PubMed HealthSearch

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ranitidine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of single doses of cisapride and ranitidine administered simultaneously on plasma concentrations of cisapride and ranitidine.

We have studied in 12 volunteers the effect of single doses of cisapride and ranitidine, administered simultaneously, on plasma concentrations of cisapride and ranitidine. Median maximum plasma concentration of ranitidine was achieved 1 h earlier when ranitidine was taken with cisapride compared with ranitidine alone (P = 0.012). There was a 24% decrease in plasma ranitidine AUC8h when ranitidine was taken with cisapride compared with ranitidine alone (P less than 0.005). Ranitidine had no effect on absorption of cisapride.

Adult

Double blind multicentre comparison of omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the treatment of cimetidine or ranitidine resistant duodenal ulcers.

The purpose of the present study was to compare omeprazole 20 mg once daily and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in healing duodenal ulcers unhealed by previous treatment with cimetidine greater than or equal to 0.8 g or ranitidine greater than or equal to 0.3 g daily for at least six weeks. In a double blind multicentre trial, 151 patients were randomly assigned to either omeprazole or ranitidine. Clinical assessments and endoscopies were carried out at two and four weeks. Patients characteristics were similar in both groups. Statistical analysis (chi 2 test) did not show any significant difference in healing rate (p greater than 0.20) irrespective of the method of calculation. On an 'intent-to-treat' analysis (n = 151), healing was: omeprazole 46.6%, ranitidine 43.3% at day 15 and omeprazole 70.7%, ranitidine 68.4% at day 29; and among the patients who completed treatment, healing was: omeprazole 48.3%, ranitidine 46.3% at day 15 (n = 125; 95% confidence interval of the difference--17 to 21) and omeprazole 79.6%, ranitidine 75.4% at day 29 (n = 115; 95% confidence interval of the difference--13 to 21). After a further four weeks treatment with omeprazole, healing occurred in 16/20 (80%) who still had active disease at day 29. Patients on omeprazole and on ranitidine experienced similar decrease in day time and night time epigastric pain and in heartburn. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) did not indicate any influence on age, sex, smoking and alcohol habits, previous drug administered, duodenitis and duodenal erosions on the healing rate. In this model, healing rate was not significantly influenced by previous treatment duration (p = 0.09 at day 15 and p greater than 0.2 at day 29) but was significantly influenced by ulcer size (p = 0.04 at day 15 and p = 0.02 at day 29). Forty one patients complained of adverse events: 19 on omeprazole (four trial withdrawals), 22 on ranitidine (three trial withdrawals).

Adult

Acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a multicentre trial to compare 150 mg ranitidine b.d. with 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s.

H2-receptor antagonists administered in conventional dosage regimens fail to heal a significant proportion of patients with moderate or severe reflux oesophagitis. We have compared the effects of a higher dose of ranitidine (300 mg q.d.s.) with the currently recommended dosage regimen (150 mg b.d.) in 138 patients suffering from reflux oesophagitis. After 4 weeks of treatment 29% of patients who received 150 mg ranitidine b.d., and 63% of patients who received 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. had complete endoscopic healing of their lesions (P less than 0.0001). After 8 weeks these proportions had increased to 54% and 75%, respectively (P less than 0.01). After 4 weeks of treatment, compete symptomatic relief had been achieved in 46% of patients who received 150 mg ranitidine b.d. and in 67% of patients who received 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. (P less than 0.05). After 8 weeks these proportions were 64% and 84%, respectively (P less than 0.05). Both dosage schedules were well-tolerated. We conclude that more rapid symptom relief and healing in reflux oesophagitis can be achieved with 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. than with 150 mg ranitidine b.d.

Acute Disease

[Acute toxicity of ranitidine and its metabolite in mice, rats and rabbits, and subacute oral toxicity of ranitidine in rats].

Acute and subacute toxicities of ranitidine hydrochloride, a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist, and acute toxicity of ranitidine N-oxide, a metabolite of ranitidine hydrochloride, were investigated. The results are summarized as follows: (1) Oral, intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal and intramuscular LD50 values of ranitidine hydrochloride in 5- and 12-weeks old mice and rats and 12-weeks old rabbits were ranged from ca. 60 mg/kg (12-weeks old male mice, i.v.) to 6610 mg/kg (12-weeks old male rats, p.o.). In comparison of the LD50 values, it was revealed that female rats were more sensitive to the drug than males in the case of oral administration. (2) A single intravenous injection with ranitidine N-oxide at a dose of 1000 mg/kg, induced no lethal cases in mice, indicating that the N-oxide has very low toxicity in a comparison with that of ranitidine hydrochloride. (3) In the subacute toxicity test, male and female rats were orally administered with ranitidine hydrochloride for 35 days. Dose dependent changes such as increase in liver weight and water consumption, decrease in spontaneous movement and others were induced at doses of more than 500 mg/kg/day in females and 1000 mg/kg/day in males. These results indicate that the no effects were observed at levels of 250 mg/kg/day in females and 500 mg/kg/day in males. In the recovery test, however, no marked changes were observed in the rats which had been administered at 1000 and 2000 mg/kg/day for 35 days.

Administration, Oral

Ranitidine for non-ulcer dyspepsia. A clinical study of the symptomatic effect of ranitidine and a classification and characterization of the responders to treatment.

Seven Norwegian centres recruited 61 female and 54 male patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). Their mean age was 40 years. After 6 weeks' double-blind alternating treatment with 150 mg ranitidine twice daily and placebo, 1 week of each alternative (part I), an effect score (Xs) and an efficacy index (Ei) were calculated. Ranitidine was significantly superior to placebo for symptomatic relief (p less than 0.01). Twenty-eight, 49, and 38 patients were Xs-classified as 'responders', 'unclassified', and 'nonresponders' to ranitidine, respectively. The symptomatic effect was impressive in the responder group and moderate but significant also in the unclassified group. The nonresponders had a significantly unfavourable effect of ranitidine compared with placebo. The Xs-classified responders and unclassified continued single-blind treatment with ranitidine for 4 weeks (part II) and were reclassified as 'new responders/nonresponders'. The new responders received single-blind treatment with placebo until relapse or maximum 8 weeks (part III). Parts II and III verified the good Xs classification of responders to ranitidine treatment. The overall effect of ranitidine in patients with NUD was due to good symptomatic effect in a subpopulation characterized by meal-related heartburn and/or regurgitation, large body mass index, first-degree relatives with gastrointestinal diseases, a relatively low frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms per week, and absence of soft stools.

Adult

A single nighttime dose of ranitidine 300 mg versus ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcer: a European multicenter trial.

Six hundred and five patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer were randomly allocated to treatment with ranitidine 300 mg at night or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in a prospective double-blind multicenter trial conducted in nine European countries. Endoscopy at 4 weeks showed complete ulcer healing in 246 of 301 patients (82%) treated with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. and 230 of 304 patients (76%) treated with ranitidine 300 mg at night. Cumulative healing rates at 8 weeks were 95 and 94% respectively. Both treatment regimens were equally effective at rapidly reducing the incidence of ulcer-related symptoms. Adverse events were few and consistent with those reported in previous studies with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. The results of this trial indicate that a single nighttime dose of ranitidine is an effective and safe alternative to the twice daily regimen in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Adult

Acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a multicentre study to compare 150 mg ranitidine twice daily with 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime.

A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was undertaken to compare 150 mg ranitidine b.d. with 300 mg ranitidine nocte in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. Endoscopy data were evaluable for 336 patients after 8 weeks of treatment. At this time 75% of patients who received 150 mg ranitidine b.d., and 73% of those who received 300 mg nocte, had healed or showed endoscopic improvement to grade I oesophagitis. At 12 weeks these rates had increased to 89 and 88%, respectively. Oesophageal biopsies from 258 patients at 8 weeks showed histological improvement in 44 and 47% of those treated with 150 mg ranitidine b.d. and 300 mg ranitidine nocte, respectively. After 12 weeks histological improvement was apparent in 57 and 54% of biopsies from each group, respectively. Symptom severity and frequency was reduced to a similar extent by both treatments. Adverse events were reported by 15 patients. A 300-mg bedtime dose of ranitidine was found to be a well-tolerated, effective alternative to twice daily treatment in reflux oesophagitis.

Adult

Acute treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicentre study to compare ranitidine 150 mg twice daily with ranitidine 300 mg once at night.

A randomised double blind clinical trial was undertaken in the UK and Ireland to compare ranitidine 300 mg given as a single bed time tablet with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in the acute treatment of duodenal ulcers. Of the 594 patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer entered into the trial, 424 patients had complete endoscopic findings on which healing rates at four weeks were determined. By this time 156 of 201 (78%) patients healed with ranitidine 300 mg nocte compared with 186 of 223 (83%) receiving ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (p = 0.28). After eight weeks of treatment 97% of the patients in each group were healed. The healing rates for smokers and non-smokers did not differ significantly at either four or eight weeks. Each regimen was equally effective in reducing day and night-time pain. Adverse events were reported in 23 patients overall; 12 were withdrawn from the trial. Minor abnormalities in liver function tests were noted in three patients. The trial confirmed that a single dose of ranitidine 300 mg given at night is a safe, effective alternative treatment to ranitidine 150 mg bd for the acute treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Clinical Trials as Topic

[Nizatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Comparison of 300 mg nizatidine and 300 mg ranitidine in a single evening dose].

In a double-blind, endoscopically controlled study on 367 duodenal ulcer patients, we compared the clinical efficacy of 300 mg ranitidine nocte with that of 300 mg nizatidine nocte, which is known to reliably provide selective inhibition of nocturnal acid secretion. Nizatidine was administered to 183, ranitidine to 184 patients. Endoscopy was performed at the start of the study, as well as at 2, 4 and 8 weeks. The presence of ulcer was defined as a benign lesion of the gastric mucosa measuring at least 5 mm in diameter; healing was characterized as complete reepithelialization. In the nizatidine group, as many as 76% of our patients were free from night pain at 2 weeks, and 88% at 4 weeks. Identical values were obtained in the group treated with 300 mg ranitidine nocte. The healing rates at 2, 4 and 8 weeks were comparable in the nizatidine and ranitidine groups (nizatidine: 57%, 87%, 92%, respectively; ranitidine: 63%, 90%, 96%, respectively). Clinically significant adverse effects were seen in neither of the two treatment groups. These results demonstrate that selective inhibition of nocturnal acid secretion achieves healing of duodenal ulcer and freedom from pain as rapidly and effectively as protracted inhibition of acid secretion provided by the administration of 300 mg ranitidine nocte.

Adolescent

Comparison between ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and ranitidine 300 mg nocte in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

A multicenter trial was undertaken to assess the clinical usefulness of a single night-time dose of ranitidine in the short-term healing of duodenal ulcer. 384 patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenal ulcer were randomly allocated to treatment with ranitidine either 150 mg b.d. or 300 mg as a single night-time dose for four weeks. The patients not healed after four weeks were again treated for four weeks. Of the 356 patients who completed the study, according to the protocol, 148 of 176 (84.1%) recovered on ranitidine 150 mg b.d. and 147 of 180 (81.7%) recovered on 300 mg nocte after four weeks. The healing rates increased to 95.8% and 94.8% respectively after four more weeks. Ulcer symptoms were rapidly reduced with no significant differences between the two treatment groups. There were no unwanted effects in either group and no significant abnormal biochemical or hematological changes. The results of this study support the hypothesis that ranitidine 300 mg given as one night-time dose and ranitidine 150 mg b.d. are equally effective. Ranitidine 300 mg once daily in a clinical practice may be advantageous to the patient.

Adult

Ranitidine versus ranitidine and prazepam in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer--a double-blind controlled trial.

Fifty out-patients with an active, endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were entered a double-blind trial of ranitidine + prazepam or ranitidine + placebo. Two drop-outs occurred in the prazepam group and 1 in the placebo group. After 28 days of treatment, the ulcer had healed in 95.6% of the patients on ranitidine + prazepam and 75% of the patients on ranitidine + placebo (p = 0.03). Sleepiness was the most frequent side effect, reported by 8 subjects in the prazepam group and by 1 subject in the placebo group. It is concluded that prazepam can be usefully combined with ranitidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Adult

Combined effect of pirenzepine and ranitidine on the nocturnal intragastric pH in non-responders to ranitidine.

Both H2-receptor antagonists and pirenzepine are used in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Since we have recently found a higher frequency of non-responders to H2-receptor antagonists among cirrhotics, we tested the effect of the combination of 50 mg pirenzepine and 300 mg ranitidine in 25 patients (12 cirrhotics and 13 controls) in whom a normal 300 mg dose of ranitidine had failed to suppress intragastric acidity. Nocturnal intragastric pH was continuously monitored for 12 hours. A rise in the intragastric pH above 4.0 for more than 6 hours following the oral dose at 18.00 h was considered as response. In all subjects, plasma concentrations of ranitidine and pirenzepine were in the therapeutic range. Coadministration of pirenzepine and ranitidine resulted in sufficient increase of the intragastric pH in only 4 of the 12 patients with cirrhosis, and in 4 of the 13 control patients. This treatment failure in most of our patients does not support the view that excessive vagal drive might play an important role in the non-response to H2-blockers. With regard to the benefit resulting from coadministration of pirenzepine and ranitidine, there seems to be no difference between cirrhotic and control patients.

Adult

Barrett's ulcer: response to standard dose ranitidine, high dose ranitidine, and omeprazole.

Between January 1984 and December 1986, 116 patients were found to have columnar-lined esophagus (Barrett's esophagus) during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Twenty-eight patients (16 men and 12 women) were found to have peptic ulcer of the esophagus (Barrett's ulcer). In 17 (60%), standard measures and ranitidine 300 mg daily resulted in healing. Two men with resistant ulcers were treated by surgical repair of their hiatus hernia. Nine (six men, three women) in whom healing failed to occur on this regimen after 3-15 months were treated with high dose ranitidine (300 mg bd). In five, healing was complete after 8 wk and one more healed after an additional 4 wk. The three patients with unhealed ulcers after high dose ranitidine received omeprazole 40 mg in the morning. In two of these, ulcers healed after 4 wk; in the third, one of two ulcers persisted after 8 wk, although the remaining ulcer was smaller and more superficial. Pain relief was good, but minor reflux symptoms persisted in both treatment groups. On completion of the study, patients received 300 mg ranitidine at night. Powerful acid-reducing regimens may be required to heal a proportion of Barrett's ulcers.

Barrett Esophagus

Comparison between ranitidine and ranitidine plus Caved-S in the treatment of gastric ulceration.

In a double blind endoscopically controlled study, 100 patients with gastric ulcers were treated with either ranitidine or ranitidine plus Caved-S. On single therapy, 58% of ulcers were healed at four weeks, 92% at eight weeks and 96% at 12 weeks. Combination therapy did not alter the healing rate, nor improve on the control of dyspeptic symptoms. No difference in healing rate was found between good and poor drug compliance patients. This suggests that ranitidine may be equally effective at lower dosages. Thirty seven patients had developed their ulcer while taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. These patients were mainly elderly women who had a higher risk of bleeding (p = 0.006) from a large ulcer (p = 0.009).

Aged

A single-centre study of gastric ulcer healing with 300 mg ranitidine at night versus 150 mg ranitidine twice daily.

In a single-centre study 59 patients with gastric ulcer were treated either with 300 mg ranitidine at night or with 150 mg ranitidine twice daily. After 4 and 8 weeks 73% and 97%, respectively, of those treated with 300 mg at night and 59% and 86% of those treated with 150 mg twice daily had complete ulcer healing. These differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. No serious side effects were seen. Ranitidine, 300 mg at night, appears to be at least as effective as the standard 150 mg twice daily regimen in the treatment of gastric ulcer.

Adult

Investigations on the penetration of ranitidine into the cerebrospinal fluid and a comparison of the effects of ranitidine and cimetidine on male sex hormones.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ranitidine concentrations were measured in 13 normal subjects undergoing routine myelography following either one, or two doses ranitidine 200 mg. Small amounts of the drug were detectable in the CSF. A separate investigation of duodenal ulcer patients compared the effects of ranitidine 150 mg twice-daily and cimetidine 1 g daily on basal and stimulated levels of male reproductive hormones in the plasma. Although cimetidine treatment resulted in a small rise in basal and stimulated testosterone, neither drug was associated with significant changes in basal or stimulated hormone levels.

Adult

Inhibition by ranitidine of acetaminophen conjugation and its possible role in ranitidine potentiation of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity.

Pretreatment with ranitidine (RA) potentiates the hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen (APAP) in male Fischer 344 rats. The present studies were undertaken to investigate the role of APAP metabolism in this potentiation. Administration of RA (50 mg/kg p.o.) to male Fischer 344 rats 30 min before [3H]APAP (750 mg/kg p.o.) increased the plasma concentrations of acetaminophen at 2 hr (193%) and 4 hr (277%) after APAP. Covalent binding of [3H]APAP-related material to hepatic macromolecules in RA-pretreated animals was similar to APAP alone values up to 12 hr after treatment; however, 24 hr after APAP, binding in the RA-pretreated animals was twice that observed in animals given [3H]APAP alone. Urinary excretion (0-24 hr) of APAP and APAP glucuronide were reduced in ranitidine-pretreated animals to 64 and 66% of control, respectively, indicating that in vivo RA altered APAP conjugation with glucuronic acid. APAP uridine diphosphoglucuronyltransferase activity in rat hepatic microsomes was competitively inhibited by RA (0.1-2 mM). The Ki apparent for RA inhibition of APAP uridine diphosphoglucuronyltransferase was 0.04 mM. In contrast, neither APAP nor 4-nitrophenol sulfotransferase activity in rat hepatic cytosol was inhibited by RA at concentrations up to 5 mM. Together, these results support the suggestion that RA-mediated alterations of APAP conjugation may explain the potentiation of APAP-induced hepatotoxicity by RA in rats.

Acetaminophen

A double-blind controlled trial of ranitidine 300 mg nocte and ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in the short-term treatment of gastric ulcer.

A multi-center study was carried out to compare the healing rates of ranitidine 300 mg nocte and 150 mg b.i.d. in the short-term treatment of gastric ulcers and to assess the side-effect liability of ranitidine 300 mg given in a single daily dose. Forty-five outpatients suffering from endoscopically and bioptically proven uncomplicated benign gastric ulcer were selected for the study. The patients were treated, for 4 weeks, on the basis of a double-blind randomized design. An endoscopic examination was repeated within 4 days after the end of the treatments. The patients who did not demonstrate complete healing were treated for an additional 4-week period. Clinical controls were performed to evaluate symptoms, antacid consumption, compliance with trial tablet consumption; hematological and biochemical tests were also carried out at the end of the 4 and 8-week periods. No differences were observed between the healing rate induced by 300 mg nocte and 150 mg b.i.d., after 4 weeks of treatment (76% and 79% respectively) and after 8 weeks (100% in both groups). Similar results were obtained as far as symptoms, antacid consumption and compliance are concerned. Neither treatment regimen induced appreciable side-effects.

Adult