PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Pregabalin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in subjects with various degrees of renal function.

The objectives of this study were to determine the single-dose pharmacokinetics of pregabalin in subjects with various degrees of renal function, determine the relationship between pregabalin clearance and estimated creatinine clearance (CLcr), and measure the effect of hemodialysis on plasma levels of pregabalin. Results form the basis of recommended pregabalin dosing regimens in patients with decreased renal function. Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled to ensure a wide range of renal function (CLcr < 30 mL/min, n = 8; 30-50, n = 5; 50-80, n = 7; and > 80, n = 6). Also enrolled were 12 subjects with renal impairment requiring hemodialysis. Each subject received 50 mg of pregabalin as two 25-mg capsules in this open-label, parallel-group study. Pregabalin concentrations were measured using previously validated liquid chromatographic methods. Pregabalin pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by established noncompartmental methods. Pregabalin was rapidly absorbed in all subjects. Total and renal pregabalin clearance were proportional (56% and 58%, respectively) to CLcr. As a result, area under the plasma concentration-time profile (AUC) and terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) values increased with decreasing renal function. Pregabalin dosage adjustment should be considered for patients with CLcr < 60 mL/min. A 50% reduction in pregabalin daily dose is recommended for patients with CLcr between 30 and 60 mL/min compared to those with CLcr > 60 mL/min. Daily doses should be further reduced by approximately 50% for each additional 50% decrease in CLcr. Pregabalin was highly cleared by hemodialysis. Supplemental pregabalin doses may be required for patients on chronic hemodialysis treatment after each hemodialysis treatment to maintain steady-state plasma pregabalin concentrations within desired ranges.

Administration, Oral↗

Pregabalin in generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Current drug therapies for generalized anxiety disorder have limitations. In a controlled trial, the novel agent pregabalin was studied for the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder. METHOD: In this double-blind study, patients with DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to receive pregabalin (150 mg/day or 600 mg/day), lorazepam (6 mg/day), or placebo. A 1-week placebo lead-in was followed by 4 weeks of treatment and then a 1-week dose taper. The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score at endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least one dose of their assigned medication. Fewer patients given lorazepam (59%, N=40 of 68) completed the trial than did those given placebo (73%, N=50 of 69), 600 mg/day of pregabalin (71%, N=50 of 70), or 150 mg/day or pregabalin (90%, N=62 of 69). The mean baseline-to-endpoint decreases in total Hamilton anxiety scale score in the patients given 150 mg/day of pregabalin (-9.2), 600 mg/day of pregabalin (-10.3), and lorazepam (-12.0) were significantly greater than the decrease in those given placebo (-6.8). As early as the week 1 observation, pregabalin significantly reduced the total Hamilton anxiety scale score compared with placebo. The most frequent adverse events reported for pregabalin and lorazepam were somnolence and dizziness. There were no serious adverse events reported by patients given pregabalin, and no withdrawal syndrome was associated with pregabalin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that pregabalin is an effective, rapidly acting, and safe treatment for generalized anxiety disorder. In short-term treatment, pregabalin does not appear to have the withdrawal symptoms associated with the benzodiazepines.

Adult↗

Comparison of Ketamine and Pregabalin on Postoperative Opioid Usage and Pain Management in Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal fusion is associated with substantial early postoperative pain and opioid exposure. Both ketamine and pregabalin are widely incorporated into Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as opioid-sparing adjuncts. However, their comparative efficacy and safety in this specific setting remain uncertain. Our objective was to compare ketamine and pregabalin indirectly for early postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and adverse events in adults undergoing spinal fusion. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Trials were searched from inception through October 2025. Eligible studies were randomized trials enrolling adults undergoing instrumented spinal fusion, randomized to perioperative ketamine, pregabalin, or control, and reported extractable 24-hour opioid consumption or pain outcomes. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences in MME or VAS units, and adverse events were reported descriptively. A connected treatment network was analyzed using random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. RESULTS: Thirteen trials (n=879) were included: ketamine (n=210), pregabalin (n=271), and control (n=398). Six trials contributed opioid data (3 ketamine, 3 pregabalin). Using pregabalin 150 mg as reference, ketamine was associated with lower 0-24-hour opioid use (MD -56.99 mg MME; 95% CI -99.56 to -14.43). Control (MD +21.31; 95% CI -1.05 to +43.66) and pregabalin 300 mg (MD -13.22; 95% CI -40.41 to +13.96) did not significantly differ from pregabalin 150 mg. Seven trials contributed 24-hour VAS data, with control being associated with higher pain versus pregabalin 150 mg (MD +0.84; 95% CI +0.01 to +1.66), while ketamine and pregabalin 300 mg were not k significantly different. Adverse events were generally infrequent and similar to control. CONCLUSIONS: Both ketamine and pregabalin provide early opioid sparing with comparable 24-hour analgesia. Ketamine showed a larger opioid-sparing point estimate, but indirect comparisons are imprecise. Adequately powered head-to-head trials with standardized protocols and adverse event reporting are needed.

Humans↗

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, multicenter study of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Pregabalin is a novel compound under development for the treatment of several types of anxiety disorders. To obtain an initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), we conducted a double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel-group, placebo and active-controlled multicenter 4-week study that compared 271 patients randomized to receive pregabalin 50 mg tid (N = 70), pregabalin 200 mg tid (N = 66), placebo (N = 67), or lorazepam 2 mg tid (N = 68), followed by a 1-week double-blind taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to endpoint (last observation carried forward) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score; adjusted mean change scores on the HAM-A were significantly improved for pregabalin 200 mg tid (difference of 3.90 between drug and placebo; p = 0.0013 [ANCOVA], df = 252) and for lorazepam (difference of 2.35; p = 0.0483 [ANCOVA], df = 252), with the significant difference between the pregabalin 200 mg tid and placebo groups seen at week 1 of treatment (p = 0.0001 [ANCOVA], df = 238). Safety analysis, which included assessment of spontaneously reported adverse events, laboratory monitoring, and withdrawal symptoms, showed pregabalin to be generally well-tolerated. The most common adverse events seen with pregabalin 200 mg tid were somnolence and dizziness. They were usually mild or moderate in intensity and were often transient. Pregabalin-treated patients had a higher completion rate than lorazepam-treated patients. This study supports the hypothesis that pregabalin is effective and safe in short-term therapy for GAD. More studies are needed to determine the best dosing regimen to optimize efficacy and tolerability.

Adolescent↗

Pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: The authors conducted a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week, randomized clinical trial in PHN, defined as pain for 3 or more months following herpes zoster rash healing. Patients (n = 173) were randomized to treatment with pregabalin or placebo. Patients randomized to pregabalin received either 600 mg/day (creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min) or 300 mg/day (creatinine clearance 30 to 60 mL/min). The primary efficacy measure was the mean of the last seven daily pain ratings. Secondary endpoints included additional pain ratings, sleep interference, quality of life, mood, and patient and clinician ratings of global improvement. RESULTS: Pregabalin-treated patients had greater decreases in pain than patients treated with placebo (endpoint mean scores 3.60 vs 5.29, p = 0.0001). Pain was significantly reduced in the pregabalin-treated patients after the first full day of treatment and throughout the study, and significant improvement on the McGill Pain Questionnaire total, sensory, and affective pain scores was also found. The proportions of patients with >or=30% and >or=50% decreases in mean pain scores were greater in the pregabalin than in the placebo group (63% vs 25% and 50% vs 20%, p = 0.001). Sleep also improved in patients treated with pregabalin compared to placebo (p = 0.0001). Both patients and clinicians were more likely to report global improvement with pregabalin than placebo (p = 0.001). Given the maximal dosage studied, pregabalin had acceptable tolerability compared to placebo despite a greater incidence of side effects, which were generally mild to moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PHN with pregabalin is safe, efficacious in relieving pain and sleep interference, and associated with greater global improvement than treatment with placebo.

Adult↗

Mucosal uptake of gabapentin (neurontin) vs. pregabalin in the small intestine.

PURPOSE: To compare the mucosal membrane transport of gabapentin and pregabalin in animal small intestine. METHODS: Uptake of the two drugs by brush-border membrane vesicles (BBMV) from rat and rabbit small intestine was studied as a function of temperature, uptake-medium sodium content, and intestinal region. Amino acid inhibition studies were conducted with pregabalin. RESULTS: Gabapentin uptake by rat and rabbit jejunal BBMV was sodium independent, whereas pregabalin uptake was sodium dependent. Uptake of both drugs in rabbit small intestinal vesicles was greater at 25 degrees C than at 4 degrees C in the absence of sodium and an additional increase in uptake was observed for pregabalin at 25 degrees C in the presence of sodium. Pregabalin uptake in rabbit duodenal, jejunal, and ileal BBMV was equivalent, whereas gabapentin uptake was greater in duodenal and ileal BBMV, compared with jejunal BBMV. Although inhibition is weak, a decrease in BBMV uptake of pregabalin is observed with coincubation of high concentrations of both neutral and basic amino acids. CONCLUSIONS: Amino acid carriers mediate the apical uptake of both drugs in the small intestine. Although gabapentin and pregabalin are structurally similar, their small intestinal mucosal uptake differs in sodium dependence and region dependence. Gabapentin uptake is likely mediated by system b0,+, whereas pregabalin uptake is also mediated by B0 and/or B0,+.

Acetates↗

Transport of pregabalin in rat intestine and Caco-2 monolayers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the intestinal transport of pregabalin (isobutyl gamma-aminobutyric acid, isobutyl GABA), a new anticonvulsant drug, was mediated by amino acid carriers with affinity for large neutral amino acids (LNAA). METHODS: Pregabalin transport was studied in rat intestine and Caco-2 monolayers. An in vitro Ussing/diffusion chamber model and an in situ single-pass perfusion model were used to study rat intestinal transport. An in vitro diffusion chamber model was used to evaluate Caco-2 transport. RESULTS: In rat ileum, pregabalin transport was saturable and inhibited by substrates of intestinal LNAA carriers including neurontin (gabapentin), phenylalanine, and proline. Weak substrates of intestinal LNAA carriers (beta-alanine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and methyl aminoisobutyric acid) did not significantly change pregabalin transport. In Caco-2 monolayers that showed a high capacity for phenylalanine transport, pregabalin transport was concentration- and direction-independent and equivalent in magnitude to the paracellular marker, mannitol. The in vitro and in situ rat ileal permeabilities of the LNAA carrier-mediated compounds neurontin, pregabalin, and phenylalanine correlated well with the corresponding in vivo human oral absorption. CONCLUSIONS: The transport of pregabalin was mediated by LNAA carriers in rat ileum but not in Caco-2 monolayers. Caco-2 was not an appropriate model for evaluating the in vivo human oral absorption of pregabalin and neurontin.

Acetates↗

Stereospecific effect of pregabalin on ectopic afferent discharges and neuropathic pain induced by sciatic nerve ligation in rats.

BACKGROUND: The new anticonvulsants, gabapentin and pregabalin, are effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The sites and mechanisms of their analgesic action are not fully known. The authors have previously demonstrated that systemic gabapentin suppresses ectopic afferent discharges recorded from injured sciatic nerves in rats. In the current study, they further examined the stereospecific effect of pregabalin on neuropathic pain and afferent ectopic discharges in a rodent model of neuropathic pain. METHODS: Tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia were induced by partial ligation of the left sciatic nerve in rats. Single-unit activity of afferent ectopic discharges was recorded from the sciatic nerve proximal to the site of ligation. RESULTS: Intravenous injection of 10-30 mg/kg pregabalin dose-dependently attenuated tactile allodynia (n = 10) and thermal hyperalgesia (n = 8). The stereoisomer of pregabalin, R-3-isobutylgaba, had no analgesic effect in this dose range. Furthermore, intravenous injection of pregabalin, but not R-3-isobutylgaba, significantly inhibited the ectopic discharges from injured afferents in a dose-dependent manner (from 20.8 +/- 2.4 impulses/s during control to 2.3 +/- 0.7 impulses/s after treatment with 30 mg/kg pregabalin, n = 15). Pregabalin did not affect the conduction velocity of afferent fibers and the response of normal afferent nerves to mechanical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These data strongly suggest that the analgesic effect of pregabalin on neuropathic pain is likely mediated, at least in part, by its peripheral inhibitory action on the impulse generation of ectopic discharges caused by nerve injury.

Animals↗

Gabapentin and pregabalin can interact synergistically with naproxen to produce antihyperalgesia.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin and pregabalin are anticonvulsants with antihyperalgesic effects in animal models of neuropathic and inflammatory nociception. This study characterized the manner in which gabapentin or pregabalin interacts with naproxen to suppress thermal hyperalgesia and inflammation in the carrageenan model of peripheral inflammation. METHODS: Gabapentin, pregabalin, naproxen, or a fixed-dose ratio of gabapentin + naproxen or pregabalin + naproxen was administered orally to rats after the induction of inflammation by intraplantar injection of lambda-carrageenan in one hind paw. Nociceptive thresholds were determined by the radiant heat paw-withdrawal test. Paw edema was measured by plethysmometry. Drug plasma concentrations were determined by a liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy-mass spectroscopy method. RESULTS: Gabapentin, pregabalin, and naproxen alone reversed thermal hyperalgesia with ED50 values of 19.2, 6.0, and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. Mixtures of gabapentin + naproxen in fixed-dose ratios of 50:1, 10:1, or 1:1 interacted synergistically to reverse carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia. However, 1:50 gabapentin + naproxen produced only additive effects. No combination of gabapentin + naproxen decreased paw edema in a manner greater than additive. Plasma concentrations of gabapentin and naproxen were unaltered by the addition of the other drug. The mixture of 10:1 of pregabalin + naproxen interacted synergistically to reverse thermal hyperalgesia on the inflamed hind paw, whereas mixtures of 1:1 or 1:10 produced additive effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that gabapentin + naproxen and pregabalin + naproxen can interact synergistically or additively to reverse thermal hyperalgesia associated with peripheral inflammation. Therefore, the use of gabapentin or pregabalin in low-dose combinations with naproxen may afford therapeutic advantages for clinical treatment of persistent inflammatory pain.

Acetates↗

Pregabalin in patients with postoperative dental pain.

Pregabalin is an analogue of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid. In preclinical models, it has shown activity as an analgesic agent. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was undertaken to compare pregabalin to placebo and 400 mg of ibuprofen using a dental pain model. Study medication was administered postoperatively to patients who had undergone elective surgery to remove one or two third molars, at least one of which was mandibular and fully or partially impacted in bone. The study was conducted in the UK at a single centre and evaluated pregabalin at doses of 50 and 300 mg. Primary efficacy parameters included pain relief (PR), pain intensity difference (PID), pain relief intensity difference (PRID), time to onset of analgesia, and duration of analgesia. The patient's global impression of the study medication was used as a secondary efficacy parameter. Efficacy data were evaluated for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all randomized patients who took study medication. Results showed that there were statistically significant differences in PR, PID, and PRID between the 300-mg pregabalin group and placebo. In addition, the 300-mg pregabalin group had a significantly longer duration of analgesia than the ibuprofen group and had the highest score on the patient global impression of study medication. Adverse events were reported more frequently in the pregabalin 300-mg group. Pregabalin appears to have significant analgesic properties in the third molar extraction model. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Adolescent↗

Pregabalin (CI-1008) inhibits the trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced chronic colonic allodynia in the rat.

In human, digestive disorders are often associated with visceral pain. In these pathologies, visceral pain threshold is decreased indicating a visceral hypersensitivity. Pregabalin [CI-1008; S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba] presents antihyperalgesic actions in inflammatory somatic pain models. This study was designed to evaluate 1) the effect of injection of TNBS into the colon on visceral pain threshold, and 2) the antihyperalgesic effect of pregabalin on TNBS-induced chronic colonic allodynia. A significant decrease in the colonic pain threshold was observed in trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-treated animals (17.8 +/- 1.27 versus 43.4 +/- 1.98 mm Hg). Pregabalin (30-200 mg/kg s.c.) and morphine (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.) showed a dose-related inhibition of TNBS-induced colonic allodynia. Pregabalin did not inhibit the colonic inflammatory effect of TNBS. In normal conditions (control animals), morphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) significantly increased the colonic pain threshold, whereas pregabalin (200 mg/kg s.c.) did not modify the colonic pain threshold. Pregabalin suppressed the TNBS-induced colonic allodynia but did not modify the colonic threshold in normal conditions. The ability of pregabalin to block the chronic colonic allodynia indicates that it is effective in abnormal colonic hypersensitivity, suggesting a possible effect in chronic pain in irritable bowel syndrome.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Pregabalin enhances nonrapid eye movement sleep.

Pregabalin, an analog of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) that does not interact with GABA receptors, is in development as an analgesic, an anticonvulsant, and an anxiolytic. We evaluated the potential somnogenic actions of pregabalin in rats and compared it to those of triazolam, a widely used hypnotic. Pregabalin increased the duration of nonrapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) and decreased rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) after either dark onset or light onset administration. Triazolam increased duration of NREMS and had no effect on duration of REMS. Pregabalin markedly increased the duration of NREMS episodes and decreased the number of NREMS episodes. Power spectrum analysis revealed pregabalin-induced dose-dependent increases in relative delta power after administration. In contrast, triazolam decreased electroencephalographic power density in low frequency bands. Results suggest that pregabalin is a potential sleep modulating agent.

Animals↗

Exposure-response analysis of pregabalin add-on treatment of patients with refractory partial seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to describe the exposure-response relationship of pregabalin add-on treatment for refractory partial seizures after multiple dosing in patients and to identify the factors that influence this relationship. METHODS: A mixed-effects model was used to characterize the relationship between monthly seizure frequency over a 3-month period and pregabalin daily dose (0, 50, 150, 300, and 600 mg) as add-on treatment in 3 double-blind, parallel-group studies in patients with refractory partial seizures (N = 1042). Seizure frequency was modeled as a Poisson process expressed as a function of baseline seizures, drug treatment, placebo effect, and subject-specific random effects. The model included a parameter that partitioned the population into subpopulations with respect to response. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of patients showed an asymptotic decrease in seizure frequency with increasing doses of pregabalin, whereas 25% did not demonstrate a significant decrease in seizure frequency from baseline. In patients who demonstrated a dose-related decrease in seizure frequency from baseline, the maximal percentage of seizure reduction from baseline was 100% for women and 80% for men, with a 186-mg daily dose decreasing seizures on average to 50% of maximum. Age, race, and menopausal status did not significantly affect seizure frequency. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin add-on treatment demonstrates a dose-response relationship in 3 out of 4 patients with refractory partial seizures. A dose of 186 mg pregabalin daily is expected to decrease the seizure rate by 50% of maximum from baseline. Age, race, and menopausal status of women did not affect the dose-response relationship.

Adult↗

Dose-response trial of pregabalin adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.

BACKGROUND: Pregabalin is an alpha(2)-delta ligand that has anxiolytic, analgesic, and anticonvulsant properties. OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pregabalin administered twice-daily (BID) without dose titration as adjunctive treatment in patients with partial seizures and to confirm the dose-response relationship. METHODS: This 76-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of an 8-week baseline and a 12-week double-blind phase. Patients with refractory partial seizures on one to three antiepileptic drugs were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups (placebo or 50, 150, 300, and 600 mg/d pregabalin, all administered BID). Efficacy was assessed using seizure frequency reduction and responder rate (> or =50% seizure reduction from baseline). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 453 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The median baseline seizure rate was 10 per month. Seizure frequency reductions from baseline were 7% (placebo; n = 100), 12% (50 mg/d; n = 88), 34% (150 mg/d; n = 86), 44% (300 mg/d; n = 90), and 54% (600 mg/d; n = 89). Responder rates (> or =50% seizure reduction) were 14% (placebo), 15% (50 mg/d), 31% (150 mg/d), 40% (300 mg/d), and 51% (600 mg/d). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 5% (placebo), 7% (50 mg/d), 1% (150 mg/d), 14% (300 mg/d), and 24% (600 mg/d). The 150-, 300-, and 600-mg/d pregabalin groups were associated with greater reductions in seizures (p < or = 0.0001) and greater responder rates compared with the placebo group (p < or = 0.006). There was a favorable dose-response trend for both seizure reductions (p < or = 0.0001) and responder rate (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive therapy with pregabalin 150, 300, and 600 mg/d, given in twice-daily doses without titration, is significantly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with partial seizures as demonstrated in patients with refractory partial seizures.

Adolescent↗

Pregabalin: a new anxiolytic.

Pregabalin (S-[+]-3-isobutylgaba) was designed as a lipophilic GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) analogue substituted at the 3'-position in order to facilitate diffusion across the blood-brain barrier. It was originally developed as an anticonvulsant agent, however it has been shown to be effective in the treatment of several disorders including hyperalgesia and behavioural disorders. Although its exact mode of action remains unclear, pregabalin interacts with the same binding site and has a similar pharmacological profile as its predecessor, gabapentin (1-[aminomethyl] cyclohexane acetic acid). Its main site of action appears to be on the alpha(2)delta subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels, widely distributed throughout the peripheral and central nervous system. Pregabalin appears to produce an inhibitory modulation of neuronal excitability. In healthy volunteers, it is rapidly absorbed with peak blood concentrations within 1 h and it has a bioavailability of approximately 90%. In preclinical trials of anticonvulsant activity, pregabalin is three to ten times more potent than gabapentin. It is well-tolerated and associated with dose-dependent adverse effects (ataxia, dizziness, headache and somnolence) that are mild-to-moderate and usually transient. There are no known pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions reported to date. Preliminary animal and human studies showed beneficial effects in both ethological and conflict models of anxiety, as well as having some sleep-modulating properties. In Phase II and III trials, pregabalin shows promising anxiolytic action when compared to placebo in generalised anxiety disorder, social phobia and panic disorder.

Animals↗

Antinociceptive effect of pregabalin in septic shock-induced rectal hypersensitivity in rats.

Pregabalin [S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba] is a novel compound under development for its analgesic, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant properties, and its interaction with the alpha(2)delta-subunit of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels. In this study, we investigate the antinociceptive activity of pregabalin in a rat model of delayed visceral hyperalgesia induced by i.p. lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. LPS (Escherichia coli, serotype O111:B4) leads to a delayed lowering threshold (9-12 h) of abdominal contractions in response to rectal distension (RD) in awake rats surgically prepared for electromyography of abdominal muscles. This allodynic effect of LPS was blocked by morphine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.), and the action of morphine was antagonized by naloxone (2.5 mg/kg s.c.). A single i.p. (10, 30 mg/kg) and oral (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) treatment of pregabalin dose dependently suppressed LPS-induced rectal hypersensitivity. When administered 2 h before RD (but preceded 12 h by LPS injection), the oral dose of 10 mg/kg was effective both in the allodynic response induced by LPS and in the intensity of the nociceptive response related to RD. Pretreatment by either naloxone or bicuculline (a GABA(A) antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg i.p.) did not affect the antiallodynic effect of pregabalin. We conclude that pregabalin is a therapeutic candidate in the treatment of gut hypersensitivity not acting through GABA(A) and opiate receptors.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗

Brain microdialysis and PK/PD correlation of pregabalin in rats.

Pregabalin [PGB, (S)-3-isobutyl GABA, CI-1008] is a derivative of the inhibitory neurotransmitter g-aminobutyric acid (GABA). It has shown anticonvulsant, analgesia and anxiety activity in animal models. In this report, blood-brain barrier (BBB) influx and efflux of PGB were investigated with microdialysis at efficacious doses in rats. BBB influx (CLin) and efflux (CLout) permeability for pregabalin were 4.8 and 37.2 microL/min/g brain, respectively, following an intravenous infusion to rats. The results indicate that PGB is brain penetrable, supporting its anti-epilepsy and other CNS pharmacology. Significant anticonvulsant action of PGB was detected between 2 and 8 hr post oral dose, which is lag behind ECF drug concentrations lees. A PK/PD link model was used to describe the counter-clockwise hysteresis relationship between pregabalin brain ECF concentration and the anticonvulsant effect in rats. The resulting Ce (concentration in effect compartment) versus effect profile exhibits a sigmoidal curve and the calculated ECe50 and Keo values were 95.3 ng/mL and 0.0092 min-1, respectively. The small Keo value suggests that the effect is not directly proportional to the amount of pregabalin in the ECF compartment possibly due to inherent delay.

Acetates↗

Inhibition of neuronal Ca(2+) influx by gabapentin and pregabalin in the human neocortex.

Gabapentin and pregabalin (S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba) produced concentration-dependent inhibitions of the K(+)-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase in fura-2-loaded human neocortical synaptosomes (IC(50)=17 microM for both compounds; respective maximal inhibitions of 37 and 35%). The weaker enantiomer of pregabalin, R-(-)-3-isobutylgaba, was inactive. These findings were consistent with the potency of these drugs to inhibit [(3)H]-gabapentin binding to human neocortical membranes. The inhibitory effect of gabapentin on the K(+)-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase was prevented by the P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel blocker omega-agatoxin IVA. The alpha 2 delta-1, alpha 2 delta-2, and alpha 2 delta-3 subunits of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, presumed sites of gabapentin and pregabalin action, were detected with immunoblots of human neocortical synaptosomes. The K(+)-evoked release of [(3)H]-noradrenaline from human neocortical slices was inhibited by gabapentin (maximal inhibition of 31%); this effect was prevented by the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX (2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro[f]quinoxaline-7-sulphonamide). Gabapentin and pregabalin may bind to the Ca(2+) channel alpha 2 delta subunit to selectively attenuate depolarization-induced Ca(2+) influx of presynaptic P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels; this results in decreased glutamate/aspartate release from excitatory amino acid nerve terminals leading to a reduced activation of AMPA heteroreceptors on noradrenergic nerve terminals.

Acetates↗