PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Radiography”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.

Images of a phantom obtained with computed radiography and standard screen-film imaging were compared to evaluate observer threshold perception performance with a modified contrast-detail technique. Optimum exposure necessary for performance with the imaging plate technique to match that with screen-film techniques was determined, as was comparative performance with variation in kilovoltages, plate type, spatial enhancement, and hard-copy interpolation method. It was found that computed radiography necessitates about 75%-100% more exposure than screen-film radiography to optimally match performance with Ortho-C film with Lanex regular or medium screens (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for detection of objects 0.05-2.0 cm in diameter. However, only minimal loss of detection performance (approximately 10% overall) was experienced if standard screen-film exposures were used with computed radiography. Little change in observer performance was found with variation in plate type, spatial enhancement, or method of hard-copy interpolation. However, perception performance with computed radiographic images was better at lower kilovoltages.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Heavy-ion radiography: density resolution and specimen radiography.

Heavy-ion radiography is performed by the passage of a beam of nuclei accelerated to energies of several hundred MeV/nucleon through an object. The technique of recording transmitted nuclei in a downstream stack of plastic sheets affords excellent resolution of density by recording the nuclei only at their stopping points. Imaging of a phantom--which stimulated tumors of low density contrast in a body part--by conventional radiography, computed tomographic scanning and the heavy-ion technique indicated superior density resolution for heavy-ion imaging at radiation dose. Superior imaging of tumors in pathologic specimens was demonstrated for heavy-ion imaging compared to conventional radiography. Values of stopping power for various tumors and normal tissues were determined by a computer-aided technique. Heavy-ion radiography shows promise for superior imaging of low contrast tumors at relatively low radiation low levels.

Achilles Tendon↗
PubMed1992

Personal computer equipment for dental digital subtraction radiography vs. industrial computer equipment and conventional radiography.

A "low-cost" personal computer (PC) system used to digitize dental radiographs was tested by assessing the accuracy of its subtraction images versus those of "high-cost" industrial equipment and conventional radiography. Subtraction images were made of artificial lesions in human femur bone and subsequently evaluated by students and teachers. The observations were analyzed in terms of true positive and false positive reports. "Low-cost" and "high-cost" subtraction images revealed only small differences in diagnostic accuracy. Compared to conventional radiography, the diagnostic accuracy of the subtraction images with the "low-cost" PC system was significantly higher for all observers. The interexaminer variance was similar for the subtraction and the conventional images for both students and teachers, except for a significantly reduced interexaminer variance for the teachers concerning the true positive reports with the "low-cost" PC subtraction technique.

Bone and Bones↗
PubMed1992

Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography.

A prospective study was performed comparing computed and conventional radiography for the detection and visibility of cardiovascular devices in intensive care unit patients. Computed images were obtained using a commercially available 2K x 2K, 12-bit storage phosphor plate system. Image sets from 50 patients were assessed independently by three observers. A significant difference between the types of image was found for the detection of mediastinal drainage tubes and prosthetic valves. Computed images allowed greater confidence in the identification of courses and tips of lines. This advantage was most marked with edge-enhanced computed images.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Radiography of the carpal scaphoid. Experimental evaluation of "the carpal box" and first clinical results.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors describe a new device ("the carpal box") for the radiographic detection of occult scaphoid fracture. METHODS: Fractures in the scaphoid of five cadaver specimens were mechanically produced. Subsequent examinations included conventional scaphoid radiography, multi-angle radiography, and radiography using the new device. The anatomic analysis of the specimens served as the standard for comparison. A pilot study was performed in six consecutive patients with suspected scaphoid fracture. RESULTS: Neither scaphoid radiography nor multi-angle radiography could confirm a fracture in two specimens, whereas all fractures were recognized on the carpal box radiographs. All scaphoid fractures were visualized by carpal box radiography, whereas scaphoid radiography was equivocal in one patient and negative in the other. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal box radiography may have additional value in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fracture. This may lead to a reduction in costs and inconvenience for patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and negative scaphoid radiography.

Carpal Bones↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level.

Panoramic, bitewing and periapical radiography and probing for measurement of the marginal bone level were compared. Altogether 237 sites of 23 patients were examined. Radiographs were taken with a splint containing steel balls to allow calculation of the enlargement of the radiographs. Probing was done before and during flap surgery using the same splint. The open bone measurement represented the true value. All radiographs were assessed by 5 observers. The mean enlargement of panoramic radiography was 27% in the upper and 26% in the lower arch. For bitewing and periapical radiography, it was 8% in the upper and 4-5% in the lower arch. All methods underestimated the bone loss. Probing bone level before surgery was most accurate, deviating at most 5% from the true value. Periapical radiography was more accurate than panoramic and bitewing radiography (p less than 0.001). Panoramic radiography presented a slightly lower mean accuracy than bitewing radiography (p less than 0.05). The underestimation of the bone loss ranged from 13 to 32% in orthopantomograms, 11-23% in bitewing and 9-20% in periapical radiographs. The interobserver variation of the radiographic methods was substantial.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Discrepancies in CPAK classification between CT and long-leg radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether substantial differences in coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotype distribution, as well as systematic angular measurement discrepancies, exist between CT and long-leg radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2021 to April 2025, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing CT- and long-leg radiography-derived coronal plane alignment classifications of the knee in patients with osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was distribution of coronal plane alignment phenotypes. Secondary outcomes included differences in medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal femoral angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle, and joint line obliquity. RESULTS: Four studies (1,134 knees) were included. Compared with long-leg radiography-derived classification, CT-derived classification increased type I phenotypes (risk difference: 0.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.20; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.040) and decreased type III (risk difference: -0.04; 95% confidence interval: -0.07 to -0.01; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.020) and type V phenotypes (risk difference: -0.04; 95% confidence interval: -0.07 to -0.01; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.004). CT yielded significantly lower medial proximal tibial angle (weighted mean difference:&#x2009;-&#x2009;1.18&#xb0;; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (weighted mean difference:&#x2009;-&#x2009;0.95&#xb0;; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and joint line obliquity (weighted mean difference:&#x2009;-&#x2009;1.40&#xb0;; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) than long-leg radiography. Heterogeneity was high for type I phenotype (I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;81%), lateral distal femoral angle (I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;70%), and joint line obliquity (I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;69%). CONCLUSION: Discrepancies between CT-based software-generated and long-leg radiography-derived measurements substantially affect coronal plane alignment classification and angular parameters. Surgeons should consider these modality-specific variations and employ compensatory verification strategies to ensure optimal alignment.

Humans↗