SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Refractive Errors”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1990

Effects of intraocular lens position errors on postoperative refractive error.

Previous theoretical attempts to predict the refractive effects of intraocular lens (IOL) misalignment have resulted in conflicting information. Discrepancies in both the potential magnitude and direction of the refractive changes exist in the literature. This paper provides a detailed description of the mathematical framework required to achieve a valid predictive model and a quantitative analysis of the effects of IOL positional errors. The effects of misalignment are shown to influence the spherical refractive component primarily. Astigmatism related to oblique incidence is generally small. Movement of the IOL away from the retina produces myopia, while movement toward the retina produces hyperopia. It is likely that longitudinal IOL positional errors are a principal component of postoperative refractive errors. Alignment errors, on the other hand, must have generally minor effects on refraction.

Astigmatism↗

PubMed1992

Myopia and refractive error in dogs.

The refractive error of 240 phakic dogs of various breeds was measured using streak retinoscopy and averaged (-0.27 +/- 1.41 D relative to infinity). Analysis by breed showed that the German Shepherd, Rottweiler, and Miniature Schnauzer breeds had an increased prevalence of myopia with an average refractive error of -0.86 +/- 1.31 D, -1.77 +/- 1.84 D, and -0.66 +/- 1.05 D, respectively. Myopia also was found in older dogs with marked nuclear sclerosis of the crystalline lens. Fifty-three percent of all German Shepherd dogs in a veterinary clinic population (n = 58 eyes) had a myopic refraction of greater than or equal to -0.50 D; 64% of all Rottweiler dogs (n = 28 eyes) were myopic. An in-depth investigation of German Shepherd dogs, using A-scan ultrasonography, photokeratoscopy, and streak retinoscopy, was done at Guide Dogs for the Blind (San Rafael, CA). By contrast with the results obtained in the veterinary clinic population, the overall average refractive error of guide dog German Shepherd dogs (n = 106 eyes) was +0.19 +/- 0.81 D, and only 15% of these dogs were myopic. The axial length and corneal curvature of myopic eyes did not differ significantly from nonmyopic eyes.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Combining refractive error and uncorrected visual acuity to assess the effectiveness of refractive corneal surgery.

Residual refractive error and uncorrected visual acuity are two frequently measures used to assess the effectiveness of refractive corneal surgery. Nordan and colleagues have suggested a Visual Function Index which combines these two measures in one quantitative measure. This article presents a Visual Function Score for radial keratotomy which includes a set of qualitative categories (excellent, good, fair, poor) and specifies the clinical values for refractive error and visual acuity in each category. There was substantial agreement among ophthalmologists who reviewed the category definitions, and we think that the Visual Function Score improves our ability to objectively assess surgical outcome. Application of the score to the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study data yielded closer agreement with refractive error results than with visual acuity values. The Visual Function Score lowered the classification of eyes that were hyperopic but had sufficient accommodation to overcome so that a high visual acuity result could be achieved. The inclusion of astigmatism values would be an important next step in the development of composite measures for the assessment of refractive surgery. In the future, a multifactorial index or score may be used to estimate the outcome of reported surgical procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed1977

The Humphrey Vision Analyzer tm: reliability and validity of refractive-error measures.

Four subjective measures of the refractive error of 42 eyes (21 patients) were obtained by 2 examiners, one using a Humphrey Vision Analyzer TM and the other using a conventional refractor. Each examiner made 2 separate measures of each subject's refractive error, one without and one with an added cylindrical lens chosen at random from a predetermined set of powers and axes. The order of using the instruments and the added lenses was mixed. Measures of the refractive errors differed with the 2 instruments by approximately the same amount on average as did duplicate measures with either instrument. Refractive-error measures obtained with the 2 instruments are about as valid as they are repeatable.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Genetics of epidermal ridges: a study in subjects with refractive errors.

The dermatoglyphic characteristics of subjects with refractive errors when compared with control group revealed significant differences in both qualitative and quantitative parameters. The loops were increased in male myopics; the whorls were increased in male hypermetropics and astigmatics and the arches were decreased in all types of refractive errors in males. However, the whorls were decreased in female hypermetropics only. The mean total ridge count was significantly higher in male astigmatics only. As regards pattern intensity (fingers) no significant difference in the mean value was observed in either sex with any type of refractive errors when compared with those of controls.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Relation between spherical refractive error and visual acuity.

The relation between a spherical refractive error and visual acuity is investigated and the results compared with previous studies. This study, unlike most of the previous studies, presents a mathematical model that includes a pupil size factor. It also examines a theoretical relation between refractive error and visual acuity which predicts that there should be a linear relation among refractive error (E), the pupil diameter (D), and minimum angle of resolution (A), over a wide range of refractive errors.

Humans↗

PubMed1990

A comparison of cycloplegic refraction to the near retinoscopy technique for refractive error determination.

The near retinoscopy technique of refractive error determination was compared to the standard method of cycloplegic refraction using 10 "infants" (3-12 months of age) and 10 "children" (32-109 months of age). There was a significant difference between the techniques for both sphere and cylinder power. Although there was no interaction of refractive technique and age group, the difference between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic refractive error tended to be larger for infants than for children. No significant difference was found when the average refractive values were compared for monocular or binocular conditions and no significant effect was found for either gender or laterality (right versus left eye). Based on these findings, it is suggested that caution be used in substituting the near retinoscopy technique for cycloplegic refraction even utilizing a "correction" factor for the dioptric difference between techniques.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1990

[Refractive errors, strabismus and amblyopia in pre-school screening--experiences using a vision test in kindergarten].

UNLABELLED: Within the framework of mass screenings conducted by the Public Health service section for juveniles, 254 children were examined jointly on a voluntary basis in 5 different kindergartens. The examined children represented in each case 88% of the respective kindergarten groups. The examination programme included, among others, the R5 apparatus (visual acuity in respect of remote objects with and without + 1.5 D), Lang- and DeKa Stereo Test, Cover-and-Uncover Test with remote and near fixation, heterostatic retinoscopy (in 205 children only), ophthalmoscopic fixation test. In addition, the acceptance for U8 and the degree of care in respect of ophthalmological control and treatment were investigated. RESULTS: Strabismus or significant uncorrected errors of refraction were discovered by the on-target tests of covering and uncovering, fixation and retinoscopy in 26 of 205 completely examined children (12.7%). This had not been satisfactorily covered by single tests such as R5-Visus test with the criteria much less than 1.0 (grade 5) or much less than 0.7 (grade 4), respectively stereo tests. The combination of "R5-Test Visus much less than 1.0" and "DeKa Stereo Test not fully identified" attained a sensitivity of 81% with a positive predictive value of only 28%. This combination, therefore, results in too many healthy children being referred to the ophthalmologist. "R5-Test Visus much less than 0.7" and "DeKa Stereo Test not fully identified" attained a sensitivity of 75% with a positive predictive value of 44%. This combination is recommended as long as the R5 or R11 apparatuses are used. The phoria and stereo tests contained in the R5 apparatus are unsuitable for kindergarten screening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amblyopia↗

PubMed1992

Optic nerve crescents and refractive error.

In this paper we discuss whether the presence of an optic nerve crescent might affect the way in which axial length and corneal curvature interact to determine refractive error. Subjective refraction, keratometry, measurement of body height, axial length of the eye, and stereophotography of the optic nerves were performed on 224 subjects, 8- to 25-years-old. Photographs were examined under magnification; optic nerve crescents, if present, were measured in the horizontal dimension. Those measurements were then corrected for magnification due to the eye and the camera. Logistic regression analysis suggested that male gender and myopic refractive error were most directly associated with the presence of a large crescent, whereas axial length, age, and horizontal keratometry reading were less directly associated with the presence of a crescent. The relation between axial length and refractive error differed among those with large crescents compared to those with small or no crescents. Simple regression showed that, for those with a crescent at least 0.2-mm wide, a 1-mm greater axial length was associated with, on the average, 1.26 D of myopia. For those with smaller or no crescents, a 1-mm greater axial length was associated with only 0.66 D of myopia. This difference was statistically significant at the 0.02 level of confidence.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Distribution of refractive errors in patients from Dominica, West Indies.

A total of 779 consecutive private patients requiring spectacles for correction of refractive errors were categorized according to age, sex, occupation and type of refractive error. Virtually all patients (97.1%) were black. The relationship between age, sex, occupation and refractive error was determined and showed that refractive errors were approximately equally distributed between the sexes, but myopia was more common among those with nearpoint occupations. Data also showed that more of the elderly were hyperopic than myopic in contrast to the younger patients who were more often myopic.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1977

Refractive errors associated with hemangiomas of the eyelids and orbit in infancy.

Asymmetrical refractive errors, both astigmatic and myopic, were associated with infantile hemangiomas of the eyelids and orbit in 46% of 37 patients who had large lesions and upper eyelid involvement predisposing to the ammetropia. The axis of the astigmatic error related to the location of the eyelid hemangioma and correlated closely with keratometric measurements of corneal astigmatism. The refractive errors tended to be stable despite eventual resolution of the hemangiomas. Efforts to combat strabismic and refractive amblyopia were rewarding in many patients. A history of complete eyelid occlusion during part of the first year of life was associated with dense amblyopia and eccentric fixation in some patients, but in other patients this history was compatible with the eventual development of useful vision. Absence of an asymmetrical refractive error in patients with eyelid and orbital hemangiomas rendered the prognosis for vision good in involved eyes.

Astigmatism↗

PubMed1989

Corneal asphericity and refractive error.

The relationship between corneal curvature measured by classical keratometry and refractive error raises the question of a possible systematic relationship between refractive error and the degree of corneal asphericity. A recomputation and analysis of previously published data leads to the conclusion that the different refractive groups have similar values of the parameter 'p' and differ only in the apical radius of the cornea.

Cornea↗

PubMed1990

Refractive error in a Puerto Rican rural population.

The distribution of refractive error in migrant workers and their families living in Patillas, Puerto Rico was studied. A total of 1,109 patients with an age range of 5-81 years and above was screened using the modified clinical technique. The refractive distribution of the total screened indicated that 10.2 percent had myopia, 17.7 percent had hyperopia and the rest had a combination of other refractive error (astigmatism, anisometropia and emmetropia). Myopia was most frequent in the age group 11-20 years (16.7 percent) and 21-30 years (16.8 percent) and decreased in the younger and older age groups. Frequency of hyperopia increased from age 31-70 years and then decreased thereafter. Hyperopic astigmatism was more common than myopic astigmatism across all age groups.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Survey of spectacle wear and refractive error prevalence in USAF pilots and navigators.

A retrospective survey of 5000 active aircrew records was performed at 12 United States Air Force (USAF) bases to obtain information about the prevalence of spectacle wear and refractive error. The data revealed that 27.4% of pilots and 51.5% of navigators/weapons systems operators (Nav/WSO) required spectacles when flying. Of the spectacle-wearing pilots, 12.4% required bifocals. Myopia was the predominant refractive error and a relatively large percentage of aircrew members had astigmatism of 0.75 D or more, e.g., 33.1% of pilots. At the time of entry into the USAF, refractive error data were clustered around emmetropia with a definite skew toward hyperopia.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Variance Polygenic Scores (vPGS) as a Tool for Studying Gene-Environment Interactions Associated With Refractive Error.

PURPOSE: Conventional polygenic scores predict an individual's phenotype based on their genetics. By contrast, variance polygenic scores (vPGS) quantify genetic predisposition to phenotypic variance. We tested the hypothesis that a vPGS for refractive error can identify individuals with increased susceptibility to environmental risk factors for myopia. METHODS: Six vPGS construction strategies were evaluated in UK Biobank participants: three variance heterogeneity genome-wide association study (vGWAS) methods and two reweighting schemes. vPGS performance was assessed using two metrics: (i) "Diff"-difference in phenotypic variance in vPGS decile ten versus one; (ii) Spearman correlation of phenotypic variance versus vPGS decile. The optimal vPGS was used to test for vPGS × time spent reading or vPGS × time spent outdoors interactions in children aged 15 years (ALSPAC cohort; n = 3471). RESULTS: Of the vGWAS methods, conditional quantile regression outperformed SCAMPI and Levene's Test. Of the re-weighting schemes, LDpred2 outperformed pruning and thresholding. In an independent sample of UK Biobank participants (n = 19,470), the top-performing vPGS successfully stratified individuals into groups with increasing variance in refractive error, even after adjusting for a conventional PGS (Diff: 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-3.47; Spearman correlation = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93). However, in ALSPAC participants, there was minimal support for vPGS interactions with time reading (P = 0.80) or time outdoors (P = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: A novel vPGS successfully stratified individuals into groups with relatively high or low genetic susceptibility to refractive error variance. However, the vPGS could not identify individuals at enhanced risk from lifestyle risk factors for myopia.

Humans↗

PubMed1990

Refractive errors in Singapore medical students.

The refraction of 128 third-year medical students aged 20-22 was studied using a Topcon autorefractometer. The population was predominantly Chinese and comprised 44% females and 56% males. The mean refractive error was -3.75 D for males and -4.76D for females. In all, 82% of the students were myopic, 72% were found to have astigmatism. This study confirms clinical impressions that Singapore students have one of the highest prevalence rates of myopia and astigmatism in the world.

Adult↗

PubMed1977

Refractive error distribution in a profoundly retarded population.

The refractive errors distribution of 103 profoundly retarded individuals (10 of zero to 20) was determined. This distribution was skewed in the direction of myopia. Since no such data were available for any other profoundly retarded population, direct comparison with other studies was not possible. However, a significant difference in mean spherical equivalent was found between the profoundly retarded of this study and the combined severely and profoundly retarded of two earlier studies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1975

Corneal curvature and refractive error changes associated with wearing hydrogel contact lenses.

To determine if there are corneal curvature and refractive error changes associated with hydrogel lens wear, 27 patients wearing F series Bausch & Lomb SOFLENS-TM contact lenses were examined regularly for nine months. During the first month of lens wear, a mean corneal steepening of 0.23 DK plus or minus 0.18 and an increase in with-the-rule toricity were found, which persisted during the following eight months of wear. A mean increase in myopia of 0.35 DS plus or minus .211 DS was found after nine months of lens wear for five randomly selected patients. This amount of change was statistically significant and was highly correlated with the observed corneal steepening. Their lenses were removed after nine months of lens wear. Both corneal changes and the increase in myopia persisted during the 14 days after lens removal. If long term studies with larger samples show similar results, the effect of hydrogel lenses on corneal curvature and refractive error will have to be considered in the decision to fit this type of lens.

Adult↗