PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Poly U”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1987

Formation of triple-helical nucleic acids studied by using antibodies specific for poly(A).poly(U).poly(U).

The formation of the triple helix of poly(A).poly(U).poly(U) was studied by using antibodies specific to poly(A).poly(U).poly(U). the 10-11 base chain length for oligo(A) and the 20-30 base chain length for oligo(U) may be the minimum sizes required to maintain a stable triple helix. Double-stranded poly(A).poly(U) which was the core of triple-stranded poly(A).poly(U).poly(U) could bind poly(U) and produce an analogue of poly(A).poly(U).poly(U) reactive with the antibodies even if the poly(A) or poly(U) was brominated or acetylated to the extent of 35-55%. However, brominated or acetylated poly(U) did not produce a stable triple helix with double-stranded poly(A).poly(U).

Acetylation↗
PubMed1977

Antisera to poly(A)-poly(U)-poly(I) contain antibody subpopulations specific for different aspects of the triple helix.

Rabbit antibodies to the triple-helical polynucleotide poly(A)-poly(U)-poly(I) were fractionated into three major antibody populations, each recognizing a different conformational feature of the triple-helical immunogen. Two distinct populations were purified from precipitates made with poly(A)-poly(U)-poly(U) and poly(A)-poly(I)-poly(I). The former reacted with double-stranded poly(A)-poly(U) or poly(I)-poly(C), and similar populations could be purified with either double-stranded form. The second population recognized the poly(A)-poly(I) region of the triple helix, and the third required all three strands for reactivity. These immunochemical studies suggest that the poly(A) and poly(U) have the same orientation in the triple-helicical poly(A)-poly(U)-poly(I) as in the double-helical poly(A)-poly(U), in which they have Watson-Crick base pairing.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Preparation of monoclonal antibodies against a poly(U), poly(C) specific ribonuclease prepared from the insect Ceratitis capitata.

A poly(U), poly(C) specific RNase of apparent MW 34 kDa has recently been purified from 6 day old larvae of the insect Ceratitis capitata. Two monoclonal antibodies were obtained by immunizing mice with this protein. Immunoblot analysis of the RNase revealed that both antibodies recognize the 34 kDa protein. Furthermore, immunoprecipitation experiments show that both antibodies were capable of precipitating the ribonuclease without affecting its catalytic activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1975

Immunochemical characterization of the anti-RNA antibodies found in scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Differences in reactivity with Poly (U) and Poly-(A) Poly (U).

In a previous study, all 40 sera from patients with scleroderma, 20 of 40 sera from SLE patients, but none of 40 sera from normal controls, were found to have antibodies to ssRNA. All scleroderma sera were also found to react with HSA-coupled uridine and UMP and their reaction with HSA-coupled uridine and UMP and their reaction with ssRNA could be inhibited by uracil, uridine, and UMP. To characterize further these uracil-specific anti-RNA antibodies found in scleroderma and compare them with the anti-RNA antibodies found in SLE, we tested their reactivity with Poly (U) and with Poly (A)-Poly (U) and all but one failed to react with Poly (A)-Poly (U). This same serum was the only one in which the reaction with Poly (U) could not be inhibited with uracil. Reactivity of SLE sera was strikingly different from that found in scleroderma sera. Seventeen of 34 SLE sera studied reacted with ssRNA but only four of these reacted with Poly (U). Conversely, two SLE sera that reacted with Poly (U) did not react with ssRNA. Fifteen reacted with Poly (A)-Poly (U) and only two of these failed to react with ssRNA. Five SLE sera which were reactive with ssRNA did not precipitate with Poly (A)-Poly (U). All SLE sera which reacted with Poly (U) could be inhibited with uracil, although less effectively than in scleroderma. Reactivity with Poly (A)-Poly )U) was not inhibited with uracil nor with adenosine. These findings confirm that antibodies to RNA that are found in scleroderma are directed to uracil and thus specific to ssRNA, whereas RNA antibodies found in SLE sera are heterogeneous and directed to either the base, to the site of union of the base and sugar moiety to the ribose backbone, or to the helical structure of double stranded RNA. These differences and the respective antigenic specificities of these anti-RNA antibodies found in scleroderma and SLE may be theoretically important.

Adenine↗
PubMed1975

The induction of delayed hypersensitivity in guinea pigs to poly U and poly A:U.

Guinea pigs were sensitized to poly U and poly A:U so that subsequent stimulation of spleen cells from these immunized animals with poly U and poly A:U resulted in the production of migration inhibitory factor (MIF). MIF was also produced when spleen cells from animals immunized with poly A:U were cultured in the presence of mycobacterial RNA or whole viable H37 Ra cells. Negative dermal reactions were observed when guinea pigs immunized with poly A, poly A:U were skin tested wtih these same synthetic nucleotides.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

The role of a template sugar-phosphate backbone in the ribosomal decoding mechanism. Comparative study of poly(U) and poly(dT) template activity.

To study the role of a template sugar-phosphate backbone in the ribosomal decoding process, poly(U), poly(dT) and poly(dU)-directed cell-free amino acid incorporation was investigated under the influence of neomycin and high concentrations of Mg2+. The specificity of a factor-dependent translation system of Escherichia coli was shown to change according to the principle: "either ribo- or deoxyribopolynucleotide messenger". Poly(dT) is shown to be effectively translated in the absence of elongation factors, both at low (2 degrees C) and high (37 degrees C) temperature. Neomycin inhibits factor-free poly(dT) translation. Little or no poly(U) translation is observed in this system. A chromatographic analysis of the oligophenylalanine residues synthesized seems to show that translocation is the main step responsible for ribosome specificity to the ribo- or deoxyribopolynucleotide template in both factor-dependent and factor-free translation systems.

Cell-Free System↗
PubMed1992

Effect of E. coli ribosomal protein S1 on the fidelity of the translational elongation step: reading and misreading of poly(U) and poly(dT).

Ribosomal protein S1 was selectively removed from E. coli ribosomes by affinity chromatography and the effect of added S1 on the translation of poly(dT) [which is read as poly(U) in the presence of neomycin] and on the misreading of poly(U) and poly(dT) were examined. S1 enhances the translation of poly(dT) at low template concentration, which is similar to the effect of S1 on poly(U) translation. The misreading of poly(dT) by E. coli ribosomes is at a lower level than is the case with poly(U). This low misreading is the same for "S1-dependent" and "S1-independent" modes of translation. On the other hand, the misreading of poly(U) is significantly reduced when S1 is present. These results thus indicate that S1 not only facilitates the binding of mRNA to the ribosome as already known, but also plays a role in the correct codon-dependent selection of aminoacyl-tRNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1990

Partial release of AcPhe-Phe-tRNA from ribosomes during poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis and the effects of chloramphenicol.

Poly(U)-programmed 70S ribosomes can be shown to be 80% to 100% active in binding the peptidyl-tRNA analogue AcPhe-tRNA to their A or P sites, respectively. Despite this fact, only a fraction of such ribosomes primed with AcPhe-tRNA participate in poly(U)-directed poly(Phe) synthesis (up to 65%) at 14 mM Mg2+ and 160 mM NH4+. Here it is demonstrated that the apparently 'inactive' ribosomes (greater than or equal to 35%) are able to participate in peptide-bond formation, but lose their nascent peptidyl-tRNA at the stage of Ac(Phe)n-tRNA, with n greater than or equal to 2. The relative loss of early peptidyl-tRNAs is largely independent of the degree of initial saturation with AcPhe-tRNA and is observed in a poly(A) system as well. This observation resolves a current controversy concerning the active fraction of ribosomes. The loss of Ac(Phe)n-tRNA is reduced but still significant if more physiological conditions for Ac(Phe)n synthesis are applied (3 mM Mg2+, 150 mM NH4+, 2 mM spermidine, 0.05 mM spermine). Chloramphenicol (0.1 mM) blocks the puromycin reaction with AcPhe-tRNA as expected but, surprisingly, does not affect the puromycin reaction with Ac(Phe)2-tRNA nor peptide bond formation between AcPhe-tRNA and Phe-tRNA. The drug facilitates the release of Ac(Phe)2-4-tRNA from ribosomes at 14 mM Mg2+ while it hardly affects the overall synthesis of poly(Phe) or poly(Lys).

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1979

Proteins of small subunits of rat liver ribosomes that interact with poly(U). II. Cross-links between poly(U) and ribosomal proteins in 40 S subunits induced by UV irradiation.

(1) When rat liver 40 S ribosomal proteins in 6 M urea were were mixed with poly(U) at an appropriate ratio, a precipitate was formed which was also insoluble in the sample solution for two-dimensional acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Analyses by two-dimensional acrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that S7 and S10 proteins (according to our numbering system) had disappeared selectively from the fraction soluble in 6 M urea. These two proteins were present in the fraction insoluble in 6 M urea, and became soluble in the sample solution after treating it with RNase. The results suggest that S7 and S10 proteins have strong affinities for poly(U). When rat liver 40 S subunits were incubated with poly(U), similar results were obtained. (2) After incubation of 40 S subunits with [3H]poly(U) and then with unlabeled poly(U), UV irradiation cross-linked poly(U) to the protein moiety of the 40 S subunit. When the protein fraction insoluble in the sample solution for two-dimensional electrophoresis was prepared from 40 S subunits cross-linked to poly(U) and then subjected to two-dimensional acrylamide gel electrophoresis after RNase treatment, S7 and S10 proteins were detected on the gel. In addition to the S7 protein spot, a triangular area spreading from the spot to the origin contained radioactivity. The results suggest that poly(U) is cross-linked to S7 protein and oligo(U) fragments bound to S7 protein affect its electrophoretic mobility. (3) Ribosomal proteins were prepared from 40 S subunits cross-linked to carrier-free [3H]poly(U) and analyzed by three-dimensional acrylamide gel electrophoresis (Terao, K. & Ogata, K. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 402, 214--229) after RNase treatment. It was found that S7, S6, and S15 proteins are cross-linked to poly(U). From the results of the present and preceding experiments it is concluded that S7 is the poly(U)-binding protein. The possibility that other proteins in 40 S ribosomal subunits interact with poly(U) is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Correlation between poly(U) misreading and poly(dT) translation efficiency in E coli cell-free systems.

A positive correlation between poly(U) misreading and efficiency of poly(dT) translation has been revealed in cell-free systems from wild-type E coli and streptomycin--resistant mutants with altered ribosomal protein S12. Different factors promoting misreading of poly(U) such as aminoglycoside antibiotics and Mg2+ ions also stimulate poly(dT) translation. The effect of the antibiotics on poly(U) translation efficiency and misreading as well as on poly(dT) decoding is characterised by the same order: neomycin greater than kanamycin greater than streptomycin. S12 mutants ribosomes are less erroneous in poly(U) translation and less efficient in poly(dT) decoding. The data obtained are in good agreement with the hypothesis of stereospecific stabilization of codon-anticodon complexes by the ribosome decoding centre.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1978

[Biospecific chromatography of poly(A)-containing RNA on poly(U)-Sepharose].

It is shown that in addition to specific binding of polyadenylic sequence with poly(U), the chromatography of poly(A)-containing RNAs on poly(U)-Sepharose is accompanied by nonspecific irreversible adsorption of polynucleotides on Sepharose gel. This disadvantage may be overcome by establishing optimal BrCN/Sepharose rations during Sepharose activation and by many-fold treatment of poly(U)-Sepharose with ethanolamine immediately before chromatography of RNAs. It was also found that the efficient separation of poly(A+)-RNA preparations from poly(A-)-RNAs is achieved only after double chromatography of RNA on poly(U)-Sepharose. The amount of poly(A+)-RNA in total RNA preparations isolated from bound polyribosomes of 10-day-old chick embryos is equal to 1%. Data from PAAG gel electrophoresis are indicative of the lack of degradation and high heterogeneity of the preparations under study.

Chemical Phenomena↗
PubMed1977

Involvement of 30S ribosomal protein S1 in poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis.

The effect of 30S ribosomal protein S1 on poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis was studied using a highly purified cell-free system which was devoid of endogenous S1. The system consisted of homogeneous preparations of EF-Tu, EF-Ts, and EF-G, and 70S ribosomes from which protein S1 had been removed by poly(U)-cellulose column chromatography. It was found that protein S1 was indispensable for translation of poly(U) by an S1-depleted system at low concentrations of poly(U). On the other hand, at higher concentrations of poly(U), a considerable amount of polyphenylalanine was synthesized in the absence of added S1. The stimulatory effect of S1 was observed at all Mg2+ concentrations examined but was most pronounced at 10 mM Mg2+. Some physicochemical properties of the protein were also studied. It was demonstrated that the protein has an elongated shape with an axial ratio of approximately 8.5.

Escherichia coli↗
PubMed1989

Photosensitized reactions of poly(U) with tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) and peroxydisulfate.

The reactions of polyuridylic acid [poly(U)] with Ru(bpy)3(3+) [Ru(III)] and SO4.-, following UV and visible light irradiation of Ru(bpy)3(2+) [Ru(II)] in the presence of S2O8(2-), were studied in an argon-saturated aqueous solution using time-resolved absorption and conductivity methods. The kinetics of the Ru(III) conversion to Ru(II) in the presence of poly(U) was monitored spectroscopically either in the absence of SO4.- [rapid mixing with Ru(III)] or in its presence (after laser flash excitation, lambda exc = 353 nm). The conversion of Ru(III) to Ru(II) is complete at a [nucleotide]/[sensitizer] (N/S) ratio greater than or equal to 10 (rate constant k = 12 s-1) for rapid mixing and at N/S greater than or equal to 6 (k = 15 s-1 at N/S = 10) after laser pulsing. Conductivity measurements following the laser pulse revealed a fast conductivity increase (risetime less than 10 micros), due to the formation of charged species and protons. A slower increase in the 0.1-0.5 s range was observed for poly(U) but it is considerably smaller for poly(dU) and absent in uracil containing monounits. The slow increase is unaffected by pH changes in the 3.5-7 range, markedly reduced in the 7-9 range and is replaced by a slight decrease in conductivity in buffered solutions. An explanation is that poly(U)-bound excited Ru(II) reacts with S2O8(2-) forming Ru(III) and SO4.- as oxidizing species both of which react with poly(U) bases. The resulting base radicals react with Ru(III) or the ligands in the ruthenium complex, producing protons which give rise to the slow conductivity increase (k = 15 s-1 at N/S = 10). The formation of single-strand breaks and the ensuing release of condensed counterions does not appear to contribute significantly to the slow conductivity signal. At N/S less than 10 the observed rate and extent of Ru(III)--Ru(II) conversion and of the slow proton production vary markedly with the N/S ratio.

2,2'-Dipyridyl↗
PubMed1979

Properties of unprimed poly(A)-poly(U) synthesis by Caulobacter crescentus RNA polymerase.

Some properties of unprimed poly(A)-poly(U) synthesis by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Caulobacter crescentus were examined. The reaction required ATP and UTP as substrates and manganese as a divalent cation. Rifampicin completely inhibited the reaction at a concentration of 1 micron/ml, and the enzyme catalyzed the polymer synthesis well regardless of the presence of GTP, CTP or both. The chain length of the poly(A)-poly(U) synthesized was about one hundred base pairs, as estimated from a sedimentation velocity and the molar ratio of [3H]AMP to [gamma-32P]ATP incorporated into the poly(A)-poly(U). The reaction was dependent on the square of the enzyme concentration and the enzyme dimers formed complexes with poly(A)-poly(U) during the reaction.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗
PubMed1975

The dependence of successful immunotherapy on adequate tumor burden as shown by the treatment of AKR leukemia with poly A-poly U.

The therapeutic efficacy of polyadenlyic-polyuridylic acid (poly A-poly U) on the transplantable AKR leukemia varied with the dose of tumor cells implanted. The greater the number of AKR tumor cells injected into 8-week-old AKR mice free of clinical evidence of cancer, the greater the effect of poly A-poly U in mediating host immunologic control of the tumor. Poly A-poly U was either ineffective or could enhance tumor growth when smaller doses of tumor cells were transferred. The efficacy of an immune adjuvant depended on a tumor burden affording optimum host responsiveness. This does not necessarily arise in the host bearing minimal tumor burden.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1991

The effects of counter-ion condensation and co-ion depletion upon the rates of chemical repair of poly(U) radicals by thiols.

Bimolecular rate constants for reactions of poly(U) radicals with a series of thiols of varying net charge (Z) were measured by pulse radiolysis with conductivity detection at low ionic strength. At pH 7 and 18 degrees C the values of k2 (M-1s-1) were: reduced glutathione (Z = -1), less than 500; 2-mercaptoethanesulphonic acid (Z = -1), 1.5 x 10(3); 2-mercaptoethanol (Z = 0), 1.8 x 10(5); cysteine (Z = 0), 2.0 x 10(5); cysteamine (Z = +1), 4.1 x 10(7). Values determined at pH 4 were: 2-mercaptoethanol, 6.1 x 10(5); cysteamine 2.2 x 10(8); N-(2-mercaptoethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane (WR-1065, Z = +2), 4.6 x 10(8). The variation in rate with structure could not reasonably be attributed to inherent reactivity differences in the thiols and was ascribed to inhomogeneous distributions of the thiols in solution resulting from electrostatic interactions. Thus, cationic thiols are concentrated approximately 100-fold near poly(U), relative to neutral thiols, as a consequence of counter-ion condensation, whereas anionic thiols have approximately 100-fold lower concentration near poly(U) than neutral thiols as a result of co-ion depletion. These results show that the ability of a thiol to repair radical sites in a polyanion is dramatically influenced by its net charge as a consequence of the counter-ion condensation and co-ion depletion phenomena.

Cysteamine↗