PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Preprint”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of an experimental chemistry preprint server.

A preprint is a research article made publicly available prior to formal publication. A preprint server is a freely available archive and distribution medium for preprints, allowing rapid dissemination and use of multimedia and supporting files. Electronic eprints have been widely adopted in certain fields (notably high energy physics), but, until recently, the preprint concept has not been received with enthusiasm by most chemists. Despite the fact that preprints have the advantage of rapid publication, chemists have been reluctant to produce them because they could be viewed as "unallowable" for research assessment or tenure exercises or for publication in certain prestigious journals. In theory, preprints, together with version control and online discussion, could be a useful compromise: rapid prepublication followed by open peer review, before publication in a traditional journal. This paper constitutes a preliminary evaluation of a Chemistry Preprint Server in its second year of operation and summarizes the lessons that can be learned from the experiment to date.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Can admission notes be improved by using preprinted assessment sheets?

Inpatient medical notes often fail to record important details of patient history and findings on clinical examination. To overcome problems with content and legibility of notes we introduced preprinted notes for the admission of children to this hospital. The quality of the information recorded for 100 children whose admissions were clerked with the preprinted notes was compared with that recorded for 100 whose admissions were recorded with the traditional notes. All case notes were selected randomly and retrospectively from traditional notes written from April to October 1993 and from preprinted notes written from October 1993 to April 1994. The quality of information was assessed according to the presence or absence of 25 agreed core clinical details and the number of words per clerking. In admissions recorded with the preprinted notes the mean number of core clinical details present was significantly higher than those recorded with traditional notes (24.0 v 17.6, p < 0.00001). Admissions recorded with the preprinted notes were also significantly shorter (mean 144 words v 184 words, p < 0.0001). The authors conclude that information about children admitted to hospital is both more complete and more succinct when recorded using preprinted admission sheets.

Admitting Department, Hospital↗
PubMed1992

Development and use of preprinted forms and adhesive labels in medical record charting.

Clear delineation of specific clinical and administrative responsibilities (eg, content requirements, cost constraints) is necessary in the development, approval, and implementation of effective preprinted documentation materials. Input early in the development stage from medical record and legal department staff ensures that proposed materials will meet organizational and legal standards. The development and use of time-saving preprinted documentation materials in medical record charting by the Johns Hopkins Oncology Nutrition Service is described. We conclude that the use of preprinted materials expedites and enhances both the consistency and quality of documentation.

Dietary Services↗
PubMed1998

Perceived value of providing peer reviewers with abstracts and preprints of related published and unpublished papers.

CONTEXT: Many journals provide peer reviewers with written instructions regarding review criteria, such as the originality of results, but little research has been done to investigate ways to improve or facilitate the peer review task. OBJECTIVE: To assess the value that peer reviewers place on receipt of supplemental materials (eg, abstracts of related papers and preprints of related unpublished manuscripts). DESIGN: Questionnaire survey sent to all 733 peer reviewers recruited by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute to review 356 manuscripts consecutively sent out for review from February 24, 1997, through January 16, 1998. The inclusion of supplemental materials with manuscript review packages was optional. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The peer reviewers' assessment of the actual or potential usefulness of supplemental materials on the performance of peer review. RESULTS: A total of 481 (66%) of 733 questionnaires were returned. Of the 471 respondents' questionnaires that could be used, 217 (46%) indicated that they received abstracts, and 44 (10%) of 458 respondents indicated that they received preprints. Higher proportions of peer reviewers who received supplemental materials than those who had not received them felt that they were (or would be) useful to them when reviewing the manuscript (63% [95% confidence interval (CI), 57%-69%] vs 45% [95% CI, 38%-52%]; P<.001) and to the peer review process in general (80% [95% CI, 75%-85%] vs 64% [95% CI, 58%-70%]; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents indicated that supplemental materials helped (or would have helped) them evaluate manuscripts and valued them more highly when they actually received them.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed1999

Building a nursing quality management program on preprinted charting forms.

The use of preprinted charting forms saves nursing time and, at the same time, increases completeness and accuracy of documentation. Data for Quality Management (QM) are easily gathered from preprinted charting forms, making the forms an effective tool for building a nursing QM program. The enthusiastic response to the presentation of this program at the American College Health Association's 1998 Annual Meeting in San Diego prompted the authors to share this information with journal readers.

Forms and Records Control↗
PubMed1996

Effect of a preprinted form on the management of acute asthma in an accident and emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a preprinted form on the documentation of clinical data and compliance with the national guidelines for the management of asthma. METHODS: Prospective audit six months before and after introduction of the form. RESULTS: Use of the form improved the documentation of past asthma history (69% v 93%, P < 0.001), current treatment (81% v 95%, P < 0.01), predicted peak flow (23% v 75%, P < 0.001), per cent predicted peak flow (1% v 62%, P < 0.001), and respiratory rate (81% v 95%, P = 0.007). Compliance with the British recommendations for treatment improved with use of the form (50% v 89%, P < 0.001) The prescription of steroids on discharge did not improve significantly (26% v 44%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The preprinted form resulted in enhanced documentation of data and conformity with current guidelines for the management of asthma.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of joint medical and nursing notes with preprinted prompts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the views of doctors and nurses about two recent innovations in the structure of case notes: the use of preprinted prompts and the use of joint medical and nursing notes. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of all doctors and nurses working on the children's wards. SETTING: Children's wards in a district general hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether or not respondents wanted to return to traditional notes; positive and negative aspects of the two innovations. RESULTS: There was an 81% response rate. 45 of 48 respondents (94%) did not want to return to traditional notes. Positive features of joint notes that were identified included: promotes team work (21/48 respondents), improves access to information (14/48), and reduces duplication (14/48). Negative features included uncertainty about identity of writer (8/48) and incompletely filled in sheets (7/48). Positive features of preprinted prompts included: less information omitted (29/48), easier to read and find information (28/48), and quicker to write (21/48). Negative features included: not enough space (19/48) and clerking too mechanical (16/48). CONCLUSION: Advantages of both innovations outweighed their disadvantages to the extent that only three out of 48 respondents wanted to return to writing traditional notes.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Using a preprinted order sheet to reduce prescription errors in a pediatric emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Medication errors are common among pediatric patients and in emergency departments (EDs). Such errors may lead to prolonged hospitalization, unnecessary diagnostic tests and treatments, and death. The objective of this study was to determine whether the use of a structured order sheet reduces the incidence of medication errors in a pediatric ED. METHODS: The study was a randomized, controlled study that was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Eighteen days were randomized into 2 study groups: days during which the regular blank order sheets were used and days during which preprinted, formatted, order sheets were used. All patients' charts from these days were reviewed by 2 medical students, who extracted demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data into a database. Two pediatric emergency physicians, blinded to the form used, reviewed the database and independently decided whether an error had occurred and the severity of the error. RESULTS: Within the study period, there were 2157 visits to the ED. A total of 2058 (95.4%) charts were available for review. A total of 411 (52.2%) orders for drugs in the ED were ordered on the regular form, and 376 (47.8%) were given on the new form. Drug errors were identified in 68 (16.6%) orders when the regular form was used and in 37 (9.8%) of the orders on the new form. Using the new form was associated with a significant reduction in the risk for an error (odds ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a preprinted structured order form significantly reduces medication errors among pediatric patients in the ED.

Child↗
PubMed1991

Responses to reprint requests: form letters versus preprinted cards.

Nine hundred ninety-four reprint requests were made for almost all the original articles that appeared in five pediatric journals between August and October in 1985, 1986, and 1987. Half of the reprint requests were made with form letters and the other half with preprinted cards. A total of 636 (64%) reprints were received within 6 months of mailing the request. The return rates for reprints solicited by form letters and preprinted cards were 68% and 60%, respectively. The response to reprint requests was greater for more recent articles. The number of articles that came in the form of photocopies was directly proportional to the time interval between the publication and the reprint request. Forty-one requests (4.1%) were returned by the authors because their reprint supply was exhausted. Thirty-eight requests (3.8%) were returned undelivered. We conclude that letter requests solicit a slightly better response than card requests and that the response is greater for more recent articles.

Periodicals as Topic↗
PubMed2003

PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS.

The PRINTS database houses a collection of protein fingerprints. These may be used to assign uncharacterised sequences to known families and hence to infer tentative functions. The September 2002 release (version 36.0) includes 1800 fingerprints, encoding approximately 11 000 motifs, covering a range of globular and membrane proteins, modular polypeptides and so on. In addition to its continued steady growth, we report here the development of an automatic supplement, prePRINTS, designed to increase the coverage of the resource and reduce some of the manual burdens inherent in its maintenance. The databases are accessible for interrogation and searching at http://www.bioinf.man.ac.uk/dbbrowser/PRINTS/.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed1987

Students evaluate MEDFILE, a preprinted medical literature filing system.

Medical professionals are highly dependent on personal libraries and reprint files as their sources for current information. A large population of practising doctors have poorly organized medical literature data bases in their professional environment. To expedite the development of a personal library data base by medical students, we created MEDFILE, a preprinted, cross-indexed file folder system for organizing the medical literature. This paper reports the results of two surveys performed in connection with the distribution of the MEDFILE system. One hundred per cent of the students who used MEDFILE found the system to be beneficial. Ninety-seven per cent felt their ability to find their personal literature improved by using MEDFILE, and 65% felt MEDFILE improved their clinical preparation. Of all surveyed recipients of the system, 96.8% felt MEDFILE would be useful in their future studies.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

Scientific publishing. Chemists toy with the preprint future.

Last week, the giant publishing house Elsevier Science launched the first electronic archive for chemistry preprints through its ChemWeb subsidiary. The new site (preprint.chemweb.com) will be a common repository for reports on a wide range of chemistry topics and a forum for authors and readers to discuss the results. But ChemWeb could face an uphill battle in convincing authors to post their papers on the site, as many of the field's premier journals decline to accept papers that have already been posted on the Web.

Chemical Phenomena↗
PubMed2004

Use of a preprinted sticker to improve the prescribing of prophylactic antibiotics for hip fracture surgery.

PROBLEM: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the number of postoperative infections following surgery for hip fracture. At Auckland Hospital the policy for antibiotic prophylaxis for hip fracture surgery is for the patient to receive the first dose of antibiotic at the induction of anaesthesia followed by two more doses at 8 hour intervals. A previous audit found that patients often received too many doses of antibiotic. A retrospective audit was performed of 100 patients undergoing surgery for a hip fracture. The primary problem was over-prescribing; 68 patients (68%) received more than three doses. The number of patients who received three doses according to the guidelines was 29 (29%, 95% CI 21 to 40). SETTING: Auckland Hospital which provides acute orthopaedic services for a population of 500,000. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: A sticker was introduced with the prescription printed on it. The sticker was applied to the medication chart by the anaesthetist when the initial dose of antibiotic was given. Charts of a further 100 patients were reviewed after the introduction of the sticker and compared with those from another hospital in Auckland where the sticker was not used. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: The number of patients who received three doses, in accordance with the guidelines, improved to 74 (74%, 95% CI 64 to 82, p<0.001). These changes were observed even though the sticker was only used in 44 patients (44%, 95% CI 34 to 54). At the other hospital the number of patients who received three doses was 10 (20%, 95% CI 10 to 42) and 13 (26%, 95% CI 15 to 40, p = 0.37) for the same two periods. LESSONS LEARNT: The use of a preprinted sticker is a simple intervention which improves the use of antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of surgery. This improvement occurred even though the sticker was used in slightly fewer than half the cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

The failure of a preprinted order form to alter physicians' antimicrobial prescribing pattern.

Use of antimicrobial agents is highly effective in reduction of morbidity and mortality due to infectious disease. There is, however, evidence that the use of such agents is frequently inappropriate worldwide. Several methods were tried to rationalize the use, and, among these, the preprinted order form (P.O.F.) offered the simplest and most efficient way. We studied the use of the P.O.F. in Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok Thailand, where there was overuse of antimicrobial agents using a historical-controlled intervention study. In period I (no P.O.F.), the antimicrobial overuse was 35 per cent, and this was not reduced by using the P.O.F. in period II (32%), which was one year apart. There was no difference in overuse after adjustment for differences in base-line characteristics which were thought to affect antimicrobial prescriptions i.e. physicians' workload, physicians' knowledge and the method of diagnosis of infectious disease. Reasons for failure of the P.O.F. in unclear. Misdiagnosis was unlikely since the correct diagnosis as revised by attending physicians and specialists was as high as 83 per cent. The fear of malpractice suits was also not the reason because defensive medicine is not a problem in Thailand. The nature of the diseases, which lower the threshold to treat, the clinical immaturity and other unknown factors were thought to play a part in deviation from responsibility to perform according to written-justification.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Utilization of MEDFILE--a preprinted medical literature filing system.

To facilitate the creation of a personal medical literature filing system, we developed MEDFILE, a noncomputerized, preprinted medical literature filing system. A graduating medical school class that had access to MEDFILE and a control group of incoming interns were studied to ascertain satisfaction, usage, utility, and implementation of MEDFILE in comparison with traditional literature filing systems. Data were obtained from 52 recent graduates of the site school and 25 graduates of other institutions. MEDFILE users had a significantly higher satisfaction level (7.3 +/- 1.5 vs 4.5 +/- 2.7, p less than .0001, two-tailed t-test), a more extensive filing system (p less than .02, chi square), and greater confidence that their filing system would remain useful during residency (p less than .0001, Fisher's exact test) than new graduates who had created their own filing systems. The data indicate that MEDFILE is an efficient, effective, and inexpensive method of organizing medical reprints. It may be particularly useful for physicians entering primary care disciplines that require information processing over a wide range of clinical topics.

Databases, Bibliographic↗
PubMed1999

Cine PACS: preprint.

The technology of cardiac image management is increasingly digital. This tutorial introduces some of the basic concepts relevant to the application of this technology in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Cardiac Catheterization↗