUSIONS: PM implementation across Asia remains heterogeneous. The identified readiness profiles highlight governance, financing, and infrastructure priorities for sustainable and equitable PM diffusion.

Asia↗

PubMed2026

Survey to inform personalised prescribing in a British South Asian community: pharmacogenomics and traditional medicine use.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) uses genetic information to personalize medication, reducing adverse reactions and improving efficacy. Despite its promise, low public awareness and disparities in PGx acceptability among under-represented groups may exacerbate health inequalities. The objective of this study was to elucidate a British South Asian community's attitudes toward personalised prescribing. METHODS: Adults of Bangladeshi or Pakistani ancestry from the Genes & Health (G&H) study completed a survey. Community feedback guided theme prioritization. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (controlling for age and gender) explored relationships among survey variables, and case-control Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and candidate variant enrichment analysis examined the genetic architecture underlying herbal remedy use. RESULTS: Out of 553 respondents (57% female, mostly aged 25-54), 72% reported medication inefficacy, and 54% experienced side effects. Herbal remedies were widely used (66%), notably Black seed (39%), Turmeric (37%), and Ginger (36%). Participants who reported not using traditional or herbal medicines had higher medication adherence MARS-5 scores (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.05-1.16, p < 0.0002). All three commonly used herbal remedies inhibit the pharmacogenomically variable CYP2C9 enzyme responsible for metabolising commonly used medications. 58% of respondents were willing to provide DNA samples for PGx testing, yet 70% agreed that they would be more likely to take medication as instructed if PGx results suggested the medicine would suit them. Concerns about PGx testing were common (27%), especially among non-English speakers. Most (69%) were concerned about misuse of PGx data, particularly by pharmaceutical companies (82%). Importantly, 87% demanded stronger PGx data protections compared to other health data. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to a national UK population, the surveyed subpopulation reported higher rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and perceived medication inefficacy, yet fewer respondents indicated willingness to undergo PGx testing. This highlights the need for tailored implementation strategies and underscores the importance of engaging underrepresented populations in policy development. The inverse relationship between medication adherence and herbal remedy use indicates an association between cultural health practices and medication behaviours that merits further investigation. Increased awareness of the common use of these CYP2C9 inhibitors and further research into the genetic architecture underlying herbal remedy use are warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Current knowledge in pharmacogenomics and precision medicine: perspectives of the PGRN global PGx committee on improving drug therapies in underrepresented ethnic populations.

A precision medicine strategy is likely to be more impactful, when pharmacogenomics (PGx) guided selection of drugs and dosage wherever applicable is implemented across the globe. In regions where resources are disproportionately distributed, PGx implementation in routine clinical care can play a critical role in ensuring the optimal use of limited healthcare infrastructure. At present, PGx data from the majority of the distinct ethnic populations across Asia, Africa, and South America is limited. While international consortia, working groups, and scientific bodies have made significant contributions toward evaluating the evidence for PGx implementation, the majority of existing guidelines and recommendations are derived primarily from studies conducted in a limited number of ethnic groups. Precision Medicine Initiatives in countries like Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia and PGx organizations like the African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (AiBST), Consortium for Genomics & Therapeutics in Africa (CGTA), implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for the effective care and treatment in Africa, Greater Middle East (GME) whole exome sequencing program, Ibero-American Network of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics (RIBEF), Latin American Society of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine (SOLFAGEM), Latin American Network for Validation and Implementation of Pharmacogenomic Clinical Guidelines (RELIVAF), IndiGen initiative, Southeast Asian Pharmacogenomics Research Network (SEAPharm), are working toward consolidating the PGx presence in these regions.

Precision Medicine↗

PubMed2026

Stromal ARHGEF15 Correlates With Inflammatory EMT and Stromal-Immune Crosstalk During Inflammatory Bowel Disease-To-Colorectal Cancer Progression.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but how chronic intestinal inflammation drives malignant transformation remains unclear. We retrospectively reanalyzed published single-cell transcriptomic datasets from intestinal biopsies of healthy individuals and patients with IBD; differential expression was assessed using independent t tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. We then integrated those single-cell findings with the Cancer Genome Atlas bulk transcriptomes and pharmacogenomic cohorts to trace stromal programs across the IBD-to-cancer continuum. ARHGEF15 emerged as a stromal gene enriched in CD74hi HLA-DRB1hi arterial pericytes within inflamed tissue. Its expression rose steadily from IBD to CRC and tracked with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activity. In CRC, higher ARHGEF15 expression was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival. These retrospective, in silico findings identify ARHGEF15 as an exploratory stromal biomarker associated with inflammatory EMT and stromal-immune remodeling during IBD-to-CRC progression. Prospective experimental and clinical validation is required to establish its prognostic or therapeutic relevance.

ARHGEF15↗

PubMed2026

Clinically Relevant Pharmacogenomic Variant Frequencies in Kazakh, Russian, and Uzbek Population Groups Residing in Kazakhstan.

Central Asian populations remain underrepresented in pharmacogenomic research, limiting the availability of population-specific data for genotype-informed prescribing and precision medicine. This study analyzed clinically relevant pharmacogenomic variant frequencies in Kazakh, Russian, and Uzbek population groups residing in Kazakhstan using genome-wide genotype data from 1301 individuals: Kazakh (n = 1111), Russian (n = 156), and Uzbek (n = 34). ClinPGx, a PharmGKB-based clinical annotation framework that prioritizes variant-drug associations according to levels of evidence, was used to select variants with evidence levels 1A, 1B, and 2A. In total, 112 directly genotyped variants were retained for population-specific allele and genotype frequency analysis. All 112 variants were queried against the gnomAD v4.1 genome and exome reference datasets. Of these, matching allele-frequency data for the predefined reported allele were available in at least one of the two gnomAD datasets for 103 variants, whereas for 9 variants the VEP-based query did not return a matching gnomAD frequency for that allele. Frequencies were reported for the same predefined reported allele across all groups, and differences between the study groups were assessed using 95% confidence intervals, Fisher's exact tests, and false discovery rate correction. Genotype counts and the proportions of individuals carrying at least one copy of the reported allele were also summarized for all selected variants. Several pharmacogenomic variants showed population-specific frequency patterns, including NUDT15 rs116855232, SLCO1B1 rs4149056, VKORC1 rs9934438, and UGT1A1 rs10929302. Comparison with gnomAD showed that the observed frequencies were variant-specific and could not be consistently approximated by a single broad genetic ancestry group. Reference-based population structure analysis provided additional ancestry context and supported separate reporting by population group. The study did not evaluate clinical outcomes or make individual prescribing recommendations, and the small Uzbek sample size limits the precision of frequency estimates for this group, particularly for rare variants. Overall, this study provides a clinically prioritized pharmacogenomic frequency resource for underrepresented population groups in Kazakhstan and supports broader Central Asian representation in pharmacogenomic implementation research.

Central Asia↗

PubMed2026

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines v2: An Update With New Criteria and Improved Clarifications.

The Animal Variant Classification Guidelines (AVCG) were developed to standardize and objectify the classification of putative disease-causing variants. These guidelines are sufficiently reproducible and are used to classify previously published and new disease-causing variants across species. Here, the guidelines are updated (AVCG.v2), based on a three-phase decision process. Overall, four new criteria and seven clarifying comments were added. The number of criteria has increased from 23 to 27, with three new criteria supporting pathogenicity and one new criterion supporting benign classification. Pharmacogenomic variants were determined to fall within the scope of the guidelines. These updated guidelines are being used by the Variant Pathogenicity Working Group (VPWG), part of the Animal Genetic Testing Standardization standing committee, which is a committee of elected members of the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG). Under the auspices of ISAG, the VPWG retrospectively classifies published putative disease-causing variants. The pathogenicity label for a variant will be presented in the variant tables of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA; https://omia.org/). The AVCGv.2 criteria and recommendations were developed by the expertise of the animal genetics community and the ISAG Executive Committee through the Animal Genetics Testing Standardization Committee endorses and strongly encourages their use to evaluate the evidence supporting pathogenicity of putative disease-causing variants.

Animals↗