How does cytochrome oxidase pump protons? A "cooperative proton pump" model.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Proton binding and release are elementary steps for the transfer of protons within proteins, which is a process that is crucial in biochemical catalysis and biological energy transduction. Local electric fields in proteins affect the proton binding energy compared to aqueous solution. In membrane proteins, also the membrane potential affects the local electrostatics and can thus be crucial for protein function. In this paper, we introduce a procedure to calculate the protonation probability of titratable sites of a membrane protein in the presence of a membrane potential. In the framework of continuum electrostatics, we use a modified Poisson-Boltzmann equation to include the influence of the membrane potential. Our method considers that in a transmembrane protein each titratable site is accessible for protons from only one side of the membrane depending on the hydrogen bond pattern of the protein. We show that the protonation of sites receiving their protons from different sides of the membrane is differently influenced by the membrane potential. In addition, the effect of the membrane potential is combined with the effect of the pH gradient resulting from proton pumping. Our method is applied to bacteriorhodopsin, a light-activated proton pump. We find that the proton pumping of this protein might be regulated by Asp115, a conserved residue for which no function has been identified yet. According to our calculations, the interaction of Asp115 with Asp85 leads to the protonation of the latter if the pH gradient or the membrane potential becomes too large. Since Asp85 is the primary proton acceptor in the photocycle, bacteriorhodopsin molecules in which Asp85 is protonated cannot pump protons. Furthermore, we estimate how the membrane potential affects the energetics of the individual proton-transfer reactions of the photocycle. Most reactions, except the initial proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp85, are influenced. Our calculations give new insights into the mechanism with which bacteriorhodopsin senses the membrane potential and the pH gradient and how the proton pumping is regulated by these parameters.
Proton translocation in the BR mutants D85N, D85T and D85,96N was studied by attachment of purple membranes to planar lipid bilayers. Pump currents in these mutants were measured via capacitive coupling and by use of the appropriate ionophores. All mutants have a reduced pK of their Schiff bases around 8-8.5 in common. At physiological pH, a mixture of chromophores absorbing at 410 nm (deprotonated form) and around 600 nm (protonated form) coexists. Excitation with continuous blue light induces in all three mutants an outwardly directed stationary pump current. These currents are enhanced upon addition of azide in D85N and D85,96N by a factor of 50, but no azide enhancement is observed in D85T. Yellow light alone induces transient inwardly directed currents in the mutants but additional blue light leads to a stationary current with the same direction. All the observed currents are carried by protons, so that the consecutive absorption of a yellow and a blue photon leads to inverted stationary photocurrents by the mutants, as observed with halorhodopsin (HR). A mechanistic model describing the inversion of proton pumping is discussed by the cis-trans, trans-cis isomerization of the retinal and the different proton accessibility of the Schiff base from the extracellular or the cytoplasmic side of the membrane.
Tumor microenvironment may play a key role in tumor malignancy. It is hypothesized that hypoxia and acidity may contribute to the progression from benign to malignant growth. In particular, the unfavorable environment may induce the selection of tumor cells able to survive in acidic and hypoxic conditions. In fact, the common components of the cancer phenotype result from active selection, and characteristics of tumor microenvironment may create the best condition for this selection. Acidity, in particular, has been shown to have a role in resistance to chemotherapy, proliferation and metastatic behavior. In fact, a mechanism of resistance to cytotoxic drugs may be the alteration of the tumor microenvironment through changes of the pH gradient between the extracellular environment and cell cytoplasm. The extracellular pH of solid tumors is significantly more acidic than that of normal tissues, thus impairing the uptake of weakly basic chemotherapeutic drugs and reducing their effect on tumors. An important determinant of tumor acidity is the anaerobic metabolism that allows selection of cells able to survive in an hypoxic-anoxic environment with the generation of lactate. However, this is not the major mechanism responsible for the development of an acidic environment within solid tumors. It appears clear that a complex framework of protein-protein, protein-lipid and lipid-lipid interactions underlay the pH homeostasis in mammalian cells. Malignant tumor cells seem to hijack some of these mechanism to protect themselves from the acidic environment and to maintain acidity in an environment unsuitable for normal or more differentiated cells. Recent data suggest that vacuolar-type (V-type) H(+)-ATPases, that pump protons across the plasma membrane, may have a key role in the acidification of the tumor microenvironment. Some human tumor cells are characterized by an increased V-type H(+)-ATPase expression and activity, and pretreatment with proton pump inhibitors -- a class of H(+)-ATPase inhibitors -- sensitized tumor cell lines to the effect of a variety of anticancer drugs. Proton pump inhibitor pretreatment has been associated with inhibition of V-type H(+)-ATPase activity and increase in both extracellular pH and pH of lysosomal organelles. In vivo experiments in human/mouse xenografts have shown that oral pretreatment with proton pump inhibitors is able to sensitize human solid tumors to anticancer drugs. These data suggest that tumor alkalinization may represent a key target of future antitumor strategies.
Proton translocation experiments with intact cells of Halobacterium salinarium overproducing sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) revealed transport activity of SRI in a two-photon process. The vectoriality of proton translocation depends on pH, being outwardly directed above, and inwardly directed below, pH 5.7. Activation of the transport cycle requires excitation of the initial dark state of SRI, SRI590, to form the intermediate SRI380. Action spectra identify the photocycle intermediates SRI380 and SRI520 as the two photochemically reactive species in the outwardly directed transport process. As shown by flash photolysis experiments, SRI520 undergoes a so-far unknown photochemical reaction to SRI380 with a half-time of <200 micros. Mutation of SRI residue Asp-76, the residue which is equivalent to the proton acceptor Asp-85 in bacteriorhodopsin, to asparagine leads to inactivation of proton translocation. This demonstrates that the underlying mechanisms of proton transport in both retinal proteins share similar features. However, SRI is to our knowledge the first case where photochemical reactions between two thermally unstable photoproducts of a retinal protein constitute a catalytic ion transport cycle.
Bacteriorhodopsin (BR), from the purple membrane (PM) of Halobacterium halobium, was chemically modified with methoxypolyethylene glycol (m-PEG; molecular weight = 5,000 Da) succinimidyl carbonate. The polyethylene glycol-bacteriorhodopsin (m-PEG-SC-BR33) conjugate, containing one polyethylene glycol chain, was water soluble. The secondary structure of the conjugate in water appeared partially denatured, but was shown to contain alpha-helical segments by circular dichroism spectroscopy. The isolated bacteriorhodopsin conjugate, with added retinal, was refolded in a mixed detergent-lipid micelle and had an absorption maximum at 555 nm. The refolded conjugate was transferred into vesicles that pumped protons, upon illumination, as efficiently as did native BR. Modification of the PM with m-PEG did not alter the native structure or inhibit proton pumping, and therefore it is suggested that the glycol polymer is present as a moiety covalently linked to residues unnecessary for proton pumping and proper folding. The site of attachment of m-PEG was determined to be at either Lys 129 or Lys 159, with position Lys 129 the most probable site of attachment. The m-PEG-SC-BR33 could be stepwise refolded to the native conformation by the addition of trifluoroethanol to lower the dielectric constant, simulating the insertion of the BR into the phospholipid bilayer.
T3 administration increases the extent of non-linearity in the flow-force relationship between pump proton conductance and protonmotive force. The effect is present also at the ATPase proton pump. These effects are not accompanied by changes in passive proton conductance. Incubation of mitochondria at 45 degrees C also causes an increased non-linearity, accompanied by a partial increase of proton conductance. It appears that the increase of respiratory activity following T3 administration is due to loss of thermodynamic control within or at the proton pumps, an effect which might be attributed to increased slipping.
Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) in purple membranes was permethylated with formaldehyde and pyridine-borane with the incorporation of approximately 12 methyl groups. This new pigment, PMbR, absorbed light in the dark-adapted state with a lambda max at 558 nm, virtually the same as that of bR. Light adaptation of PMbR produced a lambda max of 564 nm with a slightly elevated epsilon. Similar changes occurred with bR. When incorporated into asolectin vesicles, PMbR was able to pump protons in the light with an efficiency similar to that of bR itself. Bleaching of PMbR exposed its active site lysine residue, which was monomethylated to form active site methylated bR (AMbR) after regeneration with all-trans-retinal. This blue pigment, which is a cyanopsin rather than a rhodopsin, showed an extraordinary red shift, absorbing light with a lambda max of 620 nm in the dark-adapted state. Light adaptation of AMbR resulted in a spectral shift to 616 nm with a decrease in epsilon. This change was completely reversible in the dark. This shift was interpreted to mean that an L-like intermediate was accumulating, as would be expected if deprotonation of the protonated Schiff base could not occur to produce the M intermediate. Furthermore, when incorporated into asolectin vesicles, AMbR proved incapable of pumping protons in the light. It was concluded from these experiments that deprotonation of the Schiff base of bR is obligate for light-induced proton pumping.
Complexation of imidazole (Im) with an iminodiacetate (IDA) metal chelate [IDA-M(II)] ligand of chelating gel results in an acidification of the mobile phase. The scope of the action of this IDA-M(II)Im 'proton pump' in IMAC is determined by: (a) IDA-M(II) density of the gel; (b) concentration of applied Im; and (c) the buffering capacity of the mobile phase. Application of Im onto a metal chelate column in a gradient rather than in a stepwise manner, mitigates the proton pump's action, as it does an increase of buffer concentration in the mobile phase. However, only an antecedent conversion of the metal chelate gel, IDA-M(II), to its Im derivative, IDA-M(II) Im, can effectively circumscribe the action of the proton pump. The same holds true, as anticipated, when another chelating ligand (nitrilotriacetate) is used.
Proton pump inhibitors inhibit the gastric H+/K+-ATPase via covalent binding to cysteine residues of the proton pump. All proton pump inhibitors must undergo acid accumulation in the parietal cell through protonation, followed by activation mediated by a second protonation at the active secretory canaliculus of the parietal cell. The relative ease with which these steps occur with different proton pump inhibitors underlies differences in their rates of activation, which in turn influence the location of covalent binding and the stability of inhibition. Slow activation is associated with binding to a cysteine residue involved in proton transport that is located deep in the membrane. However, this is inaccessible to the endogenous reducing agents responsible for restoring H+/K+-ATPase activity, favouring a longer duration of gastric acid inhibition. Pantoprazole and tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor which has an imidazopyridine ring in place of the benzimidazole moiety found in other proton pump inhibitors, are activated more slowly than other proton pump inhibitors but their inhibition is resistant to reversal. In addition, tenatoprazole has a greatly extended plasma half-life in comparison with all other proton pump inhibitors. The chemical and pharmacological characteristics of tenatoprazole give it theoretical advantages over benzimidazole-based proton pump inhibitors that should translate into improved acid control, particularly during the night.
Resistance to cytotoxic agents is a major problem in treating cancer. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon appear to take advantage of functions involved in the control of cell homeostasis. A mechanism of resistance may be alteration of the tumour microenvironment via changes in the pH gradient between the extracellular environment and the cell cytoplasm. The extracellular pH of solid tumours is significantly more acidic than that of normal tissues, thus impairing the uptake of weakly basic chemotherapeutic drugs and reducing their effect on tumours. An option to revert multi-drug resistance is the use of agents that disrupt the pH gradient in tumours by inhibiting the function of pumps generating the pH gradient, such as vacuolar H(+)-ATPases (V-H(+)-ATPases). V-H(+)-ATPases pump protons across the plasma membrane and across the membranes of various intracellular compartments. Some human tumour cells, particularly those selected for multi-drug resistance, exhibit enhanced V-H(+)-ATPase activity. A class of V-H(+)-ATPase inhibitors, called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), have emerged as the drug class of choice for treating patients with peptic diseases. These drugs inhibit gastric acid secretion by targeting the gastric acid pump, but they also directly inhibit V-H(+)-ATPases. PPIs (including omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole) are protonable weak bases which selectively accumulate in acidic spaces. Recent findings from our group have shown that PPI pretreatment sensitised tumour cell lines to the effect of cisplatin, 5-fluoro-uracil and vinblastine. PPI pretreatment was associated with the inhibition of V-H(+)-ATPase activity and an increase of both extracellular pH and the pH of lysosomal organelles, consistent with a cytoplasmic retention of the cytotoxic drugs and targeting to the nucleus in the case of doxorubicin. In vivo experiments showed that oral pretreatment with omeprazole induced a sensitivity of the human solid tumours to anticancer drugs.
One of the putative proton-transfer pathways leading from solution toward the binuclear center in many cytochrome c oxidases is the D-pathway, so-called because it starts with a highly conserved aspartate [D(I-132)] residue. Another highly conserved amino acid residue in this pathway, glutamate(I-286), has been indicated to play a central role in the proton-pumping machinery of mitochondrial-type enzymes, a role that requires a movement of the side chain between two distinct positions. In the present work we have relocated the glutamate to the opposite side of the proton-transfer pathway by constructing the double mutant EA(I-286)/IE(I-112). This places the side chain in about the same position in space as in the original enzyme, but does not allow for the same type of movement. The results show that the introduction of the second-site mutation, IE(I-112), in the EA(I-286) mutant enzyme results in an increase of the enzyme activity by a factor of >10. In addition, the double mutant enzyme pumps approximately 0.4 proton per electron. This observation restricts the number of possible mechanisms for the operation of the redox-driven proton pump. The proton-pumping machinery evidently does require the presence of a protonatable/polar residue at a specific location in space, presumably to stabilize an intact water chain. However, this residue does not necessarily have to be at a strictly conserved location in the amino acid sequence. In addition, the results indicate that E(I-286) is not the "proton gate" of cytochrome c oxidase controlling the flow of pumped protons from one to the other side of the membrane.
Hydrogenases have clear evolutionary links to the much more complex NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductases (Complex I). Certain membrane-bound [NiFe]-hydrogenases presumably pump protons. From a detailed comparison of hydrogenases and Complex I, it is concluded here that the TYKY subunit in these enzymes is a special 2[4Fe-4S] ferredoxin, which functions as the electrical driving unit for a proton pump. The comparison further revealed that the flavodoxin fold from [NiFe]-hydrogenases is presumably conserved in the PSST subunit of Complex I. It is proposed that bovine Complex I and the soluble NAD(+)-reducing hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha each contain a second FMN group.
Proton pump inhibitors are highly effective in the management of acid-peptic diseases. These drugs potently inhibit acid secretion from gastric parietal cells by irreversibly inhibiting activity of the H(+), K(+) ATPase (proton pump). Early studies of the pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors demonstrated considerable variation in drug clearance rates among patients and healthy volunteers. This variation was also reflected in a wide range of the efficacy of acid suppression by standard doses of proton pump inhibitors among study subjects; those with slower clearance and higher drug concentrations experienced superior acid suppression. Proton pump inhibitors are predominantly inactivated by the 2C19 isoform of the hepatic cytochrome P450 mixed function oxidase system. The cytochrome P450 2C19 gene is polymorphic, with three known inactivating mutations. Individuals with one or two mutant cytochrome P450 2C19 alleles metabolize proton pump inhibitors more slowly than those with two wild-type alleles and experience higher drug levels. An individual's cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype predicts the degree of acid suppression in response to a standard dose of a proton pump inhibitor. Emerging data suggests that the clinical effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of acid-peptic diseases may also be dependent on cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype.
Proton pump inhibitors have dramatically influenced the management of acid-peptic disorders in recent years. They all have a broadly similar mechanism of action and are extensively metabolized in the liver via cytochromes P450 2C19 and 3A4. There is some variation in their potential for drug interactions due to differences in enzyme inhibition. Relatively few serious adverse effects have been reported for the proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies of acid suppression suggest that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have a potency similar to that of omeprazole on a mg for mg basis; however, rabeprazole may have a greater potency than omeprazole. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole display a more rapid onset of maximal acid suppression than the other proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies using proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, duodenal ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication show little overall difference in outcome between the proton pump inhibitors when used in their standard doses. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole provide earlier and better symptom relief than the other proton pump inhibitors in some studies of peptic ulcer treatment. The few studies of gastric ulcer treatment suggest that there is an advantage in using the proton pump inhibitors that have a higher standard daily dose.
BACKGROUND: The management of persistent symptoms during acid suppression therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or dyspepsia might be improved if patient-physician communication regarding the presence and character of these persistent symptoms were facilitated. AIM: To validate a short, simple questionnaire (the Proton pump inhibitor [PPI] Acid Suppression Symptom [PASS] test), in English and French, to identify patients with persistent acid-related symptoms during PPI therapy and document their response to a change in therapy. METHODS: Patients with persistent acid-related symptoms on PPI therapy were interviewed to produce a draft, five-item questionnaire; content validity was evaluated by focus groups comprising English- and French-speaking patients. Psychometric validity was subsequently evaluated in a multicentre, family practice-based study of English- and French-speaking patients with persistent acid-related upper gastrointestinal symptoms despite PPI therapy. The PASS test, Global Overall Symptom scale, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire and Reflux Disease Questionnaire were completed at baseline and repeated after one week while patients continued their original PPI therapy. All patients then received esomeprazole 40 mg once daily for four weeks, after which all questionnaires and an evaluation of overall treatment effect were completed. RESULTS: Content validity was established in 20 English- and 16 French-speaking patients. Psychometric validation in 158 English- and 113 French-speaking patients revealed good-to-excellent test-retest reliability coefficients: 0.76 for English; 0.68 for French. For construct validity, the PASS test showed moderate-to-high correlation with the GSRS scale (0.51 for English; 0.43 for French). After four weeks of therapy, the PASS test score fell to zero in 30% of English- and 33% of French-speaking patients, while the Global Overall Symptom score fell to one (no symptoms) in 32% of patients (English- and French-speaking); the PASS test demonstrated good responsiveness in comparison with the GSRS, Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The five-item PASS test is a valid tool for the evaluation of persistent acid-related symptoms in patients receiving PPI therapy. It demonstrates good content validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness and construct validity in both English and French forms. The PASS test is a simple, clinically applicable tool for the identification of patients with persistent acid-related symptoms during therapy and the assessment of their responses to a change in therapy.
Omeprazole and pantoprazole are known to be irreversible, SH-acting inhibitors of gastric H+,K+-adenosine triphosphatase (H+,K+-ATPase). Both drugs concentration-dependently and pH-dependently inhibited K+-dependent p-nitrophenyl phosphatase (K+-pNPPase) activity in purified rabbit gastric microsomes. The potency of omeprazole was about three times that of pantoprazole in the pH ranges tested. Both drugs also inhibited acid secretion, as determined by [14C]aminopyrine accumulation in isolated rabbit gastric glands, with the potency ratio being about 5 (omeprazole over that of pantoprazole). Under conditions in which acid secretion was inhibited completely by the drugs, the total K+-pNPPase activity in the digitonin-permeabilized glands was scarcely reduced, showing an apparent discrepancy between the acid secretion and the proton pump activity. The isolated glands were stimulated with secretagogues for 30 min in the presence of the inhibitors, homogenized, and then separated into fractions in which K+-pNPPase activity was measured. Omeprazole exclusively inhibited the activity in the low-speed fraction, which was rich in the apical membranes, whereas pantoprazole did not inhibit activity in any fraction. When the time of treatment with the inhibitors was increased up to 5 hr, the inhibition of the total K+-pNPPase activity in the glands reached a plateau at an inhibition rate lower than 50% within 2 hr. This suggested that no continuous recycling of the proton pump was occurring during stimulation. The inhibitory effect of both drugs on the permeabilized gland preparation was less potent than that on the purified enzyme, especially at the higher pH, and it appeared to be partially reversible. The extent of the reduction in potency was more prominent for pantoprazole. It is concluded that a lower amount of proton pump activity needs to be inhibited by pantoprazole than by omeprazole to achieve the same extent of acid secretion inhibition. This appears to be due to the nature of pantoprazole, i.e. the requirement of low pH for activation and the partial reversibility of the inhibition.