PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pioglitazone”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Pioglitazone increases insulin sensitivity by activating insulin receptor kinase.

A new oral agent, 5-[4-(2-(5-ethyl 12-pyridyl)ethoxy]- benzoyl]-2,4-thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone), has been developed for treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). This agent increases insulin sensitivity in vivo in genetically obese Wistar fatty rats. Administration of the agent (3 mg/kg/day) for 10 days to the rats ameliorated hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, indicating that it decreased insulin resistance. To clarify the mechanism of the drug to increase insulin sensitivity, we examined insulin binding and kinase activity of insulin receptors from muscles of both untreated and treated rats. Pioglitazone treatment did not change insulin binding in Wistar fatty rats but increased insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of insulin receptors to 78% over the level in the control but not the basal state. Kinase activity toward exogenous substrate, poly Glu4Tyr1, was also increased to 87% over the level of untreated control obese rats. In contrast, in lean rats, pioglitazone treatment did not increase autophosphorylation and kinase activity toward exogenous substrates. To further elucidate the mechanism, we incubated insulin receptors with the agent and measured kinase activity. Incubation of solubilized receptors with the agent did not increase kinase activity. However, the receptors from IM-9 cells, which were incubated with 10(-8) M pioglitazone for 7 days, showed a 46% increase over the control in insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation and kinase activity. These results suggested that pioglitazone increased insulin sensitivity in part by activating kinase of the receptors through indirect effect on insulin receptors and that the drug may have useful benefits in insulin resistance of NIDDM.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2026

Insights from changes in NDEV biomarkers of metabolism: effects of PPARγ and GLP1 receptor agonists on brain metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is implicated in central nervous system disorders, including depression and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We analyzed biological samples from two cohorts of clinical trial participants: (1) participants with unremitted depression after six months of treatment as usual who received pioglitazone (PPARγ agonist, N = 12) or placebo and (2) middle-aged participants at genetic risk for AD who received liraglutide (glucagon-like peptide 1 [GLP1] receptor agonist, N = 15) or placebo. These cohorts, which previously showed treatment-related improvements in peripheral IR, were used to assess the effects of pioglitazone and liraglutide on CNS insulin signaling using neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs) as biomarkers. We utilized biological samples to measure biomarkers of IR in NDEVs. Eleven Akt-mTOR pathway proteins were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment in both groups. RESULTS: Participants who received pioglitazone experienced broader changes, with significant increases in GSK3β (Ser9), mTOR (Ser2448), and RPS6 (Ser235/Ser236; all P ≤ .02) compared with placebo, and 77% of participants showed mTOR (Ser2448) response. Participants who received liraglutide demonstrated significantly increased NDEV-associated phosphorylated Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448; P = .04 and P = .025, respectively) compared with placebo, with 40% and 30% of participants in the liraglutide group showing biomarker response in both Akt (Ser473) and mTOR (Ser2448), respectively. These effects appeared relatively independent from changes in fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentration at 120-minutes during the oral glucose tolerance test. DISCUSSION: Our findings demonstrate CNS-specific biomarker responses to both PPARγ agonists and GLP1 receptor agonists.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Genome agnostic, multi-level non-oncogene addiction-based systems pharmacology for rescuing metastatic relapsed/refractory neoplasias.

Rescue therapies for relapsed/refractory (r/r) metastatic neoplasias present significant unmet needs. Tumor tissue editing regimen for 13 r/r tumor types, carcinomas, sarcomas and hematologic neoplasias, included in 15 phase I/II trials, nuclear/cytokine receptor agonists, pioglitazone, plus/minus dexamethasone or all-trans retinoic acid or interferon-α to counterbalance tumor tissue homeostasis and reprogramming of cancer hallmarks, stress response inhibitors, COX-2 inhibitor, everolimus, lenalidomide, or clarithromycin, and a stress response inducer, low-dose metronomic chemotherapy with treosulfan, trofosfamide, capecitabine, or azacitidine. CR in three, cCR in another five r/r neoplasias, as the best response occurred after transcriptional reprogramming of cancer hallmarks, inflammation control or differentiation induction. Receptor agonist combinations for cCR induction can be identical among quite different tumor types and diversified within the same tumor histology. Data reveal ubiquitous, differential transcriptional access to non-oncogene addiction (NOA) networks that cope with cancer hallmarks/stress responses and three levels of therapeutic NOA targeting. (1) Agonists of nuclear/cytokine receptor NOAs critically target tumor identity and viability, while (2) transcriptional reprogramming of NOA networks that contribute to tumor tissue addiction, thereby genome-agnostically counteracting oncogene addictions. (3) Targeting edited NOAs may improve long-term outcome with CR/cCR (everolimus, IMiD). Transcriptionally accessible NOA targets offer high specificity, modest toxicity profile, low cost of therapy and outpatient treatment, independent of comorbidities. Adaptive targeting of the transcriptomic landscapes of tumor cell compartments breaks tumor tissue addiction and overcomes M-CRAC, post-therapy metastasis, cancer cell recolonization, acquired resistance and genetic heterogeneity. Thus, editing approaches provide a template for controlling metastatic r/r tumors. In the future, diagnostics of NOA networks and transcription factors involved in tumor tissue addiction may be as valuable for therapy selection as histological/molecular genetic tumor typing for the establishment of personalized hematology/oncology.

Hodgkin’s lymphoma↗