PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pre-exposure prophylaxis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Same-day initiation of tenofovir alafenamide-based pre-exposure prophylaxis with drug-level feedback for transgender women in Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of same-day initiation of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and test the impact of drug-level feedback on PrEP adherence among transgender women (TGW) in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: HIV-negative TGW were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to intervention (drug-level feedback with tailored adherence counseling) or standard-of-care (SOC), and followed quarterly for 12 months (November 2021-July 2023; NCT04491422). Quarterly clinic visits included demographic and socio-behavioral data collection, PrEP refills, STI testing, and quarterly PrEP adherence assessment using tenofovir levels in dried blood spots (DBS; long-term) and urine (short-term). RESULTS: We enrolled 200 TGW (100 per arm), median age 21 years. Same-day F/TAF PrEP initiation was 100%. Tenofovir detection in urine (intervention arm) was 79, 80, 85, and 70% at the 3, 6, 9, and 12-month visits, respectively. Tenofovir detection in DBS was 46, 40, 35, and 31% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Median tenofovir DBS concentrations were 40.6 and 47.0 fmol/punch in intervention and SOC arms, respectively. There was no intervention effect on PrEP adherence (DBS tenofovir levels) [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37]. Never being harassed by police for being transgender (aIRR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.24-2.23), history of taking daily medication for more than 7 days (aIRR 1.51; 95% CI: 1.18-1.93) and higher monthly income (aIRR 1.44; 95% CI: 1.10-2.04) were associated with PrEP adherence. CONCLUSION: Oral F/TAF PrEP adherence among TGW in Uganda was low and not affected by drug-level feedback or tailored adherence counseling. Long-acting injectable PrEP formulations should be considered for this population.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Safety and Tolerability of Oral Islatravir Once Monthly as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have an Elevated Likelihood of HIV-1 Exposure: Results From the IMPOWER-24 Randomized Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir once monthly (qm), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long half-life, was evaluated for safety and tolerability in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men and are at increased likelihood of HIV-1 (HIV) exposure. METHODS: IMPOWER-24 (NCT04652700) was a double-blind, Phase 3 study. Participants were randomized 2:1 to islatravir 60 mg oral qm or emtricitabine (FTC; 200 mg) coformulated with either tenofovir disoproxil (245 mg) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF; 25 mg) once daily (qd). After &#x223c;9 months, blinded islatravir was discontinued due to lymphocyte reductions; participants were offered open-label comparator for 20 months. RESULTS: In total, 494 participants were enrolled (328 islatravir; 166 comparator): 91.5% were cisgender men, 41.7% were White, and median age was 27 years. Mean blinded dosing duration was 4.7 months (islatravir) versus 4.3 months (comparator). Overall, 211 participants (64.3%) in the islatravir group and 128 (77.1%) in the comparator group had &#x2265;1 adverse event (AE). Most AEs were mild or moderate, with 1 AE leading to product discontinuation (islatravir; gastroesophageal reflux). Serious AEs occurred in <2%; none were related to study product. Change in total lymphocytes in the islatravir group at Month 3 was -7.4%; a trend toward recovery was observed after islatravir was stopped. Mean total lymphocytes remained within normal range. No HIV infections occurred in either group during the double-blind phase. CONCLUSIONS: Islatravir qm was generally well tolerated; decreases in total lymphocytes were observed with islatravir. Original primary efficacy objectives were not assessed due to early study stoppage.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Thirty years of experience with infectious hepatitis prevention in the Israel Defence Forces.

Infectious hepatitis is endemic to Israel. Large outbreaks of infectious hepatitis were common in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) before 1970, at which time post-exposure prophylaxis with immune serum globulin was introduced. It caused a decrease in the incidence of infectious hepatitis from 10-14/1,000 to 3/1,000. A further reduction in incidence was achieved after 1978 when a policy of pre-exposure prophylaxis was established. The number of yearly outbreaks and cases per outbreak also declined as a result of this policy. Worldwide studies have shown that a policy of pre-exposure prophylaxis and/or post-exposure prophylaxis with immune serum globulin is effective in reducing the incidence of infectious hepatitis. The experience of the IDF is that a combination of both pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis is more efficacious. This policy should be worthwhile in other areas where infectious hepatitis is endemic.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Ten years on, still out of reach: barriers to PrEP access and retention in France according to frontline actors (QualiPrEP Study).

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV has been available in France since 2014, and reimbursed since 2016, with general practitioners allowed to prescribe it since 2021. Despite these policy advances, uptake remains low among some of the most affected populations. This community-based qualitative study explored barriers to PrEP access and retention ten years into its implementation.Interviews were conducted with 28 PrEP frontline actors (healthcare professionals and community-based workers involved in promoting, prescribing, or supporting PrEP). The sample included one group discussion (n = 5), two triads (n = 6), two dyads (n = 4), and nine individual interviews (n = 13). Thematic analysis was inductive, with barriers classified across four main domains.Participants were mostly cisgender men, median age 48, born in France and abroad, and employed by NGOs in Paris. Thirteen barriers and four major themes emerged: (1) Internal psychosocial barriers: lack of knowledge, negative health-related reactions; HIV stigma; STI risk perception, taboos; (2) Internal pragmatic barriers: perceived limits of protection, usage and follow-up constraints; (3) External psychosocial barriers: limited physician knowledge and reluctance; (4) External pragmatic barriers: communication failures; structural constraints, lack of human and financial resources.Findings call for more targeted messaging, simplified care models and provider training. They highlight the need to address social and symbolic dimensions of PrEP, with insights from those supporting users to ensure more equitable implementation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Intentions to use different modalities of long-acting HIV PrEP among men who have sex with men and transgender and gender diverse persons in the Netherlands.

Insight into intentions to use long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is essential for successful implementation. We assessed intention to use three hypothetical long-acting PrEP modalities (oral, intramuscular and subdermal) among HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender and gender diverse persons in Amsterdam, recruited through the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (ACS-participants) and social media (survey-participants). Intention was measured per modality using a 7-point Likert scale. We modeled the probability of high intention to use long-acting PrEP using relative risk regression. Of 1258 participants [1231 (97.9%) MSM; 557 ACS and 701 survey; median age 40 years (IQR 32-50)], 76% had ever used oral short-acting PrEP. Intention to use was highest for monthly oral long-acting PrEP [ACS: median 4.5 (IQR 2-6), 38% high intention; survey: median 7 (IQR 6-7), 81% high intention], followed by 2-monthly intramuscular PrEP [ACS: median 3 (IQR 2-5), 19% high intention; survey: median 5 (IQR 3-7), 47% high intention], and implants [ACS: median 2 (IQR 1-4), 9% high intention; survey: median 4 (IQR 2-7), 37% high intention]. PrEP-experienced participants had higher intention to use oral long-acting PrEP and injectables than PrEP-na&#xef;ve participants. Offering multiple PrEP modalities may improve the acceptability of HIV prevention strategies and increase PrEP uptake and retention in PrEP care.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The Long Road to Long-Acting: What Oral PrEP and CAB-LA Teach Us About Scaling Lenacapavir.

Despite significant biomedical advances, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a persistent global health crisis, with over 40 million people affected as of 2023, two-thirds of whom live in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region. However, from an HIV prevention perspective, the more urgent concern is the continued occurrence of approximately 1.3 million new infections annually, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and in settings where incidence is stable or increasing. This commentary explores the evolving landscape of HIV prevention, focusing on the trajectory of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA), and the newly emerging lenacapavir. While oral PrEP opened new possibilities, adherence challenges have limited its impact. CAB-LA demonstrated superior efficacy but encountered access, cost, and delivery barriers that restricted uptake. Lenacapavir, offering 6-monthly subcutaneous dosing with &#x2265;&#xa0;99.9% efficacy in trials, holds the potential to overcome these hurdles. As of May 2026, lenacapavir had received regulatory approval in 17 countries, including several African nations, while regulatory reviews remained ongoing in multiple additional countries, reflecting the rapid global expansion of access to this long-acting HIV prevention option. However, its success depends on clinical promise, timely licensing, affordability, and integration into health systems. Drawing from real-world lessons of oral PrEP and CAB-LA, this paper argues that a proactive, coordinated rollout of lenacapavir could dramatically expand prevention reach. With global stakeholders aiming for 3 million users by 2028 and strategic licensing in 120 countries, the groundwork is in place. The recent release of WHO guidance recommending lenacapavir as an additional PrEP option further strengthens this momentum. Yet, equitable delivery, user-centred models, and strong policy backing will be critical. Ultimately, long-acting PrEP is not just a clinical breakthrough; it is a test of health systems' ability to deliver innovation at scale.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Passive immunization against viral hepatitis-- status and prospects.

The value of conventional gamma globulin in prophylaxis of hepatitis A has not been confirmed in recent years but there is no evidence that ineffectiveness has been encountered as a result of declining immune experience among antibody donors in open populations. Fortunately, specific tests for hepatitis A antibody are becoming available as a means of estimating effectiveness of currently manufactured gamma globin. Hepatis B prophylaxis by conventional gamma globlin is much more uncertain but the negative evidence must be considered in light of rising anti-HBs titers of globin manufactured more recently. The latter have appeared to be effective in pre-exposure prophylaxis when nonparenteral transmission was implicated. Post-exposure prophylaxis against massive inocula of hepatitis B, as in transfusions, would appear to require large amounts of HBs antibody. Protection against hepatitis from small inocula accompanying accidental punctures with contaminated needles is under controlled study to determine whether the anti-HBs titer of special globulin preparations is a predictive index of protection. Results are expected by midyear, 1975.

Hepatitis B Antibodies↗
PubMed1978

Passive immunization against hepatitis B: a review of recent studies and comment on current aspects of control.

Several independent studies suggest that both hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) made from plasma pools containing high titers of anti-HBs and standard immunoglobulin (IG) containing some anti-HBs may be effective for pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis B. Based on a synthesis of current data, it seems reasonable to recommend HBIG for the post-exposure prophylaxis of individuals sustaining accidental needle stick or mucosal exposure to blood known to contain hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). If HBIG is unavailable there is also reason to expect that administration of standard IG which contains some anti-HBs may confer benefit. Although available data regarding prophylaxis of infants born to mothers with HBsAg positive hepatitis at time of delivery are insufficient to warrant firm recommendations on globulin administration, a temporary set of guidelines supporting use of either HBIG or standard IG containing some anti-HBs seems warranted in view of the serious implications for induction of the HBsAg chronic carrier state in infancy. Because appropriate environmental control measures may significantly reduce the transmission of hepatitis B in certain endemic settings such as hemodialysis units or homes for the mentally retarded, IG prophylaxis in these surroundings cannot be routinely recommended. Since current data show no evidence for superiority of HBIG over standard IG in these settings, and because there is some evidence that use of lower anti-HBs titer globulins may provide for acquisition of passive-active immunity, it seems reasonable to suggest that if IG is to be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis, the material to be used should be standard IG containing some anti-HBs.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed2026

"Everybody thinks that it won't happen to them": A mixed-methods study of HIV prevention strategies among people experiencing homelessness who use drugs.

BACKGROUND: HIV disproportionately affects people experiencing homelessness, particularly those who use drugs. Although effective prevention strategies exist, uptake remains suboptimal in high-risk populations. Limited research has examined how this population engages with HIV prevention strategies and the contextual factors shaping behaviors. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults (&#x2265;18 years) experiencing homelessness with recent drug use, recruited from three Boston sites (Feb 2024-Jan 2025). Participants completed a survey assessing HIV prevention strategy uptake. A subsample completed in-depth interviews on factors influencing behavior. Guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, we coded qualitative data and identified themes to help contextualize uptake. RESULTS: Among 196 participants, mean age was 48; 61% identified as male and 44% as non-Hispanic White. Forty-two percent reported condomless sex, and among those who had ever injected drugs (n = 123), 24% reported syringe sharing in the prior three months. Only 9% reported current PrEP use, and 12% had ever used HIV self-tests. Qualitative findings highlighted perceived control as a key facilitator, while low perceived HIV risk hindered uptake across strategies. Additional barriers varied by strategy and included partner dynamics and substance use affecting condom use, structural constraints affecting syringe use, and knowledge, stigma, and cost concerns affecting PrEP and self-testing. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of people experiencing homelessness who use drugs, HIV prevention strategy uptake was suboptimal, with particularly low PrEP and HIV self-testing use. Qualitative findings suggest that interventions to promote HIV prevention strategy uptake in this population should leverage perceived control, address perceived risk, and target strategy-specific interpersonal and structural barriers.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Rabies and brucellosis immunization status and adverse reactions to rabies vaccines in veterinary students.

Rabies pre-immunization has been recommended for high risk professions, including veterinarians. Cell-cultured rabies vaccines have considerably reduced the risk of post-vaccination neurological reactions found in earlier vaccines. However, some adverse reactions have been reported with Human Diploid Cell Vaccines. 329 French veterinary students were surveyed about their rabies and brucellosis vaccination status, the occurrence of adverse reactions to rabies vaccine, and their antibody titer monitoring practices. Questions also were asked to determine if mandatory rabies pre-exposure immunization upon entry to veterinary school motivated students to maintain their rabies pre-exposure vaccination. The overall vaccination rate was 98.5% for rabies and 17% for brucellosis. 19% of the rabies vaccinated students reported some form of adverse reaction, whatever the vaccine brand used, but not experienced systemic allergic reaction. Adverse reactions were twice more frequent in female than male students and were more frequent after primary series than revaccination series (Relative Risk = 1.76). Despite the mild reactions encountered, rabies pre-exposure vaccination has been well-accepted by French veterinary students. In contrast, vaccination against brucellosis was not as well-accepted for prophylaxis.

Adult↗