SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Poly T”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1994

Influence of drug binding on DNA hydration: acoustic and densimetric characterizations of netropsin binding to the poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT) and poly(dA).poly(dT) duplexes and the poly(dT).poly(dA).poly(dT) triplex at 25 degrees C.

We use high-precision acoustic and densimetric techniques to determine, at 25 degrees C, the changes in volume, delta V, and adiabatic compressibility, delta Ks, that accompany the binding of netropsin to the poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT) and poly(dA).poly(dT) duplexes, as well as to the poly(dT).poly(dA).poly(dT) triplex. We find that netropsin binding to the heteropolymeric poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT) duplex is accompanied by negative changes in volume, delta V, and small positive changes in compressibility, delta Ks. By contrast, netropsin binding to the homopolymeric poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex is accompanied by large positive changes in both volume, delta V, and compressibility, delta Ks. Furthermore, netropsin binding to the poly(dT).poly(dA).poly(dT) triplex causes changes in both volume and compressibility that are nearly twice as large as those observed when netropsin binds to the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex. We interpret these macroscopic data in terms of binding-induced microscopic changes in the hydration of the DNA structures and the drug. Specifically, we find that netropsin binding induces the release of approximately 22 waters from the hydration shell of the poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT) heteropolymeric duplex, approximately 40 waters from the hydration shell of the poly(dA).poly(dT) homopolymeric duplex, and about 53 waters from the hydration shell of the poly(dA).poly(dT), induces the release of 18 more water molecules than netropsin binding to the heteropolymeric duplex, poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT). On the basis of apparent molar volume, phi V, and apparent molar adiabatic compressibility, phi Ks, values for the initial drug-free and final drug-bound states of the two all-AT duplexes, we propose that the larger dehydration of the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex reflects, in part, the formation of a less hydrated poly(dA).poly(dT)-netropsin complex compared with the corresponding poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT)-netropsin complex. In conjunction with our previously published entropy data [Marky, L. A., & Breslauer, K. J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 4359-4363], we calculate that each water of hydration released to the bulk solvent by ligand binding contributes 1.6 cal K-1 mol-1 to the entropy of binding. This value corresponds to the average difference between the partial molar entropy of water in the bulk state and water in the hydration shells of the two all-AT duplexes. When netropsin binds to the poly(dT).poly(dA).poly(dT) triplex, the changes in both volume and compressibility suggest that the binding event induces more dehydration of the triplex than of the duplex state. Specifically, we calculate that netropsin binding to the poly(dT).poly(dA).poly(dT) triplex causes the release of 13 more waters than netropsin binding to the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed1982

Poly(A):poly(U); poly(O8A):poly(U); poly(A):poly(MeNH5U) and poly(O8A):poly(MeNH5U) versus Bida Semliki forest virus in chick embryos.

Poly(A):poly(U) (polyadenylic acid:polyuridylic acid hybrid); poly(O8A):poly(U) (poly-8-oxy-adenylic acid:polyuridylic acid hybrid); poly(A):poly(MeNH5U) (polyadenylic acid-5-methylamino uridylic acid hybrid) and poly(O8A):poly(MeNH5U) (poly-8-oxyadenylic acid:poly-5-methylamino uridylic acid hybrid) were studied in chick embryos to compare the protection offered against Semliki forest virus (the Nigerian strain) AN 49809. The modified polymers showed a higher activity index but were more toxic than the unmodified analogue.

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Poly(dA).poly(dT) exists in an unusual conformation under physiological conditions: propidium binding to poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)].

The binding of propidium to poly(dA).poly(dT) [poly(dA.dT)] and to poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)] [poly[d(A-T)2]] has been compared under a variety of solution conditions by viscometric titrations, binding studies, and kinetic experiments. The binding of propidium to poly[d(A-T)2] is quite similar to its binding to calf thymus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). The interaction with poly(dA.dT), however, is quite unusual. The viscosity of a poly(dA.dT) solution first decreases and then increases in a titration with propidium at 18 degrees C. The viscosity of poly[d(A-T)2] shows no decrease in a similar titration. Scatchard plots for the interaction of propidium with poly(dA.dT) show the classical upward curvature for positive cooperativity. The curvature decreases as the temperature is increased in binding experiments. A van't Hoff plot of the observed binding constants yields an apparent positive enthalpy of approximately +6 kcal/mol for the propidium-poly(dA.dT) interaction. Propidium binding to poly[d(A-T)2] shows no evidence for positive cooperativity, and the enthalpy change for the reaction is approximately -9 kcal/mol. Both the magnitude of the dissociation constants and the effects of ionic strength are quite similar for the dissociation of propidium from poly(dA-T)2] and from poly[d(A-T)2], suggesting that the intercalated states are similar for the two complexes. The observed association reactions, under pseudo-first-order conditions, are quite different. Plots of the observed pseudo-first-order association rate constant vs. polymer concentration have much larger slopes for propidium binding to poly[d(A-T)2] than to poly(dA.dT).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Kinetics↗

PubMed1980

Interferon induction by and toxicity of polyriboinosinic acid [poly(rI)].polyribocytidylic acid [poly (rC)], mismatched analog poly (rI).poly[r(C12Uracil)n], and poly(rI).poly(rC) L-lysine complexed with carboxymethylcellulose.

The ability of polyriboinosionic acid [poly(rI)].polyribocytidylic acid [poly(rC)], mismatched analog poly (rI).poly[r(C12Uracil)n], and poly(rI).poly(rC) complexed with poly L-lysine and carboxymethylcellulose [poly(ICLc)] to induce interferon and the comparative toxicity of each in cats were evaluated. Each induced high levels of circulating interferon, although poly(ICLC) injected intravenously at 1 to 4 mg/kg induced up to 10 times more interferon than the other compounds. Each compound was pyrogenic and caused a transient decrease in leukocyte numbers. Poly(rI).poly(rC) and the mismatched analog caused severe diarrhea and nausea at the highest drug concentrations (1 to 4 mg/kg), but poly (ICLC) did not. Each compound also caused depression and lethargy and impaired coordination.

Animals↗

PubMed1978

Specificity and crossreactivity of idiotypes of murine antibodies induced by poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)-poly(Lys) and poly(Phe,Glu)-poly(DLAla)-poly(Lys).

Antibodies elicited against the two synthetic polypeptides, poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)-poly(Lys) [(T,G)-A-L] and poly(Phe,Glu)-poly(DLAla)-poly(Lys) [(Phe,G)-A-L], are crossreactive although the humoral responses to these immunogens are under different genetic controls. The fine specificity of the antibodies elicited by the two polypeptides was studied in the present work. Antisera against (Phe,G)-A-L bind both (125)I-labeled (T,G)-A-L and iodinated modified (Phe,G)-A-L. However, while the binding to (T,G)-A-L could be inhibited completely with the two antigens, the binding to (Phe,G)-A-L was inhibited completely with (Phe,G)-A-L and only partially with (T,G)-A-L. The binding of (125)I-labeled (T,G)-A-L to antisera against (T,G)-A-L was inhibted more efficiently by the homologous antigen than by (Phe,G)-A-L although both antigens completely inhibited the binding. (T,G)-A-L specific antibodies were purified on (T,G)-A-L immunoadsorbents from antisera of high and low responder mice to (T,G)-A-L immunized with (Phe,G)-A-L. (Phe,G)-A-L specific antibodies that did not bind (T,G)-A-L were isolated from the effluent of these columns. By use of anti-idiotypic antibodies of guinea pig against C3H.SW antibodies to (T,G)-A-L it was shown that (T,G)-A-L specific antibodies isolated from antisera against (Phe,G)-A-L of C3H.SW and C3H/DiSn mice possess part of the idiotypic determinants existing on antibodies of C3H.SW obtained by immunization with (T,G)-A-L. In contrast, antibodies to (Phe,G)-A-L that did not bind (T,G)-A-L did not share idiotypic determinants with C3H.SW antibody molecules against (T,G)-A-L. These results suggest that the B cell repertoire expressed by high and low responders to (T,G)-A-L after immunization with (Phe,G)-A-L is similar and represents only part of that of high responders immunized with (T,G)-A-L.

Animals↗

PubMed1977

Cellular and genetic control of antibody responses in vitro. II. Ir gene control of primary IgM responses to trinitrophenyl conjugates of poly-L-(Tyr,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala--poly-L-Lys and poly-L-(His,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala--poly-L-Lys.

The in vitro primary IgM anti-hapten responses to trinitrophenyl (TNP) conjugates of poly-L-(Tyr,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala-poly-L-Lys (T,G)-A--L and poly-L(His,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala--poly-L-Lys (H,G)-A--L were shown to be T-cell dependent and under autosomal dominant H-2-linked Ir gene control which mapped within the K or I-A regions of the H-2 complex. The in vitro response to TNP-keyhole limpet hemocyanin, while T-dependent, was not under demonstrable genetic control. The genes governing the in vitro primary IgM anti-hapten responses to TNP-(T,G)-A--L and TNP-(H,G)-A--L resemble the Ir genes controlling the in vivo secondary IgG responses to (T,G)-A--L and (H,G)-A--L in that they are autosomal dominant, map identically within the H-2 complex, and have identical responder and nonresponder haplotypes. It is concluded that Ir genes can govern the ability to generate an IgM response upon initial exposure to antigen.

Alanine↗

PubMed1985

Reversible helix/coil transitions of left-handed Z-DNA structures. Comparison of the thermodynamic properties of poly(dG).poly(dC), poly[d(G-C)].poly[d(G-C)], and poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC).

In contrast to poly(dG).poly(dC), which remains in the B-DNA conformation under all experimental conditions the polynucleotides with the strictly alternating guanine/cytosine or guanine/5'-methylcytosine sequences can change from the classical right-handed B-DNA structure to the left-handed Z-DNA structure when certain experimental conditions such as ionic strength or solvent composition are fulfilled. Up to now the investigation of the helix/coil transition of left-handed DNA structures was not possible because the transition temperature exceeds 98 degrees C. By applying moderate external pressure to the surface of the aqueous polymer solution in the sample cell the boiling point of the solvent water is shifted up the temperature scale without shifting the transition temperature, so that we can measure the helix/coil transition of the polynucleotides at all experimental conditions applied. It can thus be shown that the Z-DNA/coil transition is cooperative and reversible. The Tm is 125 degrees C for poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) in 2mM Mg2+, 50mM Na+, pH 7.2 and 115 degrees c for poly[d(G-C)].poly[d(G-C)] in 3.04M Na+. The transition enthalpy per base pair was determined by the help of an adiabatic scanning microcalorimeter.

DNA↗

PubMed1978

Poly(dG).poly(dC) at neutral and alkaline pH: the formation of triple stranded poly(dG).poly(dG).poly(dC).

Alkaline titrations of different samples of poly(dG).poly(dC) and of the constituent homopolymers poly(dG) and poly(dC) have been performed in 0.15 M NaCl and their CD spectra followed. Sample I contained a slight excess of poly(dC) (52% C: 48% G) and showed a single reversible transition (pK = 11.9) due to the dissociation of double stranded poly(dG).poly(dC). Sample II, containing an excess of poly(dG) (43% C: 57% G), showed two transitions (pK1 = 11.4, PK2 = 11.9) the first one being only partially reversible. Examination of the CD spectra along the alkaline titrations indicated the presence of another hydrogen-bonded complex of higher G content. Mixing curves performed at pH 8 have confirmed the presence of a 2G: 1C complex, besides the double stranded complex. It can be formed in amounts up to 30% by mixing the two homopolymers, alkali treatment and heating. The CD spectra of the two complexes have been computed from the CD data of the mixing curves. This permitted the determination of the concentrations of both complexes and homopolymers in all samples. The ratio of triple to double stranded complex is not only dependent on the G/C ratio of the sample, but also a function of the previous physico-chemical conditions. These results explain the variability of many properties of different poly(dG).poly(dC) samples observed by other workers.

Centrifugation, Density Gradient↗

PubMed1989

Acoustical investigation of poly(dA).poly(dT), poly[d(A-T)], poly(A).poly(U) and DNA hydration in dilute aqueous solutions.

Apparent molar adiabatic compressibilities and apparent molar volumes of poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)], poly(dA).poly(dT), DNA and poly(A).poly(U) in aqueous solutions were determined at 1 degree C. The change of concentration increment of the ultrasonic velocity upon replacing counter ion Cs+ by the Mg2+ ion was also determined for these polymers. The following conclusions have been made: (1) the hydration of the double helix of poly(dA).poly(dT) is remarkably larger than that of other polynucleotides; (2) the hydration of the AT pair in the B-form DNA is larger than that of the GC pair; (3) the substitution of Cs+ for Mg2+ ions as counter ions results in a decrease of hydration of the system polynucleotide plus Mg2+, and (4) the magnitude of this dehydration depends on the nucleotide sequence; the following rule is true: the lesser is a polynucleotide hydration, the larger dehydration upon changing Cs+ for Mg2+ ions in the ionic atmosphere of polynucleotide.

Base Composition↗

PubMed1996

Interactions of intercalative and minor groove binding ligands with triplex poly(dA).[poly(dT)]2 and with duplex poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]2 studied by CD, LD, and normal absorption.

The binding of 9-aminoacridine and one bis-acridine compound to double helical poly(dA).poly-(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]2 and triple helical poly(dA).[poly(dT)]2 has been investigated using linear dichroism (LD) and circular dichroism (CD). A close examination of the negative reduced LD and the induced CD for the first pi-->pi* transition absorption region leads us to conclude that the acridine moiety of the 9-aminoacridine and bis-acridine molecule intercalates with both duplex and triplex DNA. Binding geometries of the acridine moieties in the examined polynucleotides are similar to those found for the ligands with DNA (Hansen et al. (1984) J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 509-511). It is also found that both 9-aminoacridine and bis-acridine effectively enhance the thermal stability of the triplex DNA. The corresponding spectra for the complexes of the minor groove binders DAPI and Hoechst with poly-(dA).[poly(dT)]2 were studied for comparison. They both show a positive LD and a mixing ratio dependent positive CD in the ligand absorption region, similar to those of their duplex complexes. This indicates that these ligands bind in the grooves of the triplex, probably to the one corresponding to the minor groove of the template duplex.

Acridines↗

PubMed1990

8-Azido double-stranded RNA photoaffinity probes. Enzymatic synthesis, characterization, and biological properties of poly(I,8-azidoI).poly(C) and poly(I,8-azidoI).poly(C12U) with 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase and protein kinase.

The technique of photoaffinity labeling has been applied to the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent enzyme 2',5'-oligoadenylate (2-5A) synthetase to provide a means for the examination of RNA-protein interaction(s) in the dsRNA allosteric binding domain of this enzyme. The synthesis, characterization, and biological properties of the photoaffinity probe poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C) and its mismatched analog poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C12U), which mimic the parent molecules poly(I).poly(C) and poly(I).poly(C12U), are described. The efficacy of poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C) and poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C12U) as allosteric site-directed activators is demonstrated using highly purified 2-5A synthetase from rabbit reticulocyte lysates and from extracts of interferon-treated HeLa cells. The dsRNA photoprobes activate these two 2-5A synthetases. Saturation of 2-5A synthetase is observed at 6 x 10(-4) g/ml poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C) following photolysis for 20 s at 0 degrees C. The photoincorporation of poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C) is specific, as demonstrated by the prevention of photoincorporation by native poly(I).poly(C). DNA, poly(I), and poly(C) are not competitors of poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C). Following UV irradiation of 2-5A synthetase with poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C), the reaction mixture is treated with micrococcal nuclease to hydrolyze azido dsRNA that is not cross-linked to the enzyme. A radioactive band of 110 kDa (the same as that reported for native rabbit reticulocyte lysate 2-5A synthetase) is observed following sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. The specific photolabeling of the 2-5A synthetase suggests that the azido dsRNA is intrinsic to the allosteric binding domain. The utility of poly[( 32P]I,8-azidoI).poly(C) for the detection of dsRNA-dependent binding proteins and the isolation of peptides at or near the allosteric binding site is discussed.

2',5'-Oligoadenylate Synthetase↗

PubMed1982

The separation of three antibody populations from anti-poly(A).poly(U) antibodies elicited in mice or rabbits and antigenic features of poly(A).poly(U)).

Anti-poly(A).poly(U) antibodies in ascitic fluid of DDY mice immunized with poly(A).poly(U)-methylated bovine serum albumin complexes were fractionated into three major antibody populations, Ab-1, Ab-2 and Ab-3, by precipitating with poly(I).poly(C), poly(A).poly(U), and poly(A).2 poly(U), respectively. Antibody population one, Ab-2, reacted with various double-stranded RNAs [poly(I).poly(C), poly(A).poly(U), and rice dwarf virus ribonucleic acid (RDV-RNA)] and poly(A).2 poly(U). Ab-2 reacted with poly(A).poly(U) and poly(A).2 poly(U). Although both Ab-1 and Ab-2 reacted with poly(A).poly(U), the two populations were distinguishable by their different reactivities against chemically modified antigens and oligonucleotides. In contrast to Ab-2, acetylation at the furanose 2'-position of poly(U) resulted in a dramatic decrease in the complement fixation reactivity of Ab-2. Also, Ab-2 was capable of binding with complexes of hexa- to heptaadenylates and poly(U), whereas Ab-1 required oligoadenylates of longer chain lengths (9-10 chain length) for binding. Therefore, it appears that poly(A).poly(U) possesses unique antigenic determinants which are recognizable only by Ab-2, in addition to those determinants which are common to a variety of double-stranded RNAs.

Animals↗

PubMed1982

Comparison of poly(A).poly(dT) and poly(I).poly(dC) as immunogens for the induction of antibodies to RNA-DNA hybrids.

A goat immunized with poly(A).poly(dT) produced three distinct antibody populations. The major one was specific for RNA-DNA hybrids and was purified from precipitates made with poly(I).poly(dC). It also reacted with hybrids of mixed base composition made with E. coli RNA polymerase. The other populations were purified with poly(A).poly(U) or poly(dT). Three rabbits also produced mainly hybrid-specific antibody in response to poly(A) . poly(dT). A goat immunized with poly(I).poly(dC) formed antibodies reactive with poly(I) and others reactive with poly(dC) but none specific for hybrid structure. Three rabbits did not respond to poly(I).poly(dC). Measurements of reactions with anti-inosine sera, thermal denaturation and sensitivity to S1 nuclease indicated that poly(I).poly(dC) is a less stable helix than poly(A).poly(dT) or poly(I).poly(C). Poly(A).poly(dT) is the more suitable synthetic immunogen for the production of hybrid-specific antibodies.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

Monoclonal antibodies specific for poly(dG) X poly(dC) and poly(dG) X poly(dm5C).

Most duplex DNAs that are in the "B" conformation are not immunogenic. One important exception is poly(dG) X poly(dC), which produces a good immune response even though, by many criteria, it adopts a conventional right-handed helix. In order to investigate what features are being recognized, monoclonal antibodies were prepared against poly(dG) X poly(dC) and the related polymer poly(dG) X poly(dm5C). Jel 72, which is an immunoglobulin G, binds only to poly(dG) X poly(dC), while Jel 68, which is an immunoglobulin M, binds approximately 10-fold more strongly to poly(dG) X poly(dm5C) than to poly(dG) X poly(dC). For both antibodies, no significant interaction could be detected with any other synthetic DNA duplexes including poly[d(Gm5C)] X poly[d(Gm5C)] in both the "B" and "Z" forms, poly[d(Tm5Cm5C)] X poly[d(GGA)], and poly[d(TCC)] X poly[d(GGA)], poly(dI) X poly(dC), or poly(dI) X poly(dm5C). The binding to poly(dG) X poly(dC) was inhibited by ethidium and by disruption of the DNA duplex, confirming that the antibodies were not recognizing single-stranded or multistranded structures. Furthermore, Jel 68 binds significantly to phage XP-12 DNA, which contains only m5C residues and will precipitate this DNA in the absence of a second antibody. The results suggest that (dG)n X (dm5C)n sequences in natural DNA exist in recognizably distinct conformations.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

Serological analysis of idiotypic determinants on monoclonal antibodies specific to poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys) and its ordered analogue (Tyr-Tyr-Glu-Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys).

Anti-idiotypic sera (aIds) were raised in C57BL/6 mice against monoclonal antibodies (McAbs) which bind poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys)--abbreviated to (T,G)-A--L--and (Tyr-Tyr-Glu-Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys)--abbreviated to (T-T-G-G)-A--L--(nos. 103 and 160) and McAbs which react only with (T-T-G-G)-A--L (nos. 100 and 114). Anti-Id antibodies against 103 McAb reacted with (T,G)-A--L specific antibodies and specifically inhibited their binding to iodinated antigen. Similarly, conventional antibodies against the major idiotypes of (T,G)-A--L-specific antibodies inhibited the binding of 103 McAb to antigen. It is therefore suggested that 103 McAb shares major idiotypes with (T,G)-A--L-specific polyclonal antibodies of C3H.SW origin. Anti-Ids against 114 McAb also inhibited the binding of (T,G)-A--L-specific antibodies to antigen, but the binding of 114 McAb could not be inhibited by conventional aIds. Therefore, idiotypes of 103 and 114 McAbs define idiotypic determinants expressed on two different subpopulations of (T,G)-A--L-specific antibodies: those that carry major idiotypes and those which express idiotypic determinants other than the major one (minor Ids). Anti-idiotypic sera against McAbs nos. 100 and 160 reacted with the homologous idiotypes and not with the major idiotypes of (T,G)-A--L-specific antibodies. In addition to the aforementioned specificities we could define cross-reactive idiotypes (private) shared by McAbs nos. 100, 103 and 114 McAbs nos. 160 and 114. The analysis of idiotypes expressed on anti-(T,G)-A--L McAbs enabled the detection of new antigen binding site related idiotypic determinants in addition to the major idiotypes which were immunodominant in the polyclonal anti-(T,G)-A--L antibodies.

Animals↗

PubMed1983

Fine specificity and idiotypic expression of monoclonal antibodies directed against poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys) and its ordered analogue (Tyr-Tyr-Glu-Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys).

In order to study the repertoire of poly(Tyr,Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys) [(T,G)-A--L] specific antibodies, monoclonal antibodies were prepared by fusing myeloma cells with spleen cells from C3H.SW mice immunized with (T,G)-A--L and boosted with (Tyr-Tyr-Glu-Glu)-poly(DLAla)--poly(Lys)](T-T-G-G)-A--L]. Eleven clones which secreted homogeneous antibodies were obtained. In general, two families of monoclonal antibodies were detected: those which bind exclusively (T-T-G-G)-A--L and those which bind both (T-T-G-G)-A--L and (T,G)-A--L. Analysis for idiotypic expression revealed that only two antibodies (clones no. 103 and 160), which were found to be similar in their fine specificity, cross-reacted with antibodies against the major idiotypes of (T,G)A--L specific antibodies. Guinea-pig antibodies against clone no. 160 reacted with the polyclonal (T,G)-A--L specific antibodies, whereas antibodies against 103 monoclonal antibodies did not react with C3H.SW anti-(T,G)-A--L antibodies, but did cross-react with four other monoclonal antibodies. It appears that the idiotypic determinants expressed on polyclonal (T,G)-A--L specific antibodies are heterogeneous, and consist of at least two serologically different idiotypes detected by clones no. 103 and 160.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Study of specific interactions of amino acid esters with the synthetic polynucleotides poly(A) x 2 poly(U), poly(A) x poly(U) and poly(A) by thermal denaturation].

The interactions of amino acid esters with poly(A)x2poly(U) and poly(A)xpoly(U) have been investigated by means of thermal denaturation of these polynucleotides. The esters under consideration raised the melting point, revealing the preferable binding to helical polynucleotide structures. The melting point shifts demonstrate the following sequence of the stabilities of these complexes: Arg greater than Lys much greater than His greater than Met greater than Ser greater than Gly. The same stability order is observed when studying the polynucleotide renaturation in the presence of esters. This order coincides with that previously obtained for the nucleotide base--amino acid ester complexes excepting basic amino acid esters. The ester interactions with poly(A) and poly(U) also reveal the specificity of monomer--monomer interactions. Some dynamic contributions into the studied specificity are also discussed.

Amino Acids↗

PubMed1985

Interaction of drugs with Z-DNA: cooperative binding of actinomycin D or actinomine to the left-handed forms of poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) and poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) reverses the conformation of the helix.

The interaction of actinomycin D and actinomine with poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) and poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) under B- and Z-form conditions has been investigated by optical and phase partition techniques. Circular dichroism data show that the conformation at the binding site is right-handed, even though adjacent regions of the polymer have a left-handed conformation. Actinomycin D binds in a cooperative manner to poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) under both B-form and Z-form conditions. Analysis of the circular dichroism data shows that 5 +/- 1 base pairs of left-handed poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) in 4.4 M NaCl switch to a right-handed conformation for each bound actinomycin D. When the left-handed form of poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) is stabilized by the presence of 40 microM [Co(NH3)6]Cl3, 25 +/- 5 base pairs switch from a left-handed to a right-handed conformation for each bound actinomycin D. Actinomine binds cooperatively to left-handed poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) in 40 microM [Co(NH3)6]Cl3 and to left-handed poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) in 2 mM MgCl2. Actinomine does not bind to left-handed poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) in 4.4 M NaCl at concentrations as high as 100 microM. Each bound actinomine converts 11 +/- 3 base pairs of left-handed poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) in 40 microM [Co(NH3)6]Cl3 and 7 +/- 2 base pairs of left-handed poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) in 2 mM MgCl2. The binding isotherm data also indicate that the binding site has a right-handed conformation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Circular Dichroism↗