PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RESINS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1981

[Studies of dental methacrylic resin. (Part 8) Flexural and impact adhesive strength of self-curing methacrylic resin to cross-linked polymethyl methacrylate resins (author's transl)].

Heat-curing methacylic resins cross-linked with three kinds of dimethacrylates, i.e. EDMA, tri-EDMA and nona-EDMA, were prepared, and the flexural and the impact adhesive strength of the dough moulding type and the pour type self-curing methacrylic resins to them were examined. The results obtained were as follows. (1) The flexural and the impact adhesive strength of the pour type self-curing resin were higher and more stable than those of the dough moulding type one. (2) The flexural and the impact adhesive strength of self-curing resins to cross-linked adherent resins rised in order of nona-EDMA greater than tri-EDMA greater than EDMA in the range of higher concentration of cross-linking agents. This tendency was marked for the pour type resin. (3) When the dough moulding type resin was used as adhesive resin, to adherent resin cross-linked with EDMA or tri-EDMA which had relatively short chain, the respective adhesive strength of that decreased with increasing the concentration of cross-linking agent. While, to adherent resin cross-linked with nona-EDMA, which had relatively long and more flexible chain, the respective adhesive strength of the dough moulding type resin increased with increasing the concentration of cross-linking agent. (4) When the pour type resin was used as adhesive resin, to adherent resin cross-linked with EDMA or tri-EDMA, the respective adhesive strength of that showed the maximum at the concentration near 2 to 5 mole% and decreased with increasing the concentration. While, to adherent resin cross-linked with nona-EDMA, the flexural adhesive strength of the pour type resin was approximately constant without the effect of the concentration, but the impact adhesive strength of that increased with increasing the concentration. (5) The flexural adhesive strength of the dough moulding and the pour type resin under the wet condition decreased about 30 to 60% compared with under the dry condition, but the percentage of the falling for the impact adhesive strength was about 15 to 30% and relatively small. (6) The flexural adhesive strength showed a similar adhesive tendency to the tensile adhesive strength, but the impact adhesive strength showed a different adhesive tendency from those.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed1999

Resin polymerization problems--are they caused by resin curing lights, resin formulations, or both?

Negative effects of rapid, high-intensity resin curing have been predicted for both argon lasers and plasma-arc curing lights. To address these questions, six different resin restorative materials were cured with 14 different resin curing lights representing differences in intensities ranging from 400 mW/cm2 to 1,900 mW/cm2; delivery modes using constant, ramped, and stepped methods; cure times ranging from 1 second to 40 seconds; and spot sizes of 6.7 mm to 10.9 mm. Two lasers, five plasma-arc lights, and seven halogen lights were used. Shrinkage, modulus, heat generation, strain, and physical changes on the teeth and resins during strain testing were documented. Results showed effects associated with lights were not statistically significant, but resin formulation was highly significant. Microfill resins had the least shrinkage and the lowest modulus. An autocure resin had shrinkage and modulus as high as or higher than the light-cured hybrid resins. Lasers and plasma-arc lights produced the highest heat increases on the surface (up to 21 degrees C) and within the resin restorations (up to 14 degrees C), and the halogen lights produced the most heat within the pulp chamber (up to 2 degrees C). Strain within the tooth was least with Heliomolar and greatest with Z100 Restorative and BISFIL II autocure resin. Clinical effects of strain relief were evident as white lines at the tooth-resin interface and cracks in enamel adjacent to the margins. This work implicates resin formulation, rather than light type or curing mode, as the important factor in polymerization problems. Lower light intensity and use of ramped and stepped curing modes did not provide significant lowering of shrinkage, modulus, or strain, and did not prevent enamel cracking adjacent to margins and formation of "white line" defects at the margins. Until materials with lower shrinkage and modulus are available, use of low-viscosity surface sealants as a final step in resin placement is suggested to seal defects.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1991

Shear resistance of composite resin to enamel using color-modifying resins and variously applied unfilled bonding resins.

The effects of bond layer thickness of color-modifying resins and variously applied unfilled resins on composite resin/enamel shear bond strengths were compared. Composite resin columns were bonded to etched enamel surfaces in vitro with either applied unfilled resins or with filled color-modifying resins. The bond layer thickness and the force required to shear the 17 specimens of each of six groups were measured. ANOVA with Tukey's test was performed to determine if significant differences at the alpha = 0.05 level existed for the mean bond layer thicknesses as well as the mean forces required to debond the specimens of six groups. Color-modifying resins resulted in a 5 to 327 times greater bond thickness than the unfilled resins. Only one of the unfilled resin groups showed a statistically significant difference in shear resistance compared with a color-modifying resin group. The method of application and resulting thickness of unfilled resin appeared to have little effect on composite resin/enamel shear bond strengths.

Acrylates↗
PubMed1998

Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite.

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified resin composites (PMC, compomers) are two recently introduced material groups supposed to replace traditional cements in operative dentistry. The new restoratives release initially fluoride in different relatively high concentrations, which decrease gradually during the first weeks in vivo. Earlier studies showed a stronger subclinical inflammatory reaction around different conventional tooth colored restorative materials than around intact enamel. The aim of this study was to compare intra-individually the initiation of gingival inflammation around, aged RMGIC, PMC and resin composite restorations. Subgingivally located Class III restorations were placed in 17 patients. Each patient received one of each of the experimental materials. All patients were placed on an oral hygiene regime 1-year after finishing of the restorations. Gingivitis was induced during a one-week period without oral hygiene. The gingival condition was assessed by sampling of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), registration of the amount of bacterial plaque and by registration of bleeding after gentle probing of the entrance of the gingival sulcus (SBI) on the experimental filling- and control-enamel surfaces at days 0 and 7. No differences were seen in plaque and gingival index scores between the materials at both days. The GCF increased significantly for all surfaces during the experimental gingivitis period. At day 7 significantly lower GCF was sampled around the enamel surfaces. In conclusion, the differences between the materials did not result in measurable differences concerning clinical or subclinical signs of gingivitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restorations.

PURPOSES: (1) To evaluate different pre-treatment modes for partial resin-based composite repair using a shear bond strength fatigue design on aged specimens, and (2) to investigate the effect of these pre-treatments on aged and partially replaced Class II resin-based composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: (Study 1) 150 composite discs (Tetric Ceram) were light-cured, secondary cured, and stored in water for 365 days. The specimens were randomly assigned to five pretreatment groups (n=30): (1) Roughening with a finishing diamond bur + dentin bonding system (DBS, Syntac Classic), (2) Roughening with a silicon carbide bur + DBS, (3) Roughening with a silicon carbide bur + DBS + Tetric Flow, (4) silica-coating (CoJet) + DBS, and (5) silica-coating + dentin bonding agent + Tetric Flow. The disks were restored with fresh repair composite cylinders and after 24-hour water storage, initial bond strengths (n=10) and fatigue bond strengths (n=20; 5,000 cycles in shear mode) were evaluated and fracture modes determined under a SEM. (Study 2): 40 Class II restorations (EBS Multi/Pertac II) were placed in extracted human third molars. The specimens were stored for 365 days and then replaced partially by removing the proximal box and leaving the occlusal part. The partial repairs (Pertac II) were placed after identical pre-treatment modes A-E (n=8). After thermomechanical loading (100,000 x 50 N, simultaneously x2,500 at 5 degrees C/55 degrees C), marginal quality between old and fresh composite was evaluated by SEM at x200 magnification and dye penetration was observed by light microscopy under x50 magnification. RESULTS: Initial repair bond strengths were significantly higher for the groups with additional application of flowable composite compared to composite only (P<0.05; Mann Whitney U test). Diamond finishing revealed the lowest bond strengths. Fatigue bond strengths exhibited the worst results for Group 1 as well, but were similar for Groups 2-5. In the Class II partial repair simulation, Groups 3 and 5 with additional flowable lining exhibited significantly better marginal quality and significantly lower leakage, whereas the other groups revealed up to 100% separation between aged and freshly applied composite.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1993

Basic studies on visible light-cured resin as a denture base. Part 17. Transverse and tensile strengths of repaired denture base resin using a trial repair resin.

Trial production of a visible light-cured repair resin (powder/liquid type, TPL) as a denture base resin was carried out using cyclophosphazene monomer, and then the transverse and tensile strengths of the repaired specimens were examined. As a control, Triad Gel (TRI) was used. In the transverse strength test, TPL showed values of 507-470 kgf/cm2, which were about double those of TRI. As for tensile strength, TPL showed values of 329-268 kgf/cm2, and higher values were obtained in comparison with TRI, especially after 30 days of water immersion, when the values were doubled. The durability of TPL was favorable in comparison with TRI.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2004

In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on the bonding of autopolymerizing resins.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Bonding failures of repair resin to denture base resin occurs when denture base resin is wet, however, little is known of how water relates to failures. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of water absorbed in denture base resin on the bond strength and resistance to cyclic thermal stresses of autopolymerizing resins bonded to denture base resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Denture base resin disks (n = 180; 12 mm diameter and 3 mm thick) were fabricated from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 199). The disks were divided into groups (n = 60) with 3 conditions of water content: (1) complete water saturation (control), (2) superficial desiccation by blowing air on the specimen, or (3) complete desiccation. Each denture base specimen received 1 of 3 surface treatments (n = 20) including: (1) no treatment, (2) airborne-particle abrasion, or (3) methylene chloride application. An autopolymerizing repair resin (Repair Material, n = 10) or reline resin (Tokuso Rebase Normal set, n = 10) was applied to the bonding area (5 mm diameter) and polymerized at 37 degrees C for 10 minutes. The resistance to cyclic thermal stress was determined after subjecting the specimens to 50,000 thermal cycles between 4 degrees C and 60 degrees C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time (n = 5 per group). Bond strength (MPa) was measured by shear bond testing at a 1.0 mm/min crosshead speed until the applied resin debonded from denture base resin. Data were statistically analyzed by 3-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons among the groups were performed with Bonferroni test (alpha = .05). RESULTS: The mean bond strengths of repair resin to airborne-particle-abraded denture base specimens were not significantly influenced by either thermal cycling or water content. The mean bond strengths of reline resin significantly decreased after thermal cycling (P < .0001) regardless of the conditions of surface treatment and water content. For methylene chloride treated specimens, bond strengths of both repair and reline resins to completely water saturated specimens were significantly higher than those of completely desiccated specimens (P = .0048 for repair resin, P < .0001 for reline resin) after thermal cycling. CONCLUSIONS: Bond strengths of autopolymerizing resin to denture base resin were not significantly influenced by water content of denture base resin but were significantly influenced by resin type, thermal cycling, and surface treatment.

Absorption↗
PubMed2003

Dual ambroxal and chlorpheniramine resinate as an alternative carrier in concurrent resinate administration.

Two classical resinates, ambroxal (AMX) resinate and chlorpheniramine (CPM) resinate, and a novel formulation of dual AMX and CPM resinate were prepared by the batch method. The dissolution behavior of the drug from the classical resinates, a mixture of two classical resinates, and the dual-drug resinate in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) was examined and compared. The equilibrium of drug on to the resin and the re-exchange of the drug on to the resinate were also investigated. The drug release pattern from the resinate followed the particle diffusion process. The type of dissolution medium affected the amount of drug released from the resinate. The amount of drug released from the dual AMX and CPM resinate was not significantly different from that from the classical AMX resinate or CPM resinate (p < 0.05), but was considerably higher than that from the concurrent administration of two classical resinates (p > 0.05). These results indicated that the concurrent administration of the resinates affected drug release from the resinate, and the dual-drug resinate can be used as an alternative carrier for an ion-exchange delivery system.

Body Fluids↗
PubMed2002

Cross-reactivity among epoxy acrylates and bisphenol F epoxy resins in patients with bisphenol A epoxy resin sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was 2-fold: first, to evaluate the potential cross-reactivity between Bis-A epoxy resins and epoxy acrylates and second, to study the cross reactivity between Bis-A epoxy resins and newer Bis-F epoxy resins in patients with allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resins and had positive patch test to the standard epoxy resin based on bisphenol A. METHODS: Forty-one patients were patch tested to 23 chemicals including epoxy acrylates, Bis-A epoxy resins, and Bis-F epoxy resins, as well as reactive diluents and nonbisphenol epoxy resins. Questions concerning exposure to epoxy resins, occupational history, and problems with dental work were completed. RESULTS: All patients included in the study had positive reactions to the standard Bis-A epoxy resin. Twenty percent (8 of 41) of the patients reacted to at least one of the epoxy acrylates; the most common reaction was to Bis-GMA. Five of 8 patients who reacted to the epoxy acrylates had dental work, but only one patient had problems from her dental work. Six of 8 patients (75%) who reacted to epoxy resins and epoxy acrylates did not react to aliphatic acrylates. Thirty-two percent (13 of 41) reacted to tosylamide epoxy resin, and none reacted to triglycidyl isocyanurate resin. In addition, all patients (100%) had positive reactions to at least one of the Bis-F epoxy resins that were tested. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with sensitivity to Bis-A epoxy resins do not cross-react with epoxy acrylates. Patients with positive patch test reactions to epoxy acrylates used in dentistry usually do not have symptoms from their dental work. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients with sensitivity to the standard Bis-A epoxy resin that have been patch tested with the more recently introduced Bis-F epoxy resins. There is significant cross-reactivity between Bis-A and Bis-F epoxy resins, which can be explained by their structural similarity.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Water sorption, solubility, and bond strength of two autopolymerizing acrylic resins and one heat-polymerizing acrylic resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Because water sorption of autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins is accompanied by volumetric change, it is a physical property of importance. As residual monomer leaches into the oral fluids and causes tissue irritation, low solubility of these resins is desired. Another requirement is a satisfactory bond between the autopolymerizing acrylic resins and the denture base acrylic resin. PURPOSE: This study compared the water sorption, solubility, and the transverse bond strength of 2 autopolymerizing acrylic resins (Duraliner II and Kooliner) and 1 heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (Lucitone 550). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The water sorption and solubility test was performed as per International Standards Organization Specification No. 1567 for denture base polymers. Bond strengths between the autopolymerizing acrylic resins and the heat-polymerizing acrylic resin were determine with a 3-point loading test made on specimens immersed in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 50 hours and for 30 days. Visual inspection determined whether failures were adhesive or cohesive. RESULTS: Duraliner II acrylic resin showed significantly lower water sorption than Kooliner and Lucitone 550 acrylic resins. No difference was noted in the solubility of all materials. Kooliner acrylic resin demonstrated significantly lower transverse bond strength to denture base acrylic resin and failed adhesively. The failures seen with Duraliner II acrylic resin were primarily cohesive in nature. CONCLUSIONS: Autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins met water sorption and solubility requirements. However, Kooliner acrylic resin demonstrated significantly lower bond strength to denture base acrylic resin.

Absorption↗
PubMed1979

[Studies of dental methacrylic resin. (Part 7) Adhesive strength of fluid methacrylic resin to polymethylmethacrylates with various cross-linked density (author's transl)].

Heat-curing methacrylic resins cross-linked with three kinds of dimethacrylates, i.e. EDMA, tri-EDMA and nona-EDMA, were prepared, and the tensile adhesive strength of fluid methacrylic resin to them was examined. The results obtained were as follows. (1) To adherent resin cross-linked with EDMA, the adhesive strength of fluid resin showed the maximum at the concentration near 2 mole% and decreased with increasing the concentration. (2) To adherent resin cross-linked with tri-EDMA or nona-EDMA, the effect of the concentration of cross-linking agent on the adhesive strength was little, except that the adhesive strength to the latter adherent resin showed a steep increase in the range of lower concentration. (3) The adhesive strength did not appreciably change in the range of L/P ratio of fluid resin from 0.57 to 0.71 ml/g. (4) The adhesive strength under the wet condition decreased about 40 to 50% compared under the dry condition. (5) To cross-linked adherent resin, the adhesive strength of fluid resin was somewhat higher than that of self-curing resin under the dry condition. But, under the wet condition this difference was little. (6) Contrarily, to non-cross-linked adherent resin, the adhesive strength of fluid resin was somewhat lower than of self-curing resin. This may be because the cracks, which are occured on the surface of non-cross-linked adherent resin by contact with abundant MMA of fluid resin, work as defects to decrease the adhesive strength.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2003

Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the effect of a resin coating consisting of a dentin bonding system and a flowable resin composite on the microtensile bond strength (micro-TBS) of a resin cement to dentin in indirect composite restorations and (2) compare the bond strengths of direct and indirect composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Occlusal surfaces of human premolars were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces and were divided into seven groups. For indirect restorations, the dentin surfaces of the experimental groups were bonded with a dentin bonding system (DBS), Clearfil SE Bond (SE) or Single Bond (SB) with and without a flowable resin composite, Protect Liner F (PLF), temporized for one day and cemented with a resin cement (Panavia F) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The dentin surfaces of the control group were temporized without prior treatment, and indirect composite (Estenia) was bonded with Panavia F. For the direct restorations, either SE or SB was applied to the dentin surface and the entire surface was built up with direct composite (Clearfil AP-X). After 24 hours in water storage, micro-TBS was measured at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Fisher's protected least significant difference test (p < .05). RESULTS: The original bond strength of the resin cement (Panavia F) to dentin significantly improved with the use of a resin coating technique in indirect restorations (p < .05). The combination of DBS + PLF showed significantly higher bond strengths compared with the single use of DBS. The combination of SE + PLF as a resin coating provided the highest bond strengths in indirect restorations (p < .05). However, the best bond strengths were observed when SE and SB were used for direct composite restorations (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of a resin coating consisting of a dentin bonding system and a flowable resin composite on the dentin following cavity preparation significantly improved the micro-TBS of the resin cement Panavia F to dentin in indirect restorations. However, the bond strengths of indirect composite restorations were significantly lower than those of direct composite restorations even with the resin coating technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Indirect composite restorations may require a resin coating to improve the bonding performance of the resin cement Panavia F to dentin. However, adhesive systems with direct composite restorations still provide superior bond strengths compared with indirect restorations.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2003

Tensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths of dual-cured resin cements. METHODS: 10 bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths of each of the following four materials: Panavia F, Link Max, Bistite II, Rely-X. Bovine dentin ground with 600-grit SiC was bonded with a resin cement according to the manufacturers' instructions or the resin coating technique, which was used in combination with one coat of a dentin adhesive; Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, One-Up Bond F or Single Bond, with one coat of a low viscosity micro-filled resin, Protect Liner-F. Each dentin adhesive and the low viscosity micro-filled resin were cured for 10 seconds and 20 seconds respectively. After 1 day storage in water, the specimens were subjected to the tensile bond test at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test (P < 0.05). The mode of failure after the tensile bond test was classified by visual inspection. The resin cement - dentin interfaces were examined by SEM. RESULTS: The tensile bond strengths (MPa +/- SD) of four resin cements to dentin with/without resin coating were: Panavia F (22.9 +/- 3.1; 10.2 +/- 2.5), Link Max (16.1 +/- 4.4; 9.6 +/- 3.2), Bistite II (14.8 +/- 3.2; 14.3 +/- 3.9), and Rely-X (15.7 +/- 4.7; 13.5 +/- 4.5), respectively. The resin coating significantly improved the bond strengths of resin cements to dentin in Panavia F and Link Max, while there were no significant differences of mean bond strengths between Bistite II or Rely-X with and without resin coating (P> 0.05). Regarding the fracture modes, complete and partial adhesive failures were observed in the cases without resin coating. For the resin coating groups, the fracture modes were much more complicated, although, adhesive failures rarely occurred. Hybrid layer formation was observed for all materials used.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Diffusion of monomers from bonding resin-resin composite combinations through dentine in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: Previous work has demonstrated diffusion of the monomer triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) from resin composite through dentine in vitro. The objective of the present work was to examine monomer diffusion from bonding resins and resin composites used in combination. METHODS: Occlusal cavities were prepared in tooth crowns and restored with bonding resin-resin composite combinations. Aqueous samples from the 'pulpal chamber' of each tooth were removed at timed intervals for analysis by reversed phase-high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Bonding resins contributed to monomer diffusion. A TEDGMA-containing bonding resin used in combination with a TEGDMA-containing resin composite hastened and increased TEGDMA diffusion through dentine. A 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-containing bonding resin used in combination with a TEGDMA-containing resin composite reduced TEGDMA diffusion only slightly compared with the resin composite alone and added substantial diffusion of HEMA. CONCLUSION: The bonding resins tested contributed to monomer passage to the pulp space and did not prevent movement of monomer from resin composites to the pulp.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength.

This study evaluated the change in the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of five polymerised resin blends of increasing hydrophilicity, after ageing in distilled water or silicon oil. Resin blocks were prepared from each resin blend by dispensing the uncured resin into a flexible, embedding mould, containing multiple cavities. The resins were polymerised in the moulds under nitrogen at 551.6 kPa and light-activated at 125 degrees C for 10 min. After dry ageing for 24 h at 37 degrees C, the middle third of each resin specimen was trimmed into an 'I' shape. Fifteen control specimens were randomly selected from each resin blend for baseline UTS evaluation. The UTS of the experimental specimens were determined after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of ageing in water or oil. The UTS of each group of resins at different storage periods in water or oil were analysed using the Friedman multiple ANOVA on ranks and Dunn's multiple comparison tests at 95% confidence level. Significant reduction (p < 0.01) in UTS was observed in Groups II-V resins after 12-month storage in water, while the most hydrophobic Group I resin showed no significant change (p > 0.05) in the same period. The percentage reduction in UTS increased with the hydrophilicity of the resin blends. Long-term water storage of hydrophilic resin blends such as those employed in dentine adhesives, resulted in a marked reduction in their mechanical strength that may compromise the durability of resin-dentine bonds.

Absorption↗
PubMed1999

Shear bond strengths for composite and autopolymerized acrylic resins bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth.

Statement of problem. Composite has been used to modify acrylic resin denture teeth. Purpose. This in vitro investigation examined the shear bond strengths between composite and autopolymerized acrylic resin bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. Material and methods. The surface treatments used for the denture teeth included wetting with methyl methacrylate (MMA), vinylethyl methacrylate monomer (VEMA), unfilled liquid resin, composite bonding agent, and composite color modifier. Nonhydrated and hydrated denture tooth groups were included. A commercial composite was bonded to the denture teeth. The control group consisted of autopolymerized PMMA resin bonded to the acrylic resin denture teeth, and another group consisted of polyvinylethyl methacrylate bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. The samples were thermocycled and tested in shear. Results. Acrylic resin denture teeth prewetted with MMA and treated with unfilled resin or a bonding agent had bond strength values comparable to the control group. VEMA was not as effective in promoting the bond. Composite color modifier did not produce a significantly weaker bond between the acrylic resin teeth and added composite. No prewetting of the teeth with MMA resulted in the lowest bond strength. Mean shear bond strengths for corresponding hydrated and non-hydrated groups were not significantly different. Conclusion. Bond strength of composite-to-acrylic resin denture teeth was comparable to the bond strength of autopolymerized acrylic resin.

Acrylic Resins↗