PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Piperacillin-Tazobactam: a new beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination.

We reviewed the spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and relative advantages of piperacillin-tazobactam, a new beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor. Piperacillin-tazobactam has a wide spectrum of activity that includes gram-positive organisms such as staphylococci and streptococci, as well as many gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The combination distributes rapidly after parenteral administration and penetrates well into skin, lung, and intestinal mucosa. Compared with other beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, piperacillin-tazobactam has comparable efficacy in the treatment of intraabdominal infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and upper and lower respiratory tract infections. It may have better in vitro activity than the currently available combinations against selective bacteria that produce class I beta-lactamases (Richmond-Sykes classification). The combination is well tolerated, with diarrhea being the most common reported adverse effect. Additional controlled trials and clinical experience are required to define its role in clinical practice.

Drug Interactions↗
PubMed1993

Susceptibility of beta-lactamase-producing enterococci to piperacillin with tazobactam.

The in vitro activity of piperacillin with and without tazobactam was evaluated against different inocula of 12 clinical isolates of beta-lactamase-producing Enterococcus faecalis obtained from different geographic areas. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of piperacillin alone at approximately 10(3) colony-forming units (CFU)/spot ranged from 4 to 8 and from 4 to 8 micrograms/ml with piperacillin plus tazobactam. When approximately 10(7) CFU/spot was used, MICs increased to a range of 128-1024 micrograms/ml piperacillin. This inoculum effect was reversed by the addition of tazobactam to piperacillin at a fixed concentration of 1 microgram/ml or at a ratio of 8 : 1 (piperacillin relative to tazobactam) with an MIC90 of 16/2 micrograms/ml for the combination drug. In time-kill studies, four beta-lactamase-producing (Bla+) isolates were tested and demonstrated a decrease of > or = 2 log10 with 8 or 16 micrograms/ml of piperacillin in combination with 4 micrograms of tazobactam, but not with piperacillin alone. A non-beta-lactamase-producing isolate was equally inhibited by piperacillin alone and piperacillin plus tazobactam. Against a Bla+ isolate, the combination of piperacillin with tazobactam with streptomycin resulted in a synergistic effect relative to that of piperacillin with tazobactam; piperacillin plus streptomycin did not show synergism. Piperacillin in combination with tazobactam is active against enterococci that produce beta-lactamase and, in combination with an appropriate aminoglycoside, could be a viable choice for therapy of enterococci that do not have high-level resistance to all aminoglycosides.

Culture Media↗
PubMed1994

Compatibility of piperacillin sodium plus tazobactam with selected drugs during simulated Y-site injection.

The compatibility of piperacillin sodium plus tazobactam with selected drugs during simulated Y-site administration was studied. A 5-mL sample of piperacillin sodium 40 mg/mL plus tazobactam 5 mg/mL (Zosyn) in 5% dextrose injection was combined with a 5-mL sample of each of 75 other drugs at concentrations used clinically. Each combination was prepared in duplicate in glass culture tubes, with the order of mixing being reversed between the duplicates; storage was in constant fluorescent light at 22 degrees C. The admixtures were examined visually in normal fluorescent light and in high-intensity light zero, one, and four hours after preparation. A turbidimeter was used to measure the turbidity of each drug combination at the same intervals. Samples showing visual or turbidimetric evidence of incompatibility were subjected to particle sizing and counting. The majority of the drugs tested were compatible with Zosyn injection; most combinations had a turbidity of less than 0.1 nephelometric turbidity unit. However, 24 drugs exhibited various incompatibilities, including increased turbidity, particulate formation and precipitation, and color change. Piperacillin sodium 40 mg/mL plus tazobactam in 5% dextrose injection was visually compatible with the majority of the drugs tested for up to four hours at 22 degrees C but incompatible with 24 drugs.

Drug Incompatibility↗
PubMed2002

[Second multicenter study of the in vitro susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam].

A study was conducted in 1999 on the activity of piperacillin-tazobactam on 1349 strains collected in a Spanish multicenter study involving 10 hospitals. A total of 897 Gram-negative bacteria of the following genuses were collected: Escherichia coli (169), Klebsiella spp. (112), Pseudomonas spp. (122), Enterobacter spp. (92), Serratia spp. (44), Citrobacter spp. (37), Proteus spp. (114), Morganella spp. (49), Acinetobacter spp. (47), Stenotrophomonas spp. (47), Haemophilus spp. (45), Moraxella spp. (19). The Gram-positive bacteria included Staphylococcus aureus (116), Streptococcus pneumoniae (92), and Enterococcus spp. (114). Piperacillin-tazobactam activity against different anaerobic bacteria was also determined: Bacteroides spp. (88), Clostridium spp. (25), Prevotella spp. (5), Fusobacterium spp. (3) and Peptosteptococcus spp. (9). The piperacillin-tazobactam combination was found to maintain its activity against the isolated microorganisms with regard to the previous study.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗
PubMed1998

[Pharmacokinetic, bacteriological and clinical evaluation of tazobactam/piperacillin in pediatrics].

Pharmacokinetic, bacteriological and clinical studies were performed in pediatrics on tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), a combined drug of a new beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam and piperacillin at a ratio of 1:4. 1. Serum levels and urinary excretions of TAZ, PIPC and desethyl piperacillin (DEt-PIPC), a metabolite of PIPC, after one shot intravenous administration of 50 mg/kg of TAZ/PIPC to two children (6-7 years old) were investigated. The serum TAZ level at 0.08 hour was 50.8-51.0 micrograms/ml after administration. Then TAZ concentrations gradually decreased with half-lives of 0.38-0.45 hour, and reached 1.0-1.4 micrograms/ml after 2 hours and was not detected after 3 hours and 6 hours. Serum PIPC levels at 0.08 hour was 167.0-231.0 micrograms/ml after administration. Then PIPC concentrations gradually decreased with half-lives of 0.41-0.55 hour, and reached 1.2-2.4 micrograms/ml after 3 hours and was not detected after 6 hours. DEt-PIPC was detected slightly in serum. A ratio of TAZ to PIPC was about 1 to 4 in serum at each time. Urinary recovery rates of TAZ in the first 6 hours after administration of TAZ/PIPC were 33.5-90.1% and those of PIPC were 41.9-77.8% and those of DEt-PIPC were 1.5-2.8%. 2. TAZ/PIPC was administered to 27 pediatric patients (their ages ranged between 2 months and 11 years old) with various infections, and clinical and bacteriological effects and adverse reactions were investigated. Single doses were 26.2-55.6 mg/kg, frequencies of administration were 3-4 times a day, and durations of administration were 3 1/3-7 1/3 days, and total dosages were 4.5-33.75 g. Clinical effects were evaluable in 26 cases. Responses were rated as "good" in acute purulent tonsillitis 1 case and acute purulent otitis media 1 case, as "excellent" in acute sinusitis 1 case, as "excellent" in 2 and "good" in 1 out of 3 cases of acute bronchitis, as "excellent" in 13 and "good" 2 out of 15 cases of acute pneumonia, as "excellent" in acute urinary tract infection 2 cases and as "excellent" in acute enteritis in 1 case, acute appendicitis in 1 case and lymphadentis in 1 case. In all cases, the results were rated as "good" or "excellent". Antimicrobial effects against a total of 10 strains identified or assumed to be pathogenic bacteria were evaluated. The 10 strains of bacteria included 4 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 3 strains of Haemophilus influenzae (2 strains beta-lactamase producing), 2 strains of beta-lactamase producing Moraxella catarrhalis, 1 strain of beta-lactamase producing Morganella morganii. All the bacteria listed here were judged to have been eradicated. Adverse reaction was observed in 1 case with mild diarrhea. As abnormal changes in laboratory data, leucocytopenia in 1 case, elevation of GOT. GPT in 2 cases and eosinophilia in 1 case were observed. On the basis of the findings, TAZ/PIPC was considered to be effective and safe in the treatment of pediatric infections.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed1998

[Basic and clinical studies on tazobactam/piperacillin in pediatric field].

A drug susceptibility test of the combination drug TAZ/PIPC, which consists of a newly developed beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam (TAZ), and one of penicillin antibiotics, piperacillin (PIPC), with combination ratio of 1:4 in potency, was conducted with stock strains and clinical isolates. The clinical efficacy and safety of its injection was also evaluated in children with a variety of infectious diseases. The results were as follows: 1. In susceptibility test, 114 strains from 4 species of stock strains were treated with 8 drugs, that is, TAZ/PIPC, PIPC, penicillin G (PCG), ampicillin (ABPC), cefotiam (CTM), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), and sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ). Of three clinically isolated species from patients, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was treated with TAZ/PIPC, PIPC, methicillin (DMPPC), CTM, CTX, and SBT/CPZ, and the others were treated with the same drugs except for DMPPC. The MICs were measured for these bacterial strains inoculated at the concentration of 10(6) CFU/ml. The MIC90 values of TAZ/PIPC against 45 strains of Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes), one of the stock cultures of Gram-positive cocci, were 0.05 microgram/ml and similar to those of PIPC, CTM, CAZ, and SBT/CPZ. The MICs of TAZ/PIPC for 28 strains of Streptococcus agalactiae (S. agalactiae) were 0.39 microgram/ml and similar to those of PIPC, CTM, CAZ, and SBT/CPZ. As for Gram-negative bacilli, the MIC90 of TAZ/PIPC against 10 strains of Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) were 0.10 microgram/ml and similar to those of PIPC. The MIC90 of TAZ/PIPC against 31 strains of Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) were 0.05 microgram/ml and similar to those of PIPC, CTX, and SBT/CPZ. Regarding Gram-positive cocci isolated from patients received this combination drug, the MIC90 of TAZ/PIPC against 2 strains of S. aureus, a non beta-lactamase producing strain and a low-beta-lactamase producing strain, were 0.78 microgram/ml and 3.1 micrograms/ml, respectively; the former value was similar to those of PIPC, DMPPC, CTM, and CTX, and the latter was similar to those of PIPC, DMPPC, CTX, and SBT/CPZ. Of 4 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 2 strains were inhibited at 0.05 microgram/ml, and the others at 1.56 micrograms/ml; both values were similar to those of PIPC, SBT/CPZ. As for Gram-negative bacilli, 6 of 7 strains of H. influenzae did not produce beta-lactamase and 1 strain was a high producer. The MICs of TAZ/PIPC against beta-lactamase nonproducing strains were < or = 0.025 microgram/ml in 5 strains and 0.39 microgram/ml in 1 strain, and the values were similar to those of PIPC and SBT/CPZ. While the MIC of TAZ/PIPC against the high beta-lactamase producing strain was 0.78 microgram/ml; similar to that of SBT/CPZ and smaller than that of PIPC. 2. The results of clinical effects on 7 diseases in 33 cases were as follows: TAZ/PIPC was clinically judged "excellent" in 17 (51.5%); good in 14 (42.4%); fair in 2 (6.1%). No case with no response was seen in this study, and the total efficacy rate of "excellent" and "good" was 93.9%. 3. Bacteriological effects were evaluated in 17 strains of 4 species, and all of them were eradicated. 4. Adverse reactions were judged in 35, which consisted of 33 in which the clinical effects were evaluated and 2 dropped from this study. Of these cases, diarrhea was observed in 4 (11.4%). 5. Laboratory tests revealed an increase in platelets in 1 of 32 cases (3.1%), and eosinophilia in 2 of 29 cases (6.9%). Biochemical profile showed an increase in GPT alone and abnormal increases in both GOT and GPT in 1 each out of 21 cases.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Comparative antimicrobial activity of piperacillin-tazobactam tested against more than 5000 recent clinical isolates from five medical centers. A reevaluation after five years.

Piperacillin combined with tazobactam at a fixed concentration (4 micrograms/ml) and a ratio (8:1) was tested against 5,029 aerobic isolates and 447 fastidious organisms, including anaerobes. Among the Enterobacteriaceae, > 95% inhibition was shared only by imipenem (99.1% at < or = 4 micrograms/ml), and some newer cephalosporins (95.1% - 99.8% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), and piperacillin-tazobactam (95.8% at < or = 16/4 micrograms/ml). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent tested against nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli (93.5% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml). Ampicillin-sulbactam was the most active agent against staphylococci (95.0% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), followed by imipenem (91.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (89.3% at < or = 8/4 micrograms/ml), and cefepime (86.2% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml). Against the enterococci, only ampicillin (93.0% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml) with or without sulbactam, piperacillin (91.0% at < or = 16 micrograms/ml) with or without tazobactam, and imipenem (91.0%) had acceptable activity. Piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem were the most active drugs tested against all aerobic isolates, inhibiting 93.5% of isolates each. Piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited all fastidious isolates tested, including Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90, 0.094/4 micrograms/ml), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC90, 0.064/4 micrograms/ml), Neisseira gonorrhoeae (MIC90, < or = 0.016/4 micrograms/ml), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (all MICs, < or = 4/4 micrograms/ml). Against the anaerobic isolates, the most broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents tested were imipenem (100.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (99.5% at < or = 32/4 micrograms/ml), metronidazole (98.4% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (95.1% at < or = 32/2 micrograms/ml). These results are nearly identical to a previous study involving the same five medical centers in 1989. Piperacillin-tazobactam appears to remain a highly effective beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with a wide empiric spectrum and potency in teaching hospitals.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1998

[Laboratory and clinical studies on tazobactam/piperacillin in the field of pediatrics].

Laboratory and clinical studies on tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), a combination drug of piperacillin (PIPC) with the new beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam (TAZ), were carried out in the field of pediatrics. 1. After intravenous administration of TAZ/PIPC at a dose of 25 mg/kg to one child, the peak plasma levels of TAZ and PIPC were 24.4 micrograms/ml and 119 micrograms/ml respectively after 5 min. The half-lives of TAZ and PIPC were 0.48 and 0.60 hours respectively. Same as 50 mg/kg to two children, the peak plasma levels of TAZ and PIPC were 17.5, 32.2 micrograms/ml and 92.8, 163 micrograms/ml after 5 min. The half-lives of TAZ and PIPC were 0.37, 0.50 hours and 0.51, 0.59 hours. A ratio of TAZ to PIPC was about 1 to 4 in plasma levels. The cumulative urinary recovery rates of TAZ and PIPC in the first 6 hours after intravenous administration were 15.8, 64.9% and 39.8, 53.4%. 2. The antibacterial activity of TAZ/PIPC against clinically isolated organisms was determined. The MICs of TAZ/PIPC were < or = 0.05 microgram/ml against Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae and > or = 1.56 micrograms/ml against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus parainfluenzae. 3. The clinical efficacy of TAZ/PIPC could be evaluated in 14 patients with various bacterial infections, and was evaluated as "excellent" in 9 patients and as "good" in 5. The overall clinical efficacy rate in 14 cases was 100% and excellent was 64.3%. Bacteriological efficacy rate was 91.7% (10/11). 4. As a side effect, loose stool was observed in one case, no abnormal laboratory test values were observed. It has been concluded that TAZ/PIPC was a useful drug in the field of pediatrics.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed2002

Penetration of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg) into synovial tissue.

The degree of penetration of an antibiotic into the infected site is an important criterion for therapeutic success. This is particularly true for bone and joint infections. The association of piperacillin and tazobactam has been widely used in the treatment of serious infections including bone infections, but no study has been devoted to the subject of its diffusion into synovial tissue. Our objective was to quantify piperacillin/tazobactam synovial tissue penetration and to estimate the efficacy of the association against the microorganisms usually encountered in joint infections. In an open-label study, 6 subjects with similar age, weight, height and creatinine clearance, who were undergoing elective total hip replacement, received a single, parenteral, 4 g/500 mg dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Plasma and synovial tissue samples were collected and analyzed by a validated HPLC method. The mean concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam 1.5 h after the initiation of infusion were 69.9 +/- 4.9 microg/mL and 7.7 +/- 0.3 microg/mL, respectively, in plasma and 37.1 +/- 2.1 microg/g and 2.8 +/- 0.4 microg/g, respectively, in synovial tissue. The synovial tissue/plasma ratios were 0.5 +/- 0.0 for piperacillin and 0.4 +/- 0.0 for tazobactam. The piperacillin/tazobactam ratios were 9.1:1 in plasma and 13.5:1 in synovial tissue. The concentrations achieved in synovial tissue are above the MICs of most of the susceptible pathogens usually involved in joint infections, which suggests that the piperacillin/tazobactam combination should be effective in the treatment of most joint infections caused by susceptible microorganisms.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375G Q4H and 4.5G Q6H.

When piperacillin/tazobactam has been used to treat hospitalized patients with serious infections, including nosocomial pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it has usually been dosed at 3.375 g q4h to provide serum concentrations above commonly encountered organisms' MICs (T > MIC) for at least 40-50% of the dosing interval. Pharmacodynamic principles suggest that a similar efficacy can be realized with extended dosing intervals when a larger dose (e.g. 4.5 g q6h) is administered, which was the objective of this study. Twelve healthy volunteers, 29.4 +/- 8.9 years of age, were enrolled in this multiple-dose, open-labeled, randomized, two-period crossover study. Blood samples were collected after the third dose and concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam were determined with a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined by noncompartment analysis. T > MIC of piperacillin was calculated for a range of MIC values. Piperacillin/tazobactam was well tolerated in 11 subjects who completed both regimens. The C(max), T(1/2), K, and AUC of P were significantly different according to a paired t test (p < 0.05) between two study regimens. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in tazobactam regimens were noted for C(max), and AUC. The piperacillin/tazobactam regimen of 4.5 g q6h achieved a 44% T > MIC for MIC values of < or = 16 microg/ml, while the 3.375-gram q4h regimen achieved 42% T > MIC, for MIC values of < or = 32 microg/ml. Dosage regimens for treating serious infections can be extended safely and effectively to 4.5 g q6h and obtain at least 40-50% T > MIC in the coverage of pathogens implicated with serious infections, including P. aeruginosa.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation of tazobactam/piperacillin in the pediatric field].

Pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation was conducted on the combination drug, tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC, YP-14), of newly developed beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam (TAZ), and antibiotic agent of penicillin group for injections, piperacillin (PIPC), and the following results were obtained. 1. Absorption and excretion Both serum levels of TAZ and PIPC after the intravenous drip infusion for 30 minutes at the dose of 25 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg of TAZ/PIPC showed peaks at the end of the intravenous drip infusion (in 30 minutes after the commencement of the administration) with the levels of 11.93 or 26.05 micrograms/ml for TAZ and 49.80 or 107.50 micrograms/ml for PIPC. The halflife times were 0.51 or 0.67 hours for TAZ and 0.51 or 0.54 hours for PIPC. The serum level of desethyl-piperacillin (DEt-PIPC), an active metabolite of PIPC, showed a peak one hour after the end of the intravenous drip infusion (in 90 minutes after the commencement of the administration) with the level of 0.79 or 1.47 micrograms/ml. On the other hand, cumulative recovery ratios into urine were 41.3% or 40.4% for TAZ and 38.7% or 37.8% for PIPC. The recovery ratio for DEt-PIPC, an active metabolite of PIPC, was 1.9% or 0.3%. 2. Clinical evaluation TAZ/PIPC was administered to 47 cases (pneumonia: 25 cases, bronchitis: 16 cases, cutaneous soft tissue infection: 3 cases, urinary tract infection: 2 cases and lymphadenitis: 1 case). Clinical efficacy evaluation was conducted in 45 cases, excluding one case with bronchitis complicated by measles and other one case with left cervical cellulitis complicated by mumps. Good or more efficacy was observed in the all cases (excellent efficacy: 28 cases and good efficacy: 17 cases). The eradication rate in 31 cases where the pathogenic bacteria were identified and bacteriological efficacy was revealed was 93.5% (29/31 cases). Out of them, bacterial replacement was observed in 5 cases. Decrease in bacteria (including partial eradication) was observed in the remaining 2 cases. Adverse reactions were not reported in any cases. Abnormal values of clinical laboratory examination were reported in 5 cases (increase in platelet count: 2 cases, decrease in leukocyte count: 2 cases and increase in eosinophil count: 1 case). However, there was no case requiring any treatment.

Bacteria↗
PubMed2000

The role of beta-lactam antimicrobials as single agents in treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics have several advantages in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. These agents are effective against gram-negative rods and anaerobes, reach therapeutic levels rapidly after parenteral administration, and, in the absence of penicillin allergy, generally exhibit low toxicity. The second-generation cephalosporins (e.g., cefoxitin, cefotetan) are used widely in surgical prophylaxis, trauma, and treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired infections, but limitations in their spectra and microbial resistance restrict their utility in more serious infections. Extended-spectrum penicillin/beta-lactamase-inhibitor combinations are effective in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections and include enterococci in their spectrum. Gram-negative aerobe resistance has developed to ampicillin/sulbactam. Piperacillin/tazobactam, a ureidopenicillin with increased gram-negative coverage and enhanced antipseudomonal activity, has proved to be effective in clinical trial therapy for intra-abdominal infections. The very broad spectrum carbapenems--imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem--are effective for serious infections or resistant organisms and are often used in the intensive care unit or for nosocomial intra-abdominal infection. These classes of beta-lactams comprise a range of antimicrobials that can be targeted effectively as single agents to both prevention and treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2003

Cost analysis of continuous versus intermittent infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam: a time-motion study.

The time and associated costs (drug, labor, supply) of administering a continuous versus an intermittent i.v. infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam were compared. The total labor cost was calculated for each regimen based on the time required for nurses, pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians to either prepare or administer the drug, according to their standard responsibilities. Thirty timed observations were made for each of the dosing formulations. Observations were conducted on separate occasions for at least four different nurses, pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians per formulation. Labor costs were calculated by multiplying the mean times recorded by the average U.S. hourly wages and local wages for these health professionals and extrapolated to encompass a 24-hour period of drug administration. The average wholesale price and hospital contract price of piperacillin-tazobactam were used to calculate the costs of both intermittent and continuous infusions. The costs for all items used in drug preparation and administration were also calculated for supplies. Basic descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the costs of the time needed to prepare and administer the different regimens. Drug acquisition costs accounted for the largest percentage of the total cost for all regimens. Analysis of labor costs revealed that nursing time accounted for the majority of the labor costs, with continuous infusion regimens being the least time-consuming and least costly administration method. Continuous-infusion regimens were more cost-efficient when evaluated on a daily basis and for the total cost of 5- and 10-day treatments. The use of continuous infusion as a means of administering piperacillin-tazobactam maximized the drug's pharmacodynamics and was more cost-efficient than intermittent infusion of the drug.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed2003

In vitro activity of combination therapy with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or meropenem with ciprofloxacin against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains has been increasing every year, and treatment with various antimicrobial combinations has been offered alternatively in the clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of combinations of meropenem, cefepime, or piperacillin-tazobactam with ciprofloxacin against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains by the time-kill method. The results show that both the combination of two beta lactams with ciprofloxacin and three beta lactams with ciprofloxacin against 4 of 5 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains has no effect in vitro. The combination of one beta lactam (meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam) with ciprofloxacin has a synergistic effect against one strain of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa that is ciprofloxacin susceptible and resistant to meropenem, cefepime, and piperacillin-tazobactam. None of the combinations had an antagonistic effect against these multidrug-resistant strains.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗