PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA, Transfer, Gln”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

An engineered class I transfer RNA with a class II tertiary fold.

Structure-based engineering of the tertiary fold of Escherichia coli tRNA(Gln)2 has enabled conversion of this transfer RNA to a class II structure while retaining recognition properties of a class I glutamine tRNA. The new tRNA possesses the 20-nt variable stem-loop of Thermus thermophilus tRNA(Ser). Enlargement of the D-loop appears essential to maintaining a stable tertiary structure in this species, while rearrangement of a base triple in the augmented D-stem is critical for efficient glutaminylation. These data provide new insight into structural determinants distinguishing the class I and class II tRNA folds, and demonstrate a marked sensitivity of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase to alteration of tRNA tertiary structure.

Acylation↗

Five transfer RNA genes lacking CCA termini are clustered in the chromosome of Streptomyces rimosus.

The nucleotide sequence of a 1105 bp Streptomyces rimosus DNA fragment containing five transfer RNA genes was determined. Two tRNA(Gln) (CUG) genes, differing by 1 bp in the aminoacyl stem, and three identical tRNA(Glu) (CUC) genes were identified. The five tRNA genes, arranged in the order: Gln1-Glu1-Glu2-Gln2-Glu3, were separated by short, nonhomologous intergenic regions. Surprisingly, none of these tRNA genes encoded the CCA 3' terminus of mature tRNAs. All five encoded tRNAs for the translation of GC rich codons, which are preferentially used in Streptomyces genes (CAG and GAG, respectively). We recently reported nucleotide sequences of two initiator tRNA genes from S. rimosus, which also do not encode the CCA end of mature tRNAs. It is therefore very likely that S. rimosus represents an example of those eubacteria in which the majority of tRNA genes do not encode the 3' terminal CCA end of mature tRNAs. Evolutionary implications of this finding remain to be elucidated.

Base Sequence↗

A single tRNA base pair mediates bacterial tRNA-dependent biosynthesis of asparagine.

In many prokaryotes and in organelles asparagine and glutamine are formed by a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (AdT) that catalyzes amidation of aspartate and glutamate, respectively, mischarged on tRNAAsn and tRNAGln. These pathways supply the deficiency of the organism in asparaginyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthtetases and provide the translational machinery with Asn-tRNAAsn and Gln-tRNAGln. So far, nothing is known about the structural elements that confer to tRNA the role of a specific cofactor in the formation of the cognate amino acid. We show herein, using aspartylated tRNAAsn and tRNAAsp variants, that amidation of Asp acylating tRNAAsn is promoted by the base pair U1-A72 whereas the G1-C72 pair and presence of the supernumerary nucleotide U20A in the D-loop of tRNAAsp prevent amidation. We predict, based on comparison of tRNAGln and tRNAGlu sequence alignments from bacteria using the AdT-dependent pathway to form Gln-tRNAGln, that the same combination of nucleotides also rules specific tRNA-dependent formation of Gln. In contrast, we show that the tRNA-dependent conversion of Asp into Asn by archaeal AdT is mainly mediated by nucleotides G46 and U47 of the variable region. In the light of these results we propose that bacterial and archaeal AdTs use kingdom-specific signals to catalyze the tRNA-dependent formations of Asn and Gln.

Adenine↗

Sequence-dependent in vivo importation of tRNAs into the mitochondrion of Leishmania tarentolae.

Sequence determinants for the importation of tRNAs into the mitochondrion of Leishmania tarentolae in vivo were investigated. tRNA(Ile)(UAU) is exclusively localized within the mitochondrion and tRNA(Gln)(CUG) exclusively in the cytosol (Lye LF, Chen DHT, Suyama Y, 1993, Mol Biochem Parasitol 58:233-246; Shi X, Chen DHT, Suyama Y, 1994, Mol Biochem Parasitol 65:23-37). L. tarentolae cells were transfected with plasmids encoding either tRNA(Ile) or tRNA (Gln) that were tagged with altered sequences in the D loop, permitting discrimination from the endogenous tRNAs. Primer extension analysis was used to show that the plasmid-encoded genes were expressed and that the tagged tRNAs showed a similar intracellular localization as the endogenous tRNAs. Exchange or deletion of the 5'-flanking genomic sequences had no effect on the expression or mitochondrial localization of the tagged tRNA(Ile) or on the expression or cytosolic localization of the tagged tRNA(Gln), suggesting that the signals for importation are localized within the tRNA itself. Swapping the D loop+stem from the exclusively cytosolic tRNA(Gln) with that from the tRNA(Ile) produced a partial mitochondrial localization of the plasmid-expressed mutated tRNA(Gln). However, D loop exchange did not eliminate the mitochondrial localization of the plasmid-expressed mutated tRNA(Ile), suggesting that tertiary structure or additional sequence elements may be involved in the importation signal.

Animals↗

Insertions in the anticodon loop of tRNA1Gln(sufG) and tRNA(Lys) promote quadruplet decoding of CAAA.

Base insertion mutations in the anticodons of two different Escherichia coli tRNAs have been isolated that allow suppression of a series of +1 frameshift mutations. Insertion of a U between positions 34 and 35 of tRNAGln1 or addition of a G between positions 36 and 37 of tRNA(Lys) expand the anticodons of both tRNAs similarly to 3'-GUUU(-5') and allow decoding of complementary 5'-CAAA(-3') quadruplets. Analysis of the suppressed mRNA sequences suggests that suppression occurs by pairing of the expanded anticodons to all four bases of the complementary, quadruplet codon. The tRNA Gln mutants are identical to the sufG class of frameshift suppressors isolated both in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and E. coli by Kohno and Roth and previously thought to affect tRNA(Lys).

Anticodon↗

Chromosomal assignment of a large tRNA gene cluster (tRNA(Leu), tRNA(Gln), tRNA(Lys), tRNA(Arg), tRNA(Gly)) to 17p13.1.

A cluster of tRNA genes (tRNA(UAGLeu), tRNA(CUGGln), tRNA(UUULys), tRNA(UCUArg)) and an adjacent tRNA(GCCGly) have been assigned to human chromosome 17p12-p13.1 by in situ hybridization using a 4.2 kb human DNA fragment for tRNA(Leu), tRNA(Gln), tRNA(Lys), tRNA(Arg), and, for tRNA(Gly), 1.3 kb and 0.58 kb human DNA fragments containing these genes as probes. This localization was confirmed and refined to 17p13.100-p13.105 using a somatic cell hybrid mapping panel. Preliminary experiments with the biotinylated tRNA Leu, Gln, Lys, Arg probe and metaphase spreads from other great apes suggest the presence of a hybridization site on the long arm of gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) chromosome 19 and the short arm of orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) chromosome 19 providing further support for homology between HSA17, GGO19 and PPY19.

Animals↗

Stepwise transfer of tRNA through the double membrane of Leishmania mitochondria.

Import of tRNA into Leishmania mitochondria involves transfer through a double membrane barrier. To examine whether specific sorting mechanisms for individual tRNAs direct them to different mitochondrial compartments, the distribution of tRNA transcripts, internalized in vitro, was examined by suborganellar fractionation. Significant amounts of tRNA(Tyr) were localized in the matrix and on the outer face of the inner mitochondrial membrane. With time, the matrix:membrane ratio increased. Translocation through the inner membrane apparently required the presence of a specific signal in the D arm of tRNA(Tyr), and tRNA(Gln)(CUG), lacking this sequence, was excluded. Hydrolysis of ATP was necessary at both the outer and inner membranes. However, the protonophores carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone and nigericin, the K(+) ionophore valinomycin, and the F(1)F(0) ATPase inhibitor oligomycin had only marginal effects on uptake through the outer membrane but severely inhibited inner membrane translocation, indicating the unusual requirement of both the electrical and chemical components of the electromotive force generated across the inner membrane. The results are consistent with a mechanism involving stepwise transfer of tRNA through distinct outer and inner membrane channels.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Cloning, purification and characterization of the protein subunit of ribonuclease P from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

The rnpA gene from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, which codes for the protein subunit of ribonuclease P (RNase P), has been cloned by functional complementation of an Escherichia coli mutant. This protein had previously been characterized only in proteobacteria and gram-positive bacteria. rnpA and the closely linked rpmH gene, which code for the large subunit ribosomal protein L34, have been sequenced. The Synechocystis 6803 L34 protein is more similar to the homologous protein from some non-green chloroplasts than to the L34 protein from other bacteria. The protein subunit of RNase P from Synechocystis 6803 has been overexpressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. Antibodies raised against the Synechocystis 6803 RNase P protein did not recognize the homologous protein from E. coli (C5 protein). Similarly, antibodies raised against the E. coli C5 protein did not recognize significantly the Synechocystis 6803 protein. In spite of the lack of immunological cross-reactivity and the low level of sequence identity, the E. coli and Synechocystis 6803 proteins are functionally interchangeable. In enzymatic assays using either an E. coli precursor tRNA(Tyr) or a Synechocystis 6803 precursor tRNA(Gln) as substrates, we have detected RNase P activity with holoenzymes reconstituted with the RNA subunit from E. coli and the protein subunit from Synechocystis 6803 or with the RNA subunit from Synechocystis 6803 and the protein subunit from E. coli. The relative efficiency of cleavage of the different substrates is dependent on the origin of the protein subunit used to reconstitute the holoenzyme.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structural basis of anticodon loop recognition by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase.

The refined crystal structure of Escherichia coli glutaminyl transfer RNA synthetase complexed with transfer RNA(Gln) and ATP reveals that the structure of the anticodon loop of the enzyme-bound tRNA(Gln) differs extensively from that of the known crystal structures of uncomplexed tRNA molecules. The anticodon stem is extended by two non-Watson-Crick base pairs, leaving the three anti-codon bases unpaired and splayed out to bind snugly into three separate complementary pockets in the protein. These interactions suggest that the entire anticodon loop provides essential sites for glutaminyl tRNA synthetase discrimination among tRNA molecules.

Allosteric Regulation↗

Coevolution of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with its tRNA substrates.

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetases (GluRSs) occur in two types, the discriminating and the nondiscriminating enzymes. They differ in their choice of substrates and use either tRNAGlu or both tRNAGlu and tRNAGln. Although most organisms encode only one GluRS, a number of bacteria encode two different GluRS proteins; yet, the tRNA specificity of these enzymes and the reason for such gene duplications are unknown. A database search revealed duplicated GluRS genes in >20 bacterial species, suggesting that this phenomenon is not unusual in the bacterial domain. To determine the tRNA preferences of GluRS, we chose the duplicated enzyme sets from Helicobacter pylori and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. H. pylori contains one tRNAGlu and one tRNAGln species, whereas A. ferrooxidans possesses two of each. We show that the duplicated GluRS proteins are enzyme pairs with complementary tRNA specificities. The H. pylori GluRS1 acylated only tRNAGlu, whereas GluRS2 was specific solely for tRNAGln. The A. ferrooxidans GluRS2 preferentially charged tRNA(UUG)(Gln). Conversely, A. ferrooxidans GluRS1 glutamylated both tRNAGlu isoacceptors and the tRNA(CUG)(Gln) species. These three tRNA species have two structural elements in common, the augmented D-helix and a deletion of nucleotide 47. It appears that the discriminating or nondiscriminating natures of different GluRS enzymes have been derived by the coevolution of protein and tRNA structure. The coexistence of the two GluRS enzymes in one organism may lay the groundwork for the acquisition of the canonical glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase by lateral gene transfer from eukaryotes.

Acidithiobacillus↗

Divergence of glutamate and glutamine aminoacylation pathways: providing the evolutionary rationale for mischarging.

Aminoacyl-tRNA for protein synthesis is produced through the action of a family of enzymes called aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. A general rule is that there is one aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for each of the standard 20 amino acids found in all cells. This is not universal, however, as a majority of prokaryotic organisms and eukaryotic organelles lack the enzyme glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, which is responsible for forming Gln-tRNAGln in eukaryotes and in Gram-negative eubacteria. Instead, in organisms lacking glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, Gln-tRNAGln is provided by misacylation of tRNAGln with glutamate by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase, followed by the conversion of tRNA-bound glutamate to glutamine by the enzyme Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase. The fact that two different pathways exist for charging glutamine tRNA indicates that ancestral prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms evolved different cellular mechanisms for incorporating glutamine into proteins. Here, we explore the basis for diverging pathways for aminoacylation of glutamine tRNA. We propose that stable retention of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase in prokaryotic organisms following a horizontal gene transfer event from eukaryotic organisms (Lamour et al. 1994) was dependent on the evolving pool of glutamate and glutamine tRNAs in the organisms that acquired glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase by this mechanism. This model also addresses several unusual aspects of aminoacylation by glutamyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases that have been observed.

Acylation↗

Selective import of nuclear-encoded tRNAs into mitochondria of the protozoan Leishmania tarentolae.

The trypanosomatid mitochondrial genome does not encode tRNA genes at all and experimental evidence obtained with Leishmania tarentolae shows that tRNAs in mitochondria represent a selected set of imported nuclear-encoded tRNAs. In this paper we present the data showing that tRNAs derived from the clustered genomic tRNA genes are invariably imported into mitochondria, while tRNA from the solitary gene is not. By sequencing a cosmid DNA clone of L. tarentolae genomic DNA, we have identified a 1.5-kb subclone encoding a duplicate set of the closely linked tRNA(Tyr) (GTA) and tRNA(Thr) (AGT) genes. Northern analysis shows that these tRNAs are imported into mitochondria. In contrast, when the tRNA gene [tRNA(Gln) (CUG)] located alone in a 40-kb DNA fragment was examined, the corresponding tRNA was not detected in the mitochondrion. This "loner" tRNA gene is highly unusual since the 3'-flanking putative RNA polymerase III transcription termination signal sequence is characterized by a long string of 8 Ts followed by an A and a stretch of 7 Cs, while all other trypanosomatid tRNA genes whose tRNA transcripts are imported are terminated by a possible transcription termination signal of only 4-6 Ts. Whether the correlation found between the gene organization and tRNA-import characteristics is of general significance needs to be investigated further. A simple computer analysis presented in this paper rules out the possibility that tRNAs found in the trypanosomatid mitochondrion are the products of the U-addition type 'RNA editing' of maxicircle DNA.

Animals↗

Discrimination among tRNAs intermediate in glutamate and glutamine acceptor identity.

The set of nucleotides in Escherichia coli tRNA(Gln) which facilitate aminoacylation by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) has been defined [Hayase et al. (1992), EMBO J. 11, 4159-4165]. To determine whether the glutamine "identity set" is sufficient to confer acceptance on a noncognate tRNA, we constructed tRNA(Glu) mutants with the set of glutamine recognition elements. These mutants were examined for aminoacylation in vitro with GlnRS and also with glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) to correlate gains in glutamine acceptance with losses of glutamate acceptance. Incorporating glutamine recognition elements in only the acceptor stem or anticodon loop of tRNA(Glu) improved the specificity constant (kcat/KM) for aminoacylation by GlnRS. However, the introduction of all defined glutamine recognition elements in tRNA(Glu) resulted in a substrate with a specificity constant 100-fold below that for aminoacylation of tRNA(Gln). Including the tertiary framework of tRNA(Gln) (in addition to the glutamine recognition elements) in the tRNA(Glu) context further improved aminoacylation by GlnRS, but the specificity was still reduced compared with that of tRNA(Gln). The increase in glutamine acceptance was correlated for all mutants with a decrease in glutamate acceptance, indicating that GluRS also recognizes acceptor stem and anticodon sequences in cognate tRNA. The inability to completely convert tRNA(Glu) to glutamine acceptance with these mutations suggests that tRNA(Glu) contains antideterminants to glutamine identity. The analysis of these mutants with both enzymes revealed that there is a strong element of discrimination between glutamate and glutamine tRNAs associated with the anticodon. To test this dependence, mutants of both tRNAs were made to effect anticodon switches to the possible glutamate and glutamine isoacceptors. The kinetic evaluation of the anticodon switch mutants suggests that overlap in anticodon recognition is avoided through specificity for the third anticodon position coupled with divergent preferences for the wobble base.

Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases↗

Evidence for unfolding of the single-stranded GCCA 3'-End of a tRNA on its aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase from a stacked helical to a foldback conformation.

The conformation of a tRNA in its initial contact with its cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase was investigated with the Escherichia coli glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-tRNA(Glu) complex. Covalent complexes between the periodate-oxidized tRNA(Glu) and its synthetase were obtained. These complexes are specific since none were formed with any other oxidized E. coli tRNA. The three major residues cross-linked to the 3'-terminal adenosine of oxidized tRNA(Glu) are Lys115, Arg209, and Arg48. Modeling of the tRNA(Glu)-glutamyl-tRNA synthetase based on the known crystal structures of Thermus thermophilus GluRS and of the E. coli tRNA(Gln)-glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase complex shows that these three residues are located in the pocket that binds the acceptor stem, and that Lys115, located in a 26 residue loop closed by coordination to a zinc atom in the tRNA acceptor stem-binding domain, is the first contact point of the 3'-terminal adenosine of tRNA(Glu). In our model, we assume that the 3'-terminal GCCA single-stranded segment of tRNA(Glu) is helical and extends the stacking of the acceptor stem. This assumption is supported by the fact that the 3' CCA sequence of tRNA(Glu) is not readily circularized in the presence of T4 RNA ligase under conditions where several other tRNAs are circularized. The two other cross-linked sites are interpreted as the contact sites of the 3'-terminal ribose on the enzyme during the unfolding and movement of the 3'-terminal GCCA segment to position the acceptor ribose in the catalytic site for aminoacylation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Selection of a 'minimal' glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and the evolution of class I synthetases.

The evolution of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is intriguing in light of their elaborate relationship with tRNAs and their significance in the decoding process. Based on sequence motifs and structure determination, these enzymes have been assigned to two classes. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS), a class I enzyme, complexed to tRNA(Gln) and ATP has been described. It is shown here that a 'minimal' GlnRS, i.e. a GlnRS from which domains interacting with the acceptor-end and the anticodon of the tRNA have been deleted, has enzymatic activity and can charge a tRNA(Tyr)-derived amber suppressor (supF) with glutamine. The catalytic core of GlnRS, which is structurally conserved in other class I synthetases, is therefore sufficient for the aminoacylation of tRNA substrates. Some of these truncated enzymes have lost their ability to discriminate against non-cognate tRNAs, implying a more specific role of the acceptor-end-binding domain in the recognition of tRNAs. Our results indicate that the catalytic and substrate recognition properties are carried by distinct domains of GlnRS, and support the notion that class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases evolved from a common ancestor, jointly with tRNAs and the genetic code, by the addition of non-catalytic domains conferring new recognition specificities.

Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases↗

Exceptional codon recognition by the glutamine tRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Recently, it was shown that wild-type glutamine tRNAs in yeast cause low-level nonsense suppression that can be enhanced by increasing glutamine tRNA gene copy number. In order to investigate glutamine tRNA behavior further, anticodon mutations that confer nonsense suppression were identified in yeast sup70 gene, which codes for glutamine tRNA(CAG). In this study we show that suppressors derived by mutation severely limit growth such that suppressor-bearing spores germinate but arrest cell division at approximately the 50 cell stage. Analysis of a sup70 deletion was used to establish that growth limitation results from loss of wild-type glutamine tRNA(CAG) function. By exploiting the growth inhibition of sup70 alleles, some exceptional codon recognition properties of glutamine tRNAs were revealed. Our results indicate that amber suppressor glutamine tRNA(UAG) can translate 5'-CAG-3' glutamine codons with low efficiency in the presence of an A/C mismatch at the first position of the codon, suggesting that reading may occur at a low level by a two-out-of-three reading mechanism. In addition, when glutamine tRNA(CAA) is over-expressed in vivo, it translates 5'-CAG-3' codons using a mechanism that resembles prokaryotic-like U/G wobble, which normally does not occur in yeast. Our studies also suggest that the yeast glutamine tRNA suppressors could potentially be exploited to express ciliated protozoan genes that normally contain internal 5'-UAG-3' and 5'-UAA-3' codons.

Base Sequence↗

Identification of base-triples in RNA using comparative sequence analysis.

Comparative sequence analysis has proven to be a very efficient tool for the determination of RNA secondary structure and certain tertiary interactions. However, base-triples, an important RNA structural element, cannot be predicted accurately from sequence data. We show here that the poor base correlations observed at base-triple positions are the result of two factors. (1) Base covariation is not as strictly required in triples as it is in Watson-Crick pairs. (2) Base-triple structures are less conserved among homologous molecules. A particularity of known triple-helical regions is the presence of multiple base correlations that do not reflect direct pairing. We suggest that natural mutations in base-triples create structural changes that require compensatory mutations in adjacent base-pairs and triples to maintain the triple-helix conformation. On the basis of these observations, we devised two new measures of association that significantly enhance the base-triple signal in correlation studies. We evaluated correlations between base-pairs and single stranded bases, and correlations between adjacent base-pairs. Positions that score well in both analyses are the best triple candidates. This procedure correctly identifies triples, or interactions very close to the proposed triples, in type I and type II tRNAs and in the group I intron.

Base Composition↗

Major identity determinants in the "augmented D helix" of tRNA(Glu) from Escherichia coli.

By a kinetic analysis of 59 variant transcripts of Escherichia coli tRNA(Glu) with glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), the U11.A24 base-pair, the U13.G22..A46 base-triple, and the lack of residue 47 (delta47) were found to serve as major determinants for tRNA(Glu) identity. This is the first system for which major identity determinants are reported to be clustered in the "augmented D helix", consisting of the D stem with some neighboring residues and the variable loop. Other identity determinants are U34, U35, C36 and A37 in the anticodon loop, and G1.C72 and U2.A71 in the acceptor stem. Phosphate-group protection by GluRS from ethylnitrosourea was observed most strongly for the minor groove side of D-stem helix, indicating that GluRs tightly binds to the D stem for recognition, on the minor groove side, of the potent identity-determinant groups of the U11.A24 and U13.G22 base-pairs. A46 is not involved in direct recognition by GluRS; the U13.G22..A46 base-triple is required probably for formation of the structural features that are recognized by GluRS. In this context, the essential role of characteristic delta47 in tRNA(Glu) identity may be to maintain the U13.G22..A46 base-triple.

Anticodon↗