SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pirinitramide”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Opioid-induced respiratory depression is associated with increased tidal volume variability.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: mu-agonistic opioids cause concentration-dependent hypoventilation and increased irregularity of breathing. The aim was to quantify opioid-induced irregularity of breathing and to investigate its time-course during and after an opioid infusion, and its ability to predict the severity of respiratory depression. METHODS: Twenty-three patients breathing spontaneously via a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask received an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of alfentanil (2.3 microg kg(-1) min(-1), 14 patients) or pirinitramide (piritramide) (17.9 microg kg(-1) min(-1), nine patients) until either a cumulative dose of 70 microg kg(-1) for alfentanil or 500 microg kg(-1) for pirinitramide had been achieved or the infusion had to be stopped for safety reasons. Tidal volumes (VT) and minute ventilation were measured with an anaesthesia workstation. For every 20 breaths, the quartile coefficient was calculated (Qeff20V(T)). RESULTS: Both the decrease of minute volume and the increase of Qeff20V(T) during and after opioid infusion were highly significant (P < 0.001, ANOVA). Patients in which the alfentanil infusion had to be terminated prematurely had lower minute volumes (P = 0.002, t-test) and higher Qeff20V(T) (P = 0.034, t-test) than those who received the complete dose. Changes in the regularity of breathing measured as Qeff20V(T) parallel those of minute ventilation during and after opioid infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids cause a more complicated disturbance of the control of respiration than a mere resetting to higher PCO2. Furthermore, Qeff20V(T) appears to predict the severity of opioid-induced respiratory depression.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

A randomized controlled double-blind trial comparing piritramide and morphine for analgesia after hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Efficacy and side-effects of piritramide (pirinitramide) and morphine, given intravenously for postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy, were compared in a randomized controlled double-blind trial in 92 ASA class I-III patients. METHODS: Administration was investigator-controlled during the first 90 min and subsequently via a patient-controlled device. Visual analogue scales for pain intensity and verbal rating scales for side-effects were taken repeatedly. RESULTS: Median visual analogue scores for pain intensity on a 100-mm scale 4, 8 and 24 h after surgery were 10, 8.5 and 5 mm in the piritramide group and 18, 10 and 8.5 mm in the morphine group. These differences are neither statistically nor clinically significant. Median values for nausea on a verbal rating scale from 0 to 3 were zero for both groups at all times with similar ranges. There was no difference in number of episodes of vomiting and retching and usage of antiemetics. The mean amount of piritramide used for initial titration was 15.2 mg; the respective amount of morphine was 15.4 mg. CONCLUSIONS: In this setting the two agents are equally effective and show a similar profile of side-effects.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

PubMed1997

Focal myopathy associated with chronic intramuscular injection of piritramide.

We report a patient in whom chronic intramuscular piritramide led to a focal fibrotic myopathy. Since piritramide myotoxicity has never been reported, we have studied its effect on rat skeletal muscle. Chronic intramuscular piritramide led to fibrous connective tissue replacement of rat skeletal muscle, similar to that found in the patient's muscle. Although the pathogenetic mechanism of piritramide myopathy is unclear, we caution against prolonged intramuscular use of piritramide to prevent this potentially debilitating adverse effect.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Preoperative oral administration of fast-release morphine sulfate reduces postoperative piritramide consumption.

The aim of this prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study was to investigate the effect of premedication with morphine sulfate on postoperative pain. Ninety-eight ASA I-III patients undergoing total replacement of the knee or hip joint were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 received 20 mg morphine sulfate p.o. approximately one hour before the start of surgery; group 2 received placebo. After surgery, piritramide was administered via patient-controlled analgesia over 24 hours. Piritramide consumption and pain scores (visual analog scale) were recorded. The duration of surgery (mean +/- SD) was comparable in the two groups (group 1: 145 +/- 42 min, group 2: 131 +/- 35 min). In group 1 the cumulative piritramide consumption during 24 hours postoperation was significantly less than in the placebo group (37.5 +/- 12.5 mg versus 46.8 +/- 22.1, t-test, p < 0.05), although similar pain scores were recorded (group 1: 4.8 +/- 1.8 and 3.6 +/- 1.7, group 2: 4.8 +/- 1.6 and 3.4 +/- 2.0, at 1 and 24 hours, respectively). These data show that the preoperative oral administration of morphine sulfate, regardless of its short half-life, can reduce postoperative consumption of opioids at similar pain levels.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

[Postoperative pain therapy in minimally invasive direct coronary arterial bypass surgery. I.v. opioid patient-controlled analgesia versus intercostal block].

OBJECTIVE: Lately introduced cardiosurgical procedures such as MIDCAB enable an early extubation immediately after surgery. This also requires an adequate anesthesia regime and especially a sufficient postoperative analgesia. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) and intercostal nerve blockade (ICB) were evaluated for their suitability for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing a MIDCAB procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After approval by the local ethic committee and obtaining written informed consent 43 patients were included in this study. Anesthesia was induced and maintained in a total intravenous standardised manner with propofol, remifentanil, cisatracurium and additionally glyceroltrinitrate, clonidine and esmolol were given as needed. After revascularisation patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving either 7.5 mg piritramid i.v. before extubation and continuing a PCA with 2 mg boli and a 10 min lockout, or an ICB with ropivacaine 1% (4 times 5 ml). Additionally all patients received 1 g paracetamol rectally before induction of anesthesia and 1 g metamizol i.v. at the end of surgery. A rescue medication of 3.75 mg piritramid i.v. was allowed. A pain score (NRS 0-10), the Aldrete score (AS 0-12) and oxygen saturation were obtained 1, 4, and 8 h after extubation. RESULTS: The ICB group showed a significantly greater pain reduction in the first (5.8 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.9; P < 0.02) and fourth h (3.6 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.6 +/- 1.4; P < 0.02), respectively. Transfer to an intermediate care ward one hr after extubation was achieved more often in the ICB group according to the AS (ICB 9.6 +/- 1.5 vs. PCA 8.9 +/- 1.2; P < 0.05), too. There was no difference with respect to the oxygen saturation. The additional piritramid demand was 9.3 mg in the ICP group and 5 mg in the PCA group in the first 8 hours postoperative. CONCLUSION: ICB gives a better pain relief in the early postoperative phase after MIDCAB procedures compared to a PCA. Both regimes are adequate in order to provide a sufficient pain relief and help to avoid prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation. These will enable an early transfer of patients to an intermediate care station and save ICU capacity.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Patient-controlled analgesia with clonidine and piritramide].

UNLABELLED: Following parenteral administration, clonidine has analgesic effects at both cerebral and spinal levels. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) makes it possible to determine equipotent dosages of analgesics by relating analgesic consumption per time to the levels of analgesia obtained in comparable patient populations. Therefore, we studied the equipotency ratios of clonidine and piritramide and the incidence of undesired side effects in the treatment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing maxillo-facial surgery. METHODS: After approval of the local ethics committee and informed consent 40 patients (age > 18 year, ASA I-III) were studied. Following randomization, the patients each received a PCA device containing either clonidine (bolus 30 micrograms), or piritramide (bolus 1.5 mg) for treatment of postoperative pain (lockout interval 5 min in both groups). During the postoperative period, pain was determined using a visual analogue scale, while analgesic consumption, sedation, haemodynamic parameters, respiration rate, and the occurrence of undesired side effects were documented additionally. RESULTS: The groups had comparable distributions of biometric data, duration of anaesthesia, and ASA classification. Pain level decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) in both groups during the first 2 h of PCA. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were lower (P < 0.05) in the clonidine group 4 and 6 h after PCA onset, while the degree of sedation after 2 (P < 0.01) and 6 (P < 0.05) h was higher than in the piritramide group. Nausea and vomiting were more frequent (P < 0.05) in the piritramide group. Both groups showed a wide interpatient variation in analgesic requirement. The equipotency ratio clonidine/piritramid was 1:63.7. CONCLUSION: Intravenous clonidine is a potent analgesic and is suitable or the treatment of postoperative pain following maxillo-facial surgery. The analgesic potency of 150 micrograms clonidine i.v. was equivalent to that of 9.56 mg piritramide i.v. Nausea and vomiting occurred more rarely in the clonidine group, while deeper sedation was observed more frequently than in the piritramide group. Owing to the wide interindividual variation of analgesic consumption, clonidine dosages have to be adjusted to the actual requirements.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

[Patient-controlled analgesia. PCA in a three year old child after traumatic amputation].

We report the case of a 3-year-old boy, who received long-term parent-controlled analgesia after traumatic amputation of one leg. He underwent surgery 17 times for a period of 25 days. Parent-controlled analgesia was started four days after admission because analgesia with non-opioid analgetics (acetaminophen) proved to be insufficient. The pump was set to a bolus-dose of 23 micrograms kg-1 piritramide (dipidolor) and a lockout interval of 10 minutes. Permitted maximum cumulative dose in four hours was 5 mg piritramide. There was no continuous infusion of opioid. PCA and possible adverse effects were explained to the mother. A monitoring regimen was used to assess efficacy (pain intensity estimated by the mother), adverse effects (sedation score, occurrence of nausea and vomiting) and piritramide consumption. For fear of side effects opioid administration was insufficient in the beginning. After three days the mother used the PCA effectively and no additional analgesic medication was required. Nausea or other side effects were not observed. After seven days opioid consumption nearly doubled. Apart from tolerance, this might have resulted from the mother's caution in the first days. After 17 days the PCA was discontinued. Oral analgetics (tramadol) controlled the pain adequately. Management of postoperative pain in children is difficult and too often insufficient. PCA is a safe and effective method of providing postoperative pain relief. Feasibility was shown in adolescents and, more recently, in children aged five years and over. Only few reports are available describing long term use of PCA in children younger than five years. Our case suggests that PCA may also be used effectively and safely in children younger than five years, if experienced staff, a monitoring regimen and cooperative and well instructed parents are available.

Amputation, Traumatic↗

PubMed1998

[Long-term experiences with mechanical patient-controlled analgesia pumps for therapy of postoperative pain in general surgery].

The efficiency and safety of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the treatment of postoperative pain is well documented. An alternative to electrical systems is the disposable pump, which is cost effective. The aim of this study was to prove the efficiency and safety of PCA disposable pumps. Eighty patients (45 men, 35 women, mean age 50 +/- 16 years) were included and received single-use PCA pumps (Vygon Medical Products, Aachen, Germany) for postoperative pain control. A sufficient reduction in pain levels, measured by the Verbal Rating scale (VRS), was achieved in nearly all patients. For the first application, a single bolus of 7.0 +/- 2 mg piritramide (Dipidolor) was needed, the mean of treatment time was 56 +/- 31 h. We had two dropouts because of non-compliance, two patients felt dizzy, and one patient felt nauseous. Further side-effects were observed during treatment. Our study led us concluded that PCA therapy with mechanical, disposable pumps is a safe and efficient treatment for postoperative pain. Such a concept can be introduced without an "Acute Pain Service" if the staff are well trained.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

[Pain therapy after thoracoscopic interventions. Do regional analgesia techniques (intercostal block or interpleural analgesia) have advantages over intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia (PCA)?].

Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia are common techniques used to provide post-operative analgesia following thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracic surgery). The aim of the present prospective randomised study was to evaluate the efficacy of two less invasive analgesic techniques, intercostal blocks (ICB) and interpleural analgesia (IPA). After approval from the ethics committee and informed consent from the patients, 36 patients scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to a group for postoperative pain management: group ICB: intercostal blocks of the segments involved with 5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine at the end of surgery and 6 h later; group IPA: interpleural analgesia with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine applied every 4 h using a catheter placed during surgery near the apex of the interpleural space; control group: IV-opiod-PCA with piritamide. Patients in the ICB and IPA groups had access to pain relief by PCA with piritramide as well. Additional medication for all groups if the analgesia was insufficient consisted of metamizol. There were no significant differences in piritramide consumption between the two regional analgesia groups and the control group up to the 3rd and 7th postoperative day. Up to the 7th day piritramide consumption in group ICB was 78 mg, in group IPA 75 mg and 80 mg in the control group. Patients in group ICB showed significantly less pain at rest measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) on the 1st postoperative day (U-test, P < 0.05), but otherwise there were no statistical differences regarding pain scores. Respiratory parameters such as forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume, peak flow and the Tiffeneau test (FVC, FEV1, PF, FEV1/FVC) were reduced significantly after thoracoscopy and showed a slow recovery in all three groups without significant intergroup differences. Thoracoscopic surgery causes less and shorter lasting pain in comparison to thoracotomy. Nevertheless, effective pain management is necessary. We could not demonstrate a significant reduction in piritramide consumption for the techniques of regional analgesia tested here (ICB, IPA). We conclude that the use of these techniques is not complementary after thoracoscopy, since an opioid (PCA with piritramide) combined with a non-opioid (metamizol) resulted in satisfactory analgesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

[Postoperative pain therapy in urology. A prospective study].

A sufficient analgesic treatment in the early postoperative period is important for the patients comfort level. Moreover, physical therapy for prophylaxis of pneumonia and thrombosis is better tolerated. In a prospective study, we compared two postoperative pain management regimens to establish a sufficient pain management without the need of additional costs or manpower. Of 215 patients undergoing major urologic surgery, 111 patients received on demand medication exclusively (group 1), whereas 104 patients were treated with basic analgesics combined with on demand medication (group 2). Pain intensity, side effects and subjective well being were evaluated with a visual analogue scale and a standardised interview. Pain intensity and side effects were significantly lower in group 2. Thus, with combined analgesic treatment, postoperative pain relieve can be achieved safely and without additional costs.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

PubMed2003

Systematic evaluation of pain in neonates: effect on the number of intravenous analgesics prescribed.

OBJECTIVE: To document the effect of systematic evaluation of pain in neonates on prescription of intravenous analgesics in a level-III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) as a marker of increased awareness of treating and preventing pain. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the number of yearly prescribed vials of intravenous analgesics in a level-III NICU during a period before (1996-1999) and after (2000 to August 2002) introduction of a multidimensional pain scale. Correction was carried out by multiple regression analysis for clinical co-variables (admissions, days on parenteral nutrition, days on respiratory support, surgical procedures), which also might explain changes in prescription of analgesics. Postoperative length (hours) of administration of analgesics was calculated in a group of infants (1996-2001) who all received cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) before (1996-1999) and since (2000-2001) introduction of pain evaluation. RESULTS: The number of yearly prescribed vials increased from 3140+/-619 (mean+/-SD) to 5915+/-675 ( P<0.005). There is also a significant increase in the number of surgical interventions ( P<0.05) but not in days on respiratory support, days on parenteral nutrition or in number of admissions. After correction for the number of surgical procedures, the increase in prescribed vials remained significant ( P<0.05). In infants who received cryotherapy, a significant increase in length of postoperative analgesia (65-107 h, P<0.01) was documented. Even after correction for the increased postoperative length of ventilation, duration of postoperative analgesia remained significantly ( P<0.05) longer. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic evaluation of pain increased awareness of treating and preventing pain in neonates, even after correction for clinical co-variables. This increase was not associated with an increase in potential side-effects (length of respiratory support, length of parenteral nutrition).

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1999

Protein binding of piritramide: influence of various protein concentrations and the postoperative acute phase response.

OBJECTIVE: Piritramide is a lipophilic opioid, which is widely used for postoperative analgesia and analgosedation in Europe. In this study we investigated the influence of various protein concentrations (total protein, alpha1-acid glycoprotein, albumin) and the postoperative acute phase response on the protein binding of piritramide. METHODS: The influence of various protein concentrations on the protein binding of piritramide was investigated by either diluting the serum samples of five volunteers with isotonic saline or by adding different amounts of alpha1-acid glycoprotein. Albumin binding was measured in a 5% human albumin solution. The impact of the postoperative acute phase response was investigated by obtaining daily serum samples from 18 surgical patients until the third postoperative day, and measuring piritramide protein binding, alpha1-acid glycoprotein, total protein and albumin. RESULTS: There was a significant relationship between piritramide protein binding and the concentrations of total protein and alpha1-acid glycoprotein. The binding to albumin was 88%. During the postoperative acute phase response, the protein binding of piritramide did not change. Serum concentrations of alpha1-acid glycoprotein increased, whereas total protein and albumin decreased. CONCLUSION: Although there were significant changes in the piritramide-binding proteins, alpha1-acid glycoprotein and albumin, during the postoperative acute phase response, the protein binding of piritramide did not change. Therefore, a change in protein binding, which might be one factor to be considered in determining piritramide dosage in the postoperative period, does not have to be taken into account.

Acute-Phase Reaction↗

PubMed1996

Posterior retroperitoneoscopy as a new minimally invasive approach for adrenalectomy: results of 30 adrenalectomies in 27 patients.

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a new minimally invasive method. It represents an alternative to conventional open procedures and laparoscopic techniques. Between July 1994 and November 1995 a total of 30 retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomies were performed on 27 patients. In 24 patients, unilateral tumors were seen (size 1-7 cm): seven Cushing adenomas, five Conn adenomas, seven pheochromocytomas, four hormonally inactive tumors, one cyst. Three patients suffered from Cushing syndrome with bilateral adrenal gland hyperplasias (two inoperable pituitary gland tumors, one bronchial carcinoid with ACTH secretion). The operations were carried out in prone position. After balloon dilatation of the retroperitoneum and creation of a pneumoperitoneum the preparation of the adrenal gland was performed via three trocar sites positioned below the 12th rib. Twenty-five adrenalectomies were completed endoscopically, and five times (among four patients) conversion to the conventional posterior technique was necessary. The average operating time of complete endoscopic adrenalectomies was 124 minutes (45-225 minutes); blood loss was 10 to 120 ml. With minimal need for postoperative analgesia (average dosage 7.9 mg of piritramide), mobilization and adequate food uptake were possible on the day of operation. The posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a relatively fast, safe method, with the advantages of the posterior open approach and minimally invasive surgery. It therefore represents an important addition to adrenal gland surgery.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1999

Pain therapy following joint replacement.A randomized study of patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional pain therapy.

A prospective randomized trial in 42 patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty under general anaesthesia was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus demanded conventional pain therapy (CPT) for controlling postoperative pain. Four patients had to be excluded from the study (2 postoperative confusion, 1 elevated piritramid dosage caused by chronic pain therapy, 1 stressed by PCA pump handling). PCA group (n = 19) received piritramid via PCA pump, CPT group (n = 19) received tramadol (oral or intramuscularly) or piritramid intravenously. PCA or CPT was started in the intensive care unit. Pain was measured with a standard 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for 60 h postoperatively. Over this period of time, no significant differences were found in the pain score of both groups, nor did the incidence of side-effects differ significantly. The PCA group required on average twice as much piritramid-equivalent than the CPT group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was good in both groups, but significantly better in the PCA group (P < 0.01), although the measured postoperative individual pain scores were above the preoperatively determined individual subjective pain threshold in the majority of both groups. From these results we draw the conclusion that even if the patients feel satisfied by the pain therapy administered, the majority are objectively treated below their individual subjective pain threshold.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2001

[Lack of pre-emptive analgesic effect of low-dose ketamine in postoperative patients. A prospective, randomised double-blind study].

NMDA receptors are assumed to play an important role for neuronal plasticity. In vitro and animal experiments confirmed that NMDA antagonistic drugs can prevent hyperexitability of dorsal root neurons after strong pain stimuli. Clinical data, however, are more or less controversial in this respect. It was the aim of the present prospective, randomised, double-blind study to verify if low-dose preoperative ketamine, an NMDA antagonist, provides relevant postoperative analgesia in surgical patients and to re-examine positive results published by other investigators. 80 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or proctologic surgery received at induction of general anaesthesia a single i.v. bolus dose of either ketamine 0.15 mg/kg or placebo (0.9% NaCl). Postoperative analgesia was provided by i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using the opioid piritramide. Cardiovascular parameters, respiration, sedation, cumulative piritramide consumption and pain scores (visual analogue scale 1-10, verbal rating scale 0-4) were monitored at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. Additionally, a retrospective pain score was documented after the 24 hours observation period. There was no statistically significant difference in any study parameter. Cumulative PCA piritramide consumption after 24 hours was 25.0+/-16.2 mg in the ketamine group and 29.5+/-20.4 mg in the placebo group. Ketamine-specific side effects such as hallucinations or bad dreams were not observed. It is concluded that under the study conditions used, low dose ketamine, contrary to previously reported results [30], does not provide a clinically relevant pre-emptive analgesic effect in postoperative patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Sensitive determination of piritramide in human plasma by gas chromatography.

A selective and sensitive method for the determination of piritramide in human plasma is described. A 1-ml aliquot of plasma was extracted with 10 ml of hexane-isoamyl alcohol (99.5:0.5, v/v) (extraction efficiency 86%) after addition of 50 microliters of 2 M ammonia and 20 microliters of aqueous strychnine solution (100 ng per 10 microliters) as internal standard. Gas chromatography was performed with J&W DB-1, 30 m x 0.53 mm I.D. separation column, film thickness 1.5 microns, using an nitrogen-phosphorus-sensitive detector. The assay was linear in the concentration range 3.75-2250 ng/ml (r = 0.999), with a lower limit of detection of 1-2 ng/ml. The precision was determined using spiked plasma samples (10 and 50 ng/ml), with coefficients of variation of 3.5 and 3.1% (intra-day; n = 5) and 4.6 and 4.1% (inter-day; n = 4). In the range 3.75-150 ng/ml, the accuracy of the assay was 3.36%. The method was used for the determination of piritramide plasma concentrations in patients receiving intra- or post-operative analgesia.

Chromatography, Gas↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Postoperative pain management and respiratory depression after thoracotomy: a comparison of intramuscular piritramide and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using fentanyl or buprenorphine.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl, buprenorphine, and piritramide and to define the respiratory risk during conventional postoperative pain management and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Department of anesthesiology of an urban hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty patients (ASA) physical status II and III) recovering from unilateral thoracotomy performed under standardized general anesthesia including intercostal blockade. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with intramuscular (IM) piritramide (7.5 to 15 mg as needed) or intravenous (IV) PCA with fentanyl (demand dose 34 micrograms) or buprenorphine (demand dose 80 micrograms) during the early postoperative period, using the On-Demand Analgesia Computer (ODAC, Janssen Scientific Instruments, Beerse, Belgium). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean postoperative observation period was 24 to 25 hours. During this time, patients requested 55.8 +/- 23.2 mg of piritramide, 1.04 +/- 0.54 mg of fentanyl, or 1.81 +/- 0.78 mg of buprenorphine. Analgesia in all groups was judged mostly good to excellent, with a preference for PCA. Side effects were only of minor intensity in all groups; euphoria or dysphoria occurred only with buprenorphine. Two patients using PCA and five patients having IM analgesia developed short periods of respiratory depression (respiratory rate less than or equal to 8 breaths/minute and/or oxygen (O2) desaturation less than or equal to 90%), which promptly responded to commands to breathe deeply. Respiration rates did not differ, and frequent arterial blood sampling showed normal mean partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) and carbon dioxide (PCO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-induced respiratory depression occurred infrequently during postoperative pain management whether by conventional means or using PCA, even though high doses of opioid analgesics were required intermittently for adequate postoperative pain relief by either technique.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

PubMed1997

Pain treatment after thoracotomy: is it a special problem?

BACKGROUND: Although it is frequently stated in the literature that thoracotomy is one of the most painful operative incisions, few data supporting this view are available. METHODS: Patients' postoperative pain experience can be assessed on the basis of their usage of patient-controlled analgesia. In a prospective trial the daily self-administered doses of analgesics in 55 patients within the first 4 days after posterolateral thoractomy were compared with those in 30 patients for the same number of days after median laparotomy. The visual analog scale was used as a second measure to evaluate postoperative pain. RESULTS: On the basis of patient-controlled analgesia usage on the first postoperative day and the visual analog scale score for the first 2 days, a small but significant difference between the two patient groups was found which showed that thoracotomy is less painful than median laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The common belief that posterolateral thoracotomy is a very painful operative access is not true. Therefore it is not necessary to use special techniques for postthoracotomy pain relief in these patients. Patient-controlled analgesia is sufficient for pain relief after major thoracic or abdominal incisions.

Adolescent↗