PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Physical Examination”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Mitral valve prolapse: comparison of diagnosis by physical examination and echocardiography.

To determine how well physical examination findings suggestive of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) correlate with echocardiographic evidence of MVP, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 104 patients referred to an Air Force Cardiology Clinic for echocardiography to rule out MVP. In each case, the referring physician's specialty and his findings on cardiac physical examination were recorded. All patients had M-mode echocardiography, and half of the patients had two-dimensional echocardiography. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios for the physical examination were calculated using echocardiography as the comparison standard. The combination of a systolic click and a systolic murmur was the physical examination finding most predictive of echocardiographic MVP, with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.43. Other combinations of physical findings yielded likelihood ratios close to 1. No differences were found based on the specialty of the examining physician. We conclude that when practicing physicians find a systolic click and murmur, MVP is likely to be present on echocardiography, though one third of the patients will have normal echocardiograms. Other combinations of physical findings are of little help in predicting echocardiographic MVP.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed1991

Causes of breast cancer misdiagnosis at physical examination.

2740 consecutive breast cancers undergoing physical examination were reviewed. Ninety-two subclinical cancers detected at mammography were excluded from further evaluation and the study focused on palpable false benign cancers. The sensitivity of physical examination varied according to T category (TIS = 0.48, T1 = 0.70, T2 = 0.90, T3 = 0.89, T4 = 0.93), age (20-29 = 0.77, 30-39 = 0.58, 40-49 = 0.75, 50-59 = 0.84, 60-69 = 0.90, greater than 69 = 0.94) and operator (range 0.69-0.89), a significant difference being recorded in favor of more expert operators. Multivariate analysis (Cox) showed that T category, patient's age and operator experience are independent determinants of sensitivity. This study confirms that physical examination is not very sensitive, particularly for small tumors and in younger women and should always be performed by expert operators.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The focused physical examination. Should checkups be tailor-made?

The "complete physical examination" taught in medical schools is not always the best approach to clinical assessment of asymptomatic adults. The authors of this article review the controversy surrounding the utility of routine physical examination, advocating evolution in medical practice from use of the complete physical examination toward the focused physical examination.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The physical examination in acute cardiac ischemic syndromes.

The physical examination in acute cardiac ischemia remains a valuable tool when done with skill. Ischemia without infarction alters cardiac function, and the physical examination yields findings that reflect these changes. Ischemia with infarction alters structure and function, resulting in physical findings that are usually more dramatic and of longer duration, sometimes permanent. Carefully done, the physical examination provides information that helps in management of the immediate course, predicts prognosis, and allows for better interpretation of cardiovascular tests, both invasive and noninvasive.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗
PubMed1991

Indications for radiography in patients with acute ankle injuries: role of the physical examination.

A prospective study was performed to test the hypothesis that a thorough physical examination can eliminate the need for a large number of radiographs obtained in patients with acute ankle trauma. Two hundred one patients were seen in the emergency department for acute ankle trauma and referred to the department of radiology for ankle radiographs. Radiology residents performed a brief but thorough physical examination of the ankle in all 201 patients. Solely on the basis of a strict set of physical examination criteria (examination for gross deformity, instability, crepitation, focal bony tenderness, severe soft-tissue tenderness, moderate or severe soft-tissue swelling, and ecchymosis), the radiologists determined whether or not the radiographs were indicated. All patients, irrespective of the physical examination, underwent ankle radiography, and the results were correlated with those of the physical examination. On the basis of the results of the physical examinations, 101 (50%) of the radiologic studies were not indicated. In only one of these patients was a fracture seen on radiographs. The radiograph in this case showed a small avulsion fracture of the dorsal aspect of the talus that was clinically insignificant (no cast or surgery was required). Our results suggest that a brief but thorough physical examination can eliminate the need for a large percentage of radiographs ordered in patients with acute ankle trauma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Basic history taking and the avian physical examination.

As one may readily see, the basic avian physical examination should be an extensive, thorough procedure. A wide array of diseases and conditions can be detected during the examination. A flow sheet or checklist should be instituted to maintain consistency and cover all aspects of the history and physical examination. I highly recommend as an adjunct to the basic physical examination Gram stains of the choanae, crop, and cloacae or feces. Owing to the fact that a great number of compromised avian patients either are ill because of gram-negative bacteria or have become more compromised by opportunistic organisms such as yeast or gram-negative bacteria, identification of these conditions greatly facilitates treatment and recovery of the avian patient. Other ancillary tests, such as fecal flotation, complete blood count, culture and sensitivity, Chlamydia test, chemistry profile, radiology, and laparotomy/laparoscopy, are available to the practitioner to aid in the diagnosis of various diseases involving the avian patient. [Editor's note: The editors suggest that the complete blood count be done before an extensive physical examination is undertaken to avoid a stress hemogram.]

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Evaluation of chest pain. Back to the basics of history taking and physical examination.

Although careful history taking and physical examination seem to have been supplanted in some parts of modern medicine by expensive and high-tech laboratory tests, evaluation of chest pain is an exception. It still depends on careful attention to the basics of a directed line of history taking and physical examination. Careful correlation of the details elicited with the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia leads the astute clinician through the maze of various causes of chest pain to the proper final diagnosis.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1979

Physical examination of the lumbosacral complex.

Examination is the foundation upon which effective treatment rests. The importance of a methodical step-by-step process is stressed. The manner in which the examination findings are used to assess the efficacy of the treatment techniques is illustrated. This paper outlines one method of examining the lumbosacral complex.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1990

The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a history and physical examination findings in diagnosing the carpal tunnel syndrome, and to determine whether constellations of clinical findings identify patients at high or low risk for the carpal tunnel syndrome. DESIGN: Comparison of diagnostic tests with neurophysiologic testing. SETTING: Patients with upper extremity complaints of diverse causes referred to a neurophysiology laboratory for diagnostic studies. METHODS: Before nerve conduction testing, a history, demographic and physical examination data, and a hand pain diagram were obtained from each patient. Diagrams were categorized as indicating the classic carpal tunnel syndrome, or as probable, possible, or unlikely to indicate the carpal tunnel syndrome. Associations between clinical data and nerve conduction results were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 110 patients in the study, 44 (40%) had the carpal tunnel syndrome. Individually, the best predictors were hand pain diagram rating (positive predictive value, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.68) and Tinel sign (positive predictive value, 0.55, CI, 0.45 to 0.65). The combination of a positive Tinel sign and a probable or classic diagram rating had a positive predictive value of 0.71; CI, 0.53 to 0.85. Other findings from physical examination and the history were less useful. Just 9% of patients under 40 years of age with possible or unlikely diagram ratings had the carpal tunnel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: With the exceptions of age, Tinel sign, and hand pain diagram rating, findings from the physical examination and the history had limited diagnostic utility. Patients under 40 years of age with possible or unlikely diagram ratings were at low risk for the carpal tunnel syndrome. This finding, which should be confirmed in an independent population, suggests that subsets of patients may be managed without nerve conduction studies.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

The periodic physical examination in asymptomatic adults.

The components of the periodic physical examination have been evaluated according to contemporary epidemiologic standards. For the asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult of any age, no evidence supports the need for a complete physical examination as traditionally defined. The efficacy for three screening procedures has been established: Blood pressure should be measured at least every 2 years; women more than 40 years of age should have a breast examination done by a physician annually; and sexually active women should have a pelvic examination and a Papanicolaou test at least every 3 years after two initial negative tests have been obtained 1 year apart. Because of the prevalence and morbidity of specific diseases, and the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, several other maneuvers are recommended for screening asymptomatic adults, although the optimal frequency has not been determined experimentally. Weight should be measured every 4 years. Visual acuity should be tested annually in adults older than 60 years of age. To identify patients at high risk for melanoma, a complete skin examination should be done once. Hearing should be tested by audioscope annually in adults older than 60 years of age. Physicians should encourage patients to have annual dental visits. To identify valvular abnormalities requiring antibiotic prophylaxis, cardiac auscultation should be done at least twice in an adult. Men older than 60 years of age should have a yearly examination of the abdomen for the presence of aortic aneurysm. Although the other components of the complete physical examination may be important in establishing and maintaining the physician-patient relationship, they have not been shown to be effective screening maneuvers for asymptomatic disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Relative contribution of history-taking, physical examination, and stat laboratory test to diagnosis in chest pain patients].

To evaluate the relative importance of the medical history, physical examination, and stat laboratory tests in diagnosis, twelve general internists recorded their hypotheses (diseases) with subjective probabilities assigned to them after taking the history, and after performing the physical examination, and again after obtaining stat laboratory test results. The resultant hypotheses generated for chest pain patients were compared with the final diagnoses which were determined an average of 7.6 months later. A hypothesis subjectively determined to have the highest probability was shown to agree with the final diagnosis in 71.1% of the patients after taking the history: the physical examination was useful in raising this proportion only by 5.0%. Stat laboratory tests, however, raised the proportion from 63.6% to 81.4% for patients where stat laboratory tests were done. When subjective probabilities were used as a measuring index, earlier hypotheses were correct with an average predictive value of 0.57 after the history-taking, 0.62 after the physical examination, and 0.73 after stat laboratory tests. The average subjective probability after physical examination for a group of patients who subsequently underwent stat laboratory tests was 0.59, while that for a group of patients who did not undergo stat laboratory tests was 0.78. Based on these results test-treatment threshold was estimated to be approximately 0.69. The number of hypotheses were, on the average, 2.48 after the history-taking, 2.35 after the physical examination, and 1.90 after stat laboratory tests. From the stand point of social responsibility and individual patient perspectives quantitative measurement of physicians' predictions should be provided as the basis for assessment of the benefit of high medical technologies.

Chest Pain↗
PubMed1976

Physical examination in ischaemic heart disease.

Physical examination can yield valuable diagnostic clues in a patient suspected of ischaemic heart disease. Examination during chest pain is especially informative. The haemodynamic abnormalities which accompany angina pectoris may precipitate elevation of blood pressure, pulsus alternans, pulsus bigeminus, abnormal precordial pulsations, a fourth heart sound or a systolic bruit; all of these may subsequently disappear with cessation of the anginal attack. Careful technique of examination, especially in detecting a fourth heart sound, is essential.

Angina Pectoris↗
PubMed1979

Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer.

Mammography and physical examination of the breast are evaluated as screening instruments for detecting breast cancer based on local biopsy data obtained from women enrolled in a national breast cancer screening program. One hundren thirteen cancers (15.5%) of women who underwent biopsy) were detected. The individual sensitivities of mammography and physical examination for detecting breast cancer are 62% and 24%, respectively. The sensitivity of the two methods combined is 75% (85 of 113). Thirty-seven cancers were in situ or minimally invasive (less than or equal to 1 cm in greatest dimension). Eighty-one percent (30 of 37) of these small cancers were detected by screening, and they comprised 35% (30 of 85) of all cancers detected by mammography, physical examination, or both. Improved survival is anticipated due to this high rate of discovery of small cancers.

Adult↗