SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Protein Domains”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

SSEP-Domain: protein domain prediction by alignment of secondary structure elements and profiles.

MOTIVATION: The prediction of protein domains is a crucial task for functional classification, homology-based structure prediction and structural genomics. In this paper, we present the SSEP-Domain protein domain prediction approach, which is based on the application of secondary structure element alignment (SSEA) and profile-profile alignment (PPA) in combination with InterPro pattern searches. SSEA allows rapid screening for potential domain regions while PPA provides us with the necessary specificity for selecting significant hits. The combination with InterPro patterns allows finding domain regions without solved structural templates if sequence family definitions exist. RESULTS: A preliminary version of SSEP-Domain was ranked among the top-performing domain prediction servers in the CASP 6 and CAFASP 4 experiments. Evaluation of the final version shows further improvement over these results together with a significant speed-up. AVAILABILITY: The server is available at http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/SSEP/

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

EVEREST: a collection of evolutionary conserved protein domains.

Protein domains are subunits of proteins that recur throughout the protein world. There are many definitions attempting to capture the essence of a protein domain, and several systems that identify protein domains and classify them into families. EVEREST, recently described in Portugaly et al. (2006) BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 277, is one such system that performs the task automatically, using protein sequence alone. Herein we describe EVEREST release 2.0, consisting of 20,029 families, each defined by one or more HMMs. The current EVEREST database was constructed by scanning UniProt 8.1 and all PDB sequences (total over 3,000,000 sequences) with each of the EVEREST families. EVEREST annotates 64% of all sequences, and covers 59% of all residues. EVEREST is available at http://www.everest.cs.huji.ac.il/. The website provides annotations given by SCOP, CATH, Pfam A and EVEREST. It allows for browsing through the families of each of those sources, graphically visualizing the domain organization of the proteins in the family. The website also provides access to analyzes of relationships between domain families, within and across domain definition systems. Users can upload sequences for analysis by the set of EVEREST families. Finally an advanced search form allows querying for families matching criteria regarding novelty, phylogenetic composition and more.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Cyclic diguanylate is a ubiquitous signaling molecule in bacteria: insights into biochemistry of the GGDEF protein domain.

Proteins containing GGDEF domains are encoded in the majority of sequenced bacterial genomes. In several species, these proteins have been implicated in biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides, formation of biofilms, establishment of a sessile lifestyle, surface motility, and regulation of gene expression. However, biochemical activities of only a few GGDEF domain proteins have been tested. These proteins were shown to be involved in either synthesis or hydrolysis of cyclic-bis(3'-->5') dimeric GMP (c-di-GMP) or in hydrolysis of cyclic AMP. To investigate specificity of the GGDEF domains in Bacteria, six GGDEF domain-encoding genes from randomly chosen representatives of diverse branches of the bacterial phylogenetic tree, i.e., Thermotoga, Deinococcus-Thermus, Cyanobacteria, spirochetes, and alpha and gamma divisions of the Proteobacteria, were cloned and overexpressed. All recombinant proteins were purified and found to possess diguanylate cyclase (DGC) activity involved in c-di-GMP synthesis. The individual GGDEF domains from two proteins were overexpressed, purified, and shown to possess a low level of DGC activity. The oligomeric states of full-length proteins and individual GGDEF domains were similar. This suggests that GGDEF domains are sufficient to encode DGC activity; however, enzymatic activity is highly regulated by the adjacent sensory protein domains. It is shown that DGC activity of the GGDEF domain protein Rrp1 from Borrelia burgdorferi is strictly dependent on phosphorylation status of its input receiver domain. This study establishes that majority of GGDEF domain proteins are c-di-GMP specific, that c-di-GMP synthesis is a wide-spread phenomenon in Bacteria, and that it is highly regulated.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2001

A genome-wide survey of RS domain proteins.

Domains rich in alternating arginine and serine residues (RS domains) are frequently found in metazoan proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing. The RS domains of splicing factors associate with each other and are important for the formation of protein-protein interactions required for both constitutive and regulated splicing. The prevalence of the RS domain in splicing factors suggests that it might serve as a useful signature for the identification of new proteins that function in pre-mRNA processing, although it remains to be determined whether RS domains also participate in other cellular functions. Using database search and sequence clustering methods, we have identified and categorized RS domain proteins encoded within the entire genomes of Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This genome-wide survey revealed a surprising complexity of RS domain proteins in metazoans with functions associated with chromatin structure, transcription by RNA polymerase II, cell cycle, and cell structure, as well as pre-mRNA processing. Also identified were RS domain proteins in S. cerevisiae with functions associated with cell structure, osmotic regulation, and cell cycle progression. The results thus demonstrate an effective strategy for the genomic mining of RS domain proteins. The identification of many new proteins using this strategy has provided a database of factors that are candidates for forming RS domain-mediated interactions associated with different steps in pre-mRNA processing, in addition to other cellular functions.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed1999

Extragenic suppressors of loss-of-function mutations in the aspergillus FlbA regulator of G-protein signaling domain protein.

We showed previously that two genes, fl bA and fadA, have a major role in determining the balance between growth, sporulation, and mycotoxin (sterigmatocystin; ST) production by the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. fadA encodes the alpha subunit for a heterotrimeric G-protein, and continuous activation of FadA blocks sporulation and ST production while stimulating growth. fl bA encodes an A. nidulans regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) domain protein that antagonizes FadA-mediated signaling to allow development. To better understand FlbA function and other aspects of FadA-mediated growth control, we have isolated and characterized mutations in four previously undefined genes designated as sfaA, sfaC, sfaD, and sfaE (suppressors of flbA), and a new allele of fadA (fadAR205H), all of which suppress a fl bA loss-of-function mutation ( fl bA98). These suppressors overcome fl bA losses of function in both sporulation and ST biosynthesis. fadAR205H, sfaC67, sfaD82, and sfaE83 mutations are dominant to wild type whereas sfaA1 is semidominant. sfaA1 also differs from other suppressor mutations in that it cannot suppress a fl bA deletion mutation (and is therefore allele specific) whereas all the dominant suppressors can bypass complete loss of fl bA. Only sfaE83 suppressed dominant activating mutations in fadA, indicating that sfaE may have a unique role in fadA- fl bA interactions. Finally, none of these suppressor mutations bypassed fl uG loss-of-function mutations in development-specific activation.

Alleles↗

PubMed2005

Cooperative folding in a multi-domain protein.

Most protein domains are found in multi-domain proteins, yet most studies of protein folding have concentrated on small, single-domain proteins or on isolated domains from larger proteins. Spectrin domains are small (106 amino acid residues), independently folding domains consisting of three long alpha-helices. They are found in multi-domain proteins with a number of spectrin domains in tandem array. Structural studies have shown that in these arrays the last helix of one domain forms a continuous helix with the first helix of the following domain. It has been demonstrated that a number of spectrin domains are stabilised by their neighbours. Here we investigate the molecular basis for cooperativity between adjacent spectrin domains 16 and 17 from chicken brain alpha-spectrin (R16 and R17). We show that whereas the proteins unfold as a single cooperative unit at 25 degrees C, cooperativity is lost at higher temperatures and in the presence of stabilising salts. Mutations in the linker region also cause the cooperativity to be lost. However, the cooperativity does not rely on specific interactions in the linker region alone. Most mutations in the R17 domain cause a decrease in cooperativity, whereas proteins with mutations in the R16 domain still fold cooperatively. We propose a mechanism for this behaviour.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Arabidopsis RADICAL-INDUCED CELL DEATH1 belongs to the WWE protein-protein interaction domain protein family and modulates abscisic acid, ethylene, and methyl jasmonate responses.

Experiments with several Arabidopsis thaliana mutants have revealed a web of interactions between hormonal signaling. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis mutant radical-induced cell death1 (rcd1), although hypersensitive to apoplastic superoxide and ozone, is more resistant to chloroplastic superoxide formation, exhibits reduced sensitivity to abscisic acid, ethylene, and methyl jasmonate, and has altered expression of several hormonally regulated genes. Furthermore, rcd1 has higher stomatal conductance than the wild type. The rcd1-1 mutation was mapped to the gene At1g32230 where it disrupts an intron splice site resulting in a truncated protein. RCD1 belongs to the (ADP-ribosyl)transferase domain-containing subfamily of the WWE protein-protein interaction domain protein family. The results suggest that RCD1 could act as an integrative node in hormonal signaling and in the regulation of several stress-responsive genes.

Abscisic Acid↗

PubMed2006

Fast prediction of protein domain boundaries using conserved local patterns.

We have found certain conserved motifs and secondary structural patterns present in the vicinity of interior domain boundary points (dbps) by a data-driven approach without any a priori constraint on the type and number of such features, and without any requirement of sequence homology. We have used these motifs and patterns to rerank the solutions obtained by the well-known domain guess by size (DGS) algorithm. We predict, overall, five solutions. The average accuracy of overall (i.e., top five) predictions by our method [domain boundary prediction using conserved patterns (DPCP)] has improved the average accuracy of the top five solutions of DGS from 71.74 to 82.88 %, in the case of two-continuous-domain proteins, and from 21.38 to 80.56 %, for two-discontinuous-domain proteins. Considering only the top solution, the gains in accuracy are from 0 to 72.74 % for two-continuous-domain proteins with chain lengths up to 300 residues, and from 0 to 62.85 % for those with up to 400 residues. In the case of discontinuous domains, top_min solutions (the minimum number of solutions required for predicting all dbps of a protein) of DPCP improve the average accuracy of DGS prediction from 12.5 to 76.3 % in proteins with chain lengths up to 300 residues, and from 13.33 to 70.84 % for proteins with up to 400 residues. In our validation experiments, the performance of DPCP was also found to be superior to that of domain identification from secondary structure element alignment (DomSSEA), the best method reported so far for efficient prediction of domain boundaries using predicted secondary structure. The average accuracies of the topmost solution of DomSSEA are 61 and 52 % for proteins with up to 300 residues and 400, respectively, in the case of continuous domains; the corresponding accuracies for the discontinuous case are 28 and 21 %.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2005

The EAL domain protein VieA is a cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase.

The newly recognized bacterial second messenger 3',5'-cyclic diguanylic acid (cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP)) has been shown to regulate a wide variety of bacterial behaviors and traits. Biosynthesis and degradation of c-di-GMP have been attributed to the GGDEF and EAL protein domains, respectively, based primarily on genetic evidence. Whereas the GGDEF domain was demonstrated to possess diguanylate cyclase activity in vitro, the EAL domain has not been tested directly for c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase activity. This study describes the analysis of c-di-GMP hydrolysis by an EAL domain protein in a purified system. The Vibrio cholerae EAL domain protein VieA has been shown to inversely regulate biofilm-specific genes (vps) and virulence genes (ctxA), presumably by decreasing the cellular pool of c-di-GMP. VieA was maximally active at neutral pH, physiological ionic strength, and ambient temperatures and demonstrated c-di-GMP hydrolytic activity with a Km of 0.06 microM. VieA was unable to hydrolyze cGMP. The putative metal coordination site of the EAL domain, Glu170, was demonstrated to be necessary for VieA activity. Furthermore, the divalent cations Mg2+ and Mn2+ were necessary for VieA activity; conversely, Ca2+ and Zn2+ were potent inhibitors of the VieA phosphodiesterase. Calcium inhibition of the VieA EAL domain provides a potential mechanism for regulation of c-di-GMP degradation.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed1999

Differential interactions between Brother proteins and Runt domain proteins in the Drosophila embryo and eye.

Brother and Big brother were isolated as Runt-interacting proteins and are homologous to CBF(beta), which interacts with the mammalian CBF(alpha) Runt-domain proteins. In vitro experiments indicate that Brother family proteins regulate the DNA binding activity of Runt-domain proteins without contacting DNA. In both mouse and human there is genetic evidence that the CBF(alpha) and CBF(beta) proteins function together in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Here we demonstrate functional interactions between Brother proteins and Runt domain proteins in Drosophila. First, we show that a specific point mutation in Runt that disrupts interaction with Brother proteins but does not affect DNA binding activity is dysfunctional in several in vivo assays. Interestingly, this mutant protein acts dominantly to interfere with the Runt-dependent activation of Sxl-lethal transcription. To investigate further the requirements for Brother proteins in Drosophila development, we examine the effects of expression of a Brother fusion protein homologous to the dominant negative CBF(beta)::SMMHC fusion protein that is associated with leukemia in humans. This Bro::SMMHC fusion protein interferes with the activity of Runt and a second Runt domain protein, Lozenge. Moreover, we find that the effects of lozenge mutations on eye development are suppressed by expression of wild-type Brother proteins, suggesting that Brother/Big brother dosage is limiting in this developmental context. Results obtained when Runt is expressed in developing eye discs further support this hypothesis. Our results firmly establish the importance of the Brother and Big brother proteins for the biological activities of Runt and Lozenge, and further suggest that Brother protein function is not restricted to enhancing DNA-binding.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Prediction of protein domain boundaries based on statistics of appearance of amino acid residues].

We have created a database of two-domain proteins with homology less than 25% (452 proteins). Based on one half of this set of proteins statistics of appearance of amino acid residues on the domain boundaries of multiple domain proteins has been obtained. Small and hydrophilic amino acids (proline, glycine, asparagine, glutamic acid, arginine and others) appear on the domain boundaries more often than in the whole protein. Opposite, hydrophobic amino acid residues (tryptophane, methionine, phenylalanine and others) appear on the domain boundaries more rarely. The obtained scales of the appearance of amino acid residues on the boundary regions from the statistics have been used for calculation of domain boundaries in the proteins of the second half of the database. The probability scale obtained by averaging the appearance of amino acid residues on the domain boundary region including 8 residues (+/-4 residues from the real domain boundary) gives the best result: for 57% of proteins the predicted boundary was closer than 40 residues to the boundary assigned from three-dimensional structures, for 41% it was closer than 20 residues from the real boundary. The probability scale was used to predict domain boundaries for proteins with unknown three-dimensional structure (international competition CASP6).

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Folding mechanism of a multiple independently-folding domain protein: double B domain of protein A.

The antibody binding properties of staphylococcal protein A (SpA) can be attributed to the presence of five highly homologous domains (E, D, A, B, and C). Although the folding of the B domain of protein A (BdpA) is well-characterized, the folding behavior of this domain in the context of full-length SpA in the cell remains unexplored. The sequence of the B domain is 89 and 91% identical to those of domains A and C, respectively. We have fused B domain sequences (BBdpA) as a close approximation of the A-B or B-C portion of SpA. Circular dichroism and fluorescence-detected denaturation curves of BBdpA are experimentally indistinguishable from those of BdpA. The rate constants for folding and unfolding from NMR line shape analysis for the single- and double-domain proteins are the same within experimental uncertainties (+/-20%). These results support the designation of SpA as a multiple independently-folding domain (MIFD) protein. We develop a mathematical model that describes the folding thermodynamics and kinetics of MIFD proteins. The model depicts MIFD protein folding and unfolding as a parallel network and explicitly calculates the flux through all parallel pathways. These fluxes are combined to give a complete description of the global thermodynamics and kinetics of the folding and unfolding of MIFD proteins. The global rates for complete folding and unfolding of a MIFD protein and those of the individual domains depend on the stability of the protein. We show that the global unfolding rate of a MIFD protein may be many orders of magnitude slower than that of the constituent domains.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Signaling complex organization by PDZ domain proteins.

As one of the most abundant protein domains in the genomes of metazoans, PDZ domains play important roles in the targeting of proteins to specific cell membranes, as well as assembling proteins into supramolecular signaling complexes. The structures of individual PDZ domains, along with their diverse cooccurrence with a great variety of other protein domains, provide the biochemical basis for the functional diversity of PDZ proteins. In this review, we first briefly summarize the structure and target-binding properties of PDZ domains. After surveying the SMART protein domain database, we attempt to classify PDZ domain proteins into three general categories. We end the review by presenting several recent studies showing some novel features of PDZ domain proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Protein domain decomposition using a graph-theoretic approach.

MOTIVATION: Automatic decomposition of a multi-domain protein into individual domains represents a highly interesting and unsolved problem. As the number of protein structures in PDB is growing at an exponential rate, there is clearly a need for more reliable and efficient methods for protein domain decomposition simply to keep the domain databases up-to-date. RESULTS: We present a new algorithm for solving the domain decomposition problem, using a graph-theoretic approach. We have formulated the problem as a network flow problem, in which each residue of a protein is represented as a node of the network and each residue--residue contact is represented as an edge with a particular capacity, depending on the type of the contact. A two-domain decomposition problem is solved by finding a bottleneck (or a minimum cut) of the network, which minimizes the total cross-edge capacity, using the classical Ford--Fulkerson algorithm. A multi-domain decomposition problem is solved through repeatedly solving a series of two-domain problems. The algorithm has been implemented as a computer program, called DomainParser. We have tested the program on a commonly used test set consisting of 55 proteins. The decomposition results are 78.2% in agreement with the literature on both the number of decomposed domains and the assignments of residues to each domain, which compares favorably to existing programs. On the subset of two-domain proteins (20 in number), the program assigned 96.7% of the residues correctly when we require that the number of decomposed domains is two.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Characterization and prediction of linker sequences of multi-domain proteins by a neural network.

In this paper, we describe a neural network analysis of sequences connecting two protein domains (domain linkers). The neural network was trained to distinguish between domain linker sequences and non-linker sequences, using a SCOP-defined domain library. The analysis indicated that a significant difference existed between domain linkers and non-linker regions, including intra-domain loop regions. Moreover, the resulting Hinton diagram showed a position-dependent amino acid preference of the domain linker sequences, and implied their non-random nature. We then applied the neural network to predict domain linkers in multi-domain protein sequences. As the result of a Jack-knife test, 58% of the predicted regions matched actual linker regions (specificity), and 36% of the SCOP-derived domain linkers were predicted (sensitivity). This prediction efficiency is superior to simpler methods derived from secondary structure prediction that assume that long loop regions are putative domain linkers. Altogether, these results suggest that domain linkers possess local characteristics different from those of loop regions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2001

DrhoGEF3 encodes a new Drosophila DH domain protein that exhibits a highly dynamic embryonic expression pattern.

The Rho GTPases regulate many different cellular and developmental processes, and activation of Rho GTPase signalling is mediated through interaction with the Dbl homology (DH) protein domain. We describe the expression pattern of DrhoGEF3 (cytological position 61B1-B3), which encodes a new member of the DH domain protein family from Drosophila and is a homologue of the human protein hPEM-2. During gastrulation and germ band extension, DrhoGEF3 exhibits a segmented expression pattern. DrhoGEF3 is subsequently expressed in the visceral mesoderm, at the sites of muscle attachment and in specific groups of sub-epidermal cells. The possible function of such a dynamically expressed signalling molecule is discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

Cell-cell signaling in Xanthomonas campestris involves an HD-GYP domain protein that functions in cyclic di-GMP turnover.

HD-GYP is a protein domain of unknown biochemical function implicated in bacterial signaling and regulation. In the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, the synthesis of virulence factors and dispersal of biofilms are positively controlled by a two-component signal transduction system comprising the HD-GYP domain regulatory protein RpfG and cognate sensor RpfC and by cell-cell signaling mediated by the diffusible signal molecule DSF (diffusible signal factor). The RpfG/RpfC two-component system has been implicated in DSF perception and signal transduction. Here we show that the role of RpfG is to degrade the unusual nucleotide cyclic di-GMP, an activity associated with the HD-GYP domain. Mutation of the conserved H and D residues of the isolated HD-GYP domain resulted in loss of both the enzymatic activity against cyclic di-GMP and the regulatory activity in virulence factor synthesis. Two other protein domains, GGDEF and EAL, are already implicated in the synthesis and degradation respectively of cyclic di-GMP. As with GGDEF and EAL domains, the HD-GYP domain is widely distributed in free-living bacteria and occurs in plant and animal pathogens, as well as beneficial symbionts and organisms associated with a range of environmental niches. Identification of the role of the HD-GYP domain thus increases our understanding of a signaling network whose importance to the lifestyle of diverse bacteria is now emerging.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Fas-associated death domain protein interacts with methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4: a potential link between genome surveillance and apoptosis.

Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD) is an adaptor protein bridging death receptors with initiator caspases. Thus, its function and localization are assumed to be cytoplasmic, although the localization of endogenous FADD has not been reported. Surprisingly, the data presented here demonstrate that FADD is mainly nuclear in several adherent cell lines. Its accumulation in the nucleus and export to the cytoplasm required the phosphorylation site Ser-194, which was also required for its interaction with the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein exportin-5. Within the nucleus, FADD interacted with the methyl-CpG binding domain protein 4 (MBD4), which excises thymine from GT mismatches in methylated regions of chromatin. The MBD4-interacting mismatch repair factor MLH1 was also found in a complex with FADD. The FADD-MBD4 interaction involved the death effector domain of FADD and a region of MBD4 adjacent to the glycosylase domain. The FADD-binding region of MBD4 was downstream of a frameshift mutation that occurs in a significant fraction of human colorectal carcinomas. Consistent with the idea that MBD4 can signal to an apoptotic effector, MBD4 regulated DNA damage-, Fas ligand-, and cell detachment-induced apoptosis. The nuclear localization of FADD and its interaction with a genome surveillance/DNA repair protein that can regulate apoptosis suggests a novel function of FADD distinct from direct participation in death receptor signaling complexes.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗